'Scalpel,' not an 'ax': Why many Indianapolis departments could face budget cuts in 2026
Without those proposed cuts, city leaders would be staring down a roughly $43 million budget deficit caused in part by property tax reforms passed by state lawmakers this spring, City Controller Abby Hanson told IndyStar in a recent interview. After Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett made clear that he wanted to present the city's 10th straight balanced budget with no tax increases, Hanson is pushing most departments to cut 4% of their budgets that "we could live without." Officials are also asking the local police, sheriff's and fire departments to limit their budget growth to 2%.
"Frankly, the amount of property taxes that I was expecting us to have in 2026, that didn't come to fruition," Hanson said in an exclusive Aug. 6 interview with IndyStar, noting that property taxes accounted for about a third of city revenues in 2025. "That's not the amount of growth that we ended up having."
Experts have warned that SB 1, which is forecast to reduce property tax growth by $1.4 billion statewide from 2026 to 2028, would force local governments to tighten their belts and could force hard decisions about whether to cut public services in the coming years. Starting next year, cities will start collecting less money as homeowners earn tax credits that lower their property tax bills by up to $300.
A state analysis shows that under the new law, the Indianapolis city-county and Marion County governments will miss out on about $11 million in expected property tax revenue growth in 2026. But Hanson said the actual loss is nearly $18 million after factoring in separate taxing districts that are split up in the analysis, including the police, fire and sanitation.
SB 1 was a component of the revenue shortfall, but not the only factor. New multi-year labor contracts that the city signed with public sector unions at the end of 2024, including the Fraternal Order of Police and the Indianapolis Professional Firefighters Union, have significantly increased its expenses.
The four-year contract with the FOP includes annual pay raises for officers across the board and boosted the starting salary for an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officer to nearly $75,000 in 2025, according to the contract. A patrol officer with three years of service is set to earn nearly $88,000 in 2026. Hanson also said a state change that increased the pension rates paid to firefighters and police officers will cost the city more money.
In 2025 the city spent nearly $1 billion, or 60%, of its $1.65 billion budget on public safety and criminal justice services including the Indianapolis police and fire departments, the Marion County sheriff's and prosecutor's offices, and the Marion County courts.
Where exactly the 4% reductions show up in city services will become clearer during months of budget negotiations that formally begin at the Aug. 11 City-County Council meeting. Presentations by Hogsett and Hanson that night will kick off weeks of hearings at which each department presents its budget to council committees.
Hogsett's Chief of Staff Dan Parker told IndyStar that despite the cuts, no "significant" city programs will disappear next year and new investments will still be announced. The growth of the overall budget is expected to be in line with previous years, too, although city officials would not cite an exact amount. The $1.65 billion 2025 budget was about 6% higher than the 2024 budget.
"This wasn't an ax being taken to the budget," Parker said. "It was really more of a scalpel because we empowered the agencies to look at their budgets."
The city will also set up a new fund for the Department of Public Works that draws mainly on organic growth in local income tax revenues, with the goal of raising $50 million in new money to spend on roads by 2027, Parker said. Starting that year, the state will offer up to $50 million a year in matching grants to help Indianapolis repair its battered roads.
Parker said the new state program will make amends for a road-funding formula that disregards lane and traffic counts, sending the same amount of money to a two-lane road in a rural county and a six-lane road in Indianapolis. If the city earns the full matching grant, Indy would spend $100 million more each year on roads.
The city's 2025 budget for roads, bridges and greenways was about $200 million.
"The mayor's position was that Marion County residents were overpaying into a state system where they weren't getting their fair share," Parker said. "Well, with this bill we're now eligible to get our fair share, and so we want to make sure this budget lays the foundation to be able to get that $50 million and put even more dollars out into road construction."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
10 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
'Utterly chilling': IU professor sanctioned over Indiana's intellectual diversity law
Indiana University has sanctioned an outspoken professor at its Bloomington campus after finding an anonymous complaint about his classroom conduct had merit — likely making him the first professor to be punished under Indiana's new intellectual diversity law enacted last year. However, Germanic studies professor Ben Robinson told IndyStar that he believes the university did not conduct an investigation to uphold its sanctions. And considering some odd circumstances in his case, he said, he's concerned the university is making an example out of him. "There's no reference to any sort of discovery process whatsoever," he said. "It was clearly a hastily and thoughtlessly written, anonymous complaint in a reporting system that had no consequences. ... It was elevated into an SEA 202 complaint." IU policy on reviewing such complaints states the university will conduct a investigation if a preliminary review found the complaint had merit. It's unclear if this step was taken before Robinson was sanctioned. The complaint lodged against Robinson is one of at least 14 grievances investigated in the state so far. It's unclear whether disciplinary action has been taken in most of those cases. Under Senate Enrolled Act 202, a professor must embrace free expression and "intellectual diversity," while not lecturing about political views unrelated to their field. The law requires those qualities to be considered during tenure review and creates a mechanism for students to report professors. After a "thorough review," Rick Van Kooten, executive dean of IU's College of Arts and Sciences, found the complaint reflected that the professor conflated "personal life experiences, academic scholarship and pedagogical practice" in violation of SEA 202, according to the five-page disciplinary letter. "This blurring of roles compromises the integrity of the classroom environment and risks confusing or alienating students," the letter reads. "While this is a matter of degree, it serves as a formal warning to Prof. Robinson to exercise greater care in ensuring that personal experiences and opinions do not unduly influence his pedagogy." IU spokesperson Mark Bode said the university does not comment on personnel matters. He did not respond to an IndyStar question about whether it conducted an investigation. The complaint against Robinson was filed last year and cited classroom comments he made about the university restricting free speech rights, times he's been arrested while protesting, and his views regarding the state of Israel. "He has used class time to say that the university is restricting people's free speech. He has talked about being arrested during class time several times," the complaint reads. "He talks negatively about the state of Israel and describes the war in untrue and unfair ways." Robinson has been a vocal critic of the IU administration, including its now-struck-down expressive activities policy, and was arrested during the Bloomington campus' Palestine solidarity encampment in spring 2024. He has also been the target of external "watchdog" groups seeking to publicize and condemn political activities of faculty. The professor said he plans to fight the sanction. According to the letter, he can request a campus Faculty Board of Review to investigate whether university officials have infringed on his right to academic freedom. The complaint isn't valid, Robinson asserts, both because of its anonymity and its origin. According to IU policy, a SEA 202 complaint will only be considered if it is submitted by a student or university employee; the policy does not specify protocol for anonymous complaints. In his letter, Van Kooten said the complainant was "very likely a student" in Robinson's class. Also, the complaint was not initially submitted to the student reporting system intended for "intellectual diversity" concerns. Instead, it was sent to an informal remediating body, which cannot investigate or discipline, and the university escalated the complaint to the Office of Civil Rights Compliance, which can. "It was surprising that the dean felt that a reporting mechanism that says there's no investigations can just be passed off to someone else, namely him, to conduct the investigation," Robinson said. In the letter, Van Kooten said the complaint submission was "somewhat unusual," but it would be "irresponsible" for the university to ignore the report. In the disciplinary letter, Van Kooten appeared to be concerned with the complaint's claim that Robinson frequently mentioned university criticisms and his personal experiences. He acknowledged that Robinson's class "addresses matters such as free speech, education, authority, state violence, and genocide" in the curriculum. "However, referencing these experiences 'several' or 'numerous' times risks shifting the focus away from the academic content and toward personal political narratives," Van Kooten writes. "When such references become excessive, they may inadvertently allow personal ideology to overshadow the intended learning objectives and compromise the neutrality expected in the classroom." The sanction does not result in immediate punishment. However, the written warning was added to Robinson's permanent personnel file, meaning it will be considered in future faculty reviews. Additional sanctions could subject Robinson to probation, suspension, termination or a host of possible penalties related to promotions, tenure or salary, according to IU code. When the bill was passed in 2024, faculty across the state rebuked it as an infringement on academic freedom and warned of a mass chilling effect on free speech and lecturing on divisive topics. News of his sanction is "utterly, utterly chilling" of his and his colleague's academic freedom and free speech rights, Robinson said, especially during a time when faculty may feel compelled to speak out. He specifically cited genocide in the Israel-Gaza conflict and state-mandated degree cuts at state universities. Receiving another sanction would put his livelihood at risk, Robinson said, and he has lost sleep figuring out how to navigate the process. He said that though he is in a vulnerable position, he hopes to continue to drive conversation about these policies and laws. "The urgency of not caving, the urgency of sticking to one's rights is even greater, because the consequences go well beyond the individual," he said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Cincinnati police union blasts 'political games' as leaders call for prosecution of White man in viral assault
The Cincinnati police union is firing back as local leaders are calling for the prosecution of several White individuals involved in the viral downtown assault that led to six people being injured in late-July. The city's Fraternal Order of Police released a statement defending the department's investigation of the violent beatdown, while condemning city leaders' demands that additional arrests be made. "Cincinnati Police investigators have worked tirelessly to gather all of the facts, meet with prosecutors and sign appropriate charges to ensure those involved will be brought to justice," Ken Kober, president of Queen City Lodge #69, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Efforts have been made by politicians to influence the outcome of the investigation for their own gain. It's wildly inappropriate. There's no place for political games in law enforcement." The union previously noted the White individuals involved in the fight have been identified as "victims," according to WKRC 12. The development comes after Ohio state Rep. Cecil Thomas spoke out at a public discussion Monday to discuss concerns over the city's handling of the investigation into the fight, WLWT reported. "The video speaks for itself," Thomas said, according to the outlet. "The method by which this situation has been handled raises serious questions as to whether there is bias involved in this investigation. It also brings into question the lack of integrity and whether there is something else to hide." The Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office declined Fox News Digital's request for comment. The comments are in response to a July 26 beatdown on the corner of Fourth and Elm streets that quickly went viral, sparking national outrage and putting pressure on Cincinnati's leadership to address safety concerns. Additional footage of the assault obtained by WLWT shows the unidentified White man allegedly hitting a Black man in the face, leading to several others joining in on the beatdown that ultimately led to seven arrests. A separate video obtained by Fox News Digital revealed another angle of the moments before the fight, in which a White man can be heard repeatedly using a racial slur toward the group before the physical altercation began. The viral incident has sparked racial tensions within the city as all seven arrested individuals are African American. Last week, a grand jury indicted Patrick Rosemond, 38, Jermaine Matthews, 39, Montianez Merriweather, 34, DeKyra Vernon, 24, Dominique Kittle, 37, and Aisha Devaughn, 25, on three counts of alleged felonious assault, three charges of assault and two charges of aggravated rioting, the Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office confirmed to Fox News Digital. If convicted, they would each face the possibility of up to 29 years in prison. A seventh individual, 32-year-old Gregory Wright, was arrested Monday afternoon and is facing charges of alleged aggravated riot and aggravated robbery, according to the Hamilton County Jail. "It's a powder keg, it's a powder keg," Carl Lewis, the attorney for Wright, said during his client's arraignment on Monday, according to WKRC 12. Lewis reportedly was referring to the high-tension situation unfolding in the community following the beatdown. "If, in fact, you start out with the narrative that they're 'victims' just based upon what you've seen in a video, that's a problem," Lewis said. Lewis did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. WATCH: Viral Cincinnati attack victim speaks out amid recovery from violent beating The potentially explosive situation forced Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Tyrone Yates to request additional security during Wright's arraignment, WKRC 12 reported. "Can we send a couple of deputies to the outside to make sure that while I conduct this hearing, everyone understands that everyone is to be cool, to keep their cool," Yates said. Vice Mayor Jan-Michele Kearney also reportedly weighed in on the criticism. "The actions of the White people involved appear to be the proximate cause of the violence, and they should be charged," Kearney said, according to WKRC 12. "We should push for justice and not turn against each other." Kearney did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Spirit Halloween opens some, but not all of its Indiana stores. Here's where to shop in Indy
Who cares if its August and fall weather is weeks away? There are less than 80 days to go before Halloween, and one of the season's spookiest retailers is now officially open for business. Spirit Halloween reopened three of its Indianapolis locations Aug. 13 with a fourth store coming soon. If you're ready to start shopping for costumes and terrifying animatronics, here's what we know about Spirit Halloween locations in Indiana. Spirit Halloween outlets in Clearwater Village, Greenwood Place and Traders Point in Indianapolis reopened at 11 a.m. Aug. 13, according to the company. Store hours at each location are from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and noon to 6 p.m. Sundays. Other Spirit Halloween stores will open in the next two weeks, according to the company. Here's where you can find them. More Spirit Halloween stores will be opening across Indiana soon. Here's a list of their locations and what we know about their opening dates. Spirit Halloween, Highland: (OPEN) Former Party City - 10300 Indianapolis Boulevard, 14, Highland, IN 46322. To see the the full Indiana location map, visit Katie Wiseman covers trending news for IndyStar and Midwest Connect. Contact her at klwiseman@ Follow her on Bluesky @katiewiseman.
