European second-quarter corporate profits expected to fall 0.7%
European companies are expected to report a drop of 0.7% year-on-year in second-quarter earnings, on average, according to LSEG I/B/E/S data, below the 0.2% decrease analysts had expected a week ago.
This earnings season is the first to expose the impact of U.S. President Trump's tariff-fueled trade war on corporate health. Trump's tariff policies have changed frequently since April, the most common start of the second fiscal quarter. Some were imposed while others were proposed and then delayed.
From last week, consensus for revenue forecasts meanwhile remained the same, with analysts expecting a 3.0% decrease, compared with a 3.0% drop expected before.
Last week, after weeks of negotiations, President Donald Trump threatened to impose a 30% tariff on imports from the European Union starting on August 1, though EU ministers have voiced their confidence in still closing a deal before the deadline.
The latest estimates compare with a 3.0% increase in earnings and a 0.8% drop in revenues a year ago, the data showed.
This would be the worst quarterly performance in more than a year.
Second-quarter results from Novartis (NOVN.S), opens new tab and Volvo Cars (VOLCARb.ST), opens new tab expected later this week, might shed more light on how European companies are faring at the start of this reporting quarter.
The biggest second-quarter earnings winners are expected to be the Irish and Polish companies in the Europe-wide STOXX 600 stock index, with average growth of 88.6% and 67.3%, respectively. Norwegian and Austrian companies, meanwhile, are expected to see earnings fall 19.4% and 8.2%, respectively.
As of Tuesday's close, the STOXX 600 was up about 7.4% year to date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
Chinese steel companies find new tariff workaround: steel billet
July 17 (Reuters) - Chinese steelmakers are bypassing tariffs in countries such as Indonesia and Turkey by exporting semi-finished products, a tactic that undermines barriers against a flood of cheap Chinese metal and is raising concern in Beijing over the surge in lower-value exports, industry sources said. Record steel exports from the world's largest producer have sparked a protectionist backlash globally with 38 anti-dumping investigations from various countries since January last year. Top trade partners Vietnam and South Korea have imposed tariffs, arguing domestic manufacturers are hurt by cheap Chinese steel. In response, Chinese exporters are turning to steel billet, semi-finished blocks of steel, that typically faces fewer tariffs. Exports between January and May were three times greater than the year before at a record 4.72 million metric tons, or nearly 10% of all steel exports over the same period, customs data showed. Chinese exporters need to find any opportunity they can to sell products that are hemmed in on all sides by tariffs and weak demand at home, said Tomas Gutierrez, head of data at consultancy Kallanish Commodities, who added the trend started last autumn. "Whenever billet exports are profitable, they will be exported," Gutierrez said. The top five export destinations for steel billet are Indonesia, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Italy and Turkey, according to customs data. Indonesia, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have tariffs on some finished steel products, but none on steel billets. Other top export destinations for finished steel, including South Korea or Vietnam, similarly don't have tariffs on billet, which is processed into finished products then used in construction and manufacturing. That relative lack of trade barriers for steel billet versus finished steel has helped fuel the rapid growth in exports, analysts at Mysteel said in a note last week. Part of that demand comes from trans-shipment, they added, with countries in Southeast Asia importing Chinese billet, processing it and then re-exporting it to Europe and the U.S. President Donald Trump's 50% tariffs on steel imports have disrupted parts of the trans-shipment trade by making it far less lucrative for countries to ship to the United States. Underpinning the push for exports, whether billet or finished steel, is a weak Chinese economy and a battered property sector unable to absorb the huge amount of steel produced by a sector that has been toying with output cuts for months. The surge in billet exports has sparked warnings from China's state-backed industry body, which wants steelmakers instead to focus on higher-value added products. The China Iron and Steel Association (CISA) advised the government to limit billet exports so the industry would stay focused on exporting higher value steel products, according to a statement reported in local media last month. Beijing is considering imposing an export tax on steel billet, a source with knowledge of the matter told Reuters on condition of anonymity as the discussions are private. Details about whether and how much tax may be imposed have not been finalised, the source added. China's Ministry of Commerce and the CISA did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Added value for steel billet is 400 yuan ($56) to 500 yuan lower than for finished steel products, according to consultancies Mysteel and Fubao. ($1 = 7.1729 Chinese yuan)
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Competition watchdog is on the prowl so business must be alert
A recent investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority into Amazon in some ways typifies the regulator's old way of doing things. Yes, the investigation centred around potentially fake or misleading reviews, which is very much an area of focus for the authority today, but this investigation started well before the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 came into effect. The case appears to have dragged on for almost half a decade and, after some back-and-forth between Amazon and the regulator, it has ended with Amazon providing undertakings to promise to take enhanced measures to tackle fake reviews on its platform. Provided it does so, Amazon will not face any financial penalties. Importantly, there is no finding of any breach. Amazon has promised to enhance its efforts to tackle fake reviews DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP Following the legislation coming into force in April this year, the authority's investigations will take on a different complexion. The organisation now has strong powers to investigate businesses and compel co-operation under threat of large daily fines, to conduct the investigation in a swift manner and to decide for itself — without needing to persuade the courts — whether the business under investigation has breached consumer law. If it concludes there has been a breach, the authority can impose a range of sanctions, including a financial penalty of up to 10 per cent of a business's annual global turnover. These are not theoretical powers — as the authority has made clear, it intends to use them, so large fines may become the norm. Unlike the Amazon case, which rumbled on for several years, the watchdog is now committed to conducting and concluding investigations quickly. Businesses under investigation will have significantly less time to gather information and prepare their responses, and the authority is much less likely to engage in protracted negotiations over undertakings. If undertakings are involved — most likely in addition to, rather than instead of, financial penalties — the CMA will want them to be crisp. And it will punish breaches of those undertakings with further financial penalties. This means retailers doing business in the UK — including those headquartered outside the country — will need to ensure they are complying with all the latest rules and guidance. It is advisable to focus on the authority's high priority areas, including fake and misleading reviews, which means that businesses can no longer take a hands-off approach to hosting them. Other areas include pricing and discount claims, and hidden fees. The CMA will also be looking at a range of other unfair commercial behaviour, including aggressive practices and misleading actions or omissions, across a range of businesses. Meanwhile, consumer organisations will be doing even more to draw to the authority's attention claims and activities by businesses that breach the law. Geraint Lloyd-Taylor is a partner at the law firm Lewis Silkin
Top Gear
33 minutes ago
- Top Gear
Buy Mercedes-Benz CLA Price, PPC or HP
AMG Line Premium is another £2,395 up from the AMG Line at £51,770, but comes with pretty much everything. And they all get the MB-OS and AI helper, plus the same 11kW on-board AC charging ability, 320kW DC rapid charging that 85kWh battery (until the smaller one arrives). In the UK, we get the 250+ from £45,615 for the base Sport, with the AMG Line (different wheels, bodystyling etc) running in at £49,375. So £3,760 more than the Sport. It's worth noting that the Sport is actually priced fairly aggressively in the market for the range/ability; Merc's smallest EV actually making the best case for itself. Colours are pretty standard, two blacks (metallic and non), a grey and white, though the CLA actually looks best in the two brightest; the light sapphire blue and Patagonia red. Later on we'll get the 350+ 4Matic as well as the estate and hybrid versions, and you can option a variety of interior colours and wheels separately – although all wheels are aerodynamically optimised for their design and size. Other stuff worth mentioning? Well, you get a Merc smartphone app, and CLAs come with which aggregates all relevant chargers for most efficient route-mapping, working with the on-board AI to do stuff like precondition the battery for fastest-possible charging. You can even tell it what percentage of the battery you wish to arrive at your destination with, which is handier than you think.
