logo
How ‘The Queen of Spades' Brought Two Tchaikovsky Brothers Together

How ‘The Queen of Spades' Brought Two Tchaikovsky Brothers Together

New York Times22-05-2025
In 1888, Modest Tchaikovsky wrote a letter to his brother Pyotr, the composer. Modest, a former law student and budding dramatist and critic, had recently been commissioned by the Imperial Theaters in St. Petersburg, Russia, to write his first opera libretto: an adaptation of Pushkin's 'The Queen of Spades.'
Modest revered his older brother's talent and international renown. He had already proposed potential collaborations to Pyotr twice, to no avail. He had a composer lined up for 'The Queen of Spades,' Nikolai Klenovsky, but he was disheartened that he and his brother would not be working on it together.
Pyotr's response to the letter was measured but blunt. 'Forgive me, Modya, but I do not regret at all that I will not write 'The Queen of Spades,'' adding: 'I will write an opera only if a plot comes along that can deeply warm me up. A plot like 'The Queen of Spades' does not move me, and I could only write mediocrely.'
Then Klenovsky dropped 'The Queen of Spades.' Ivan Vsevolozhsky, the director of the imperial theaters, asked Pyotr to take over. He agreed.
And so 'The Queen of Spades,' which returns to the Metropolitan Opera on Friday, became the first collaboration between the two Tchaikovsky brothers, men of different disciplines and artistic abilities, despite their closeness. This work was the culmination of nearly 40 years of Modest's attempt to escape the cool of Pyotr's shadow and bask in his light. The result, the musicologist Richard Taruskin wrote, was the 'first and probably the greatest masterpiece of musical surrealism.' It's a testament to their camaraderie and fraternity, as well as their openness and intimacy.
When stripped to its thematic core, Pushkin's 'The Queen of Spades,' first published in 1834, has all the makings of spectacle — obsession, greed, madness, phantasmagoria — that you could also find in sentimental Italian operas of the 19th century. Pushkin was not just god of Russian letters, but the god, yet his writing wasn't easy to adapt into a libretto. His storytelling is anecdotal and ironic, lacking in empathy and tenderness for and between its characters. No one evolves, and there are no changes of heart. And 'The Queen of Spades' is short; Taruskin counts the text at 'barely 10,000 words.'
If there was anyone for the job, it was Pyotr. About 10 years earlier, he pulled off adapting Pushkin with 'Eugene Onegin,' one of the most beloved works in all of Russian literature. And that was a case of spinning gold from straw: Pushkin's source material, while celebrated for its cynical commentary on high society and innovative use of prose, does not have a plot designed to necessarily sustain the attention of an opera audience. (For those reasons, Modest, when Pyotr shared his plans for 'Onegin' with him, was intensely critical. 'Let my opera be unstageable, let it have little action,' Pyotr retorted. 'I am enchanted by Pushkin's verse, and I write music to them because I am drawn to it. I am completely immersed in composing the opera.')
Pyotr mostly adapted the text for 'Onegin' on his own. Any deficiencies in the libretto are compensated by his sonorous, impassioned score. You could say the same for 'The Queen of Spades.' Modest softened Pushkin's austerity without diluting the menace. Tchaikovsky's music, in turn, amplified the emotional stakes, drawing the listener into the characters' inner worlds.
When Modest was brought on to write the libretto for 'The Queen of Spades,' recommended to Klenovsky by Vsevolozhsky, he was still in the process of paving his own artistic path. Unlike the prodigious Pyotr, Modest lacked tenacity and diligence, and often abandoned projects before finishing them. He tried his hand at law, fiction, criticism, translation and drama, with varying success. In his early career, Modest tried and failed to collaborate with Pyotr at least twice: once for the concert overture adapted from Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' in 1874, and again three years later for an opera based on Charles Nodier's 1837 novel 'Inès de las Sierras.' Pyotr rejected both while encouraging his brother's literary talent.
The brothers wrote to each other often. Pyotr looked forward to Modest's letters, in part because he 'wrote them with the grace of Sévigné.' He wrote to Modest in 1874: 'Seriously, you have a literary vein, and I would be very happy if it were to beat so strongly that you became a writer. Maybe at least there will be a decent libretto one day.'
Eventually, that 'decent libretto' came along with 'The Queen of Spades.' When Pyotr was brought on, Modest had already been working on it for over a year, under Vsevolozhsky's and Klenovsky's guidance. The world premiere was just a year away.
Pyotr would write the score for 'Queen of Spades' abroad. He had temporarily relocated to Florence, Italy, as a creative reset. Modest remained in Russia. His libretto was workable but would need to be altered significantly to meet the composer's and director's demands. Story lines had to be shifted, characters added, its timeline moved to the previous century, during the reign of Catherine the Great.
Often motivated by deadlines, Pyotr created a working score in only 44 days in a fit of spectacular inspiration. Their different working modes were exacerbated by their distance. Pyotr arrived in Florence with only the first scene of text. When he finished a scene, he sent it back and eagerly awaited a new scene by mail. Modest could not keep up with his brother's speed. Pyotr made adjustments to nearly every scene to fit the score, and on several occasions, he was unhappy with Modest's verses and provided the text himself, including for Lisa's Act I arioso 'Otkuda eti slyozy' and Prince Yeletsky's Act II aria 'Ya vas lyublyu.'
How 'The Queen of Spades' was created is less a reflection of the Tchaikovsky brothers' differences in artistic approach than their similarities and proclivities. Although Modest had a twin brother, Anatoly, it was recorded that Pyotr and Modest, too, had identical qualities. The actor Yuri Yuriev, who mentioned Modest several times in his memoirs, once described him as 'Pyotr's double.'
'He was so similar in everything to his older brother,' Yuriev wrote. 'I am convinced that they thought, felt and perceived life exactly the same. Even their voices, manner of speaking were similar.'
At face value, this characterization of fraternal resemblance is innocuous, perhaps obvious. Pyotr, too, was aware of their likeness. 'I would like to find in you the absence of at least one bad trait of my individuality, but I cannot,' he once wrote to Modest, years before their eventual collaboration. 'You are too much like me, and when I am angry with you, I am, in fact, angry with myself, for you are always playing the role of a mirror in which I see the reflection of all my weaknesses.'
But Yuriev's comments could also be interpreted as a euphemism that hints at secrets hiding in plain sight. It has been suggested that among the reasons Pyotr and Modest became so close as adults — closer to each another than to any of their other three brothers — is that they both had homosexual propensities. The scholar Alexander Poznansky, whose biographies on the Tchaikovskys uncover previously censored letters from open publication, has meticulously laid out the many correspondences Pyotr wrote to Modest about his many trysts and feelings of limerence with other men: prostitutes, conservatory students, coachmen, manservants. Few letters betray Pyotr's shame or guilt. If anything, they are strikingly contemporary. In a footnote to one letter, Pyotr refers to a male prostitute with feminine pronouns, a custom that still exists, and that Poznansky writes was a habit among 19th-century men who would be described as gay today.
Poznansky and Taruskin theorize about Modest's queerness as well in their writings, based on examinations of his unpublished memoirs archived at the Tchaikovsky State House-Museum in Kiln, Russia. These documents are not available to the public, and few other people have studied them.
One that Taruskin has cited includes Modest's reaction to learning about Pyotr's sexuality from his twin brother: 'I am not a freak, I am not alone in my strange desires. I may find sympathy not merely with the pariahs among my comrades, but with Pyotr! With this discovery everything became different.'
Modest's earlier contempt for himself, he wrote, 'changed into self-satisfaction, and pride to belong among the 'chosen.''
It is apt that the brothers' first collaboration was creating an opera based on a tale about the hoarding of a secret, one shared with only those 'chosen' to know. Despite his initial reservations about the subject, Pyotr warmed up to it. Two months into the process, he wrote to Modest that 'either I am terribly, unforgivably mistaken — or 'The Queen of Spades' will really be my chef d'oeuvre.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lola Tung and the Cast of ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty' Style Pieces by John Galliano for Dior, Dolce & Gabbana and More for ‘Jimmy Fallon'
Lola Tung and the Cast of ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty' Style Pieces by John Galliano for Dior, Dolce & Gabbana and More for ‘Jimmy Fallon'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lola Tung and the Cast of ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty' Style Pieces by John Galliano for Dior, Dolce & Gabbana and More for ‘Jimmy Fallon'

Cast members Christopher Briney, Gavin Casalegno and Lola Tung of 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' continued their promotional tour for the third season, styling looks by John Galliano for Dior, Dolce & Gabbana and more for their appearance on 'The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon' on Tuesday in New York City. Tung wore a John Galliano for Dior corset dress from a 2001 collection, along with a pair of 2013 Dior mary jane pumps. Tung accessorized her attire with Panconesi earrings. More from WWD Designer Sneakers Ruled the 2025 MLB All-Star Game Red Carpet Thanks to Shohei Ohtani, Ketel Marte and More Guests Paris Fashion Museum Names New Director Loro Piana Placed Under Judicial Oversight Due to Alleged Worker Exploitation Briney wore a suited look courtesy of Dolce & Gabbana. The look included a black blazer with coordinated shirt, beige tapered trousers and black patent leather shoes by the Italian luxury fashion house. Briney's look was styled by Daniela Romero. Casalegno also wore a suit by Dolce & Gabbana. The mocha brown suit featured a coordinated, monochrome aesthetic with a jacket, trousers and collared shirt with buttons running down the front placket. He also wore black patent leather shoes by Giuseppe Zanotti. The TV series adaptation of 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' has grown in popularity since its debut in 2022, leading the show to partnerships in the fashion and accessories spaces. In June, New York City-based jewelry brand Catbird collaborated with the series on a collection of jewelry inspired by the romantic young adult show. The collection took inspiration from young love, coastal nostalgia and a journey of self-discovery, mirroring the themes of the series. The Catbird x 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' collection included delicate, feminine necklaces, rings and charms. 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' is a coming-of-age story that follows Belly, played by Tung, who finds herself caught in a love triangle between brothers Conrad and Jeremiah, played by Briney and Casalegno respectively. The latest season, based on the young adult novels by Jenny Han, debuts on Prime Video on Wednesday. Catbird x 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' Jewelry Collaboration [PHOTOS] View Gallery Launch Gallery: Catbird x 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' Jewelry Collaboration [PHOTOS] Best of WWD Amanda Anisimova's On-court Tennis Style Through the Years: From Teen Phenom to Wimbledon Finalist A Look Back at Fourth of July Celebrations at the White House Princess Diana's Birthday Looks Through the Years: Her Sleek Black Jacques Azagury Dress, Vibrant Colors and More Solve the daily Crossword

Real fighting, first-person footage – is this the greatest war film ever made?
Real fighting, first-person footage – is this the greatest war film ever made?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Real fighting, first-person footage – is this the greatest war film ever made?

The lights go down in the cinema, the curtain parts and we are in a dug-out on the eastern front line in Ukraine. 'Are you filming?' asks one soldier. 'Yeah,' replies his comrade, Bors. 'Film how beautiful I am,' the soldier says, blowing a kiss. Then all hell breaks loose. A Russian missile thumps into the earth feet from the men's position. 'FPV!' screams Bors, raising his rifle to shoot down an incoming first-person view drone. Suddenly a second missile lands, showering the men with mud and debris. Bors decides to move before another missile strikes and enters a landscape of hellish devastation: splintered tree trunks jut out of the mud. Lightning flashes. Smoke rises from craters in the ground. There is another blast. This time, the Russian missile knocks Bors to the ground, breaking both his legs and leaving him gazing up, in agony, at the sky. 'Don't even think about blowing yourself up,' a comrade begs. This is the opening scene of 2000 Metres to Andriivka, the latest film from Mstyslav Chernov, the Ukrainian director who won an Oscar for 20 Days in Mariupol and a Pulitzer prize for his reporting from that city under attack. It would be dramatic enough if it were a feature film or a video game, but this is a documentary, much of it culled from footage shot by soldiers on the front line. The result is a viewing experience unike any other in cinema, and the closest the comfortable world will come to the terror, agony and mad-eyed courage of the men holding back the army of Vladimir Putin. A masterpiece of story-telling, it's one of the most impactful war films ever made; never before has a European land war, as intense as 1914 or 1939, been captured like this. An establishing shot filmed by drone shows a narrow strip of forest leading to Andriivka, a tiny village in Ukraine held by Russian forces. The Ukrainian counter-offensive of 2023 is underway and the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade has been ordered to retake the village, severing a crucial supply route for Moscow's forces in the blood-drenched city of Bakhmut. For three years, the world has watched grim, grainy footage of the war in Ukraine. The battles are fought by nameless men for often nameless places. In 2000m, Chernov reverses the equation: he captures the humanity of the university students, engineers and IT workers who are called upon to fight and die for every metre of land on the way to Andriivka. The battles take place only a few hours' drive from Chernov's birthplace of Kharkiv, a city he says only remains free because of the sacrifices of soldiers like those he follows here. 'They are the only reason the places of my childhood still exist,' he says. Distance matters intensely to the platoon. In the film, their battles in the forest over the course of three months are introduced in terms of the distance remaining to reach Andriivka; 1000m, 600m, 300m. But traversing another distance was also on Chernov's mind. 2000 Metres to Andriivka 'I wanted to shoot something that will express how different it feels to be there on the frontline, but at the same time, how close it is to the normal world we all know,' Chernov, 40, says when we speak over Zoom ahead of the film's release. During filming, he flew from premieres of 20 Days in Mariupol in London to the front line in Ukraine in under 24 hours to embed with the soldiers. 'That transition was so striking and dramatic for me. Like going back 100 years, or to another planet.' Western audiences might have a sense of the counter-offensive raging to the east, but it is inevitably filtered through scraps of deracinated footage. 'We keep seeing this footage on YouTube, Telegram and Instagram,' says Chernov. 'I can see how people are detached from the violence, watching through their small screens without context, without connecting to the people who are doing it. I want to make sure people don't look at battlefield footage like it's a video game.' Displaying the same bravery that saw him remain in starving Mariupol for 20 days after Russian forces entered the city, Chernov decided to join the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade on its final push for Andriivka, linking up with Fedya, a 24-year-old sergeant and unit leader tasked with raising the Ukrainian flag over the village. In his voiceover for the film, Chernov admits that one commander 'tells us we are idiots for wanting to go.' The forest is a death-trap. Russian snipers, mortar teams and drones have wiped out dozens of men, and those sent in are filmed visibly shaking ahead of their deployment. But Chernov's reward for putting his life in danger are powerful interviews conducted off-the-cuff with soldiers who know they are only ever moments from death, hiding under trees or crammed into dug-outs. Sometimes the camera will lie on the floor while the men open up in a way that would be impossible in the formal sitdown interviews typically used in documentaries. Throughout the film's 106 minutes, the viewer never leaves the battlefield, unlike spiritual predecessors such as Sebastian Junger's Restrepo (2010), which covered a platoon's deployment to Afghanistan's deadly Korengal Valley, or Mosul (2017), depicting the war against the Islamic State. And its characters shine through. First, we meet 'Freak', a 22-year-old radio operator who has been tasked with ferrying Chernov and his second cameraman to Fedya. The men realise they went to rival universities in Kharkiv. In between puffs on a Lost Mary vape, Freak breaks into a huge smile as they joke about whether he should move to a separate dug-out. 'We'll get back and settle it,' he says, as a missile lands nearby. 'Who's better.' Then comes the call to move up and out. 'Yes, the film could exist entirely edited from bodycam footage and drone footage,' says Chernov. But he felt compelled to walk alongside the soldiers to bring their stories to life. 'Partially, that comes from my civilian perspective as being Ukrainian,' he explains. 'I'm a journalist, I'm a film-maker… but just having that guilt of not doing enough in my head also pushes me to step in and to be closer to these men.' Further up the forest we see Sheva, an older man who at first asks not to be filmed. 'I haven't done anything yet,' he says, hunched in a corner of a dug-out. 'Do you smoke?' asks Alex Babenko, Chernov's second cameraman. 'I smoke like a freight train,' replies Sheva, before speculating on what his wife is doing at that moment, and remembering that he has not, as he promised to, fixed the toilet. 'Maybe I shouldn't say that I'll quit smoking [after the war],' he says. 'But maybe I'll smoke just a normal amount, without all these extra smoke breaks.' 2000 Metres to Andriivka It is a funny, out-of-place exchange, almost ecstatic in its mundanity. And then, comes terrible news. A few months after the battle for Andriivka, explains the voice-over, Sheva is wounded and killed. The laughs in the cinema turn to gulped-down sobs. 'When you talk to someone on the front line, there is always this fear that this might be the last conversation you're having with that person,' Chernov says. In Sheva's case, these few minutes of film are also the last recording of him alive. At a premiere for family members of the brigade earlier this year in Kyiv, Chernov met with Sheva's wife. 'Every second of it was a treasure,' she told him, and would be too for their daughter and grandson. The brutal toll of the push for Andriivka colours the film. There are strategic debates about why the counter-offensive failed that Chernov deliberately avoids: was it right to fight so long for Bakhmut? Did the Americans push too hard for a full-frontal assault on hardened Russian lines? Instead, 2000m focuses on the narrow experience of the soldiers, and poses deeper, more existential questions. In essence, the film records a Pyrrhic victory: Fedya raises the flag above Andriivka, but within months that village – no more than a pile of bones and rubble – is recaptured by Russian forces. Chernov wonders in the film how long Ukraine can keep fighting a war like this, and at least leaves open the question of whether anything can be worth such loss. The death of many of the men featured in the film posed challenges to Chernov, changing the tone of the final product. 'We spent a lot of time thinking, 'How do we do this right? How do we do this respectfully?'' His answer was that the film, in effect, would serve as a living memorial: 'I need to make sure this man will be heard and seen,' he says. At a funeral for one of the members of the brigade, a crying woman laments that all the country's young men will soon be dead. But 2000m is not a lecture. Fedya himself provides a constant shot of optimism, leading his men into battle with what is, quite simply, an indomitable spirit. 'I think this is the power of cinema, especially for modern audiences who are bombarded with radical opinions and ideologies,' says Chernov. 'It is very important for film-makers to step back a little bit and let the audience decide how they feel.' A former Associated Press photographer, who has covered wars in Gaza, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq, Chernov does have one agenda: to bring the suffering of his countrymen to the attention of a wider, and potentially influential, audience. As we speak, he is hoping to arrange a screening for senior Republicans, a route perhaps to Donald Trump, on a US tour. Some viewers may be drawn to the film by the ground-breaking technology it employs. To capture the battle at 600m, footage is spliced together from seven different helmet cameras: the effect is immersive to the point of whiplash, a real-life version of the D-Day scene in Saving Private Ryan. (It was 'simply unheard of even a few years ago' to be able to film something like this, says Chernov.) But the director also employs techniques lifted from fictional films to lure in an audience that might be more comfortable watching Dune than events in the Donbas. Deep, stomach-churning bass accompanies 2000 metres, scored by Sam Slater, the producer of soundtracks for Sicario and Joker. An insistent, military drumbeat similarly drives the men forward. The combined effect is one of ferocious, blood-stained momentum. 'The film has a very raw, visual language,' says Chernov. 'But we use all the instruments of dramatic structure, music and editing, to make sure the audience will not walk away. Because we are inviting the audience into extremely tough conditions. We are basically inviting the audience to experience war.' At a preview screening of the film in London, Chernov was met with a long standing ovation. He is already working on a third film on the war in Ukraine, having taken on the role as its great documentarian, an empathetic eye in a morass of dehumanised news. 'Once this war is over, maybe I'll just make nature films,' he says. 'Very peaceful films somewhere quiet.' 2000 Metres to Andriivka is in cinemas from today Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Why More Couples Are Choosing Black-Tie for Their Destination Weddings
Why More Couples Are Choosing Black-Tie for Their Destination Weddings

Los Angeles Times

time8 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Why More Couples Are Choosing Black-Tie for Their Destination Weddings

When many people imagine a destination wedding they picture breezy linens, barefoot ceremonies, and a relaxed carefree vibe. Increasingly couples are embracing a more refined aesthetic, bringing black-tie or black-tie optional dress code to their destination celebrations. This fusion of formal-wear with unforgettable locales is not just a passing trend. It is a statement of elevated taste, timeless style and a memorable guest experience. Destination weddings already feel special but a black-tie or black-tie optional dress code reinforces the significance of the occasion. Couples want their guests to share the same sense of excitement and celebration they feel, and dressing up helps set that tone. Even in a tropical setting, black-tie signals a once-in-a-lifetime experience. Maurisa Collis owns and is the lead planner of Collis Co.,known for designing refined intentional celebrations. She shares 'For our clients a black-tie dress code aligns with the level of investment and detail our clients pour into their weekend. It honors the weight of the occasion and helps guests feel a part of something exceptional. There's a shift in energy when guests are dressed to the nines. They're more present, more engaged, and the event becomes less about logistics and more about emotion beauty and shared experience. That is the magic of black-tie.' From Italian villas, to French châteaux, to luxury Hawaiian resorts, many destination venues are ideally suited for black-tie. Couples are drawn to the timeless elegance of formalwear which complements grand spaces and beautiful design details. It pairs beautifully with lush florals, elevated decor and a thoughtfully curated guest experience. As Collis explains, 'Designing around a black-tie aesthetic is an exercise in restraint and refinement. Every detail has to feel cohesive elevated and deliberate. The fashion informs the tablescapes, color palette and scale of the event. When the attire is formal everything else must follow suit.' As a wedding photographer I see firsthand how black-tie or black-tie optional attire elevates the overall look of an event. Formal attire creates a cohesive polished aesthetic across portraits group shots and candid images. No guest feels out of place and the wedding story comes together with a unified cinematic quality that feels refined and classic. Choosing a breathtaking location is only part of the story. Black-tie attire rises to meet the grandeur of the destination itself. Whether the backdrop is a centuries-old villa on the Amalfi Coast or an oceanfront estate in Hawaii, formalwear feels not only fitting but expected. Couples want their fashion to reflect the elegance and drama of their surroundings. Many guests are excited for the opportunity to dress up while on vacation. After a casual welcome event or a laid-back beach gathering, putting on a tuxedo or a floor-length gown feels celebratory and fun. Black-tie gives guests permission to fully embrace the moment elevating the atmosphere and creating a sense of true occasion. For many guests a black-tie or black-tie optional event for a destination wedding is a rare chance to dress for a truly special event. In everyday life people often have few opportunities to wear a tuxedo or a formal gown. Seeing parents, grandparents, college friends, and loved ones looking their absolute best adds a sense of magic to the day. It honors the importance of the wedding and creates memories and photographs that feel even more meaningful. As multi-day destination weddings become more common, couples often vary their dress codes across events. A welcome party might be beach chic and a farewell brunch could lean resort casual, but the main wedding day is typically anchored in black-tie or black-tie optional. That intentional choice sets the wedding apart as the pinnacle of the celebration. Finally black-tie is clear and simple. Compared to ambiguous terms like 'beach formal' or 'resort chic' guests immediately know what is expected. That clarity removes stress, helps everyone feel confident and contributes to a smoother more enjoyable experience. Ultimately black-tie at a destination wedding brings together tradition and beauty honoring the formality of a milestone event while celebrating in a breathtaking setting. The result is a wedding story that feels timeless, elegant and unforgettable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store