Trump's Gulf tour reshapes Middle East diplomatic map
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa meets with U.S. President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in this handout released on May 14, 2025. Saudi Press Agency/Handout via REUTERS
Nothing captured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's isolation more starkly last week than the image of U.S. President Donald Trump shaking hands with Syria's Islamist leader Ahmed al‑Sharaa - a man Israel has branded "an al‑Qaida terrorist in a suit."
"He's got the potential. He's a real leader," Trump told reporters after talks with Sharaa in Riyadh - a meeting brokered by his Saudi hosts, with whom the U.S. president agreed a slew of arms, business and technology deals.
Trump's whirlwind four-day tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates this week was more than just a diplomatic spectacle marked by lucrative investments.
It sealed the emergence of a new Sunni-led Middle East order - one that eclipses Iran's shattered 'axis of resistance', and leaves Israel sidelined, according to three regional and two Western sources.
Amid growing irritation in Washington with Israel's failure to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, Trump's tour was a snub to Netanyahu, a close U.S. ally who was the first foreign leader to visit Washington after the president returned to office in January, the sources said.
The message was clear: in Trump's less ideological, more results-driven vision of Middle East diplomacy, Netanyahu could no longer count on unconditional U.S. support for his right-wing agenda, the sources said.
"This administration is very frustrated with Netanyahu and that frustration is showing," said David Schenker, a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs under Republican former President George W Bush. "They're very, very transactional, and Netanyahu isn't giving them anything right now."
The sources said that the U.S. was not about to turn its back on Israel, which remains a vital U.S. ally whose support in Washington runs deep and is bipartisan.
But the Trump administration wanted to deliver the message to Netanyahu that America has its own interests in the Middle East and it does not like him standing in its way, the sources added.
U.S. patience has been strained not just by the Israeli prime minister's refusal to countenance a Gaza ceasefire but also his objection to U.S. talks with Iran over its nuclear program, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Netanyahu's office did not respond to requests for comment. It has made no public statements on Trump's regional visit.
A spokesperson for the White House's National Security Council emphasized Trump was a friend to Israel.
"We continue to work closely with our ally Israel to ensure remaining hostages in Gaza are freed, Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon, and to strengthen regional security in the Middle East," NSC spokesman James Hewitt said.
While publicly insisting U.S.-Israeli relations remain strong, Trump administration officials have privately expressed irritation with Netanyahu's refusal to fall into line with Washington's positions on Gaza and Iran, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Six regional and Western sources said friction between the U.S. and Israel was building before Trump's regional trip.
The tension began when Netanyahu flew to Washington on a second visit in April seeking Trump's backing for military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites - only to discover, to his shock, that Trump was opting for diplomacy.
An unbending advocate for a hardline stance against Tehran, Netanyahu was caught off guard, learning just hours before his meeting that negotiations were about to start.
In the following weeks, Trump's declaration of a ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen, rapprochement with Syria's new Islamist leadership and bypassing of Israel on his Gulf visit showed how the traditionally close relations have become strained, the sources said.
David Makovsky, a fellow at the Washington Institute, where he directs a project on Arab-Israeli relations, said Washington and Tel Aviv "don't seem in sync on the big questions the way they were in the first hundred days" of Trump's presidency.
GAZA PROVES DIVISIVE
During his election campaign, Trump made clear he wanted a ceasefire in Gaza and the hostages there released before he returned to the White House.
But months into Trump's presidency, Netanyahu has continued to defy ceasefire calls, expanded the offensive, and offered no endgame or a post-war plan after 19 months of conflict. The death toll in Gaza has passed 52,900 in recent days, according to local health officials.
The war - which has sparked international outcry over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza - was triggered by Palestinian Islamist group Hamas' Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel that killed around 1,200 people and captured some 250 hostages.
Any hope that Trump could use his regional visit to cement his image as a peacemaker and announce a deal to end the bitterly divisive war were dashed.
Instead, Netanyahu - who is charged with war crimes in Gaza by the International Criminal Court - has doubled-down on his aim of crushing Hamas. Netanyahu is also on trial in Israel over corruption charges, which he denies.
As Trump wrapped up his visit, Israel launched a new offensive on Friday in Gaza. Israeli strikes have killed hundreds of Palestinians in recent days.
Trump's other key priority - expanding the Abraham Accords establishing diplomatic ties between Israel and Arab states to include Saudi Arabia - has also been blocked by Netanyahu's intransigence.
Riyadh has made it clear it will not normalize relations with Israel until the war has ceased and there is a path to Palestinian statehood, something Netanyahu rejects.
"He's got no strategy, no day-after plan on Gaza," Schenker said. "And he's standing in the way."
Publicly, Trump himself has dismissed any talk of a rift. In an interview with Fox News, broadcast after the regional visit, Trump denied being frustrated with Netanyahu, who he said faced "a tough situation" over the war in Gaza.
But Trump is forging ahead without Netanyahu. With unapologetic self-interest, the American president is driving a realignment of U.S. diplomacy toward wealthy Sunni states, anchored by oil-rich Riyadh.
One senior regional source said Trump's visit had crowned the influential role of Saudi Arabia as the leader of the Sunni Arab world. By contrast, years of Iranian overreach - and Israel's heavy military blows to its proxies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon - have left Shi'ite regional power Tehran diminished.
"Iran had the leading role; now Saudi Arabia has entered with other tools: the economy, money, investment," the source said.
SUNNI ASCENDANCY
Although Netanyahu led the fight against Iran, the new regional order is being shaped in Riyadh, Doha and Abu Dhabi.
These Gulf monarchies are eager to gain access to sophisticated weaponry to shield them from attacks by Iran and its proxies, as well as to secure advanced U.S. chips and AI technology.
They have found a willing partner in a U.S. president whose foreign policy can sometimes blur with his family's financial interests.
In Qatar, on the second leg of his tour, Trump was offered a luxuriously outfitted 747 Boeing jet, and welcomed with regal fanfare befitting a monarch. Amid a lavish ceremony, sword dances, a cavalry parade and royal banquet, Trump declared Qatar - which has provided major financial support to Hamas - was "absolutely trying to help" with the Israeli hostage crisis.
Trump's statement struck a nerve in Jerusalem, where officials view Doha as a strategic threat bankrolling one of their bitterest enemies.
Many Israelis "don't understand just how central Qatar has become to the U.S.", said Yoel Guzansky, a Senior Fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University, noting it hosts the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East.
While its ties to Hamas make Qatar a threat to Israel, its vast natural gas wealth, financial clout and diplomatic influence have turned it into an indispensable ally to Washington, Guzanksy added.
In total, the White House estimated the tour secured more than $2 trillion in investment commitments for the U.S. economy - including major orders of Boeing planes, deals to buy U.S. defense equipment, data and technology agreements. A Reuters tally of publicly announced deals put the total value at closer to $700 billion.
In Saudi Arabia, Trump agreed a record $142 billion arms deal with Riyadh, stoking Israeli fears over losing air superiority in the region if Riyadh gains access to Lockhead's F-35 jet.
At the same time, in a recalibration of U.S.-Saudi ties, Trump offered Riyadh leeway on establishing relations with Israel, telling its rulers they could do so in their own time.
Now, Trump is negotiating a US-led civil nuclear investment for Saudi Arabia - another deal causing concern in Israel.
Sunni states also pushed their own diplomatic agenda. Trump's surprise announcement during his tour that he would lift sanctions against Syria - another major shift in U.S. policy - came at the behest of Saudi Arabia and over the objections of Israel.
Until December, when Sharaa toppled Syrian autocrat Bashar al-Assad, Washington had a $10 million reward for his capture.
Gulf nations have also applauded Trump's truce with the Houthis in Yemen, part of Iran's regional 'axis of resistance', which put an end to a costly U.S. military operation in the Red Sea. The announcement, which followed the opening of nuclear talks with Iran, came just two days after a Houthi missile struck Israel's Ben Gurion Airport.
"Israel is more and more looking like a spoiler, that stands in the way not just of the US, but the international community, as it tries to shape the region differently after the fall of al-Assad and Hezbollah, and maybe end the Gaza war," said Guzansky, a former coordinator of Iran-Gulf affairs at Israel's National Security Council.
While Netanyahu's right-wing government has maintained silence on Trump's visit, Israeli media has voiced concern that the country's standing with its most important ally has been eroded.
Opposition politicians have criticized the prime minister for leaving Israel sidelined while old alliances are reconfigured.
Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who is preparing a return to politics, delivered a blistering indictment of Netanyahu's government, capturing the sense of alarm gripping many in Israel's political and security establishment.
"The Middle East is undergoing tectonic changes before our eyes, our enemies are getting stronger, and Netanyahu...and his gang are paralyzed, passive, as if they don't exist," the former prime minister and minister of defense said on social media platform X.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
17 minutes ago
- Japan Times
On economic policy, the White House is its own worst enemy
The path of U.S. politics over the past 10 years is scarcely believable — and keeps getting weirder. A miraculously successful amateur politician, now half a year into his second term in the White House, isn't content to take his wins and count his achievements. Instead, he seems eager to bring the ceiling down on his own head. Meantime, his career-politician opponents aren't just failing to hold him to account, they are doing what they can to shield him from falling debris. Forgive the median voter for being disgusted, bewildered or both. If systemic political failure is possible, this must surely be what it looks like. Consider a recent poll in the Wall Street Journal. On issue after issue they care most about, voters say they trust Republicans more than Democrats — yet, at the same time, they disapprove of the way the administration is managing them. Voters prefer Republicans to Democrats on the economy, inflation, immigration, tariffs, foreign policy and Ukraine. Yet on each of those topics, there's net disapproval of the president's initiatives. In particular, "51% say the change he is bringing is a form of chaos and dysfunction that will hurt the country. By contrast, 45% agree with the alternative statement that he is making needed and helpful changes.' The implication for both political parties might seem clear. The White House needs to calm down and choose consolidation, not further controversy and "chaos.' And the Democratic Party needs to dump (not just downplay) its plainly unpopular positions and concentrate on projecting competence and moderation. They're both doing just the opposite. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I could suspect each party of planting agents in the other, secretly dedicated to guiding the enemy to defeat. I'd be deeply impressed by the skill of these covert operatives, instead of stunned by the parade of willful political dysfunction. To be fair, in wrenching itself in a new direction, the Democratic Party has structural problems: zero leadership and activists who'd rather lose than compromise. That's challenging. The Republicans' dysfunction is more puzzling. They have a leader, to put it mildly, and he delights in winning above all. Yet Trump is willing to put his record of seemingly impossible political wins at risk for little or no return. On immigration, clear majorities agree that the border should be secure, there's a difference between legal and illegal immigration, and some of the millions of people who came to the U.S. illegally (especially those guilty of other offenses) should be sent home. Merely by committing itself to this, the administration defeated the Democrats. But clear majorities don't support rounding up any and all such violators regardless of their circumstances — without regard for due process — and using a hurriedly expanded force of masked enforcement officers and opaque network of makeshift, ostentatiously punitive detention centers. Resorting to such methods seems a good way for the administration to lose an argument that it had won. The same goes for economic policy. As it intended, the White House has successfully dismantled the postwar trading system and moved the U.S. into a new regime of discriminatory tariffs and managed trade. The recent Big Beautiful tax-and-spending bill abandoned all pretense of fiscal prudence and accelerated the trajectory of unsustainable public debt. Yet despite warnings of inevitable disaster, the S&P 500 continues to set records, seeming to validate Trump's thinking. So far, at least, another big political win. The political threat to this new economic regime isn't its long-term consequences — which in any case are uncertain. Large forces are in contention. Will the push to growth and productivity from AI-driven innovation, less regulation and generous tax relief for investment overpower the pull of tariff-driven stagflation, ill-conceived industrial policy and the crowding out of investment due to excessive government borrowing? Hard to say. But the debate about those questions will last well beyond the current administration. The politically salient threat to Trump's economic policies is short-term disruption in financial markets — the risk that Wall Street will stop applauding Trump, turn against him and drive the economy into a recession. As with immigration, the conduct of economic policy might have been calculated to sabotage the whole enterprise. Name three things capable of provoking a financial-market veto while delivering no offsetting benefit. How about stoking endless uncertainty over future tariffs, kneecapping the Federal Reserve's operational independence and undermining trust in official statistics? Done, done and done. Trump has escalated his unwarranted attacks on Fed Chair Jerome Powell (whom he appointed back in 2018), going as far as to drum up accusations of impropriety over the central bank's renovation of its headquarters. Just recently, he appointed Stephen Miran, a key thinker behind Trumpist heterodoxy, to a temporary position on the Fed's board, while the search for a suitably compliant successor to Powell proceeds. Doesn't it serve Trump's purposes to install a servant at the Fed? No, it doesn't. For a start, the idea that the Fed is scheming to defeat Trump's broader policy agenda is preposterous. Even if an obedient Fed were to deliver the much lower policy-rate that the president thinks appropriate, this wouldn't necessarily lower the interest rates he cares about — mortgage rates, cost of credit and long-term borrowing. It's much more likely that ending the Fed's perceived independence (to say nothing of a big cut in the policy rate with inflation still above target) would push market-driven rates higher. Politically, attacking the Fed is all risk and no return. Installing a follower at the Fed looks almost reasonable compared to firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics on patently specious grounds. The president accused Erika McEntarfer of rigging the July jobs figures released on Aug. 1, because they included unusually big downward revisions for May and June. It's hard to see how McEntarfer could have rigged the numbers even if she'd wanted to. Revisions happen and they're apt to be bigger when sectoral demands for labor are shifting a lot (as they are now, thanks to tariffs and the crackdown on illegal workers) and when the agency is short of the resources it needs to gather data (as it is, thanks to the drive to cut government workers). For sure, the agency needs to improve its methods and keep the revisions as small as possible — goals made harder by the administration's dismantling of the panel of unpaid technical experts responsible for doing so. To repeat, I'm fairly sure a Democrat saboteur hasn't tunneled into the White House — but the true explanation evades me. As with attacking the Fed, firing the head of the BLS to install a follower whose independence will be questioned is all risk and no return. Planting the suspicion that employment and inflation numbers might be manipulated would add a further premium to long-term interest rates. And as such doubts accumulate, so does the risk of a "Trump moment' for financial markets — with no short-term political benefit, beyond dominating the headlines, in exchange. On immigration, trade, the Fed and the integrity of official data, the White House seems determined to cast aside its successes and take risks that serve no purpose. To be sure, for as long as financial markets allow, the president will probably keep on winning — you know, because the Democrats. How such a great country wound up with such politicians, I cannot fathom. Look on their works, median voters, and despair. Clive Crook is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and member of the editorial board covering economics.
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Xi Jinping visits Tibet amid Dalai Lama succession tensions
People take photos in front of a portrait of Chinese President Xi Jinping during a government-organized tour in Lhasa, in the Tibet Autonomous Region, in March. The president arrived in the region on Aug. 20, state media reported. © Reuters CK TAN August 20, 2025 19:40 JST TOKYO -- Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday arrived in Lhasa to mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Tibet Autonomous Region, according to state media outlet Xinhua.
The Mainichi
3 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) -- Israel gave final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Wednesday, the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on Aug. 6. If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday. Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognize a Palestinian state in recent weeks. "This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize," Smotrich told reporters. "Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground." The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. The two cities are 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart by air, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. Peace Now, an organization that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution" which is "guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed." Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognized. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.
