logo
Musk's ‘Spicy Mode' AI porn generator is not just dumb, it's dangerous

Musk's ‘Spicy Mode' AI porn generator is not just dumb, it's dangerous

Things are happening fast in the world of generative AI, and in the world of online safety. But where the two collide, particularly in the increasingly concerning regulatory environment of the United States, things seem to have shifted practically overnight.
We're approaching a place where major Western governments are blocking access to educational material for young girls to learn about their own bodies, while AI scans images of those bodies without consent to make models for generating salacious material on demand. A place where mentions of homosexuality and transgenderism are scrubbed from scientific documents and pressure campaigns stop artists making money off their original erotic content, but where the world's richest man can sell you deepfakes of Taylor Swift's bare breasts for $45 a month.
It's easy to imagine a horror-scenario future for our culture, which is already dominated and regulated by an internet that's increasingly privatised and vulnerable to the whims of governments and tech oligarchs. A scenario where certain kinds of sex – like anything that might empower women or queer people – are deemed woke and get buried. While other kinds – like the ability of men to see any woman they want naked, while she's powerless to do anything about it – are fine.
And it's all the easier to imagine as the constant procession of AI grossness and conservative government mandates make us so apathetic that barely anybody seems to point it out any more.
Last week, Elon Musk's xAI rolled out a public version of its image-generation platform Grok Imagine, with a marquee feature being its ability to turn any generated image into a short video.
But true to form for Musk's 'free speech absolutist' X platform, which has a history of allowing, gestating and amplifying harm towards anyone of a different gender, sexuality, skin colour or belief system to the Tesla founder himself, this is mainstream AI video with a recklessly immature difference: an optional 'Spicy Mode' ensures the video output is suggestive or explicitly sexual in nature.
The idea is that the user (and they must be a paying user, with access to Grok Imagine starting at $45 a month), can ask for an image of any person they want in any situation they want, and then hit the Spicy button to turn it into soft porn. X is filled with videos of users celebrating and sharing their creations.
As you might expect, almost all the generated videos are of women, with videos commonly showing them removing their tops and shorts to expose their naked bodies, rolling around while ripping at skintight suits, or messily eating ice cream that Grok seems to think should become liquid the second it's touched by anything. The videos are uncanny, with moments of photorealism but also strange physics, impossible behaviour, weird shiny textures and other common AI video oddness, plus awful audio. They're also extremely unimaginative, despite the name of the product.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump
Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump

A number of recent humiliating fiascos have reinforced artificial intelligence's growing image as the 21st century reincarnation of Tulip Mania. In July, Elon Musk's chatbot, Grok, was updated and promptly started spewing antisemitic and other toxic content. Earlier this month was the disastrous launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT-5. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had promised users that it would be like talking to 'a PhD level expert in anything', but within hours of the launch, epic fails started to flood in. One user asked GPT-5 to generate a map of the United States with each state named, which is how we all learned about the great states of Aphadris, Wiscubsjia and Misfrani. It also had problems counting to 12, and referred to President Gearge Washingion. These kinds of inaccuracies are initially hilarious, until we realise we're drowning in a sea of online misinformation and the joke's on us. Nevertheless, we're repeatedly told that the AI spaceship is leaving for a brave new world, so we'd better get on board or risk being left behind. Unfortunately, the people steering the spaceship appear to have lost their moral compass. So where exactly we're headed remains unclear. Loading Australia does not currently have AI-specific legislation. Chair of the Tech Council of Australia, Scott Farquhar, prefers it that way, stating that he doesn't want Australia to be 'hampered by the wrong legislation'. The right legislation, according to the council, is a text and data mining exemption to the Copyright Act, which would allow AI companies to use copyrighted work to train their large language models without seeking consent or paying authors a cent. Their illogical argument is that the work of Australian artists is immeasurably valuable, while simultaneously worth nothing at all. The council's lobbying effort at the Economic Reform Roundtable this week will also push for Australia to build more data centres, the huge energy- and water-guzzling facilities which provide the vast power, storage and cooling requirements that AI requires. Farquhar has repeatedly argued that Australia should become a regional data centre hub, saying: 'I think we are going to have a huge amount of benefits (from AI) and I hope we as a nation set ourselves up to have some of those benefits accrue to Australia.'

Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump
Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Tech lords are promising us utopia. Their brave new world might be a dump

A number of recent humiliating fiascos have reinforced artificial intelligence's growing image as the 21st century reincarnation of Tulip Mania. In July, Elon Musk's chatbot, Grok, was updated and promptly started spewing antisemitic and other toxic content. Earlier this month was the disastrous launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT-5. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had promised users that it would be like talking to 'a PhD level expert in anything', but within hours of the launch, epic fails started to flood in. One user asked GPT-5 to generate a map of the United States with each state named, which is how we all learned about the great states of Aphadris, Wiscubsjia and Misfrani. It also had problems counting to 12, and referred to President Gearge Washingion. These kinds of inaccuracies are initially hilarious, until we realise we're drowning in a sea of online misinformation and the joke's on us. Nevertheless, we're repeatedly told that the AI spaceship is leaving for a brave new world, so we'd better get on board or risk being left behind. Unfortunately, the people steering the spaceship appear to have lost their moral compass. So where exactly we're headed remains unclear. Loading Australia does not currently have AI-specific legislation. Chair of the Tech Council of Australia, Scott Farquhar, prefers it that way, stating that he doesn't want Australia to be 'hampered by the wrong legislation'. The right legislation, according to the council, is a text and data mining exemption to the Copyright Act, which would allow AI companies to use copyrighted work to train their large language models without seeking consent or paying authors a cent. Their illogical argument is that the work of Australian artists is immeasurably valuable, while simultaneously worth nothing at all. The council's lobbying effort at the Economic Reform Roundtable this week will also push for Australia to build more data centres, the huge energy- and water-guzzling facilities which provide the vast power, storage and cooling requirements that AI requires. Farquhar has repeatedly argued that Australia should become a regional data centre hub, saying: 'I think we are going to have a huge amount of benefits (from AI) and I hope we as a nation set ourselves up to have some of those benefits accrue to Australia.'

Patrick Mahomes had doubts about Travis Kelce's romance with Taylor Swift at first
Patrick Mahomes had doubts about Travis Kelce's romance with Taylor Swift at first

Perth Now

time14 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Patrick Mahomes had doubts about Travis Kelce's romance with Taylor Swift at first

Patrick Mahomes was doubtful when Kansas City Chiefs team-mate Travis Kelce told him he was dating Taylor Swift. The Chiefs quarterback revealed that his friend Kelce had told him about the pair's relationship but explained that it was only when the pop star attended her first NFL game in September 2023 that he realised that the romance was genuine. Speaking in the ESPN docuseries The Kingdom, Mahomes said: "He told me during the week. It was one of those where I gotta see it until I believe it." Travis and Taylor's relationship was confirmed when the Blank Space singer attended the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium for the NFL clash against the Chicago Bears and Mahomes admits that her presence at the game generated a "buzz". The 29-year-old sports star said: "You definitely felt the buzz and you could see people in the stadium gravitating towards where she was up there. At the same time, we had business to handle." Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones was astonished when the team discovered Taylor's relationship with Kelce. He recalled in the documentary: "We were in the locker room like, 'Taylor Swift's here. Taylor Swift? For real? With Travis? Oh my God!' "We were like, 'Oh my God Travis pulled Taylor Swift.'" Taylor recently compared Travis wooing her to being a John Hughes movie as she opened up about how the pair's romance came about. The 35-year-old singer said in a revealing interview on her boyfriend and his brother Jason Kelce's New Heights podcast: "This dude didn't get a meet and greet and he's making it everyone's problem. "That's what I thought at first... You realise he didn't even reach out to our management. He came with Pat [Mahomes] and he thought that because he knows the elevator lady, that he could talk to her about just getting down to my dressing room." She continued: "It felt more like I was in an '80s John Hughes movie, and he was standing outside of my window with a boombox saying, 'I want to date you! Do you want to go on a date with me? I made you a friendship bracelet! Do you want to date me?" The Cardigan singer acknowledged that Travis, 35, turned out to be the guy she'd been manifesting in her songs. She smiled: "I was like, 'If this guy's not crazy, this is sort of what I've been writing songs about wanting to happen to me since I was a teenager.'"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store