Trump's macho crew, it turns out, is a vicious little sewing circle
Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got into a white-hot shouting match in a West Wing hall, within earshot of Trump and his guest, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy. The fight started about their different opinions on who should lead the IRS, but then spilled over into the efficiency of the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk's team.
'Bessent criticised Musk for overpromising and underdelivering budget cuts with DOGE,' Axios' Marc Caputo reported. 'Musk clapped back by calling Bessent a 'Soros agent' and accusing him of having run 'a failed hedge fund.''
Musk also had a nasty spat with Peter Navarro, Trump's top trade adviser, earlier this month over Teslas and tariffs. Musk posted on his social platform X that 'Navarro is dumber than a sack of bricks'.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, dismissed that hair-pulling incident, saying, 'Boys will be boys.'
There was once a fear that women would be too emotional at the top, but look at Elon. He maniacally jumps around the stage, and he is known to mist up in the middle of interviews about his work and his love life.
And if you don't want an unstable creature at the top, particularly at that bastion of masculinity, the Pentagon, why would you hire Pete Hegseth?
The lightweight former Fox weekend anchor, who promised to forgo his louche ways, made dunderheaded blunders with Signal that could have jeopardised American troops, and invited a nest of vipers into the Defence Department. (He even ordered up a spiffy makeup studio next to the Pentagon briefing room, as CBS reported.)
Hegseth followed his boss's reality-show lead and produced the Real Housewives of the Pentagon, casting fellow military veterans as top advisers, even if none of these men had the requisite experience to run a sprawling, global organisation, and they had no interest in learning. Instead, they lit up the Pentagon with bawdy meetings, vicious rivalries and power feuds. The bad-mouthing led to three firings and, on Thursday, the abrupt departure of Hegseth's chief of staff.
Having his wife, Jennifer, a former Fox producer, by his side at the Pentagon, where she is known as the 'human leash', has not kept Pete on the straight and narrow.
Loading
Hapless Hegseth fought back by accusing reporters of publishing 'hoaxes' and using 'disgruntled former employees' to smear him.
But the man in charge of a department with a budget of approximately $US850 billion seems flighty and shaky, unable to find loyal consiglieres and unable to stick to the Pentagon's classified message system, which is among the best in the world for a reason: It protects US troops.
When General Jim Mattis was Trump's defence secretary in the first term, he conveyed the idea that he was the adult who would make sure the highchair king in the Oval Office did not do anything crazy with the military. But who is the adult now?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
15 minutes ago
- West Australian
Protests at US Army parade will be met with force
US President Donald Trump has warned against protesting at the weekend military parade in Washington marking the US Army's 250th anniversary. "For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump told reporters in the White House's Oval Office on Tuesday after making a speech at Fort Bragg to mark the army anniversary. Law enforcement agencies are preparing for hundreds of thousands of people to attend Saturday's parade, US Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Matt McCool said on Monday. McCool said thousands of agents, officers and specialists will be deployed from law enforcement agencies from across the country. The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have said there are no credible threats to the event. At least nine permits have been issued for protests on that day, a US Secret Service spokesperson said on Tuesday. In unscheduled Oval Office remarks, Trump discussed his decision to deploy 4000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after protests erupted in response to federal immigration raids at workplaces there. Trump defended his decision to take that rare step and said troops were necessary to contain the unrest, despite objections from local and state officials that they were needed. Saturday's event, which will coincide with Trump's 79th birthday, includes an Army birthday festival on the National Mall and will culminate with a parade through the capital and an enlistment and re-enlistment ceremony presided over by the president. Nationwide protests on that day were being organised by a group called No Kings. "They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights and slashed our services," the group says on its website. "The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings."
ABC News
39 minutes ago
- ABC News
US and China agree on a framework to resolve their trade disputes
The US and China have agreed in principle on a framework to carry out an agreement they reached on resolving their trade disputes last month. The announcement by US and Chinese officials followed Tuesday's conclusion of two days of talks in London. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs. Li Chenggang, a vice minister of commerce and China's international trade representative, said the two sides had agreed in principle on a framework for implementing the consensus reached between the two leaders and at talks in May in Geneva, the official Xinhua News Agency said. Further details, including plans for a potential next round of talks, were not immediately available. Mr Lutnick said as he arrived on Tuesday morning that the talks were "going well," and he expected them to continue all day. Mr Li also said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. Asked late Monday how the negotiations were going, President Trump told reporters, "we are doing well with China. China's not easy". The two sides sought to build on negotiations in Geneva last month that agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100 per cent-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at American universities and rare earth minerals that are vital to car manufacturers and other industries. Mr Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last week in an attempt to put relations back on track, then announced the trade talks would resume in London. China, the world's biggest producer of rare earths, has signalled it may ease export restrictions it placed on the elements in April, alarming automakers around the world who rely on them. Beijing, in turn, wants the US to lift restrictions on Chinese access to the technology used to make advanced semiconductors. Mr Trump said that he wants to "open up China", the world's dominant manufacturer, to US products. "If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything," he said at the White House. "But we want to open up China." AP/Reuters
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Someone needs to punch the bully': What it will take to save the American Empire from ruin
The Big Short author Michael Lewis is, as one interviewer put it recently, 'a kind of guru of our age'. He has, after all, chronicled some of the big social and economic sea changes of our time – and, in the case of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's DOGE saga, he even seems to anticipate the sea changes. Speaking with Samantha Selinger-Morris on The Morning Edition podcast, Lewis discusses the catastrophic risks that could come from decimating the US federal government, and whether he thinks Trump's presidency will be the end of the American Empire. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Selinger-Morris: I have to start by asking you what civil servants in the American federal government actually do, and what is the risk if they're fired… your latest book was actually mostly written last year before Trump returned to office. It seemed to predict Musk's gutting of the federal workforce. So what happens if they're fired? Lewis: Well, it depends on which ones you fire, but for starters, if you think about the federal government, there are several frames that are useful, but one is, it just manages a portfolio of risks and problems that the free markets don't want to manage or deal with, and it's all the hardest problems... everything from like, how you keep nuclear weapons from exploding when they shouldn't, to cleaning up horrible waste to forecasting hurricanes. Loading If you move from agency to agency in the US federal government, inside each one, you will find spine-tingling risks being dealt with and the way they've gone about... supposedly addressing the waste, fraud and abuse that they say existed in the government, was just to cut arbitrarily, whoever they could, rather than subjecting them to any kind of relevancy test or competency test. And so God knows what happens... It's very hard to predict where this leads. Selinger-Morris: So in your estimation, does that mean the United States is perhaps closer to experiencing another pandemic or a nuclear accident now than, say, before all of these DOGE cuts? Lewis: Of course. Yes. All of the above. Name your risk. I don't think there's a single risk it's less likely to have to deal with.
