Malacca: The Strait That Could Strangle China's Future
If you want to understand one of China's deepest strategic nightmares, look no further than a thin, congested strip of water between Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia called the Strait of Malacca.
Every day, about 60 to 80 percent of China's imported oil and gas — the lifeblood of its factories, cities, and army — squeezes through this one narrow bottleneck. If anything goes wrong there — a war, a terrorist attack, a US naval blockade — China's energy lifeline gets cut, fast. It's what former President Hu Jintao famously called the "Malacca Dilemma" back in 2003, and it's been haunting Chinese strategists ever since.
Geography as China's Achilles' Heel
In Great Power politics, geography is destiny, and Malacca is China's Achilles' heel. Unlike a factory, you can't pick it up and move it. It's a chokepoint locked between neighbors who are friendly — but not friendly enough to bet their own futures on China's rise. Worse for Beijing, the US Navy, along with allies like Singapore, Australia, and Malaysia, still rules these waters.
Even though China has built pipelines through Myanmar and dreamed up new overland routes, most of its vital oil still floats precariously through Malacca. Which means, in a real showdown, America could strangle China's economy without even firing a shot — just by parking a few ships in the right place.
The Malacca Dilemma at the Heart of Global Rivalry
That's why the Malacca Dilemma is at the very heart of today's Great Power Rivalry. Washington's strategy is simple: keep dominating the world's maritime chokepoints — Malacca, Hormuz, Suez, Panama — so that, if tensions spike, it can squeeze China's jugular.
Beijing's counter-move is equally ambitious: build a "String of Pearls" — a network of ports, naval bases, and diplomatic friendships stretching from Pakistan's Gwadar to Djibouti in East Africa — to open up alternative routes and soften the Malacca trap. Belt and Road isn't just about trade; it's a hedge against naval strangulation.
The US Flexes Its Muscle at Sea
Meanwhile, out at sea, the US is busy flexing its muscles through something called Freedom of Navigation Operations — FONOPS for short — sending warships through the South China Sea to challenge Beijing's island-building and maritime claims.
Malacca itself is technically an international waterway, open to everyone under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). But the message behind FONOPS is
clear: "We're here. We're watching. And if push comes to shove, you're not as free as you think."
A Narrow Strait Could Decide the Fate of Nations
Bottom line: China's Malacca Strait Dilemma is no abstract theory. It's the chokehold that connects geography to grand strategy, economics to energy, and every US Navy patrol to the pulse of China's future growth. In a flat, fast, and sometimes brutal world, even a narrow strip of water can decide the fate of nations.
Malaysia's Energy Gamble in a Flat, Volatile World
From Trump's Shale Flood and Malacca Choke to Malaysia's Green-Energy Rebirth, — in today's "flat" energy world, Malaysia finds itself on the same oil-price roller coaster as everyone else — one moment plunged by the COVID-19 collapse, the next jolted by recovery and geopolitical flare-ups.
In Q1 2020, Brent crude tumbled over 65 percent from its year-start levels as global demand evaporated under lockdowns; by 2023, however, it had averaged US$83 per barrel, down from $101 in 2022 and roughly $81 in 2024. President Trump's "America First" energy agenda — unleashing a US shale surge, imposing tariffs on Chinese goods, and withdrawing from the Paris pact — amplified these supply–demand swings and regulatory uncertainty, forcing Malaysia to weather thinner trade surpluses, ringgit gyrations, and a bruised fiscal cushion.
Rethinking Fuel Subsidies: A Fiscal Revolution
By June 2024, Putrajaya ripped up blanket diesel subsidies in Peninsular Malaysia, sending pump prices from RM2.15 to RM3.35 per litre — yet instead of leaving smallholders and truckers stranded, the government funneled RM200 a month under the Budi Madani programme to vulnerable diesel-dependent groups.
Simultaneously, it retooled RON95 petrol aid to protect the bottom 85 percent of earners while phasing out support for the top 15 percent. In doing so, Malaysia transformed subsidy reform from a political liability into a fiscal advantage.
Malaysia's Green Energy Sprint: No Turning Back
Recognizing that volatility won't abate, Malaysia has accelerated its pivot to renewables. The Green Technology Master Plan targets 40 percent renewable energy in the power mix by 2035 through solar, hydroelectric, and waste-to-energy projects.
April 2024 saw the launch of Energy Exchange Malaysia (Enegem), a 100 MW pilot auction exporting green power to Singapore and laying the foundation for an integrated
ASEAN grid. The 2023 National Energy Transition Roadmap commits to 70 percent renewable capacity by 2050, while the 2024 Aviation Decarbonization Blueprint and the 2023–2040 Circular Economy Roadmap set ambitious net-zero and resource-efficiency milestones across transport and industry.
Oil and Gas: Still Malaysia's Financial Backbone
Despite the green rush, oil and gas remain pillars of the economy — making up roughly 7 percent of GDP (about RM124 billion in 2022), 15 percent of exports, and 20–30 percent of federal revenue, buoyed by Petronas's RM375 billion haul that year.
Natural gas alone contributed RM52 billion in 2024, powering factories and turbines nationwide. Paradoxically, Malaysia still imports more refined products than it exports — an inefficiency the government plans to remedy through expanded downstream capacity at Pengerang.
China's Energy Juggernaut and the Looming Malacca Trap
To our north and east, China's energy juggernaut looms larger by the day. In 2023, it consumed 16.4 million barrels per day of liquid fuels — more than triple India's demand — and imported 11.3 million barrels per day of crude for its refineries and petrochemical complexes.
Yet nearly 80 percent of those imports must pass through the narrow Strait of Malacca — a vulnerability Admiral Hu Jintao dubbed the "Malacca Dilemma" in 2003. While Beijing has built pipelines through Myanmar and Central Asia to bypass the choke point, most of its oil still flows past our shores, intertwining Malaysia's economic fortunes with every Sino-American flare-up and Indian Ocean security calculus.
Malaysia's Urgent Imperative: Diversify or Be Dragged Under
That interdependence can be a vulnerability — or an opportunity. Malaysia's best hedge is diversification:
• Ramp up renewable capacity and green hydrogen,
• Deepen petrochemical value chains at Pengerang,
• Modernize refining and logistics under the new Oil, Gas and Energy Services (OGSE) Blueprint.
Pair that with tax reforms to ease fiscal reliance on hydrocarbons, deeper financial markets to absorb external shocks, and targeted subsidies that protect the most vulnerable — and Malaysia will not just weather the storm, but set its sails to harness every gust in Asia's unfolding energy century.
Economist Samirul Ariff Othman is an adjunct lecturer at Universiti Teknologi Petronas, international relations analyst and a senior consultant with Global Asia Consulting. The views in this OpEd piece are entirely his own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Feature: Emerging Chinese-built harbor links past, present and future in Tanzania
by Xinhua writer Hua Hongli DAR ES SALAAM, June 9 (Xinhua) -- A gentle sea breeze stirs the trees on a quiet island off the southeastern coast of Tanzania. Here lie the ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani, once a bustling port on the Indian Ocean trade route, where ships loaded with gold, spices, and porcelain gathered in significant numbers. Now, just across the water, another port is taking shape. The Kilwa Fishing Harbor, dubbed a "port of the future," is rising with ambition. A 315-meter-long jetty extends into the ocean like a steel arm. Nearby, construction is in full swing on cold storage facilities, a trading market, office buildings, and a sewage treatment plant. This new harbor is expected to anchor Tanzania's blue economy for years to come. Historical records show that Chinese navigator Zheng He led massive fleets during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 AD) on seven expeditions to the Indian Ocean, reaching as far as East Africa and the Red Sea. "Many pieces of Chinese porcelain have been unearthed at the Kilwa Kisiwani site. It shows how long the friendship between Tanzania and China has existed," said Shomari Rajabu Shomari, historical curator of the National Museum of Tanzania. "Six hundred years ago, the Chinese came in peace to trade. Now, six hundred years later, they are helping us build a port that leads to prosperity," he told Xinhua in an interview, pointing to an old chart of a 15th-century Chinese fleet. The project, constructed by China Harbor Engineering Company Ltd (CHEC), a leading Chinese construction company, is Tanzania's first modern large-scale fishing harbor. Covering about 5.6 hectares, it is designed to handle 60,000 tonnes of fish annually and can dock deep-sea fishing vessels, according to Chen Zhifeng, vice project manager of the CHEC Tanzania maritime project department. The project is expected to be completed in September. Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan attended the groundbreaking ceremony in 2023, emphasizing its significance to the national economy and people's livelihoods. Tanzania boasts abundant marine resources, and the waters around the Kilwa District lie along the migration route of tuna. Yet, for years, the lack of modern fishing facilities has forced local fishermen to maneuver small boats close to the shore. Without proper cold storage, their catch spoils easily, resulting in unstable incomes. The fishermen's hardship mirrors a major bottleneck hindering Tanzania's development of a blue economy. While the East African country has an extensive coastline, its deep-sea fishing capacity remains limited. "Once completed, the cold storage and trading facilities will solve the preservation problem. Fishermen won't have to worry about unsold catch, and deep-sea fishing will be viable," said Chen. At the construction site, nearly 600 direct jobs have been created, including skilled roles like welders, crane operators, and excavator drivers. "Each Chinese engineer mentors a dozen or so Tanzanian workers, occasionally entrusting them with independent operation. This approach to training has enhanced the practical skills of local workers," said Edwin Christopher, the project's human resources and administration manager. "We believe that after the project, these trained workers will be capable of holding jobs in related sectors." The Chinese company is committed to sustainability as well. For the surrounding mangroves, they have established protective boundaries where machinery is prohibited. An environmental team conducts monthly beach cleanups to remove marine waste. Additionally, to ensure visitor experience and safety at the ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani, a boarding ladder was relocated away from the construction zone. On a sightseeing boat, local guide Daudi Gideon gazed at the emerging fishing harbor, his eyes glittering with anticipation. "When visitors come to see Kilwa Kisiwani, they will also see this remarkable new port. Once it's completed, more people will come to learn about our history and witness our new chapter," he envisioned.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Tariffs tarnishing jeweller's shine
PANDORA, the world's largest jewellery company, is based in Denmark and has nearly 500 stores in the United States, more than any of its other key markets. But in some ways, its real home is Thailand, where the company has been making its products for nearly four decades. Like many global corporations, Pandora's continent-crossing supply chain has allowed it to sell its goods worldwide at a low cost. That supply chain became a grave weakness in April when US President Donald Trump said he would impose 36% tariffs on goods entering the United States from Thailand, alongside steep tariffs on dozens of other countries. After Trump unveiled his 'reciprocal tariffs', Pandora's shares were among the worst performing in Europe. Later, Trump postponed those tariffs until early July, offering a reprieve. But the threat looms, and Alexander Lacik (pic), CEO of Pandora, is not expecting the uncertainty that is paralysing businesses to end. Unless tariffs return to previous levels, the next year will be turbulent, he said in an interview. For now, he added, there is little to do but wait to see how investors, customers and competitors react. 'With the information at hand today, I would be crazy to make big strategic decisions,' Lacik said. Alongside business leaders all over the world, Lacik is grappling with how to respond to Trump's unpredictable policies, which have generated almost maddening uncertainty. Lacik says he is not expecting the uncertainty paralysing businesses to end unless tariffs returned to previous levels. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times The Trump administration has started to show a willingness to lower tariffs, but his first agreements, with Britain and China, have posed more questions than answers, and tariffs are still higher than they were a couple of months ago. Although some aspects of the trade war have been suspended, Pandora and other multinationals are in limbo, waiting for more agreements to be finalised. Pandora, best known for its silver charm bracelets, has been making jewellery in Thailand since 1989. Across three factories, thousands of people handcraft the products. The company is building a fourth plant in Vietnam, but Trump has also threatened tariffs on Vietnamese goods. Last year, the company sold 113 million pieces of jewellery, about three items every second, making it the largest jewellery brand by volume, with stores in more than 100 countries. A third of Pandora's sales, US$1.4bil, was generated in the United States and Lacik said he had no intention of moving away from the company's most profitable market. But prices will rise, he said, and who will bear the brunt of that is unclear. 'The big question is, am I going to pass on everything to the US consumer, or am I going to peanut butter it out and raise the whole Pandora pricing globally?' Lacik said. Jewellery by Pandora being worn by a model at a promotional event in Los Angeles. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times But Pandora keeps several months' worth of stock, giving him time to see how other jewellers change their pricing and then decide. A few things can be done immediately, such as streamlining parts of the supply chain. The day after the reciprocal tariffs were announced, Pandora said that it would change its distribution so that products sold in Canada and Latin America would no longer move through the company's distribution hub in Baltimore, a process that would take six to nine months to complete. Moving production into the United States is not being considered, in part because of higher labour costs. Pandora employs nearly 15,000 craftspeople in Thailand and expects to hire 7,000 more in Vietnam. In an earnings report last month, the company estimated the cost of the trade war. If higher tariffs go back into effect, they would cost Pandora US$74mil this year, and then US$135mil annually after that. But the jeweller is not panicking. In fact, the economic curveballs are starting to feel normal, Lacik said. 'We are battle ready,' he added. When he joined the company as the CEO in 2019, Pandora was struggling. Its share price had dropped more than 70% from its peak three years earlier. Lacik instituted a 'complete overhaul', he said, with new branding and store designs, an emphasis on its 'affordable luxury' label and showcasing its complete jewellery line, not just charms. That prepared the company for the trials that hit the global economy next. First, the Covid-19 pandemic, when 15,000 store employees were sent home, and some factory workers slept on cots to keep production going. Then, a surge in inflation risked customers pulling back. Lacik's strategy appeared to be working. In January, Pandora's share price reached a record high. Since then, however, it has dropped more than 20% as it shields itself from some of the trade turmoil. — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
America's cold shoulder to foreign students is worrying Asia
The Harvard Students for Freedom rally in support of international students at the Harvard University campus in Boston recently. The US government said it intends to cancel most foreign student visas. — AFP AN Ivy League degree has long been central to the Asian Dream – a ticket to success and status. But President Donald Trump's message to international students is clear: Far fewer of you are welcome. The blunt statement and growing chaos across the university sector has left families wondering if sending their children to America is still worth it. The White House's immediate target is Chinese students allegedly connected to the Communist Party. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the United States plans to start 'aggressively' revoking their visas. Students affected would include 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' The US will also enhance scrutiny 'of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added. It's unclear how these rules will be executed; the move follows a short period of improved ties between the superpowers after they agreed to a truce in the trade war. China's Foreign Ministry has expressed its dissatisfaction, saying it had lodged a protest with the US. The impact is wider than Washington and Beijing's geopolitical rivalry. The decision to ban Harvard from enrolling international students is focusing minds in Asia, even though a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy. Many families are wondering if other universities will be next. The rhetoric coming out of the White House is hardly reassuring. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump had said. Students of other universities protesting in support of international students at Harvard University. — Bloomberg This attitude, combined with a directive ordering US embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas sends a chilling message to Asian students: The Ivy aspiration is no longer as accessible as it once was. The worries are pouring in on my parent chat groups. Many have already spent thousands of dollars preparing children for a future at a prestigious American university – hiring expensive college counsellors, visiting campuses, and investing countless hours navigating complex application processes. That's not to mention time spent on preparing for standardised tests and extracurricular activities, all in an effort to perfect the profile for a prospective candidate. There are also legitimate concerns about what happens to deposits and scholarships, all of which are up in the air as students and their families figure out what the new rules mean for them. It's no small cost. An average American degree can set an international student's family back approximately US$100,000 (RM42,300) over four years, excluding living costs. An Ivy League degree? It's more than triple that. Parents spend decades making sacrifices and putting aside the massive investment required to help their kids go to their dream university. The money is worth it, the thinking goes, because eventually their child will reap the rewards. The schools get something out of this, too. Foreign applicants are more likely to pay full tuition, essentially subsidising American students who receive aid. Over a million international students studied in American universities in the 2023-2024 school year, according to data from Open Doors, an information resource for foreign students studying or teaching in the US. Asians made up a significant proportion, with Indians and Chinese citizens accounting for over half. America is not going to lose its appeal overnight. It's still a coveted place to study, both because of its world-class tertiary education and the potential to find lucrative employment after graduation. But other countries are becoming more attractive because of the Trump administration's crackdown. Some parents I've spoken to will simply go elsewhere. Canada and the United Kingdom, already popular alternatives, are poised to scoop up disillusioned applicants. Closer to home, Australia and New Zealand are also promoting their schools. Asian universities that offer top-tier programs will appeal to anxious Asian families. Schools such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, and Malaysia's Sunway University are offering credit transfers and other incentives to attract ambitious students and families looking for quality education without the uncertainties tied to American foreign policy. For many Asian students who have dreamt of studying and working in cities like New York or Los Angeles, the political gyrations affecting their futures are no doubt disappointing. But this is about more than visas and policies. It's about the hopes of a generation searching for a place to study, grow, and build their future. Trump has just made the US seem like a far less inviting option. — Bloomberg Opinion/TNS Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China.
