Subverting democracy a key objective of anti-transformation movement
Leaders of AfriForum and Solidarity during their visit to the White House in the US earlier this year. South Africa's sovereignty somehow stands in the dock of America's kangaroo court that has arbitrarily found Pretoria guilty as charged by the likes of AfriForum, sections of the DA, Institute of Race Relations, Solidarity and others overtly or covertly, says the writer.
Abbey Makoe
NEVER in the history of democratic South Africa has so few caused so much pain to so many and with impunity.
The preposterous saga of a very tiny minority of Afrikaners who this week flew to the US under the utterly false pretence of escaping persecution has pooh-poohed Mandela's dream of a South Africa for all races regardless of history.
My fellow writer, Gillian Schutte, captured it all so well when she posted on X: 'This is not the Great Trek of wagons and rifles. It is the soft trek of displaced entitlement. Just the silent movement of whiteness away from discomfort and toward re-absorption into a global order that still centres it.' Phew!
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been at pains attempting to convince the Trump administration that empirical evidence shows no proof of any iota of the alleged persecution of the Afrikaner community in democratic SA.
The country's Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, has also done his bit, trying strenuously to push back against the false narrative of discrimination against the Afrikaner based on their skin pigmentation, beliefs, religion or any basis for that matter.
Thus far, Pretoria's decorous diplomatic engagements with Washington appear to have fallen on deaf ears.
The most unfortunate consequence of this developing sorry saga is that some, perhaps many, outside of SA, believe this balderdash.
For in plain language, the claptrap behind allegations of persecution is indefensible in any court of law, including the public court of opinion.
The flight of unpatriotic Afrikaners who are reeling from the displeasure of losing the privileges of institutionalised racial discrimination triggered by the advent of democracy and equality before the law has cast misplaced scrutiny on SA's transformative agenda.
A flurry of twists and turns, laced with utter falsehoods and geopolitical bullying of the weak by the powerful, all this is a concocted recipe to discredit a developing democracy that seeks to write the wrongs of the past in pursuit of a brighter future for all citizens.
Amid the ensuing brouhaha, South Africa's sovereignty somehow stands in the dock of America's kangaroo court that has arbitrarily found Pretoria guilty as charged by the likes of AfriForum, sections of the DA, Institute of Race Relations, Solidarity and others overtly or covertly.
Taking advantage of a hugely liberal Constitution that guarantees freedoms such as that of speech, thought and association, the fake refugees take umbrage with the country's developmental agenda without any fear of repercussions.
Had it not been of the liberal nature of the predominantly Western-aligned Constitution, surely to travel abroad and speak ill of SA, conniving with foreign forces against the sitting administration, would constitute high treason.
I also want to argue that this debilitating litany of lies about our country exposes the lingering fault lines in geopolitics and modern-day international relations practices. In my book, it reveals the extent of overbearing ideological power and dominance of the global neo-liberal forces that are premised on the notion of universal racial solidarity.
Let's call it for what it is: The anti-transformation movement against South Africa is a heavily-funded, well-oiled machine that assumes various forms and postures.
It seeks to portray, sadly with great success, the ANC-led governance of the country as anti-White and hell-bent on victimising minority groups, particularly Afrikaner farmers.
The movement is also hugely networked in a world that has become interconnected and inter-dependent thanks to globalization. Inside the Trump administration, it boasts powerful contacts such as SA-born Elon Musk, who also happen to be world's wealthiest person.
For the uninitiated, SA's democracy was founded on the back of hard negotiations between the Mandela-led ANC and the De Klerk-led segregationist white minority regime of the National Party.
The CODESA negotiations produced a negotiated settlement and later a liberal Constitution that guarantees the protection of property rights. This section of the law insulated the minority white population of the country against any threat to the wealth they had amassed over more than 350 years of Black subjugation. For the record, to this day, there is no single member of any minority group, including Afrikaners, ever to be threatened with the loss of any rights under the challengeable laws of the land.
The dirty campaign against South Africa by a tiny minority of South Africans, therefore, serves as a blatant affront to the inclusive foundations of our nascent democracy.
Since the first batch of Afrikaners flew out in a chartered plane from OR Tambo International en route to the land of Coca-Cola and hamburgers that symbolise the mink and manure, there has been a heightened debate about race relations in our country.
The conclusion is, however, not difficult to reach: Despite a myriad of dichotomous standpoints, the centre first built by Madiba and De Klerk still holds firm.
But that said, it would be foolhardy to ignore the reputational damage and significant harm caused to the international standing of SA by the Trump administration's mischievous peddling of falsehoods about our country's complex and difficult transition from the old to the new order.
Just as President Trump believes in the misrepresentation of facts, so too do millions of people, especially the Republican voters who believe the balderdash espoused by some among us, against us.
It is this certainty of the looming damage to SA's good name that pains me more. It hurts deeply, because our citizens have elected to disown us in the most ignominious fashion – hanging our dirty linen in public and inconsiderately seeking to throw us to the wolves.
President Ramaphosa-led government has been accused of enacting the Expropriation of Land without Compensation to the detriment of the Afrikaners who own large swathes of land acquired at the height of apartheid through the displacement of Black people.
Yet the truth is, the Act speaks of a careful need to free relevant portions of land parcels for 'public good' should the need arise.
No single Afrikaner farmer has been targeted. But for those who are hankering for the preservation of apartheid-era white privileges, they'd like the US and the rest of the West to view SA with jaundiced eyes, and accordingly punish the country by imposing sanctions.
The hurt that all patriotic South Africans should feel at this point is owed to the sheer impunity that the Judases who flew out as refugees this week enjoy, thanks to the most powerful nation on Earth. Just the other week, our Constitutional Court also ruled that people such as the fake refugees may never lose their citizenship even if they take up the citizenship of another country.
In my view, and that's the view of many others, SA is being punished through a malicious public relations campaign for not kowtowing to the whims of Washington's foreign policy dictates.
The membership of BRICS is also not helpful for SA. The Trump administration regards BRICS as an aberration.
Additionally, SA's claim of non-alignment of foreign policy is also viewed by Washington and the West as a load of baloney.
Lastly, tackling the untouchable Israel and hauling Tel Aviv before the International Court of Justice on charges of genocide against the Palestinians was the last straw that broke the camel's back.
These are unstated truths at the centre of the deteriorating bilateral relations between Pretoria and Washington. Being the weaker economy, and refusing to be bullied in internal affairs, we can expect that the plot against our nation will continue to thicken.
The first batch of Afrikaner refugees is only a ploy and pawn in the greater scheme of things. By all accounts, more Afrikaners will leave soon on a ticket of blatant lies about being persecuted. Let's connect the dots here. The US is boycotting our presidency of the G20. Mark my words: It will be a miracle if the US does not kick SA out of AGOA in a jiffy. Our sin is one - We are too independent for a 'small' country. But then again, they forget that we are Mandela's and Tutu's rainbow nation, replete with imperfections but morally upright.
*Abbey Makoe is Publisher and Editor-in-Chief: Global South Media Network (gsmn.co.za). The views are personal.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
38 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past
If Operation New Broom is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. In a move that belongs more in the archives of apartheid than in a democratic constitutional state, the department of home affairs has launched 'Operation New Broom', a campaign whose stated aim is to 'combat illegal immigration' through biometric verification and mass raids. Sweeping with a 'broom' is no innocent metaphor, it's drawing a very intentional parallel between illegal migrants and rubbish, a dehumanising tell-tale signal of stripped rights, dignity and humanity. An affront to every value enshrined in our Bill of Rights. If this is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. Barely two days after the campaign was launched on 21 May, more than 50 individuals, including children, pregnant women and asylum seekers, were rounded up during an early morning raid at the Plastic View informal settlement in Tshwane. Minister Leon Schreiber called it 'a new era of digital border enforcement'. What followed was hardly innovation; it was humiliation, institutional cruelty dressed up in the vocabulary of tech-enabled governance. Lawyers for Human Rights and 20 other organisations said the operation 'marks a troubling descent into repressive state practices reminiscent of the apartheid past'. That is no exaggeration. Operation New Broom is not a policy, it is abuse of power, a show of force for the sake of political optics, where the primary victims are those least able to defend themselves. Children were taken from schools and homes without due process. Babies were detained at the Lindela Repatriation Centre, a facility unfit to care for them. ALSO READ: Home Affairs launches Operation New Broom to tackle illegal immigration The constitution is clear: the detention of children must be a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period. These events lay bare a troubling trend: the creeping securitisation of SA's borders and the scapegoating of migrants to mask governance failures. This cannot be claimed to be part of an effort to address unlawful entry, it is a campaign showcase masquerading as immigration enforcement, a political theatre dressed as policy. A familiar playbook keeps unfolding: blame the foreigner, distract the public and dress up persecution as patriotism. Ahead of the 2026 municipal elections, politicians like Gayton McKenzie (Patriotic Alliance) have already begun calling 'Abahambe' (let them go) for the removal of migrants along ethnic and racial lines, embracing his xenophobic labelling. Taking centre stage globally and in SA at the same time was the media frenzy surrounding the 59 Afrikaners granted refugee status by the US on the basis of alleged racial and economic persecution. A sad irony that is difficult to ignore, particularly from within the African continent and SA itself, where the principles of Ubuntu, as enshrined in the constitution, call for compassion, shared humanity and the protection of the vulnerable. The Constitutional Court has repeatedly affirmed Ubuntu as a guiding principle not only in private law, but in matters of state conduct. ALSO READ: Big changes coming for ID, passport applications and birth registrations – Home Affairs It is meant to embody dignity, empathy and social solidarity – all of which are absent from Operation New Broom. Though the department has framed its action as lawful and measured and Cabinet has publicly praised it, nothing about the manner in which these raids were conducted passes constitutional muster. This is not a crisis that ends at the border. Migrants may be the primary targets today, but the machinery of arbitrary enforcement rarely limits itself to one category of individuals. Even SA citizens without access to proper documentation already encounter a contrarian bureaucracy on many levels. In August last year, 700 000 IDs were automatically unilaterally blocked by the department, some merely on the suspicion of fraud or due to duplicate IDs reflecting in the systems, with no prior warning or due diligence. The courts confirmed this to be unconstitutional because it lacked fair procedures, such as notice, investigation and an opportunity for appeal. The dysfunction is systemic and it does not discriminate as neatly as the policies claim to. Without constitutional watchdogs and public scrutiny, no-one is immune. Today's raid is tomorrow's precedent. Some have pointed to the use of biometric verification as a sign of progress and, indeed, it can significantly streamline processes and increase efficiencies on multiple levels. ALSO READ: EFF calls for treason charges against corrupt Home Affairs officials But in the hands of untrained officials and opaque institutions, such tools carry significant risk. Mismanagement is not a technical glitch, it is a gateway. Without safeguards, digital enforcement quickly slides into digital authoritarianism. Deploying facial scans and fingerprint readers without legal safeguards or oversight is not governance, it is surveillance. When the state uses such tools in vulnerable communities already suffering from economic exclusion and neglect, it amounts to profiling at scale. This is not a moment for silence or bureaucratic indifference. It is a moment to remember that democracy is measured not by how we treat the powerful, but by how we treat the most vulnerable. State-led roundups, data-driven profiling and the slow bleed of constitutional values is a recipe for instability. Amnesty is not capitulation; it is legal realism. It is an invitation to build a functioning migration system that does not rely on repression to operate. It is time for a new broom, yes, but one that sweeps away injustice, not people. One that restores rights, not just order. NOW READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Paying more, getting nothing — the Nelson Mandela Bay ward whose capital budget was slashed to zero
'I have been a ward councillor for 25 years and this has never happened to me,' said DA caucus chief whip Gustav Rautenbach. The capital budget for Lorraine and its surrounding suburbs — which makes up Ward 8 — has been slashed from R1.2-million to zero in the draft budget scheduled for discussion and a vote on Thursday. It is one of four DA-led wards in the metro that have been allocated no capital budget — and there is no mechanism for residents to appeal against the decision. The DA caucus chief whip, Gustav Rautenbach, said on Tuesday that there were rumours that the ward might still receive about R500,000 — but this had not been confirmed. Ratepayers are facing increases of 5% for property rates, 5.50% for water, 5.50% for sanitation and 6% for refuse collection, as well as a 12.8% increase in electricity prices if it is approved by the National Energy Regulator of SA. Last year, Ward 8 used its capital allocation to tar and repair part of Circular Drive, a major arterial road. But for the next year, Rautenbach said, there would be no capital allocation. 'It is very problematic,' he said, 'because this means that the Integrated Development Plan and the budget are not talking to each other. 'I think it is important to note that this doesn't mean that no potholes will be filled or no sewage spills will be fixed,' he said. 'That would come from the operational budget.' However, it does mean that no big new projects will be scheduled for the ward in 2025. 'We contribute millions to the municipal treasury,' said Rautenbach. 'Parts of this ward are old and must be replaced. How is that fair?' Lorraine has 122 townhouse complexes with around 3,000 houses, in addition to freestanding homes. 'I would say there are about 21,000 residents who live here,' said Rautenbach. Two of the main roads in the area, Dijon Road and Luneville Road, require major work. 'We don't even have an office,' said Rautenbach. 'We don't have a community hall, and we have no recreational facilities.' He said they had received only R100,000 for a humanitarian fund, like all other wards in the metro. Short-sighted 'This is very short-sighted from the municipality,' he said. 'Because it should be clear that the only direction in which Gqeberha can grow is in this westerly direction. 'I am very upset. Residents are making their contributions, and they are getting nothing.' Three other wards are facing the same outcome. However, Ward 41, represented by Luyanda Lawu, the mayoral committee member for safety and security, is set to receive about R48-million in the upcoming budget and R42-million and R37-million, respectively, for the next two financial years. The ward has several informal settlements that need major infrastructure projects. Last week, the budget was once again 'noted' in the council as Nelson Mandela Bay Executive Mayor Babalwa Lobishe said negotiations around ward allocations were ongoing. According to the budget document, the metro faces 'significant challenges' with the new budget, including: A declining collection rate; The poor financial performance of the electricity service, which now operates at a huge deficit; Escalating electricity and water losses that are at unacceptably high levels; Allocation of the required operating budget provision for newly created infrastructure and facilities, with a consequential impact on the level of property rates and tariff increases; Allocation of the required budget provision for the rehabilitation and maintenance of infrastructure; Underfunded mandates, such as the Library Services, negatively affect the municipality's budget; and Financial commitments emanating from previous council decisions, such as the insourcing of security guards, which become an ongoing cost on the municipality's payroll. DM


eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Afrikaner 'refugee' reveals why he left South Africa
ALABAMA, US - The United Nations defines a refugee as a person who has fled their country to escape conflict, violence or persecution, and seeks safety in another country. READ: US welcomes Afrikaner 'refugees' from South Africa South Africa is divided on whether a group of Afrikaners who recently left South Africa for the US, qualify as refugees. The move has stirred controversy, with critics arguing it politicises the refugee system and ignores those fleeing war, famine, and persecution elsewhere. Despite this development, most Afrikaner communities say they have no intention of leaving South Africa, insisting their future remains rooted here. READ: DIRCO warns Afrikaners seeking refuge in US of challenges ahead In an exclusive interview, Annika Larsen headed to Alabama to speak to one man who packed up his life, and said goodbye to his homeland forever.