Here's the bumper sticker slogan Democrats are looking for
I read Nancy Kaffer's column regarding Mallory McMorrow's U.S. Senate candidacy. ("Can Democrats win Michigan's 2026 US Senate seat? Mallory McMorrow says yes," Detroit Free Press, April 6.) What stuck with me from the story was state Sen. McMorrow's bumper sticker statement (articulating her campaign priorities), "success, safety, sanity."
While that is all well and good, I feel that it demonstrates, once again, the Democratic Party's lack of understanding of what middle and working class people are feeling here in Michigan, and the country at large. McMorrow and other Democratic candidates seem to think that their voters only demand of them is to be "anti-Trump." They are missing the point. Voters are angry with Dems for refusing to address economic inequality and the problems that result from it. Democrats should look at last month's Bernie Sanders rally in Warren, and use that as a starting point for understand what voters want and what will motivate them.
Donald Trump offers an angry populist economic message to the economically disadvantaged. The Democrats need to wake up and adopt their own, one that is bumper-sticker-able: "The rich are screwing you."
And more importantly, they should actually do something about it.
Chris Skupny
Livonia
How much of Project 2025 has been implemented? Enough to break us beyond repair. | Opinion
Detroit is my home and heart. I am honored to represent it in the Michigan State House. Raised here by my mother and grandmother, this city shaped me. It's where my wife and I are raising our children. Because I love my community, there is one reality that I cannot accept: that our Black infant and maternal mortality rates are among the worst in the nation. For Black Maternal Health Week this month, I am calling on all of us to tackle this problem head-on.
Many disparities persist throughout our healthcare system, but they hit Black mothers the hardest when they are seeking to have healthy pregnancies and births. Not only do Black mothers lack access to the care they need, but even when they do get care, their concerns are often dismissed. I have witnessed it in my community, and my wife and I experienced it firsthand.
When my wife, Shaunté, and I were expecting our first child, we had a plan. But, as often happens, the best-laid plans can go awry. We wanted a birth as free from unnecessary interventions as possible, but as her labor progressed slowly, we felt pressured to rush things along. She was given an epidural and oxytocin. Before we knew it, doctors were wheeling her away for a C-section — which we both knew came with increased risk to her. In what should have been a joyous time, I was consumed by fear, knowing the statistics about Black maternal health.
My wife and child came through the delivery safely. But during her recovery, Shaunté experienced excruciating pain. Doctors dismissed her concerns, telling us it was normal. Years later, we learned that extensive scar tissue from the C-section was the reason for her pain. Finally, we received acknowledgment of what should have been recognized and respected years earlier. My wife had joined the awful club of Black women whose health was ignored by the medical system. My wife — and all Black women — deserve to be listened to, not ignored.
As a husband and father, my role was to support her through one of the most vulnerable times in her life. As a legislator, my duty is to take that experience and fight for change so no family has to endure the same struggle.
When we had our first baby, we both prepared as much as we could. We took birthing classes, had a midwife and a doula and even went to a natural birthing center. But still, I was unprepared. I didn't know what to ask or advocate for, nor what to expect. I compare it to my early days as a legislative staffer. I had to listen to others to do my job effectively. The same is true for birth experiences. We need to share our stories to help others navigate this system and change the situation.
I want to be a voice calling for dads, men and entire communities to engage. This isn't just a women's fight — it's a fight for all of us. In Michigan, we are fortunate to have the advocates at Mothering Justice championing the Mamas' Agenda. The women at the helm of this organization have solutions to not only reduce maternal and infant mortality rates, but also increase essential programs that allow families to thrive, such as paid leave and affordable childcare.
In our legislature, Sens. Erika Geiss and Sylvia Santana and Rep. Stephanie Young are leading the charge in making these solutions a reality. I am calling on all my colleagues to step up and stand beside these leaders.
This won't be easy. From our environment and water quality to democracy and health care, our city and state have a hell of a lot of challenges. But with determination, and by listening to each other and our community advocates, we can improve the care Black families receive and reduce our Black maternal and infant mortality rate.
Donavan McKinney
The writer represents Michigan's 14th District in the state House of Representatives
The recent Signal leak of attack plans reveals gaps in our national security and threatens our prosperity. Our elected officials need to do their job providing oversight of these appointed officials and hold them accountable for their serious blunder.
U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman, R-Watersmeet, represents Northern Michigan. He is also a retired Marine Corps Lieutenant General, and a member of the House Armed Services Committee. I retired as an Air Force Major who held a high-level clearance. I know the Signal screwup exposed classified information to a reporter due to the carelessness of appointed officials including the national security advisor, secretary of defense, and other intelligence community leaders.
For those not familiar, classified information is any information that could cause harm to our national security if it falls into the hands of an enemy. The information shared in the Signal chat included the specific timing, military units and types of attack for an upcoming operation. That is all classified before an operation happens.
Communicating attack plans over an unapproved system puts that information at risk of being leaked. If I had mishandled classified information as a military member, I would have been punished and possibly imprisoned for not properly protecting information that could have gotten my fellow service members killed. Rep. Bergman knows this, and must do his duty to guarantee our national security, protect classified information, and hold these officials accountable.
Classified information is similar to trade secrets in the commercial world. Companies require employees to sign non-disclosure agreements in order to maintain their competitive edge. This is no different than the the non-disclosure agreements military members sign to protect classified information.
Imagine Paul, an employee of Ford Motor Company, communicates with coworkers via group text about a new Mustang engine. He thinks the group only has Ford engineers. He didn't realize that his co-worker Mark added his friend, John, who is an engineer from Chevy. Even if John doesn't share these trade secrets, Ford would almost certainly fire Paul and Mark for not protecting information that could damage the company.
In this recent Signal incident, we were incredibly lucky it did not lead to disaster. If the information had been published when the reporter first got it, America's enemies could have killed our highly trained service members, destroyed expensive airplanes paid for with your tax dollars and led to mission failure.
The difference between the car company example and the recent Signal chat is the latter group are people leading the departments of the executive branch. They are supposed to be safeguarding our nation. Their unserious actions put our nation, service members and tax dollars at risk. People entrusted with the nation's secrets need to be held accountable for their mistakes — just like any one of us would be for failing at our jobs.
Every Michigander, regardless of their ideological leaning, must care about this because it is not only the national security and safety of our service members, but ultimately the prosperity of our nation. I call on Rep. Bergman, and all of our elected leaders, to hold these appointees accountable, ensure the proper handling of classified information, and protect the interests of the citizens they represent.
Jennifer Caulk
Cheboygan
Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters and we may publish it online and in print. If you have a differing view from a letter writer, please feel free to submit a letter of your own in response.
Like what you're reading? Please consider supporting local journalism and getting unlimited digital access with a Detroit Free Press subscription. We depend on readers like you.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: 'The rich are screwing you' ought to on a bumper sticker | Letters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

16 minutes ago
In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles
The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
MAGA Supporters Counter Anti-ICE Protests: 'Go Back to Mexico'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Donald Trump supporters in Tampa, Florida, have started counter-protests to anti-ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demonstrations. Video footage posted on X, formerly Twitter, shows a man holding a red "MAGA country" flag chanting "we want ICE" and telling a woman holding a Mexican flag: "If you love Mexico, go back to Mexico." In another clip, a group of men can be seen holding a Trump-Vance banner, before move for a truck coming through. Hundreds gathered outside Tampa's City Hall to protest on Monday, after a weekend of violent clashes between anti-ICE demonstrators and law enforcement. Police intervened during some heated moments between anti-ICE protesters and counter-protesters but there was no violence, according to Tampa broadcaster FOX13. This is a developing story - more to follow.

16 minutes ago
World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament
NEW YORK -- Philadelphia's host city executive for the 2026 World Cup says organizers accept that an immigration crackdown by President Donald Trump's administration may be among the outside events that impact next year's tournament. "There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going affect the tournament next year, so we recognize that we're planning within uncertainty,' Meg Kane said Monday at a gathering of the 11 U.S. host city leaders, one year and two days ahead of the tournament opener. The World Cup will be played at 16 stadiums in the U.S., Mexico and Canada from June 11 to July 19 next year, a tournament expanded to 48 nations and 104 games. All matches from the quarterfinals on will be in the U.S., with the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. 'Whether it's the Olympics, whether it's a World Cup, whether it's a Super Bowl, you name it, anytime you've got a major international sporting event, geopolitics is going to have a role,' said Alex Vasry, CEO of the New York/New Jersey host committee. Kane said the host committees must adapt to decisions made by others. 'One of the things that I think we all recognize is that we have to be really good at operating within that uncertainty,' Kane said. 'I think for each of our cities, we want to be prepared to make any person that is coming and makes the decision to come to the United States or come to this World Cup feel that they are welcome. We do not play a role necessarily in what is happening in terms of the decisions that are made.' Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 countries exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. 'We allow for FIFA to continue having constructive conversations with the administrations around visas, around workforce, around tourism,' Kane said. FIFA is running the World Cup for the first time without a local organizing committee in the host nation. Asked in late April whether FIFA president Gianni Infantino was available to discuss the tournament, FIFA director of media relations Bryan Swanson forwarded the request to a member of the media relations staff, who did not make Infantino available. Legislation approved by the House of Representatives and awaiting action in the Senate would appropriate $625 million to the Federal Emergency Management Agency 'for security, planning, and other costs related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.' The 11 U.S. host committees have been consulting with each other on issues such as transportation for teams and VIPs, and for arranging fan fests. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after fans breached security gates. 'Certainly we were not involved in the planning or the logistics for that particular match,' said Alina Hudak, CEO of the Miami World Cup host committee. She said local police 'have done an extensive review of the after-action reports related to that in collaboration with the stadium and so all of the things that happened are in fact being reviewed and addressed and I can assure you that everything is being done within our power to make sure that the appropriate measures are being placed, the appropriate perimeters.'