Cannabis Council of Canada Welcomes the Findings of Deloitte Report and Calls for Change to the Excise Tax to Strengthen Canada's Legal Cannabis Industry
Article content
OTTAWA, Ontario — The Cannabis Council of Canada echoes the urgent need for excise tax reform as outlined in Deloitte's 2025 study on the Impact of the Cannabis Excise Tax.
Article content
Article content
The report confirms what Canada's cannabis producers have long expressed: the current excise tax model is unsustainable and must be restructured to reflect the economic realities of the industry.
Article content
'Canada likes to position itself as a global leader in legal cannabis – but since legalization in 2018, the federal government has failed this industry and the tens of thousands of hardworking Canadians it supports,' said Paul McCarthy, President of the Cannabis Council of Canada. 'With a new government in office, it's time for a fresh approach. The cannabis industry deserves the same attention and support as any sector of our economy.'
Article content
Canada's cannabis industry is a major driver of economic growth – since legalization it has contributed over $43 billion to the national GDP, with approximately $7.4 billion contributed in 2024 alone. To keep that momentum going, key policy changes are needed to ensure the industry can grow, compete and innovate.
Article content
The current excise taxation framework is completely misaligned with today's market realities. When it was introduced in 2018, cannabis sold for approximately $10 per gram. Today, producers are receiving as little as $3 per gram – yet the excise tax remains the greater of 10% of the product's value or $1 per gram. This has created a crushing and unintended tax burden that now is three times higher than what was originally envisioned. Instead of thriving, licensed producers are being pushed to the brink – many are unable to meet their tax obligations and are being forced out of the market, taking good jobs with them. If not fixed, Canada risks losing the very businesses it once championed through legalization.
Article content
The Cannabis Council of Canada calls on the Government of Canada to eliminate the $1 per gram floor and instead apply a 10% ad valorem rate as proposed by the Standing Committee on Finance in 2024.
Article content
The industry's challenges extend well beyond taxation. Since legalization, the previous government largely turned a blind eye to the persistent illicit cannabis market, allowing criminal actors to thrive at the expense of licensed businesses. This undermines the foundation of legalization and the promise of a safe, regulated cannabis industry. Illicit cannabis is estimated to make up between 25% and 40% of total sales in Canada – an unacceptable reality that demands urgent federal action. For the cannabis industry to thrive, the Government of Canada must act to eradicate criminal forces from the industry.
Article content
Elements of a comprehensive strategy must include tackling illegal production, shuttering illegal storefronts and online sales, interdicting shipments of illegal product, and launching a public awareness and education campaign on the dangers of supporting the illicit market. Many consumers who purchase cannabis online do not realize they are purchasing illegal products, nor do they recognize how harmful these products can be. Not only do these transactions support other crimes, but they also pose a significant threat to public safety.
Article content
The Cannabis Council of Canada (C3) is the national voice of the legal cannabis industry, representing Licensed Producers and Processors. C3 advocates for sensible cannabis policies that prioritize public health and safety, support economic growth, and promote social responsibility.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Contacts
Article content
For media inquiries, please contact:
media@cannabis-council.ca
Article content
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
27 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Alberta Premier grilled on province's coal policy at rowdy, angry town hall
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. 'If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list,' Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. 'Banning industries is just not something we are going to do.' The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Many in the crowd held small placards reading 'lie' and 'false,' raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Alberta regulator approves controversial coal exploration applications at Grassy Mountain Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal. The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. 'If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion).' An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. 'I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our earth and our planet,' he said. Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes are poisoning fish populations, study says Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. 'We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future.' The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. 'I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy,' she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Xtract One Technologies Inc. Announces $7 Million 'Bought Deal' Public Offering
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE U.S. NEWSWIRE OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES BASE SHELF PROSPECTUS IS ACCESSIBLE AND PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE ON SEDAR+ WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS TORONTO, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- June 11, 2025 – Xtract One Technologies Inc. (TSX: XTRA) (OTCQX: XTRAF) (FRA: 0PL), a leading technology-driven threat detection and security solution that prioritizes the patron access experience by leveraging AI, (the " Company" or " Xtract One") is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement with Ventum Capital Markets (the " Underwriter") pursuant to which the Underwriter has agreed to purchase 18,000,000 units (the" Offered Securities") from the treasury of the Company, at a price of $0.39 per Unit (the ' Issue Price ') and offer them to the public by way of prospectus supplement for total gross proceeds of $7,020,000 (the " Offering"). Each Unit will consist of one common share of the Company (each a ' Common Share ') and one common share purchase warrant (each full warrant, a ' Warrant ' and collectively the ' Warrants '). The Company has granted the Underwriter an option to purchase up to an additional 15% of the Offered Securities at the Issue Price. The Over-Allotment Option may be exercised in whole or in part to purchase Offered Securities as determined by the Underwriter upon written notice to the Company at any time up to 30 days following the Closing Date (the ' Over-Allotment Option '). The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Offered Securities will be offered (i) by way of a prospectus supplement to the base shelf prospectus of the Company dated February 6, 2024 (the ' Base Shelf Prospectus ') to be filed in all provinces and territories of Canada, except Quebec (the ' Prospectus Supplement '); (ii) may be distributed in the United States to Qualified Institutional Buyers (as defined in Rule 144A under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ' U.S. Securities Act ')) pursuant to an exemption under Rule 144A; and (iii) may be distributed outside Canada and the United States on a basis which does not require the qualification or registration of any of the Company's securities under domestic or foreign securities laws. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to sell any of securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. The Offering is expected to close on or about June 18, 2025, or such other date as the Company and the Underwriter may agree, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the approval of the securities regulatory authorities and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Access to the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendments thereto are provided in Canada in accordance with securities legislation relating to procedures for providing access to a shelf prospectus supplement, a base shelf prospectus supplement and any amendment to such documents. The Base Shelf Prospectus is, and the Prospectus Supplement will be (within two business days from the date hereof), accessible through SEDAR+ at An electronic or paper copy of the Prospectus Supplement, the Base Shelf Prospectus and any amendment thereto may be obtained, without charge, from Ventum Financial Corp., or email at ecm@ by providing the contact with an email address or address, as applicable. About Xtract One Xtract One Technologies is a leading technology-driven provider of threat detection and security solutions leveraging AI to deliver seamless and secure experiences. The Company makes unobtrusive weapons and threat detection systems that are designed to assist facility operators in prioritizing- and delivering improved 'Walk-right-In' experiences while enhancing safety. Xtract One's innovative portfolio of AI-powered Gateway solutions excels at allowing facilities to discreetly screen and identify weapons and other threats at points of entry and exit without disrupting the flow of traffic. With solutions built to serve the unique market needs for schools, hospitals, arenas, stadiums, manufacturing, distribution, and other customers, Xtract One is recognized as a market leader delivering the highest security in combination with the best individual experience. For more information, visit or connect on Facebook, X, and LinkedIn. About Threat Detection Systems Xtract One solutions, when properly configured, deployed, and utilized, are designed to help enhance safety and reduce threats. Given the wide range of potential threats in today's world, no threat detection system is 100% effective. Xtract One solutions should be utilized as one element in a multilayered approach to physical security. For further information, please contact: Xtract One Inquiries: info@ Media Contact: Kristen Aikey, JMG Public Relations, 212-206-1645, kristen@ Investor Relations: Chris Witty, Darrow Associates, 646-438-9385, cwitty@ Forward-Looking Information This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated completion of the Offering, intended use of proceeds from the Offering, future estimates, plans, programs, forecasts, projections, objectives, assumptions, expectations or beliefs of future performance, are 'forward-looking statements'. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as 'plans', 'expects' or 'does not expect', 'is expected', 'estimates', 'intends', 'anticipates' or 'does not anticipate', 'believes', or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results 'may', 'could', 'would', 'might' or 'will' be taken, occur or be achieved. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the Company's limited operating history and lack of historical profits; risks related to the Company's business and financial position; fluctuations in the market price of the Company's Common Shares; that the Company may not be able to accurately predict its rate of growth and profitability; the failure of the Company and/or the Underwriter to satisfy closing conditions to the Offering; whether the Over-Allotment Option will be exercised; the failure of the Company to satisfy certain TSX additional listing requirements in respect of the Offered Securities; the failure of the Company to use any of the proceeds received from the Offering in a manner consistent with current expectations; reliance on management; the Company's requirements for additional financing, and the effect of capital market conditions and other factors on capital availability; competition, including from more established or better financed competitors; and the need to secure and maintain corporate alliances and partnerships, including with research and development institutions, clients and suppliers. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other risk factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. The Company has no intention to update any forward-looking statement, even if new information becomes available as a result of future events, new information or for any other reason, except as required by law.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Could a trade and security deal with the U.S. happen before the G7?
Watch Vassy Kapelos says steel and aluminum tariffs are what is presently holding up a possible economic and security agreement between Canada and the U.S.
