
Democrats prevail in Wisconsin while GOP holds the line in Florida: 3 takeaways
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Here's who Booker surpassed for longest Senate speech
Sen. Cory Booker gave the longest Senate speech in recorded U.S. history, breaking Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1957 record set while opposing civil rights.
Democrats were able to let out a sigh of relief this week after the liberal contender prevailed over President Donald Trump's preferred candidate in Tuesday's closely watched Wisconsin Supreme Court election.
Despite being a nonpartisan race, the Badger State contest served as a national proxy battle for Democratic officials and progressive groups, who are grasping at any glimmer of hope amid Trump 2.0's dominance in Washington that has expanded to other parts of the country and culture.
Further south, Republicans did keep hold of two Florida congressional seats that will send House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., some much needed reinforcements for his razor-thin majority.
But even in those races Democrats held their chin up and declared they had done better than expected in Trump's political backyard.
GOP leaders largely dismissed the results and point out that Democrats remain in the gutter in terms of popularity, but political observers note all together this marks the first true electoral test of Trump since returning to power, and could be the first cracks in his political armor as he sharpens his legislative agenda for the summer.
Here are the important takeaways from Tuesday's contests.
Crawford outpaced Harris' 2024 margins in Wisconsin
Wisconsin is known for nail-biter elections but voters didn't take long to deliver the message when Judge Susan Crawford, who was backed by the state Democratic Party was declared the winner over Judge Brad Schimel, who was endorsed by Trump, far earlier than expected on Tuesday evening.
The victory will give liberals a 4-3 edge on the state's high court for at least the next three years, which will be critical on issues such as abortion, union rights and elections including the 2028 presidential contest.
Both candidates embraced their partisan supporters, but what stands out is how much better Crawford did when compared to former Vice President Kamala Harris in key Wisconsin counties.
The 60-year-old judge, for example, outpaced Schimel by 6 percentage points in Kenosha County, which is part of the Chicago metro area, whereas Harris lost by the same amount four months earlier.
Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said the national party is doing what it can to rebuild infrastructure, and that starts with winning local elections.
"The only thing we can do at this moment as Democrats is, because we don't have power in Washington right, is to win elections," Martin told USA TODAY.
'Beat the billionaire': Musk's role blasted as liability question boils
Immediately after Crawford was projected to have won, Democrats and their allies cast the win as a rebuke of the world's richest person, billionaire Elon Musk, who inserted himself directly in a race that saw more than $100 million in total spending.
Leading up to the election, Trump's top man at DOGE was making it rain money on the state. Musk doled out about $20 million of his own money to boost Schimel. He even handed out two checks for $1 million each to voters and sported a Green Bay Packers "cheesehead" at a rally ahead of Tuesday's contest.
"Wisconsin beat the billionaire," Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the former Democrat vice presidential nominee, said in a post on X.
The Crawford campaign − which received financial backing from liberal-leaning billionaires such as George Soros and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker − didn't shy away from anchoring Schimel to Musk, who is far less popular than the president and has become the Democrats favorite target.
About 51% of Americans have a negative view of the tech innovator versus roughly 39% who think of him positively, according to a national NBC News survey.
Wisconsin voters may have accelerated a brewing conservation within the Trump administration and the GOP at-large of whether Musk and his continue presence in the White House is becoming a problem they cannot ignore much longer.
Republicans hold Florida seats as House majority begins to show cracks
It wasn't all doom and gloom for the GOP, which easily replaced former Reps. Mike Waltz and Matt Gaetz with fellow Republicans in the Sunshine State's two special elections.
The expected wins give Trump — at least for the moment — a bit more breathing room for his legislative agenda which is always tricky in the House given Republicans currently hold a 218-213 edge over Democrats. That majority fell apart this week, for instance, when nine GOP members bucked their leadership to join Democrats to stop a rule change that would have prohibited new parents from voting by proxy.
Democrats didn't let the GOP wins on Tuesday go without adding their two cents, arguing the margins in both races show their candidates did far better than they should have in two districts that are solidly conservative.
In Florida's 6th Congressional District, Waltz won by 33% last fall but preliminary results show Republican Randy Fine winning by about 14%. Similarly, in the 1st Congressional District, Gaetz coasted to a win by 32% last time around but Republican Jimmy Patronis won by roughly 14% as well, according to Florida election data.
Democrats were eager to point they cut those margins in half but GOP stalwarts weren't impressed and dismissed the notion that either result gives their opposition bragging rights.
"Remember, they're special elections," Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., told USA TODAY. "You know when there's a presidential race, everybody knows who to vote, right? Even a governor's race, but when there's a special election, it's hard to get people to go out and vote."
Contributing: Sudiksha Kochi
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
23 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge issues injunction preventing FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters
A federal judge has issued an injunction preventing the Trump administration's Federal Trade Commission from investigating Media Matters for America, the liberal media watchdog group that had alleged the spread of hate speech on X since Elon Musk acquired the social media platform. U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled Friday that the FTC's probe of Media Matters, 'purportedly to investigate an advertiser boycott concerning social media platforms,' represents a clear violation of the group's freedom of speech. 'It should alarm all Americans when the government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,' Sooknanan wrote. Even before the FTC got involved, Media Matters has been defending itself against a lawsuit by Musk following the organization's November 2023 story that, following Musk's purchase of the social media site once known as Twitter, antisemitic posts and other offensive content were appearing next to advertisements there. Sooknanan said the injunction halting any FTC probe was merited because Media Matters is likely to succeed on its claim that the FTC is being used to retaliate against it for a critical article on a Trump supporter. 'The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration,' said Angelo Carusone, chairman and president of Media Matters. There was no immediate comment from an FTC spokesman.


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Illinois gov. signs bill opening financial aid to all residents — including illegal immigrants
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a major Democratic leader and rumored presidential candidate, signed a bill into law opening student financial aid to all residents, regardless of immigration status, opening a pathway for illegal immigrants residing in the state to receive educational financial benefits. The move was slammed by conservative Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., as rewarding illegal immigrants and a 'slap in the face' to Illinois families and students. The bill purports to establish 'equitable eligibility for financial aid and benefits' for all students in the state. The bill reads that 'a student who is an Illinois resident and who is not otherwise eligible for federal financial aid, including, but not limited to, a transgender student who is disqualified for failure to register for selective service or a noncitizen student who has not obtained lawful permanent residence, shall be eligible for financial aid and benefits.' One of the bill's sponsors, state Sen. Celina Villanueva, a Democrat, celebrated Pritzker signing the bill by saying in a statement that 'this law is about making sure no student is left behind because of where they were born.' 4 Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a bill into law opening student financial aid to all residents, opening a pathway for illegal immigrants residing in the state to receive educational financial benefits. REUTERS A statement by Villanueva's office said that the measure 'eliminates the patchwork of confusing and sometimes conflicting requirements that have excluded undocumented, DACAmented, and mixed-status students from critical aid.' The law pertains to any student residing in Illinois, making him or her eligible for financial aid programs funded or administered by the state, local governments, or public universities, according to the statement. The statement said that the law 'builds upon Villanueva's long-standing advocacy for immigrant and first-generation students by creating a more consistent and inclusive pathway to accessing support.' 4 The move was slammed by conservative Rep. Mary Miller (above), R-Ill., as rewarding illegal immigrants and a 'slap in the face' to Illinois families and students, according to reports. AP 'If you live in Illinois and are pursuing higher education, you should have access to the same opportunities as your peers,' said Villanueva. 'Illinois invests in all of our students, and we're committed to helping them succeed.' Commenting on the legislation, Miller told Fox News Digital that 'allowing taxpayer-funded financial aid for illegal aliens is a slap in the face to hardworking Illinois families and students.' 'Our state is drowning in debt, yet JB Pritzker is determined to drain even more taxpayer dollars to reward illegals,' she said. 'It's absolutely shameful.' 4 The bill purports to establish 'equitable eligibility for financial aid and benefits' for all students in the state, reports say. Allison Bailey/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 4 One of the bill's sponsors, state Sen. Celina Villanueva (right), a Democrat, celebrated Pritzker signing the bill by saying in a statement that 'this law is about making sure no student is left behind because of where they were born.' AP A spokesperson for the Illinois GOP also chimed in, telling Fox News Digital that 'once again, Governor Pritzker proves that he is prioritizing illegal immigrants at the expense of Illinois families.' 'Illinois taxpayers should not have their hard-earned taxpayer dollars pay for benefits to illegal immigrants who shouldn't be here in the first place,' added the spokesperson. Pritzker's office declined Fox News Digital's request for comment. Villanueva's office had not replied to Fox News Digital's request for comment by the time of publication.


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bessent: Trump's Putin meeting like showing off ‘gun case' to ‘uncontrollable neighbor'
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday commended President Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week. 'Alaska was a show of force by President Trump. He invited President Putin to land that the Russians used to own. He displayed a huge amount of military hardware and then did a flyover,' Bessent said during a Tuesday morning appearance on CNBC's ' Squawk Box.' 'It was kind of like inviting your uncontrollable neighbor to your house and showing him your gun case,' he added. The Treasury Secretary said the immediate follow-up meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday signaled strong strides toward peace between Russia and Ukraine. 'We had a very good meeting with him in and his team in the Oval for about an hour and a half, and then we met with the European leaders who were an incredible group to have in the White House, all led by President Trump,' Bessent said. 'And yes, the culmination of that was a call with President Putin and my strong belief is that there will be a bilateral meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky,' he continued. 'And that's the only way to end this conflict, is to get the two sides talking.' The Kremlin's strikes on Ukraine have continued amid peace negotiations as Russian leaders have urged NATO not to deploy forces in Eastern Europe. On Monday, Russia's foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said troop from NATO member nations 'could lead to an uncontrollable escalation of the conflict with unpredictable consequences.' Some world leaders have maintained that the Trump-Putin summit benefitted Moscow more than the U.S. Former British ambassador to Russia Laurie Bristow said the bilateral meeting 'produced nothing for Mr. Trump and gave Mr. Putin most of what he was looking for,' according to The Associated Press while Zelensky pegged the meeting as a photo-op. Still, Bessent said economic pressures on Moscow will force the over three-years long war to end. 'I think the sense is that both sides are ready for this terrible conflict to end, and one of the ways to make President Putin want it to end is on the economic side,' he told CNBC on Tuesday. 'The Russian economy has 20 percent plus inflation. Right now, it is a war economy. I think more than 25 percent of the GDP is coming from the military buildup. So, you know, it's a very imbalanced economy,' he continued.