FactCheck: False claims about toxins, Vitamin D and ‘cooked' skin in viral claims about suncream
SUMMER HAS BEGUN, meaning soaring temperatures (maybe), shining sun (possibly), and weeks of balmy, good weather (probably not).
It's also a time you'll hear good advice to wear suncream, but an odd chorus of counter advice has taken hold with false and harmful claims that suncreams can be dangerous.
These include incorrect suggestions that sun scream is full of 'toxins', can block vitamin D or cause cancer.
These claims, which have long been espoused online, came to the fore in Ireland recently in reaction to
the appearance
of skincare expert Eavanna Breen on TV to talk about the dangers of sun exposure and the importance of wearing suncream.
'I opened a can of worms,' Breen said in a 19 May Instagram video. 'People saying in the comments that I didn't know what I was talking about. That suncreams are full of toxins and we shouldn't be putting them on our skin.'
Breen is correct. Social media is rife with posts that make false claims about suncream (also called sunscreen), often from accounts that claim to give health advice, can accumulate hundreds of thousands or even millions of views.
Although many of the most popular versions of these posts are not from Ireland their influence has been felt here, particularly in alternative medicine circles.
'It's this rejection of what they need – man made or synthetic – versus what they deem natural,' says David Robert Grimes, a science writer who studies how misinformation spreads. By way of example, he shows why this belief is false: 'Arsenic, Uranium and Ebola are all 'natural'.'
Grimes conducted research for his PhD into UV radiation, which is what can make sunlight so damaging.
'A tan is your body's way of screaming at you 'get me out of the sun'. It is an adaptive response to UV radiation,' he summarises.
'The idea [among those spreading misinformation] is that suncream is made by man, so putting it on your skin is bad, but the sun is natural, therefore it's good,' Grimes said.
He noted that a similar logic is often used by people who go against vaccines; viruses are natural, while vaccines contain ingredients which are synthetic. Nevertheless, the vaccines in use are much less likely to cause you harm than being infected with the live virus.
Grimes also said that many of these outlandish claims often do well because of social media algorithms, which promote them into people's feeds.
People who scroll on social media sites are more likely to click on and react to counterintuitive claims, even if it's to argue against them. On many social media sites, such interactions push those posts higher in the feed so that even more people can see them.
On the flip side, standard advice can struggle to make an impression; even if it is correct, people have heard it all before.
steffyweffy777
/ YouTube
Anti-sunscream claims tend to fall into three main categories: that suncream is toxic; that suncream does more harm than good by blocking vitamin D production; and that there were no skin cancers in the past before suncream was used.
These claims can be dangerous. UV radiation, such as that from the sun or tanning beds, is the main factor for most skin cancers in Ireland.
There were,
on average
, 7,545 cases of Basal cell carcinoma and 1,243 cases of melanoma, both types of skin cancer caused by the sun, diagnosed annually between 2018 and 2022. According to an analysis by the National Cancer Registry, rates of both these cancers are increasing.
If people forego suncream, especially if they do so thinking that the sun's rays must be healthy for them, they are putting themselves at risk needlessly.
Toxins
One of the major claims made against suncream is that it contains toxic ingredients.
'What if slathering toxic, cancer-causing chemicals on our skin in the name of 'protection' was doing more harm than good?' one post we found on Facebook by a skincare company asked.
However, unlike posts by other users that appear to be dispensing odd health advice for social media engagement, the motivation behind that one is clear: it also promotes the company's own suncream, which it says is made from beef fat and 'non-nano zinc'.
(Zinc is a standard sun-blocking ingredient in mineral suncreams. It's what makes them, and other formulas like Sudocreme, white).
Other false claims claiming there are toxins in suncream are not as explicit, but rather implied; they often try to sell 'non-toxic' suncream to a public while amping up the suspicion of 'chemicals', such as those listed on the back of most suncream bottles.
However, as David Robert Grimes points out, even the
chemical description of an apple
can sound sinister when you don't know what the terms mean.
'Unless you're talking about particles of light, everything in our tangible universe is chemical,' he said.
Long lists of exotic-sounding chemicals make up many anti-suncream posts, which warn that these chenmicals can be dangerous.
They often refer to oxybenzone, octinoxate, oxytocinate, octisalate, octocrylene, homosalate, parabens, PUFAs, avobenzone, or nanoparticles.
'If you can't pronounce it, your liver's already struggling,' one of these posts, viewed tens of thousands of times on X, reads.
'These ingredients don't block UV rays. They absorb them. Convert them into heat. Your skin turns into a microwave. Congrats, you're cooked.'
The last part of this claim is partly true, but is misleading in a way that purposely makes the process sound more sinister than it is.
Some sunscreen ingredients do absorb UV rays and
convert them
into tiny amounts of heat, but nowhere near the levels needed to cook or microwave a person's skin.
The heat generated is
negligible
, and is far less damaging than the
DNA mutations
that UV radiation can cause on the skin when they are left unblocked.
Advertisement
Concerns about the chemicals in suncreams are also partly based in fact — some of the ingredients do have potentially negative health effects in high doses, which is why they are regulated.
In order to prevent this from happening, Europe places regulatory limits on them so they are far below any harmful thresholds when they are used in suncream.
'Sunscreens are cosmetic products and as such manufacturers must comply with strict European regulatory standards that include governance on ingredients, safety and labelling,' the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) told
The Journal.
'The HPRA's role as the competent authority is to ensure cosmetic products on the Irish market are safe for consumers and meet the requirements of the cosmetics regulation.
'When a cosmetic product comes to the Irish market, it undergoes a safety report, including product testing and likely exposure levels.
'Ingredients used in cosmetic products must be safe and must abide by the minimum standards to be met by all cosmetic products placed on the market.'
For sunscreams specifically, this means that only protective UV filters approved for that purpose may be used.
A list of UV filters allowed in cosmetic products, as well as what concentrations and what products they can be used in, is available on the European Commission website
here
.
'The HPRA continuously evaluate the inclusion of cosmetic ingredients at European level and in collaboration with other EU markets, to ensure the highest standards of consumer safety are maintained.
'Consumers should check for a European address on the label. If it is not there, it might indicate that the product has been imported from outside the EU and may not meet European requirements for safety assessment.'
Vitamin D and cancers
A near constant refrain on posts encouraging people to forego suncream is that sunlight is needed to make vitamin D.
'Sunlight increases your body's production of Vitamin D which fights cancer. Sunscreen is full of chemicals that cause cancer,' a post by a self-described 'Naturopath' said on X last July.
To date, the post has accumulated more than 2.4 million views, according to X's analytics.
An identical post by an anti-Covid vaccine account using the exact same wording was also posted last August, and has accumulated a further 3.6 million views on the platform.
Although
research
has looked at whether Vitamin D can prevent cancers, the evidence has been '
mixed
' and there is no credible evidence that skipping sunscreen to boost Vitamin D is worth the well-established risk of
UV-induced skin cancers
.
'We don't have rickets,' David Robert Grimes says. 'That is your bog-standard test for nutritional deficiency.'
While it may seem intuitive that suncream, which blocks the sun's harmful rays, would reduce the amount of Vitamin D produced in the skin,
experiments
have shown that volunteers that used suncream in the sun
maintained
vitamin D production, while
reducing sunburns
.
'Our bodies can still make vitamin D from sunlight even when using suncream,' the HSE told
The Journal
by email.
'The Department of Health recommends vitamin D supplements for everyone. The amount you need depends on your age, skin tone, your situation and the time of year.'
Cancer rates
'We were exposed to the sun for hundreds of thousands of years and were doing just fine until sunscreen was invented in 1938,' a post on X last June said. It was from an account that describes themself as 'the most canceled scientist'.
'Since then, melanoma rates began to skyrocket in the 1950s, yet people blame the sun rather than the toxic chemicals in sunscreen.' The post has been viewed more than 1,800,000 times.
Melanoma is a particularly dangerous form of skin cancer.
Skin cancer diagnoses have increased over the last century, but there is no evidence that sunscreen is responsible. The rise is more accurately explained by much more obvious factors.
'Improved diagnostics, better reporting, and also that we live longer, and we have more time to accumulate that DNA damage that can lead to things like skin cancer,' David Robert Grimes said, listing other reasons why more cases of skin cancer are recorded now than in the past.
Melanomas have been
recorded in history
, including in the writings of Hippocrates, as well as archaeological evidence of melanomas on 2,400-year-old Peruvian mummies.
However, historical statistics on rates of skin cancers are scant. National Cancer Registry Ireland began collecting data on cancer cases in 1994.
'Over 5,000 cases of skin cancer were diagnosed in Ireland in 1994,' a spokesperson for the HSE told
The Journal.
'It can take decades for skin cancer to develop after exposure to UV radiation. Many of those diagnosed with skin cancer in 1994 would have been exposed many years earlier when sunscreen was much less widely used or available.'
The connection between UV rays and skin damage is well established, as is suncream's ability to stop these rays.
Pyro Labs
/ YouTube
Grimes also listed living longer as a reason that more skin cancers are being detected nowadays.
'Cancer is primarily a disease of aging,' Grimes said. 'Most cancers manifest post your 60s, right? There are exceptions, but almost all of them are associated with aging. The damage is done much earlier on, and then decades later, the cancer emerges. You might have got some exposure in your 30s that eventually leads to cancer in your 60s.
'So as we live longer, we get more cancers.'
Ingredients in suncreams are regularly revised in the EU based on the latest science and have strict limits to make sure their use is safe. Many claims about suncream being bad for you are based on incorrect data or faulty reasoning.
Not wearing suncream on sunny days can quickly lead to
visible radiation burns
and genetic damage, which increase the likelihood of cancer developing.
Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new
FactCheck Knowledge Bank
for guides and toolkits
The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it
here
. For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide
here
. You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks
here
.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions.
We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support.
Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
FactCheck: False claims about toxins, Vitamin D and ‘cooked' skin in viral claims about suncream
SUMMER HAS BEGUN, meaning soaring temperatures (maybe), shining sun (possibly), and weeks of balmy, good weather (probably not). It's also a time you'll hear good advice to wear suncream, but an odd chorus of counter advice has taken hold with false and harmful claims that suncreams can be dangerous. These include incorrect suggestions that sun scream is full of 'toxins', can block vitamin D or cause cancer. These claims, which have long been espoused online, came to the fore in Ireland recently in reaction to the appearance of skincare expert Eavanna Breen on TV to talk about the dangers of sun exposure and the importance of wearing suncream. 'I opened a can of worms,' Breen said in a 19 May Instagram video. 'People saying in the comments that I didn't know what I was talking about. That suncreams are full of toxins and we shouldn't be putting them on our skin.' Breen is correct. Social media is rife with posts that make false claims about suncream (also called sunscreen), often from accounts that claim to give health advice, can accumulate hundreds of thousands or even millions of views. Although many of the most popular versions of these posts are not from Ireland their influence has been felt here, particularly in alternative medicine circles. 'It's this rejection of what they need – man made or synthetic – versus what they deem natural,' says David Robert Grimes, a science writer who studies how misinformation spreads. By way of example, he shows why this belief is false: 'Arsenic, Uranium and Ebola are all 'natural'.' Grimes conducted research for his PhD into UV radiation, which is what can make sunlight so damaging. 'A tan is your body's way of screaming at you 'get me out of the sun'. It is an adaptive response to UV radiation,' he summarises. 'The idea [among those spreading misinformation] is that suncream is made by man, so putting it on your skin is bad, but the sun is natural, therefore it's good,' Grimes said. He noted that a similar logic is often used by people who go against vaccines; viruses are natural, while vaccines contain ingredients which are synthetic. Nevertheless, the vaccines in use are much less likely to cause you harm than being infected with the live virus. Grimes also said that many of these outlandish claims often do well because of social media algorithms, which promote them into people's feeds. People who scroll on social media sites are more likely to click on and react to counterintuitive claims, even if it's to argue against them. On many social media sites, such interactions push those posts higher in the feed so that even more people can see them. On the flip side, standard advice can struggle to make an impression; even if it is correct, people have heard it all before. steffyweffy777 / YouTube Anti-sunscream claims tend to fall into three main categories: that suncream is toxic; that suncream does more harm than good by blocking vitamin D production; and that there were no skin cancers in the past before suncream was used. These claims can be dangerous. UV radiation, such as that from the sun or tanning beds, is the main factor for most skin cancers in Ireland. There were, on average , 7,545 cases of Basal cell carcinoma and 1,243 cases of melanoma, both types of skin cancer caused by the sun, diagnosed annually between 2018 and 2022. According to an analysis by the National Cancer Registry, rates of both these cancers are increasing. If people forego suncream, especially if they do so thinking that the sun's rays must be healthy for them, they are putting themselves at risk needlessly. Toxins One of the major claims made against suncream is that it contains toxic ingredients. 'What if slathering toxic, cancer-causing chemicals on our skin in the name of 'protection' was doing more harm than good?' one post we found on Facebook by a skincare company asked. However, unlike posts by other users that appear to be dispensing odd health advice for social media engagement, the motivation behind that one is clear: it also promotes the company's own suncream, which it says is made from beef fat and 'non-nano zinc'. (Zinc is a standard sun-blocking ingredient in mineral suncreams. It's what makes them, and other formulas like Sudocreme, white). Other false claims claiming there are toxins in suncream are not as explicit, but rather implied; they often try to sell 'non-toxic' suncream to a public while amping up the suspicion of 'chemicals', such as those listed on the back of most suncream bottles. However, as David Robert Grimes points out, even the chemical description of an apple can sound sinister when you don't know what the terms mean. 'Unless you're talking about particles of light, everything in our tangible universe is chemical,' he said. Long lists of exotic-sounding chemicals make up many anti-suncream posts, which warn that these chenmicals can be dangerous. They often refer to oxybenzone, octinoxate, oxytocinate, octisalate, octocrylene, homosalate, parabens, PUFAs, avobenzone, or nanoparticles. 'If you can't pronounce it, your liver's already struggling,' one of these posts, viewed tens of thousands of times on X, reads. 'These ingredients don't block UV rays. They absorb them. Convert them into heat. Your skin turns into a microwave. Congrats, you're cooked.' The last part of this claim is partly true, but is misleading in a way that purposely makes the process sound more sinister than it is. Some sunscreen ingredients do absorb UV rays and convert them into tiny amounts of heat, but nowhere near the levels needed to cook or microwave a person's skin. The heat generated is negligible , and is far less damaging than the DNA mutations that UV radiation can cause on the skin when they are left unblocked. Advertisement Concerns about the chemicals in suncreams are also partly based in fact — some of the ingredients do have potentially negative health effects in high doses, which is why they are regulated. In order to prevent this from happening, Europe places regulatory limits on them so they are far below any harmful thresholds when they are used in suncream. 'Sunscreens are cosmetic products and as such manufacturers must comply with strict European regulatory standards that include governance on ingredients, safety and labelling,' the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) told The Journal. 'The HPRA's role as the competent authority is to ensure cosmetic products on the Irish market are safe for consumers and meet the requirements of the cosmetics regulation. 'When a cosmetic product comes to the Irish market, it undergoes a safety report, including product testing and likely exposure levels. 'Ingredients used in cosmetic products must be safe and must abide by the minimum standards to be met by all cosmetic products placed on the market.' For sunscreams specifically, this means that only protective UV filters approved for that purpose may be used. A list of UV filters allowed in cosmetic products, as well as what concentrations and what products they can be used in, is available on the European Commission website here . 'The HPRA continuously evaluate the inclusion of cosmetic ingredients at European level and in collaboration with other EU markets, to ensure the highest standards of consumer safety are maintained. 'Consumers should check for a European address on the label. If it is not there, it might indicate that the product has been imported from outside the EU and may not meet European requirements for safety assessment.' Vitamin D and cancers A near constant refrain on posts encouraging people to forego suncream is that sunlight is needed to make vitamin D. 'Sunlight increases your body's production of Vitamin D which fights cancer. Sunscreen is full of chemicals that cause cancer,' a post by a self-described 'Naturopath' said on X last July. To date, the post has accumulated more than 2.4 million views, according to X's analytics. An identical post by an anti-Covid vaccine account using the exact same wording was also posted last August, and has accumulated a further 3.6 million views on the platform. Although research has looked at whether Vitamin D can prevent cancers, the evidence has been ' mixed ' and there is no credible evidence that skipping sunscreen to boost Vitamin D is worth the well-established risk of UV-induced skin cancers . 'We don't have rickets,' David Robert Grimes says. 'That is your bog-standard test for nutritional deficiency.' While it may seem intuitive that suncream, which blocks the sun's harmful rays, would reduce the amount of Vitamin D produced in the skin, experiments have shown that volunteers that used suncream in the sun maintained vitamin D production, while reducing sunburns . 'Our bodies can still make vitamin D from sunlight even when using suncream,' the HSE told The Journal by email. 'The Department of Health recommends vitamin D supplements for everyone. The amount you need depends on your age, skin tone, your situation and the time of year.' Cancer rates 'We were exposed to the sun for hundreds of thousands of years and were doing just fine until sunscreen was invented in 1938,' a post on X last June said. It was from an account that describes themself as 'the most canceled scientist'. 'Since then, melanoma rates began to skyrocket in the 1950s, yet people blame the sun rather than the toxic chemicals in sunscreen.' The post has been viewed more than 1,800,000 times. Melanoma is a particularly dangerous form of skin cancer. Skin cancer diagnoses have increased over the last century, but there is no evidence that sunscreen is responsible. The rise is more accurately explained by much more obvious factors. 'Improved diagnostics, better reporting, and also that we live longer, and we have more time to accumulate that DNA damage that can lead to things like skin cancer,' David Robert Grimes said, listing other reasons why more cases of skin cancer are recorded now than in the past. Melanomas have been recorded in history , including in the writings of Hippocrates, as well as archaeological evidence of melanomas on 2,400-year-old Peruvian mummies. However, historical statistics on rates of skin cancers are scant. National Cancer Registry Ireland began collecting data on cancer cases in 1994. 'Over 5,000 cases of skin cancer were diagnosed in Ireland in 1994,' a spokesperson for the HSE told The Journal. 'It can take decades for skin cancer to develop after exposure to UV radiation. Many of those diagnosed with skin cancer in 1994 would have been exposed many years earlier when sunscreen was much less widely used or available.' The connection between UV rays and skin damage is well established, as is suncream's ability to stop these rays. Pyro Labs / YouTube Grimes also listed living longer as a reason that more skin cancers are being detected nowadays. 'Cancer is primarily a disease of aging,' Grimes said. 'Most cancers manifest post your 60s, right? There are exceptions, but almost all of them are associated with aging. The damage is done much earlier on, and then decades later, the cancer emerges. You might have got some exposure in your 30s that eventually leads to cancer in your 60s. 'So as we live longer, we get more cancers.' Ingredients in suncreams are regularly revised in the EU based on the latest science and have strict limits to make sure their use is safe. Many claims about suncream being bad for you are based on incorrect data or faulty reasoning. Not wearing suncream on sunny days can quickly lead to visible radiation burns and genetic damage, which increase the likelihood of cancer developing. Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Teen, 19, dies after viral TikTok ‘dusting' challenge went wrong leaving family ‘utterly devastated'
A TEEN, 19, has died after taking part in the viral TikTok "dusting" challenge that went wrong, leaving her family "utterly devastated". Renna O'Rourke, from Arizona, tragically passed on Sunday after being in an intensive care unit for a week. 4 Renna O'Rourke, from Arizona, tragically passed on Sunday Credit: Facebook 4 Renna and her boyfriend used an app delivery service to have the cleaning agent delivered to their door Credit: Facebook 4 Renna went into cardiac arrest before later being declared brain dead Credit: YouTube Dusting involves young people inhaling aerosols like spray deodorant, paint thinner or keyboard cleaners. Renna went into cardiac arrest before later being declared brain dead after using a cleaning product to take part in the deadly challenge. The teen's heartbroken dad Aaron O'Rouke described how his daughter dreamed of fame. He told Aaron and his wife Dana shared their daughter's tragic story to raise awareness of the social media challenge. Dana said: "There's no ID required. It's odorless. It's everything kids look for. "They can afford it, they can get it, and it doesn't show in mom and dad's drug test." The mom explained how Renna and her boyfriend used an app delivery service to have the cleaning agent delivered to their door. Most read in The US Sun She told "We want to make sure that we use our tragedy so that no other parent has to experience looking at their child on life support and a ventilator and not breathing on her own all because she huffed out of a can." Pheobe Bishop cops arrest 34-year-old flatmate who was last to see missing Aussie teen on explosive journey to airport Dr. Randy Weisman, from the HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, explained how inhaling aerosols can make users feel drunk or euphoric for a few minutes. But such use can result in liver failure, heart failure and lung disease among other irreversible issues - or death. He told AZFamily: "This is extremely concerning. "When they inhale these chemicals in the gas it will actually replace the oxygen within their lungs and within the rest of their body." Renna's parents said that the only light to come from her passing is that her organs have gone on to save at least six other people. Mom Dana said: "Through that we're finding strength and purpose. "She will be unbelievably missed, leaving the most aching hole in our lives, but if her life is to mean anything, we are going to do what we can to prevent somebody else's child from being where ours is right now. "She will be unbelievably missed, leaving the most aching hole in our lives, but if her life is to mean anything, we are going to do what we can to prevent somebody else's child from being where ours is right now." A post on the Read more on the Irish Sun "She was the light in every room she walked into, and the pain that her family and friends feel is simply immeasurable. "We want to use the proceeds of this fundraiser to cover the extensive medical bills , burial costs, therapy costs, and to spread awareness about the dangers of Huffing/Dusting, the practice of inhaling keyboard cleaner or similar." 4 Renna's parents said that the only light to come from her passing is that her organs have gone on to save at least six other people Credit: Facebook
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
My name's Ulrika Jonsson & I'm an alcoholic – I was on knees swigging a bottle at 11am then one day I made cry for help
MY name is Ulrika and I am an alcoholic. Not a drop of alcohol has passed my lips in just over a year. Advertisement 7 Ulrika Jonsson bravely marked one year of sobriety with before and after photos 7 The 57-year-old admits getting sober saved her life - and sanity Credit: Instagram For family and friends, it's been a cause for great celebration, it's viewed as a major feat. take me out for a celebratory meal. For me, the run-up to this anniversary has been the cause of much trepidation and a sprinkling of fear. But, most of all, it's been a realisation. Because this is my life now. Advertisement The day I surrendered and accepted I had a problem with alcohol, I knew I couldn't just give it up for a while. I knew I couldn't just cut back in the hope that I'd be cured, because alcoholism is a disease for which there is no cure. There is a solution, but there is no fix. I was trapped in a vicious cycle of hell. Advertisement Even though I would NEVER have admitted it at the time. Then came June 5 last year. A hangover day much like any other, really. I sat on the sofa with my liver and brain pickled in equal measure, wrapped up in the blanket of shame, and something made me reach out for help. Ulrika Jonsson speaks out during Sober October about overcoming binge drinking I typed a message that read, quite simply: 'I can't do this any more' and sent it to a friend who was five years' sober. And that's how a life of There is every possibility I could have Saved my life It has saved my life in more ways than one. And, without sounding too evangelical about my journey, I've had a spiritual awakening and found an inner peace I never knew possible. Advertisement I'm a different person to the I've learnt more about myself in the past year than I did in my past 56 on this planet. I was trapped in a vicious cycle of hell. Even with my best friend calling me one Saturday morning to tell me to get help because I clearly had a problem Has it been easy? Nothing easily gained is ever worth having, I say. I've not had the temptation to pick up a drink, but alcohol is impossible to avoid — it's everywhere. What to do if you think are an alcoholic IF you're struggling with alcohol addiction, the most important thing is to recognise the problem and seek support - You don't have to face it alone. Seek Professional Help GP or Doctor – A medical professional can assess your situation and provide advice on treatment options. Therapists or Counsellors – Talking to an addiction specialist can help address underlying causes and develop coping strategies. Rehab or Detox Programmes – If physical dependence is severe, medically supervised detox may be necessary. Consider Support Groups – A well-known 12-step programme that provides peer support. – A science-based alternative to AA, focusing on self-empowerment. At the beginning, I would look lovingly at a glass of red wine when I went out for a Sunday roast. Advertisement But knowing that a drink would not make things better, and it would never just be the ONE, stopped me from picking it up. But at least I was able to be my authentic self — to be more discerning and accept that these men were just not for me. Sobriety comes with a hefty dose of honesty, which can be as welcome as it can be unwelcome. So, this journey goes on. It's not a destination. It will only end with my dying breath. Advertisement I've yet to learn the exact damage my drinking might have inflicted on those around me. 7 I was trapped in a vicious cycle of hell and my best friend told tell me to get help because I clearly had a problem, says Ulrika 7 Ulrika admits she was binge-drinker who drank to black out I think of my children and how worried about me they were. How I must have scared them. How torn they must have been between wanting to say something and just hoping I would come to my senses. I have amends to make. I have character defects to accept and improve. I have to remember to live in the moment and that whether I'm one year or ten years' Advertisement I still have I have no objections at all to others drinking around me but, by Christ, people can be annoying when drunk! At least it's not me doing the crazy stuff, dancing on the tables or doing things I will quickly forget or regret. Nor do I wake up with punishing hangovers and terrifying Beautiful things happen in sobriety. Good things come your way. Beautiful people come into your life, too. Advertisement People without judgment who fundamentally care for you and understand you. That has been my greatest reward. Don't get me wrong, life has continued to throw me curveballs. I'm just better equipped to deal with them as a sober person. Sobriety comes with a hefty dose of honesty, which can be as welcome as it can be unwelcome I have a history of alcoholics in my family on my mother's side, but I don't have decades of alcohol abuse behind me. I didn't become addicted after the first sip of Pimm's at the age of 14 when I first got drunk. My drinking history is quite unremarkable. It didn't result in me losing my job, my marriage, my children or even my driving licence. I didn't get arrested or end up in jail. I wasn't a vomiting mess that couldn't get her kids ready for school in the morning. I wasn't a violent drunk. Which is why it might be helpful for anyone else out there to note that alcoholics come in all shapes and sizes and many live among us in plain sight. Advertisement But the few years running up to my decision to quit, I was clearly drinking for the wrong reasons and I had no control over my cravings. I was a binge-drinker Heavy shame A perfect storm of life led me to self-medicate, to soothe away life's ills and sharp edges; to quell my crippling anxiety by drinking neat rum from the neck of the bottle while kneeling into the cupboard underneath the stairs. There is nothing quite as 'sobering' as admitting to dropping to your knees at 11am and sticking your lips around a bottle of 40 per cent alcohol; feeling it swiftly burn your throat and immediately extinguish your anxiety, fears and self-loathing. Drinking was 'my thing'. It was a personal and private activity I had all to myself. I foolishly believed it was harmless because it didn't affect anyone else, so it was nothing anyone could take away from me. And I loved it. It made me feel instantly better and helped me cope with life. It killed my feelings of being overwhelmed; it relaxed me and made me a much nicer person. I thought . . . Advertisement See, the one thing I had established by the time my drinking got completely out of hand was that I simply wasn't cut out for life. 7 Beautiful things happen in sobriety. Good things come your way. Beautiful people come into your life, too, says Ulrika Credit: Getty 7 Ulrika says she's now better equipped to deal with life's curve-balls 7 I've not had the temptation to pick up a drink, but alcohol is impossible to avoid — it's everywhere, says Ulrika Credit: Instagram I just couldn't cope. Everyone else seemed on top of everything while I was constantly swimming against the tide. Advertisement I was forever traipsing through fields of molasses; perpetually found myself on the battlefield of life utterly unarmed. I was just no good at it. While I made no specific plan to end my life, my hope was eventually that alcohol would destroy me. I was a solitary drinker. But what might have started out as fun very quickly, and without fail, ended in blackout. I couldn't just have the one drink. What weirdo does that? I wasn't seeking light inebriation. I wanted the full anaesthetic effect. My Or better still, nothing at all. I had such crippling anxiety about the present and future, which was coupled with past ordeals, that I was desperate for my feelings just to STOP. Advertisement Because I didn't initially drink every day, and because my life looked impeccable from the outside, I convinced myself there wasn't a problem. I was still in control. However, I know now that those close to me saw a different picture. They heard my slurred voice on the phone; saw my drunk eyes betray me; worried about my volatile and highly strung demeanour and mood swings. They grew tired of repeating things to me that my blackouts had erased. It took months to rid myself of the heavy shame that drinking brought. Now, I realise I was really ill — both physically and spiritually — and that makes me go a bit easier on myself. In short, I'm grateful to my alcoholism for bringing me to where I am today: a life of honesty and integrity; of clarity and calm and being the person I never believed I could be. Advertisement My name is Ulrika and I'm an alcoholic. And I have chosen life.
