logo
Why are Europe's electricity bills so high? Austria has the answer

Why are Europe's electricity bills so high? Austria has the answer

Euractiv14 hours ago
With Austrian energy companies refusing to compete with one another, consumers at the mercy of their local hegemons are left paying higher bills than they should – a problem mirrored across Europe.
When energy prices in Russian-gas-addicted Austria surged – and Vienna's main utility company almost went bust – the government ordered the competition authority and energy regulator to examine the sector.
Two years on, their final report paints a damning picture of an energy market frozen in time.
'After 24 years of liberalisation, there is still no functioning national competitive market,' said Natalie Harsdorf, head of Austria's competition authority, the BWB.
Instead of utilities competing nationwide for the business of Austria's millions of households, firms have carved out regional fiefdoms – or as Harsdorf put it, 'we have regional companies that dominate the markets'.
Austria has one of Europe lowest contract-switching rates – a key indicator used to gauge market competitiveness – at just 4.5%. A typical new supply contract is currently around 10% more expensive than in neighbouring Germany.
The investigation revealed a retail electricity market riddled with 'countless cross-shareholdings between companies'. What that means is that each regional utility owns stakes in others.
'The question arises: do these companies even want to participate in Austria-wide competition?' said Wolfgang Urbantschitsch, head of the country's energy regulator, E-Control.
Vienna's main utility firm owns 28% of Lower Austria's EVN, which in turns holds an indirect 36% stake in Burgenland's primary energy provider. Most utilities also own shares in Austria's main power producer, Verbund.
So why compete? 'It seems that they do not need to,' Urbantschitsch concluded.
The situation has grown so dire that Austria is pioneering a new set of antitrust laws aimed at curbing the dominance of major energy suppliers. Introduced in 2024, the legislation compels firms to match consumer-friendly terms offered elsewhere – or explain why they don't.
'The BWB is now focusing on individual investigations,' Harsdorf said. Europe in trouble Austria is far from alone. Two major indicators suggest the entire EU is struggling to foster real competition for retail electricity consumers.
Just 7.15% of European household consumers switched suppliers in 2023, according to market data from the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER) and EU watchdog ACER.
And for all of Austria's flaws, eight countries – including Romania, Slovakia, Poland and Luxembourg – fare even worse.
The problem: dominant utilities tend to hold onto consumers. Once switching rates drop below 10%, regulators say 73% of households are locked into a dominant supplier.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a common measure of market concentration, tells a similar story. In 2023, just five EU countries were in the 'green' – indicating a competitive, unproblematic market.
Nine others – among them Belgium, Poland, Italy and Spain – were in the 'orange' zone, showing signs of worrying concentration.
A further nine countries were flagged 'red', where one or very few utilities dominate the retail market – leaving consumers vulnerable without firm regulatory intervention.
Too often, that oversight is lacking – and Germany offers a cautionary tale. In 2023, local grid operators saw a staggering 20.2% return on investment, an investigation by think tank BNE found.
'If network operators can achieve such returns, then something is fundamentally wrong with the regulatory framework,' said its CEO, Robert Busch.
While firms with state-backed monopolies should normally be afforded returns upwards of 5%, in some extreme cases – like EWE – profits surged to 50% on capital, BNE said.
(rh, aw)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Green groups uneasy as EU bets on market to drive nature restoration
Green groups uneasy as EU bets on market to drive nature restoration

Euractiv

time2 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Green groups uneasy as EU bets on market to drive nature restoration

The European Commission believes a market for nature credits will unlock private financing to fund ecosystem restoration and biodiversity protection, but critics are sounding the alarm over what they fear may become another greenwashing tool. Months after Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen floated the idea of a cash-for-nature scheme, the EU executive has developed the idea further with the publication of a nature credits roadmap. 'This not about turning nature into a commodity, but about recognising and rewarding actions that restore and sustain nature," environment commissioner Jessika Roswall told reporters on Monday. "Nature credits are emerging as a promising tool to change how we value nature,' she said. The Commission envisages a scheme to reward farmers and landowners for environmental actions and sustainable management that goes beyond legal obligations, thus reconciling the economics of farming and forestry with nature preservation. According to the roadmap, a nature credit is 'a unit that represents a nature-positive outcome, derived from a certified and independently verified action'. The fungible units would be generated in two steps. A given action, such as the restoration of drained wetland, must first pass a 'high-quality' standards test and be certified. The project must then be monitored, with the issuance of nature credits linked to demonstrable results. '[W]e face a €37 billion annual gap in biodiversity financing across the EU. To close it, we must unlock private finance to complement public support,' Roswall said. At a time when there is growing awareness that biodiversity loss leads to financial and economic risks – with 75% of European businesses dependent in some way on ecosystem services – the new market-based tool is presented as complementary to public funding. With the finance gap estimated globally at $200 billion a year until the end of the decade, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity calls for increased and diversified flows of money into nature restoration. Greenwashing risks To lay the groundwork for a future EU nature credits market, the Commission plans to launch an expert group tasked with developing initial criteria and methodologies over the coming year. In parallel, an EU-wide pilot project is slated to run from 2025 to 2027, after the Commission tested the concept in two national pilot projects in Estonia and France. 'To avoid greenwashing is key,' Roswall said, adding that it was 'crucial that we can trust nature'. But warnings have already emerged about a lack of demand for nature credits, even before the scheme gets off the ground. The Commission's efforts to avoid accusations of greenwashing – which have previously dogged the market for carbon credits used to outsource climate action – have not staved off criticism that it is promoting a false, possible even destructive, solution. 'It is absurd that discussions around nature finance are relying on a pilot that increases environmental destruction,' said Siim Kuresoo, a campaigner with the forest protection group Fern. Specifically, the NGO claims that one of the nature credits pilot projects, in Estonia, has led to 27 hectares of forest being clear-cut, some of it in ecologically sensitive areas. Roswall declined to answer when asked by Euractiv whether she was aware of or acknowledged this criticism. 'Nature credits are a cover for inaction, a greenwashing shortcut that allows corporations to keep destroying nature as long as they pay for it," said Clara Bourgin, a nature campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe. "This is not the time for market schemes that benefit only a few while putting nature at risk," Bourgin said. (rh, aw)

Spain's Cuerpo, Lithuania's Šadžius pull out of Eurogroup race
Spain's Cuerpo, Lithuania's Šadžius pull out of Eurogroup race

Euractiv

time2 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Spain's Cuerpo, Lithuania's Šadžius pull out of Eurogroup race

Spanish economy minister Carlos Cuerpo and Lithuania's finance minister Rimantas Šadžius have pulled out of the race to become the next Eurogroup chair, paving the way for Irish incumbent Paschal Donohoe to be re-elected head of the powerful group of eurozone finance ministers later today. 'After intense days gathering numerous supports among finance ministers of the Eurogroup, and after recent contacts in the last hours, it has been found that the support for Minister Cuerpo does not reach the necessary majority to guarantee the success of the candidacy,' the Spanish economy ministry said in a statement released on Monday. 'In the current context of great challenges for the Eurozone, it is necessary to promote unity and avoid fragmentation within the Eurogroup, a key body for economic decision-making in the union. Therefore, in an exercise of responsibility, the minister has decided to step aside to favour a choice based on consensus,' it added. Shortly after Cuerpo's withdrawal, Lithuania's Rimantas Šadžius – who was the only other candidate in the race to beat Donohoe – announced that he was also withdrawing from the race as he didn't have "sufficient support" from other member states. Cuerpo and Šadžius are both socialists, while Donohoe – a veteran politician who has led the body since 2020 – hails from the same centre-right European People's Party political family as European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen. In his motivation letter announcing his candidacy last month, Cuerpo suggested that the Eurogroup currently focuses too much on 'discussion' rather than 'delivery'. The statement was widely interpreted as a swipe at Donohoe's practice of seeking consensus among member states before advancing major policy files, such as capital markets integration. Cuerpo has called for Spain and other willing member states to deepen their capital markets, even without the backing of all 20 euro area countries. Donohoe's re-election was widely anticipated by EU diplomats even before Cuerpo's and Šadžius' withdrawal. Many member states are deeply suspicious of the Spaniard's support for controversial proposals, including doubling the EU's regular long-term budget and issuing more common EU debt to finance defence investment. Spanish premier Pedro Sánchez's staunch refusal to boost military expenditure to 5% of annual GDP, as agreed during last month's NATO annual summit, also didn't help Cuerpo's cause, diplomats said. Cuerpo later told reporters that Madrid "will continue to contribute constructively from now on to support the new presidency". Šadžius was not believed to represent a serious rival to Donohoe and had not earned the support of any other country in the single currency area, according to diplomats. Created in 1997, the Eurogroup gained prominence – and even notoriety – during the eurozone crisis in the 2010s, when it took crucial decisions to preserve the integrity of the euro area, including member state bailouts and banking reforms. Donohoe is only the fourth person to lead the Eurogroup since its inception. Luxembourg's Jean-Claude Juncker was chairman from 2005 to 2013, followed by the Netherlands' Jeroen Dijsselbloem until 2018, and Portugal's Mário Centeno until 2020. The group typically meets once a month, usually in Brussels, to coordinate economic policies across the single currency area. Its president is elected for a two-and-a-half year term, which can be renewed indefinitely. Inés Fernández-Pontes contributed reporting. (vib) CORRECTION: Updated to state that Cuerpo is Spain's economy minister. UPDATE: This article has been updated to include further context.

Belgium takes bronze in global work-life balance survey
Belgium takes bronze in global work-life balance survey

Euractiv

time2 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Belgium takes bronze in global work-life balance survey

Belgium again scored high, placing third in an annual global index comparing 60 countries with the highest GDPs worldwide. Seven out of this year's Top 10 are in Europe. The index – conducted by HR platform Remote – weighs factors such as minimum sick days, paid maternity leave, minimum and average wage, and overall happiness and is based on fresh data from April this year. Remote started compiling an annual work-life index since 2023. Globally, work-life balance now ranks alongside job security as the most important factor for workers considering current jobs and future employment, surpassing pay, according to a survey from Dutch HR consulting firm Ranstad. 'Cementing its place in the top three (...) life-work balance is becoming just as much a hallmark of Belgian culture as chocolate, waffles and beer – and not just because it has one of the highest minimum wages in Europe (topped only by the United Kingdom and Germany),' Remote said. Based on a 38-hour work week, the current minimum wage in Belgium stands at €12.82, one of the highest in the European Union. Since 2023, private sector employers in Belgium with 20 or more workers must implement the right to disconnect – the ability of workers to disconnect from work related communications and activities outside their normal working hours. While New Zealand took Remote's top spot this year, seven European countries made it to the Top 10. Ireland led Belgium in second, and Germany, Norway and Denmark took fourth, fifth, and sixth place respectively. Spain and Finland tailed in ninth and tenth. The US rank 59 out of 60, Nigeria took the bottom spot. (vib)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store