Scientists Find Popular Vitamin Targets Visible Signs of Aging, Makes Skin Look Younger
Getting adequate levels of vitamin C may help fight signs of skin aging, according to recent findings.
Doctors explain how to get more of the essential vitamin in your diet.
Your skin protects your body from germs and other environmental hazards, but it gets weaker over time. That changes its appearance, leading to visible signs of aging, like wrinkles and fine lines. While you can't do anything to stop your skin from getting older, new research suggests that vitamin C may help skin look younger.
Specifically, having plenty of vitamin C in your diet may help to reactivate certain genes that control your skin's growth and repair. The study, which was published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, used lab-grown models designed to mimic human skin. In these models, the skin cells were exposed to air while being nourished underneath with a liquid nutrient designed to mimic the way your skin gets nutrients from your blood vessels.
Meet the experts: Gary Goldenberg, M.D., assistant clinical professor of dermatology at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital; Ife J. Rodney, M.D., founding director of Eternal Dermatology + Aesthetics
The researchers used vitamin C at different concentrations comparable to what would be transported from your bloodstream to the epidermis, which is the outermost layer of your skin. After seven days, the researchers discovered that the skin that was treated with vitamin C had a thicker epidermal cell layer without impacting the stratum corneum, which is the outer layer of skin made up of dead cells. After two weeks, the epidermis was thicker, while the outer layer of dead skin cells was thinner.
This suggests that vitamin C helps to boost the formation and division of keratinocytes, skin cells that move from deeper layers of the skin to the surface, the researchers explained. The researchers also found that skin samples that were treated with vitamin C had more cell proliferation, which is important for maintaining the skin's healthy barrier and creating a fresher look.
'Vitamin C is a promising molecule that can be used as a developing treatment for epidermal thinning, including in aging,' the researchers wrote in the conclusion.
The findings raise questions about the impact of vitamin C on skin. So, should we all be having more of it in our lives for a healthier, younger-looking complexion? Here's what dermatologists want you to keep in mind.
Vitamin C, a.k.a. L-ascorbic acid, is a water-soluble vitamin. Humans need to get vitamin C from food and supplements, making it a vital part of the diet, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Vitamin C plays a role in several areas of health, including biochemical reactions to support collagen and protein metabolism, per the NIH. Vitamin C also helps with wound healing and is an antioxidant that supports immune function.
Most adult women need 65 to 75 milligrams of vitamin C a day, while most adult men need 75 to 90 milligrams daily. While many adults in the U.S. get the recommended amounts of vitamin C daily from foods and drinks, some are more at risk of not getting enough than others, per the NIH. Those include:
People who smoke and are exposed to second-hand smoke.
People who eat a limited diet.
People with certain medical conditions, like severe malabsorption, certain types of cancer, and some forms of kidney disease.
When you eat or drink something with vitamin C, it's absorbed into your bloodstream and then transported to the skin, explains Gary Goldenberg, M.D., assistant clinical professor of dermatology at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital. There, it tends to be concentrated in the basal layer of the epidermis, which is the deepest layer of the outer layer of your skin.
Vitamin C is a co-factor (meaning it's a required element) in a process that activates genes that are involved in cell proliferation, Dr. Goldenberg says. 'This can lead to epidermal thickening and improved skin health and appearance,' he says.
Vitamin C is also crucial for the production of collagen, a protein that helps to support your skin's barrier and enhances your skin's elasticity, says Ife J. Rodney, M.D., founding director of Eternal Dermatology + Aesthetics. 'Collagen is the building block of the skin,' she says. 'It's the supporting matrix that gives the skin its tightness and firmness, but over the years, it starts to break down. That's why skin gets saggy and thin.'
While having more vitamin C in your life won't magically transform your skin, it can help, Dr. Rodney says.
If you eat a lot of vitamin C-rich foods, Dr. Goldenberg says you should get enough of the nutrient to support good skin health. If you could do better, these are some of the most vitamin C-rich foods to consider eating, per the NIH:
Red bell pepper, ½ cup: 95 milligrams
Orange juice, ¾ cup: 93 milligrams
Orange, 1 medium: 70 milligrams
Grapefruit juice, ¾ cup: 70 milligrams
Kiwifruit, 1 medium: 64 milligrams
Green pepper, ½ cup: 60 milligrams
Broccoli, ½ cup: 51 milligrams
If you're not sure how you're doing on the vitamin C front or if you're concerned that you may not be absorbing the nutrient properly, Dr. Goldenberg says a blood test can help determine your levels. 'If levels are low or not optimal, supplementation can help,' he says. However, Dr. Rodney points out that vitamin C supplements aren't for everyone. 'They really don't help unless you're deficient,' she says.
This study focused on having vitamin C in your diet, but dermatologists say there's a role for vitamin C serums in skincare, too.
'I like topical vitamin C on the skin—serums, specifically,' Dr. Rodney says. Because of vitamin C's antioxidant effect, these can help to protect the skin from environmental stressors, she says, which may contribute to signs of aging. (Dr. Rodney recommends looking for a serum with vitamin C and ferulic acid, which helps keep the vitamin C molecule stable in your products.)
Overall, dermatologists say the findings stress the importance of eating a healthy diet for good skin health. 'Nutrition has a direct impact on skin health,' Dr. Goldenberg says. 'Nutrients like vitamin C can promote skin regeneration, delay aging effects, and maintain barrier function.'
Dietary supplements are products intended to supplement the diet. They are not medicines and are not intended to treat, diagnose, mitigate, prevent, or cure diseases. Be cautious about taking dietary supplements if you are pregnant or nursing. Also, be careful about giving supplements to a child, unless recommended by their healthcare provider.
You Might Also Like
Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss?
Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Californians Say AI Is Moving 'Too Fast'
The liquid cooling system at Equinix Data Center in Ashburn, Virginia, on May 9, 2024 Credit - Amanda Andrade-Rhoades—TheHello and welcome to the Tuesday edition of In the Loop. I'm writing to you while looking out over the sunny city of San Francisco, where I'm spending the week on a reporting trip. If you're working on something cool here and want to say hi, feel free to shoot me an email at What to Know: Californians are fearful of AI Californians are more concerned than excited about the future of AI, by a margin of 55% to 33%, according to new polling shared exclusively with TIME ahead of its publication this Tuesday. Of the 1,400 adults polled, 48% said the technology was progressing 'too fast,' compared to 32% who said the pace was 'about right' and just 4% who said it was 'too slow.' And 59% of respondents said they believed AI would benefit the wealthiest corporations and households most, compared to 20% who said it would most benefit working people and the middle class. The poll was funded by TechEquity, a progressive non-profit. Support for regulation — The new data shows that 70% of Californians believe in the need for 'strong laws to make AI fair.' But the data also reveals high levels of skepticism that those laws will ever be enacted. 59% of those surveyed say they don't trust the California state government to control AI. Even more — 64% — said they do not trust the federal government. A picture emerges — The poll adds to a growing collection of data from around the world suggesting that ordinary people are worried about the impact of AI on their lives. In January, I wrote about a U.K. poll that showed 60% of Brits favoring a ban on the development of 'smarter-than-human' AI models. And in April, the Pew Research Center found that 43% of U.S. adults believed AI was more likely to harm than benefit them, compared to 24% who expected the benefits to outweigh the harms. Ground zero — California is emerging as a key battleground for efforts to legislate on AI, as the state where most top American AI companies are based. Last year a bill that aimed to regulate so-called 'frontier' models cleared the state legislature, only to be vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom. That hasn't stopped other efforts to regulate AI in the state, however. California 'is a place where you can still legislate and govern with a semi-functioning legislative process, which is not something you can say about D.C., particularly on this topic,' says Catherine Bracy, the CEO of TechEquity. 'The federal government has made it clear that they are going to be completely hands-off, if not creating rules that unleash the industry even more,' Bracy says. '[So] it is incumbent on the states to pick up the slack and make sure that real people who are going to be impacted by these tools are protected.' Who to Know: Dean Ball, former White House advisor on AI For a stint in office, it was an unusually impactful one. Dean Ball joined the Trump Administration in April—headhunted based on an essay he had written titled 'Here is what I think we should do' about AI policy. What followed was a whirlwind five months in government, in which he played a key role contributing to the AI Action Plan, Trump's AI policy, which was announced in July. Earlier this month, Ball announced he was leaving the government to focus on his own research. Action planning — Trump's Action Plan won praise for its emphasis on bolstering U.S. energy grid capacity, plus onshoring datacenters and the production of the chips that power them. The document also urged U.S. companies to focus more on developing open-weight AI models, to prevent the world from coming to rely on Chinese models (which are currently the best in class). The document framed these recommendations, and more, in terms of the escalating AI race with China. Exit interview — In an interview with TIME, Ball emphasized the importance of AI to the Trump administration. 'AI is the President's number one technology policy priority, by a significant margin,' he said. At the same time, Ball says, there is a lot of skepticism inside the Administration toward AI industry projections that superintelligent machines are some two to five years away. 'The diffusion of AI is going to take a really long time,' Ball says. 'I've lived through technology revolutions before, where I was young and bright-eyed and thought it was all going to happen in two or three years. And it turns out a lot of it did happen, but it took 15.' AI in Action: Should you delete your old emails to save water? An official U.K. government document, published last week, has caught a lot of heat online for suggesting that users should 'delete old emails and pictures' to save water during a drought, because data centers 'require vast amounts of water to cool their systems.' It is true that many data centers use water for cooling, but let's get a sense of perspective here. Andy Masley, a blogger who has written several illuminating pieces about the energy and water expenditure of AI systems, ran the numbers. Fixing a leaking toilet, he wrote, can save 200-400 liters of water per day. 'To save as much water in data centers as fixing your toilet would save, you would need to delete 1.5 billion photos, or 200 billion emails. If it took you 0.1 seconds to delete each email, and you deleted them nonstop for 16 hours a day, it would take you 723 years to delete enough emails to save the same amount of water in data centers as you could if you fixed your toilet. Maybe you should fix your toilet.' As always, if you have an interesting story of AI in Action, we'd love to hear it. Email us at: intheloop@ What We're Reading 'Meta's flirty AI chatbot invited a retiree to New York. He never made it home' by Jeff Horwitz in Reuters A relentlessly bleak story from Jeff Horwitz, the best Meta reporter in the business. 'Bue's story, told here for the first time, illustrates a darker side of the artificial intelligence revolution now sweeping tech and the broader business world. His family shared with Reuters the events surrounding his death, including transcripts of his chats with the Meta avatar, saying they hope to warn the public about the dangers of exposing vulnerable people to manipulative, AI-generated companions.' Write to Billy Perrigo at
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Michael Lebow Launches Healthcare Made-Easy Grant to Support Future Innovators in Patient-Centered Care
ATLANTA, GA / / August 19, 2025 / Atlanta-based vascular surgeon Dr. Michael Lebow announces the Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant, a national academic opportunity designed to support undergraduate students committed to improving the future of healthcare through innovation, accessibility, and patient-first care models. This initiative reflects Dr. Michael Lebow's ongoing dedication to equipping the next generation of healthcare professionals with the resources and mindset needed to transform patient care in meaningful ways. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant is open to undergraduate students enrolled in accredited colleges and universities across the United States. Applicants must be pursuing or intending to pursue careers in healthcare-related fields, including nursing, pre-med, public health, and allied health disciplines. Through a competitive application process, students are invited to submit a 500-700-word original essay addressing the question: "As a future healthcare professional, how do you plan to make healthcare more accessible, efficient, or compassionate? Share how your personal journey or values align with Dr. Michael Lebow's mission to improve patient care through innovation, service, and minimally invasive approaches." All entries will be evaluated based on clarity, originality, relevance to the prompt, and the applicant's demonstrated commitment to improving the healthcare system. The application deadline is April 15, 2026, and the selected recipient will be announced on May 15, 2026. Dr. Michael Lebow, who leads this initiative, is a board-certified vascular surgeon known nationally for his work in restoring circulation and preventing amputations through minimally invasive vascular techniques. As the founder of the Limb Preservation Center in Jonesboro, Georgia, Dr. Michael Lebow remains at the forefront of vascular health and procedural innovation. Throughout his career, he has consistently advocated for systems of care that emphasize precision, compassion, and practical accessibility. With an educational background from Brown University and the University of Virginia School of Medicine, followed by advanced surgical training at Louisiana State University and a vascular surgery fellowship at the University of Tennessee, Dr. Michael Lebow brings both academic rigor and clinical leadership to his work. His extensive experience directing endovascular programs and mentoring medical professionals informs his deep commitment to guiding the future of healthcare leadership. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant serves as an extension of this commitment. It aims to identify and assist students who are ready to challenge outdated systems and elevate patient care through creative problem-solving, service-driven leadership, and modern approaches in healthcare delivery. By launching this grant, Dr. Michael Lebow further solidifies his role in shaping a healthcare environment that not only adapts to current challenges but also anticipates the needs of future patients. His emphasis on efficient, minimally invasive techniques and collaborative care models reflects the direction in which the next generation of healthcare professionals must lead. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant is not bound to any particular city or state, allowing students from across the United States to apply. The opportunity is designed to reward thought leaders in healthcare whose values mirror those of Dr. Michael Lebow - service, integrity, compassion, and innovation. Contact Information: Spokesperson: Dr. Michael LebowOrganization: Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy GrantWebsite: SOURCE: Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Healthcare costs can make or break your retirement
The best laid plans for retirement can be totally upended by an unexpected medical emergency, especially if you don't have a reserve of savings to draw from. On this episode of Decoding Retirement, host Robert "Bob" Powell speaks with Sudipto Banerjee, global retirement strategist at T. Rowe Price, about what you can do to factor healthcare costs into your retirement planning. Sudipto discusses maximizing tax efficiency with Health Savings Accounts, whether you should consider a Medigap policy, and whether de-risking some of your investments as you enter retirement may be the right Finance's Decoding Retirement is hosted by Robert Powell. Find more episodes of Decoding Retirement at When it comes to planning, you know, if you're close to retirement and you're really thinking about planning, what you're probably really thinking in your mind is your cash flow that, you know, how much once I retire, you know, how much income I have coming in and how much spending, you know, I outflow do I have, right? How much will you need to pay for healthcare in retirement? Well, a number of institutions have published estimates over the past two decades plus that have lately frightened you into a state of fear and maybe even inertia. Consider the Employee Benefit Research Institute has shown that a 65-year-old couple needs $350,000 to have a 90% chance of covering all healthcare expenses in retirement, and that doesn't include long-term in the world will you pay for all that healthcare? Well, here to help me decode all that is Suduo Banerjee. He is a global retirement strategist at TO Price. Sudoko, welcome. Thank you. Thank you forhaving me. It's a pleasure. Uh, we're old friends, and I, I know the tale well, but I, I want to start here with the EBR numbers, which is a research institution, a nonpartisan one I should add that you once worked at, where we showed, and you showed perhaps maybe Paul Fronston and others showed that a 65 year old couple needs $350,000 to pay for healthcare and retirement andFor someone who might be listening, maybe they're in their 50s or 60s or so, that's a big number and thinking, I don't even have that in my, I maybe I have that in my 401k in my IRA, but what am I gonna use for living expenses? Yeah, yeah, I mean, um, so, you know, my, my first point there would be not to really focus on that number, that one single number that you mentioned where $350,000. Um, but really to understand that, you know, it's one way of looking at healthcare costs. It's basically, it's what a couple will spend over 30 years, right? It's just the sum of, of that, butwhen it comes to planning, you know, if you're close to retirement and you're really thinking about planning, what you're probably really thinking in your mind is your cash flow, that, you know, how much once I retire, you know, how much income I have coming in and how much spending, you know, I outflow do I have, right? Um, and for that, of course, you know, you need to figure out your income side and then you are looking at your spending side and right there there's one big element which is healthcare, right?So I think that's why people should focus on that, you know, doing the cash flow analysis, and which means asking how much am I going to spend on healthcare on an annual basis, right? And then you know the, all the other elements that you know, housing, you know, food, etc. right?And then how that matches up with how much income are you expecting, whether a mismatch or not, then go from there, right? But to focus on that one single number, uh, I think it does not help as much with planning because, you know,Healthcare is not something that you retire, you know, a day, then you got a check of $250,000 to someone and healthcare is taken care of. It doesn't work like know, it's an ongoing process. Every year you have to make decisions. So I would say that focus on that cash flow and the annual numbers. So we have done a lot of research as you mentioned, where we provide you know a lot of different numbers but looking from that annual, you know, uh, point of view, um, so I would say, you know, maybe start there. Yeah, I mean, this is just rough back of the napkin. I'm not going to do a present value of that per se, but if I take a look at, let's call it $300,000 for a couple aged 65/30 years, I'm looking at what, uh, what is that, uh, maybe $10,000 per a couple or $5000 per person over the course of 30 years, which seems like a much more manageable expense given that you might have cash flow and you might have assets to pay for this, and you might have Social Security benefits to pay for this. I know we're gonna dive deeper into but before we do so, I, I wanna talk a little bit about, uh, Medicare Advantage versus, uh, Medi gap, uh, uh, traditional Medicare, and, uh, what you, your, your research has shown around what might be a better way to manage healthcare costs as you think about removing the risk that you might face, or the, the unplanned for costs, let's say. Yeah, yeah. I mean, it's, it's a, it's a really important decision. I think, you know, when it comes to healthcare and retirement, that's the choice of the plan. I mean, exactly what plan you choose, whether you go with traditional Medicare, whether you go the Medicare Advantage or you add a Medi gap. I think that's a really important decision, so people should pay a lot of attention to that. Uh, but particularly when it comes to the, the choice of whether you uh want to add a Medicare policy, you know, with your traditional Medicare or not.I think uh there's two questions really to answer here. So the first one is, can you afford it? Right? Because as you might have seen from the research that we have published and others have done similar work that, you know, Medi gap on average it costs more, you know, annually maybe around $2000 so there is a question of affordability, right? Can you afford that additional, you know, $2000 or so? If you can, that's great, right? Uh, so that then the next question then becomes is basically, why are you, um, what do you want Mia?Basically, right. So usually the, the reason that people want to add Medi gap, you know, to their coverage is to limit their out of pocket expenses, right? Because with traditional Medicare, you have the deductibles, you have the co-insurance and all that. Once you add Medi-gap to that, you know, you my out of pocket expenses, you know, are, are, you know, they, they will be checked. But when we did the research, when we look at the numbers, so on average, people who have Medi gap, you know, they are spending, their out of pocket spending isYou know, similar to people who have other types of coverage, it's not less. Uh, it's only at the extreme end where you see that people who have Mediga, you know, they have uh lower numbers, um, and the reason for that is basically people who have Mediap, they just use more because they know they have that protection, they just use more healthcare. So when people are thinking about this, I just want to make sure that they understand that the expectation, if they have the expectation that, you know, I will have lower out of pocket expenses, that might not happen because what we see is people just end up using more healthcare. Yeah, I, I, I should mention too that this is almost an irreversible decision. If you decide to go with Medicare Advantage when you sign up for Medicare, and you should become unhealthy over the course of retirement, trying to switch from Medicare Advantage to a um original Medicare with a Mediga policy is probably virtually impossible. So you need to think about the 5, 1015 years into your retirement and make that decision not based on today, but perhaps on what the future may hold andAnd though you may pay more for Mediga now in the present, uh, maybe you'll pay less over the course of your retirement for healthcare because you won't be exposed to those, uh, large out of pocket costs that you might face with the Medicare Advantage plan, for instance, should you become unhealthy. You're right, and yeah, it's a personal decision. People know they, they have their own medical histories and all that. So based on that, you need to make a decision, but you're absolutely right, yeah, you have to be aware of that, you know, the down the line, you, it might be an irreversible decision, yeah. Um, there's another, uh, sort of healthcare decision that people need to think about, but maybe in their 30s, 40s, and 50s, which is if they have an HSA available to them, uh, in their employer through a high deductible health plan, uh, they have an opportunity to take advantage of a triple tax-free account that in some ways offers more advantages than, say, a 401k. yeah, what do they need to know?Yeah, I mean, I don't know that, you know, if all your, you know, listeners are aware ofUh, the, the triple tax advantage of HSA assuming they are, um, it is really unique because there is no other, uh, place where you, that the money is basically virtually never taxed, you know, uh, so the contributions are not taxed, the growth is not taxed, and the distributions, of course, they have to be like eligible, you know, for healthcare purposes, so then they're not taxed either. Um, so when it comes to HSAs in, I think, to use, um, how to maximize the value of HSA, I think there is a, a theoretical answer and there is sort of a practical answer to it. So the theoretical answer is that I would say yes, maximize your HSC contributions, right? So there is acontribution limit and, and would you do that? So, would you, would you do that before your your pre-tax 401k like with in terms of sequencing your contribution, would it be?Oh no, the, the 41K comes first because you know with the 401k if you have match, right, that's an instant like you know, whatever, uh whatever per your employer is matching, that's an instant return on your on your contributions, right? So that comes first, but once you sort of, you know, maximize your 401k match and all, all that, right, um, at that point, it might make sense to, you know, put all your money up to the contribution limits in your there are caveats to that. So, uh, the, the, so one is that, you know,The the value of HSA is really, you know, if you keep it invested over the long term, right? So then the let the money grow and then you take the money out in retirement, right? So then you get all the tax advantages, right? Uh, but if you're putting in the money in HSA and taking the money out whenever you need, you know, for healthcare purposes, then you are not using it correctly. And so in that case, you know, you might be better off putting the money in somewhere else, right?Um,So I, so if you know, the other part is you mentioned that high deductibles, so HSS are attached with high deductible plans. So to keep the money invested, they have to meet those high deductibles, right, which might not be, you know, possible for everyone, right? So for the, the practical answer to me seems like, you know, yes, put money to your, into your HSA as much as you can, but try to keep it that if you need, you know, money for healthcare purposes, you try to get the money from somewhere else. So then whatever money you are keeping in your HSA you're actually taking the advantage of the growth and the tax advantage as well. Uh, so, we have to take a short break, but when we come back, I, I want to talk about long term care, which I mentioned at the start of the program, but it's a really important topic that people worry about, so don't go away. Welcome back to Decoding Retirement. I'm speaking with Suddu Bill Banerjee. He is the global retirement strategist at T Rowe Price. Suddu though, I said that we were going to talk about long-term care costs, but I, the first thing I want to talk about is since we were just talking about investing your HSA, I, I want to talk a little bit about the research has traditionally shown that you should allocate your assets based on your age, that you would take 100 minus your age, and that would be the percent allocations that you would split between stocks and bonds, but you have a contrary point of view? Uh, not contrary, so we actually just published some new research, um, uh, just, you know, this week, and it's, uh, it's using data from our, you know, 401k recordkeeping business and we worked with some academics from MIT and Stanford, butThe, the, the key, the, the interesting finding was that so we try to estimate their preferences, like, you know, their equity allocation preferences and how that changes with age, and we also track their actual, you know, how they manage their allocations. So when we looked at preferences, so at younger ages, you know, the preferences are pretty similar, like, you know, it's pretty homogeneous for they all want to be highly invested in equities, which makes sense, you know, people have very little money, they want to grow their portfolio. They all want to be highly invested in equities. But when we look at the older, you know, groups, 50 and above, we see there is a lot more heterogeneity in their allocation preferences. So some people don't want equities at all. Some people want to be, you know, fully invested in equities, and there are a lot of people, you know, in middle, you know, some most people are in that 60 to 80% range in that age group. Uh, so, so that tells us that, you know, there is, there needs to be more personalized solutions, you know, as people get closer to when we track what they're actually doing with their money in their 401k, the interesting finding was that, you know, as people get older, they are more actively making changes to their, uh, uh, to a 401k, which makes sense, right? But the more interesting part was that the older they're getting, we see more and more of them making their their portfolios more aggressive, so they have a higher equity allocation. They're moving towards a higher equity so, so that, that's a very interesting, um, and we did not really dive into the reason why people are, you know, uh choosing higher equity allocation at older ages. We have some theories, like, you know, it could be that just trying to catch up, they're, you know, lagging behind. There are also some research which suggests that as people get older, they are they gain more investing knowledge, their risk preferences, you know, they might be more tolerant of risk and things like that, but that's, you know, for our future research, but this is what we found that, you know, people at older ages, basically there's a lot of, you know, variation. So that's our point. The point trying to make is that more personalized solutions probably make sense at that age. Yeah, I mean, it sounds like the actual advice in this case would be to at least not do this willy-nilly arbitrarily, but to know why you're becoming more aggressive with your asset allocation and, and not just sort of, uh, you know, flip a coin and say, I'm going to invest more in whatever international equities this day because my neighbor has, or whatever the case may right, so I promise we would talk about long-term care, um, which is the, it's the one thing that many people worry about, right? They, they, they think that they will face some sort of tragedy at some point and they'll end up in a nursing home. They don't know how they'll pay for it. They don't know whether they should buy a long-term care insurance policy. They don't know the degree to which they could self-fund their home equity is a break class option. They talk about qualifying for Medicaid to pay for long-term care, but your research seems to suggest that it's a very idiosyncratic risk that, in the main, not that many people will need long term care. So, but to me, I don't know if I'm going to be in the 3% or the 97%, right? Yeah, so it's, it's, it's a tough decision, honestly, because what, this is a classic example of what we call tail risk that, you know, for most people, if you look at the average, you know, people don't spend anything on long term care out of pocket, right? Um, but a very small percentage, you know, uh, will spend a large amount, right? And this is sort of a classic case where, you know, you, you would think that, you know, it' insurance, right? It's, it's, it's a uh situation to be addressed by insurance because uh it's a tail risk, but as you know very well that the long term care, you know, insurance market has not, um, you know, um uh perform or function, you know, very well over the years, you know, they're having a lot of problems and the least of which is that the, the policies are very expensive so people, you know, they don't want to you know, spending so much on, on these policies and never needing the care, so that's the uncertainty of it. Um, in terms of how to think about, you know, whether you insure, you get insurance, whether you sell fund, I so, so for some people, it's an easy decision like if it's you lower end of the, you know, income spectrum or so that most of you don't have, you know, a lot of liquid assets. Most of your income is going from Social Security, you go with Medicaid, right? You're on the opposite end with the higher end, you're probably able to, you know, self-fund yourself. It's people in the middle, uh, who you really have to think about it, whether they want to protect their assets, uh, from, you know, um, uh, Medicaid or I think it's, it's a tough decision. There's no like rule what they should do, but I think we can provide some guidelines as to if you are thinking about, you know, getting, uh, long term care insurance, if you're seriously thinking about long term care insurance, what things you should have in mind. So, uh, so my colleagues, you know, uh, at Trice, they have done an excellent job. They have produced a very good guide on long term care you know, if your listeners are interested, I would highly doubt it, um, towards that. But some of the key takeaways want is when is the right period to get a long-term care insurance, um, because the, the trick is you don't want to be too late when, you know, you have health issues crop up and your premiums will really go up and you don't want to get it too early when you are spending your premium in your, uh, spending on premiums for a long I think somewhere between 55 and 65 is, you know, um, a good uh period to consider long term care insurance. And then the other one is really to figure out, you know, what's your living situation going to be if you know that, you know, if you think that, you know, I'm going to be at home and then I'm going to move into a continuing care, right? So then it's easier to get the type of insurance that you want because there are some umbrella policies which would cover, you know, almost any living arrangement, and those are more you have more targeted, you know, if you have figured out your living situation and you get a more targeted policy, then your cost might be lower. So there are all these different things and there are, you know, benefit limits and all that. So keep all that in mind, to do your research, basically. Yeah. I want to save time to talk about your years in college as a Buckeye sup though, but, but first, I, I want to double back on a topic that we begin with, with in terms of paying for health care expenses over the course of retirement. In your research, correct me if I'm wrong, you've shown that for costs, your Medicare Part B, your Medicare Advantage, your Part D, uh, premiums, whatever those may be, that you would pay for those perhaps out of cash flow as you go through retirement, but for other expenses out of pocket deductibles, copays, etc. that you might use a different bucket of money. Is that fair to say? Yeah, yeah,exactly. So the way, I mean, I mean, we talk about it is, you know, think of premiums and you're out of pocket as two separate elements. So premiums, the reason is that premiums are basically, you know, they're predictable, they're face. Even the year to year changes are minimal. So you have a very good idea how much you are going to need for your health insurance premiums, right? So you can basically build that into your cash flow, your into your income flow, right? Uh, the, the, the more trickier part is the out of pocket expenses where you might not know exactly how you know, something might happen, you know, in some years. So the idea is that you keep sort of a cash reserve for that and we have shared numbers, you know, based on your age and whatever, uh, how much you might expect. So you keep, you know, whatever you're comfortable with $5000 10,000 dollars, you keep that as a reserve. You spend that at the end of the year, you fill that up, you know, again, and start the new year. So that's, that's how we think about it, yeah. Yeah, I should remind our listeners that they can go to the T. Rowe Price website where you have at least 3 if not more research papers that sort of hand walk people how to uh approach this paying for healthcare in retirement. So, and they're, they're quite good that we can only do a sort of a uh a shallow dive here today, I said I wanted to talk about your college years. You, uh, you wrote plays, you directed plays in college as a Buckeye, and I'm curious, what, uh, parallels do you see between maybe writing and directing plays and, you know, you're sort of your role today now as a retirement, uh, strategist. Um, that's, that's a, you know, a difficult connection, but, um, I, I gave up on that dream a long time ago because I just realized it's, it's really hard, uh, to make a career, you know, in, in creative arts, um, but I, I do see one connection, which is really writing, uh, because I, I like to write, and what that has stayed with me over the years andUh, I really, so I value the, the, the skill of writing now more and more because when I'm writing about, you know, all the research papers or anything like that, I think you get a clarity of thought when you are writing in, in that way, I sort of envy you know, journalists like you who get to write on a more daily basis. Um, but, uh, but I think that, that has stayed with me and that has helped me because I still like to, you know, spend some time, you know, it doesn't happen every day, but write some of these thoughts, uh, because that really helps me even think about the research itself, yeah. Yeah, I, I forget exactly whose quote this is, but uh they said something to this effect that writing is easy. I just wait till beads of blood form on my forehead and then the words spill though, I'm afraid we've run out of time. 23 minutes goes by in the blink of an eye, but thank you ever so much for talking with us and sharing your knowledge and wisdom. Uh, we'll have you back on a future episode to, to talk about things we didn't get to today. So thank you. Yeah, absolutely. And thank you for having me. It was an absolute pleasure, um, and, you know, look forward to staying in touch. Thank you. So that wraps up this episode of Decoding Retirement. We hope we provided you with some actionable advice to help you plan for or live in retirement. If you have questions about money or retirement, you can email me at YF podcast@ and I'll answer your questions in a future episode. And lastly, remember you can listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement wherever you find your favorite podcasts. This content was not intended to be financial advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional financial services. Are you ready to master the markets and dare I say, become a better leader in the process? Well, Yahoo Finance has you covered with our new full suite of original podcast content, whetherIf you're a seasoned investor, but you're just starting your financial journey, we offer invaluable market insights and strategies to help boost your portfolio, build your wealth, and make you a successful investor. Join us on Yahoo the Yahoo Finance app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
