logo
Lee, Trump likely to defer details on ‘alliance modernization'

Lee, Trump likely to defer details on ‘alliance modernization'

Korea Herald2 days ago
South Korea and the United States are expected to agree at their upcoming summit on a broad principle to 'modernize the alliance' amid an evolving regional security environment, while leaving key details to future working-level talks, according to officials in Seoul familiar with the matter.
Seoul and Washington have been gearing up for the first in-person summit between South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump, widely anticipated to take place in the US later this month.
The summit is poised to address a wide range of agenda items centered on two key pillars: security and foreign affairs — with a focus on alliance modernization and the North Korean nuclear issue — and trade, particularly tariffs.
The allies have been engaged in working-level talks in preparation for the summit.
However, due to time constraints, Lee and Trump are expected to announce only a broad agreement in principle on alliance modernization at the summit, according to a diplomatic source who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The alliance modernization agenda had taken a back seat to the trade deal finalized on July 30, which had commanded the allies' primary attention.
Seoul and Washington have been in discussion on how to modernize their alliance, with the aim of strengthening its capabilities and readiness posture amid an evolving regional security environment.
However, the allies held only one round of working-level talks on the issue — director general-level consultations held on July 10 and 11 in Seoul.
Trump and Lee are largely expected to echo the principle, which was agreed upon in a joint statement following the two-day working-level negotiations: "to strengthen the US-ROK Alliance into a future-oriented, comprehensive strategic alliance, and to modernize the Alliance in a mutually beneficial manner in the face of an evolving regional security environment."
The ROK refers to South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea.
Alliance modernization gains focus
The "alliance modernization" agenda, first proposed by the Trump administration and reflecting key US interests and demands, encompasses a wide range of issues that could bring significant changes not only to the South Korea–US alliance but also to the broader security landscape on the Korean Peninsula and across the Indo-Pacific region.
Alliance modernization includes adjustments to the size and role of US Forces Korea, an increase in South Korea's defense spending, and an expanded leading role for Seoul in addressing threats from North Korea — with the US increasingly shifting its focus toward countering threats stemming from China.
In particular, any adjustments to the size and role of US Forces Korea require careful consideration, as they are closely linked to the new US National Defense Strategy and the Global Posture Review — both expected to be completed between late summer and autumn.
While the concept of 'strategic flexibility' for US Forces Korea was agreed upon by the allies in 2006, The Korea Herald has learned that Seoul recognizes the need for deeper discussions — based on the existing agreement — in light of the evolving regional security environment.
In the 2006 agreement, Seoul agreed to respect the "necessity for strategic flexibility of the US forces the ROK," and Washington agreed to respect the "ROK position that it shall not be involved in a regional conflict in Northeast Asia against the will of the Korean people" in the implementation of strategic flexibility.
Unlike other alliance modernization-related issues, South Korea's defense spending is expected to take center stage at the summit due to Trump's interest, with remaining items likely deferred to working-level talks, according to the source.
The Korea Herald also learned from sources that the allies have been discussing the scope of alliance modernization.
South Korea believes alliance modernization should not necessarily be confined to the military domain and could expand into other sectors, including technological cooperation. The US is also said to share this understanding.
Allies differ on US Forces Korea
As the allies prepare for the first Trump-Lee summit, public remarks by high-ranking officials have showed discrepancies over troop levels and the mandate of US Forces Korea.
South Korea's Foreign Minister Cho Hyun dismissed the possibility of changes to the size and role of US Forces Korea.
'We are talking with the United States, but there is no concern about the US forces in Korea. We believe that they will remain as such and their role will remain as of today,' Cho said in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.
However, US Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby suggested that Seoul should take greater responsibility in countering North Korean threats and reiterated Washington's call for increased defense spending.
"South Korea continues to be a role model in its willingness to take more of the lead in a strong defense against the DPRK and in its spending on defense," Colby said on Aug. 1 on his official X account, following the first phone call between the defense chiefs of the allies on July 30.
DPRK stands for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
"We and the ROK are closely aligned on the need to modernize the Alliance in response to the regional security environment," Colby added. "We will work closely with Seoul to ensure a strategically sustainable Alliance that is ready to defend against shared threats."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

[Robert J. Fouser] Trump's search for a Nobel Peace Prize
[Robert J. Fouser] Trump's search for a Nobel Peace Prize

Korea Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Robert J. Fouser] Trump's search for a Nobel Peace Prize

After long and difficult negotiations over tariffs between the US and its major trading partners, most have reached last-minute agreements with the US. The agreements, including the one with South Korea, follow a similar pattern of 15 percent tariffs on goods sent to the US, combined with promises to purchase more US goods and increase investment in the US. Among major US trading partners, deadlines have been extended for China and Mexico, but tariffs on Canadian goods not covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement jumped to 35 percent. The continued negotiations with China suggest Trump may have softened his long-held hard-line stance. In July, he lifted the restriction on selling Nvidia's advanced H20 AI chips to China. After imposing 145 percent tariffs on Chinese goods in April, he reduced them to 30 percent in response to sharp declines in US stocks. Later, he set a deadline of Aug. 12, but an extension is likely. In the meantime, Trump's views of India have begun to sour. In recent days, he has threatened India, the 10th largest trading partner with the US, with heavy tariffs if it continues to buy Russian oil. India refused, hoping that Trump would pull back from damaging the closer relations between the two countries that began during his first term, but Trump's changing views on India come from an increasingly critical stance toward Russia stemming from its refusal to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. What is going on? The core of Trump, as I have noted before, is narcissism. Like all narcissists, he needs attention and adoration. Attention means being at the center of things, the all-powerful prime mover. Adoration means winning moments and cheering crowds. Everything Trump has done in his long public life confirms this hypothesis. Call it the Trump Operating System, or TOS for short. For Trump, foreign policy is just one of many fields to stir things up to gain attention and adoration. Economic policy, including tariffs, is another, as is immigration. What appear to be long-held beliefs — for example, tariffs — which run against long-established views and norms, are really tools for disruption that put Trump at the center of attention. Foreign policy offers Trump an important vehicle for attention and adoration: A Nobel Peace Prize. Since the prize was created in 1901, four US presidents — Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama — have won. Of these, only Jimmy Carter won the prize after leaving office. Trump desperately wants to join this list, particularly because Obama, his first-term predecessor, is on it. Winning the Nobel Peace Prize is the prime mover of Trump's foreign policy, particularly now that he is in his last term. What opportunities does Trump have? Gaza and Ukraine top the list, which explains why Trump has focused on them since returning to the White House. Initially, he tried to get ceasefire negotiations started between the combatants, but as the conflicts have raged on, he has become frustrated and has shifted his focus to Ukraine. He now hopes that increasing support for Ukraine and threatening more sanctions against Russia will pressure the Russians to come to the negotiating table. In this fluid situation, Trump's views of China may be moderating. Since Trump's first term, China has moved closer to Russia as tensions with the US have increased. Trump's more conciliatory stance on China suggests that he may be trying to woo the country away from Russia. Trump's recent tariff threats against India are an attempt to pull it away from Russia as well. A weakened Russia would then have no choice but to negotiate a peace agreement with Ukraine, which would, in Trump's mind, raise his prospects of winning a Nobel Peace Prize. In the hands of a different president, the strategy might offer hope of pressuring Russia while reducing tensions between the world's two largest economies. Barring a sudden change in leadership, such breakthroughs require a slow process of trust-building and finding common ground. The actors need to view the process of rapprochement as a long-term investment in a worthy goal. Donald Trump doesn't have the discipline or patience for any sort of process because he is interested in the right-now attention of the show. Expect him to cycle through attempts to be the peacemaker in the desperate hope of winning a Nobel Peace Prize. And expect those on the other side of the table to know exactly what is going on. Robert J. Fouser, a former associate professor of Korean language education at Seoul National University, writes on Korea from Providence, Rhode Island. He can be reached at robertjfouser@ The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.

[Editorial] Rules for some
[Editorial] Rules for some

Korea Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Editorial] Rules for some

Rep. Lee Choon-suak's stock trade under aide's name sparks public outcry, legal probe Rep. Lee Choon-suak, a four-term lawmaker from South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea, faces public fury and political fallout following allegations that he engaged in stock trading under a borrowed name — potentially implicating him in insider trading and false asset reporting. The scandal erupted after local media photographed Lee operating a mobile trading app during a parliamentary session on Monday. The account was registered under his aide's name. Lee was seen transacting shares in companies including Naver, KakaoPay and LG CNS — all designated as key players in the government's newly announced artificial intelligence initiative that same day. Lee's conduct presents a clear challenge to the credibility of the country's financial disclosure regime and ethical oversight. As head of the economic subcommittee on AI policy within the Presidential Committee on Policy Planning, Lee held privileged access to information that could materially affect markets. His trading activity — allegedly via an aide's account — raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest. If confirmed, such activity would constitute violations of both the Capital Markets Act and the Financial Real Name Act. The former prohibits trading based on nonpublic information, while the latter mandates that securities transactions be conducted under the true owner's name to prevent concealment. Furthermore, Lee's asset disclosure filed in late 2024 declared no stock holdings, contradicting reports that assets exceeding 100 million won ($72,000) were held in the aide's account. This would breach the Public Official Ethics Act, which requires officials to fully disclose their assets. Lee resigned from the Democratic Party on Tuesday night amid mounting pressure. The party, seeking to contain the damage, initiated expulsion proceedings. He was also removed from his post on the Presidential Committee and replaced as chair of the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee — a powerful role he had held until the scandal broke. The police have formed a task force of legal and financial experts to investigate. Civic groups have filed criminal complaints, while lawmakers from the main opposition People Power Party are calling for the appointment of a special prosecutor, citing doubts that a police-led probe will be sufficient to uncover systemic misconduct. This is not the first time ethical breaches have surfaced within the National Assembly in connection with lawmakers' financial dealings. In 2023, Rep. Kim Nam-kook of the Democratic Party was found to have traded cryptocurrency during parliamentary sessions. While that case led to his temporary resignation, he ultimately returned to office, underlining the soft consequences Korean lawmakers often face for violating ethical norms. The current regulatory framework is riddled with loopholes. Lawmakers can avoid declaring stock holdings if assets are sold shortly before disclosure deadlines, and the system fails to track holdings registered under third parties' names. In contrast, more stringent regimes elsewhere impose real-time reporting obligations and broader definitions of beneficial ownership. President Lee Jae Myung has called for a swift investigation, warning during a recent visit to the Korea Stock Exchange that 'playing with stocks will result in ruin.' Yet this scandal, centered on a senior policymaker allegedly trading from the floor of parliament, directly undermines his administration's emphasis on financial transparency and ethical governance. If the National Assembly hopes to restore public trust, it must go beyond symbolic dismissals. Reforms should include prohibiting lawmakers from trading in sectors where they hold policymaking authority, requiring real-time public reporting of trades, and empowering independent bodies to monitor and enforce ethical conduct. The case of Rep. Lee is more than a personal lapse. It reflects a political culture that continues to tolerate opaque asset reporting and blurred lines between public service and private interest. To move forward, South Korea's legislature must demonstrate that ethical standards are not optional and accountability applies even to its most senior members.

Intel's stock tumbles after Trump says its CEO must resign
Intel's stock tumbles after Trump says its CEO must resign

Korea Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Intel's stock tumbles after Trump says its CEO must resign

Intel's shares are tumbling before markets opened Thursday after President Donald Trump said in a social media post that the chipmaker's CEO needs to resign. 'The CEO of Intel is highly conflicted and must resign, immediately,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Trump made the post after Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over CEO Lip-Bu Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army. Cotton specifically called out Tan's recent leadership of Cadence Design Systems in the letter. The tech company admitted in July to selling its products to China's National University of Defense Technology in violation of U.S. export controls. 'In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip-Bu Tan as its new CEO," Cotton wrote in the letter. "Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People's Liberation Army.' Intel's stock dropped more than 4 percent in premarket trading. (AP - Yonhap)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store