How Generative AI Is Shaping Public Discourse During Geopolitical Tensions
"Specifically, adversaries are deploying Natural Language Generation (NLG) models to produce synthetic news articles, social media posts, and deepfake multimedia content that appear highly credible and are designed to sow discord or confusion among the population," Ankush Sabharwal, Founder and CEO, CoRover
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
The scale and sophistication of AI-generated misinformation in India is rising sharply. In 2025 alone, the country is projected to lose INR 70,000 crore to deepfake-related frauds, according to Pi-Labs' "Digital Deception Epidemic" report. Since 2019, deepfake-linked cybercrime cases have surged by over 550 per cent. As geopolitical tensions escalate, generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly being misused to manipulate narratives, and stir panic in public.
With social media platforms transcending borders and verification frameworks, the spread of fake content often indistinguishable from reality has become alarmingly easy. Now the question is how prepared is India to defend itself from these emerging threats?
A new age of information warfare
Experts warn that both state and non-state actors are leveraging GenAI to launch influence campaigns during moments of national vulnerability.
"Hostile actors are leveraging AI-driven technologies, particularly generative models and deep learning algorithms, to manipulate public narratives in India. These actors utilise AI for large-scale content generation, sentiment manipulation, and disinformation amplification across digital platforms," shared Ankush Sabharwal, Founder and CEO, CoRover.
"Specifically, adversaries are deploying Natural Language Generation (NLG) models to produce synthetic news articles, social media posts, and deepfake multimedia content that appear highly credible and are designed to sow discord or confusion among the population."
Sabharwal added that these campaigns often exploit regional languages, cultural sensitivities, and fault lines through micro-targeting, especially during elections or military flare-ups.
A race against time
While the volume of synthetic content is accelerating, India's cyber defence systems are attempting to keep pace.
"India has made commendable progress through initiatives like the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), which employs AI/ML-based threat intelligence systems to monitor anomalies and respond to cyber incidents proactively," Sabharwal noted.
Yet vulnerabilities remain, particularly in coordination and speed. "Although India has made great progress in strengthening its cyber defences and media integrity, the speed at which AI-driven misinformation is spreading necessitates more flexible and comprehensive countermeasures," explained Ankit Sharma, Senior Director and Head, Solutions Engineering, Cyble.
Further Sharma added, "India's digital borders need dynamic, real-time monitoring with quick takedown mechanisms, just like its physical borders, which are protected by layered surveillance."
High risk in tier 2 and tier 3 regions
Sharma also believes that misinformation and deep fakes pose greater danger in Tier-2 and Tier-3 regions where digital literacy remains low, but smartphone and social media usage is high. "The risk is extremely high," said Sharma. "When AI-created disinformation, particularly voice recordings or videos in local languages is distributed into these communities, the information is ingested without fact-checking…One effectively written AI-fabricated instance of misinformation can trigger real-world effects ranging from social tension to election manipulation or cyberattacks on critical infrastructure," he noted.
The legal void
There is growing consensus that India urgently needs a dedicated legal framework to combat AI-powered fake news especially in times of national crisis.
"India needs, at an urgent level, a legal framework to deal with the weaponisation of AI in the information space, particularly in the event of war or national emergencies," Sharma emphasised. Further he said that the current IT laws are at times inadequate in dealing with the sophistication of synthetic media, transnational attribution, or algorithmic amplification.
While concluding Sabharwal said, "A framework should mandate AI watermarking, source traceability, and accountability for hosting platforms while ensuring innovation isn't stifled."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
2 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Week in Review: Why Anthropic cut access to Windsurf
Welcome back to Week in Review! Got lots for you today, including why Windsurf lost access to Claude, ChatGPT's new features, WWDC 2025, Elon Musk's fight with Donald Trump, and lots more. Have a great weekend! Duh: During an interview at TC Sessions: AI 2025, Anthropic's co-founder had a perfectly reasonable explanation for why the company cut access to Windsurf: 'I think it would be odd for us to be selling Claude to OpenAI,' Chief Science Officer Jared Kaplan said, referring to rumors and reports that OpenAI, its largest competitor, is acquiring the AI coding assistant. Seems like a good reason to me! Everything is the same: Chinese lab DeepSeek released an updated version of its R1 reasoning AI model last week that performs well on a number of math and coding benchmarks. Now some AI researchers are speculating that at least some of the source data it trained on came from Google's Gemini family of AI. WWDC 2025: Apple's annual developers conference starts Monday. Beyond a newly designed operating system, here's what we're expecting to see at this year's event, including a dedicated gaming app and updates to Mac, Watch, TV, and more. This is TechCrunch's Week in Review, where we recap the week's biggest news. Want this delivered as a newsletter to your inbox every Saturday? Sign up here. News Image Credits:Thomas Fuller / SOPA Images / LightRocket / Getty Images Business in the front: ChatGPT is getting new features for business users, including connectors for Dropbox, Box, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Google Drive. This would let ChatGPT look for information across your own services to answer questions. Oh no: Indian grocery delivery startup KiranaPro was hacked, and all of its data was wiped. According to the company, it has 55,000 customers, with 30,000 to 35,000 active buyers across 50 cities, who collectively place 2,000 orders daily. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW Artsy people, rejoice! Photoshop is now coming to Android, so users of Google's operating system can gussy up their images, too. The app has a similar set of editing tools as the desktop version, including layering and masking. Let's try that again: Tesla filed new trademark applications for 'Tesla Robotaxi' after previous attempts to trademark the terms 'Robotaxi' and 'Cybercab' failed. Rolling in dough: Tech startup Anduril just picked up a $1 billion investment as part of a new $2.5 billion raise led by Founders Fund, which means Anduril has doubled its valuation to $30.5 billion. On the road again: When Toma's founders realized car dealerships were drowning in missed calls, they hit the road to see the problem firsthand. That summer road trip turned into a $17 million a16z-backed fundraise that helped Toma get its AI phone agents into more than 100 dealerships across the U.S. Fighting season: All gloves were off on Thursday as Elon Musk and President Trump took to their respective social networks to throw jabs at each other. Though it might be exciting to watch rich men squabble in public, the fallout between the world's richest person and a sitting U.S. president promises to have broader implications for the tech industry. Analysis Image Credits:BlackJack3D / Getty Images Money talks: Whether you use AI as a friend, a therapist, or even a girlfriend, chatbots are trained to keep you talking. For Big Tech companies, it's never been more competitive to attract users to their chatbot platforms — and keep them there.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Viatris (VTRS) Faces Securities Fraud Class Action Over FDA Inspection Fallout
On May 31, 2025, Viatris Inc. (NASDAQ:VTRS) became the subject of a securities fraud class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The suit alleges that between August 8, 2024, and February 26, 2025, the company and certain executives made materially false or misleading statements regarding the operational status of its Indore, India manufacturing facility. Ralf Kleemann/ The complaint centers on Viatris' public assurances that its facilities were in "good operating condition" and committed to "the highest quality manufacturing standards." However, following a failed inspection, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a Warning Letter and Import Alert in December 2024 that affected 11 products, including the cancer drug Lenalidomide. On February 27, 2025, Viatris (NASDAQ:VTRS) disclosed that the inspection issues would negatively impact 2025 revenue by roughly $500 million and earnings from operations by about $385 million. This revelation led to a 15% drop in Viatris' stock price, from $11.24 to $9.53 per share. Investors who purchased Viatris securities during the specified period have until June 3, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. While we acknowledge the potential of VTRS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Android Authority
3 hours ago
- Android Authority
These two apps finally fixed my creative workflow
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority For years, Notion has been my go-to for organizing everything from invoices to movie watchlists. Its flexibility as a database is unmatched, but when it came to creative workflows like jotting down spontaneous ideas, threading together thoughts, and collecting visual inspiration, that's where Notion starts to feel a bit rigid. I needed something that didn't ask me to file every passing idea into a system the moment it showed up. That's just not how a creative flow works. At least not for me. I needed a tool that didn't ask every idea to fit into a system the moment it showed up. I know, I know. Obsidian is the usual answer here with its unending customisation and the famed graph view. But I wanted something cloud-first. So I began looking for a tool that could complement, if not replace, what Notion already does so well. That's how I found myself bouncing between Notion and Capacities for the better part of a year. Like most people trying to organize their digital life, I started with one, flirted with the other, then went back and forth until I realized something simple: these two tools aren't competing. They're completing each other. Here's why building a system that uses both apps works so well for me. Capacities is where I think, Notion is where I act Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority The trick, as always, wasn't picking a side at the get-go. It was figuring out what each tool is actually good at — and then staying out of their way. That realization changed how I approached both tools. For example, I stopped using Notion as a space for unstructured notes. Not because it can't do that, but because it never felt natural. You can create endless pages and subpages, sure. You can embed anything you want. But that multi-page hierarchy quickly spirals out of control. I was using Notion to catalog interesting places in cities I want to visit, and over time, that structure became a maze — multiple layers deep, hard to navigate, and harder to maintain. Notion thrives when there's structure and purpose. It's where I build systems that are borderline automatic in execution. Capacities works best when there's none. It's where I think. The moment I stopped trying to force one app to do it all, things clicked, and I could move between them without friction, letting each tool handle what it's built for instead of bending it into something it's not. Capacities doesn't ask you to polish your thoughts before capturing them. It's not just a user interface issue. It's a mindset issue. Notion forces you establish tables, databases and more the moment you decide to enter in some data. This makes me feel like every idea needs a home before it even exists. That pressure to organize too early kills my creative flow and inhibits how much I use Notion. I might have the ideas, but the environment doesn't feel right. You wouldn't want to work in Google Sheets for capturing ideas. Notion's rigidity has the same effect. Capacities flips that dynamic. You don't start with a table or a template — you start with an object. Notes, images, bookmarks, and files are all loosely organized by type and stitched together with backlinks. It's closer to how Obsidian works and feels more like a living network than a rigid notebook. That one shift changes everything. I don't worry about where a thought belongs. I just capture it, drop in a few tags, and move on. I'll clean it up later. Or not. A place to gather ideas without having to polish them first Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority When I'm in creative mode doing anything from writing to outlining something vague, my go-to app is Capacities. If I'm collecting screenshots, reference visuals, creating to-do notes or compiling quotes across multiple articles, it all goes there, easily cross-referenced by Capacities' take on a graph view. I can write half a thought, leave it for a week, and come back to find it already connected to three other ideas I forgot I had. That's not just good design. That's momentum. And it is critical in allowing me to jump back into work and be in a creative space almost immediately. Trying to think in Notion can feel like brainstorming in a spreadsheet. At the risk of sounding loquacious, Capacities offers an environment that invites exploration. This includes the way Capacities treats images which can be inline, full-bleed, or tied to objects allowing you to effectively turn it into a gallery, not just a document. That might seem like a small thing, but when you're spending hours sketching outlines or piecing together visual references, it adds up. You're not just writing. You're effectively building an interconnected web of ideas — something I've struggled with in Notion. Apple's wildly different FreeForm tool offers the closest, but not quite the same, experience. On the other hand, Notion doesn't work like that. It's structured. Precise. Sometimes a little too precise. But that's exactly why it works so well for everything else. Notion is still where my life lives Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Capacities may be better for thinking, but Notion still runs the day-to-day. This is where I track invoices, update my reading list, monitor freelance projects, and check off recurring tasks. When I know what I'm tracking — things like client deliverables, brand campaigns, editorial calendars — Notion is unbeatable. I can build databases with views and filters, connect them with automation, and set up reminders that actually help. It's purpose-built for that kind of work. Tools like Notion Forms make it a killer home for long-term data, and on-the-fly additions. Unlike Capacities, Notion offers a kind of safety in knowing that everything has a place. If I log something today, I'll know exactly where to find it three weeks later. It also makes it incredibly easy to add data on the go. When I want to add something quickly like, say, a new restaurant I've spotted on Instagram, I use a Notion Form I set up to log key details straight into my food database. Name, location, cuisine, tags, and that's it. The form is saved as a bookmark on my phone's homepage and lets me accomplish the task in seconds. That's the kind of frictionless utility Notion excels at. I've tried doing that inside Capacities, and while there is a table view, it still feels like an afterthought. It's not really built for structured data entry, nor is it very good at making sense of large volumes of data. They solve different problems — so stop comparing them Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority The biggest mistake is thinking these two tools are solving the same problem. They're not. They both let you write, collect, embed, and organize. But what they do with those abilities is totally different. Capacities is designed for creativity and knowledge exploration. Similar to Obsidian, everything in its interface is nudging you to connect ideas through backlinks, nested objects, graph views. It's less of a productivity tool and more of a creative studio. When I'm not quite sure what I'm working on, but I know I want to chase an idea, Capacities gives me the room to do that. Notion, on the other hand, is more like a traditional work tool. It doesn't ask you to explore. It asks you to decide, define, and commit. And that matters because how we feel when using these tools often dictates whether we use them at all. While it is certainly possible to use either of these tools exclusively, Notion's structured approach to data types makes it feel like a chore. In fact, I've tried to commit to Notion several times, but every single time it felt I was underusing it because my notes were messy or incomplete. But that wasn't a Notion problem. That was a mismatch. Once I gave that role to Capacities instead, Notion stopped feeling like a burden and started being useful again. The takeaway There's no straight-up winner here. Capacities helped me get comfortable with a messy workflow again. It gave me back the ability to think in fragments and collect ideas without committing. It's a tool for planning and for users still getting used to the idea of knowledge management. In fact, I'd say it's the perfect PKM tool for the first-time user. On the other hand, Notion helps me make order out of chaos. It's the tool I trust to hold the pieces together once I know what they are. Be it large databases of pitches, invoices, things to do, restaurants to check out, Notion is great for that kind of workflow. That said, at the end of the day, both tools taught me to stop looking for the perfect app and start building a better workflow instead. For me, it was a combination of Capacities and Notion.
