King Cobras Found Near Mt Everest, Here's Why Experts Are Worried
King Cobra is the world's longest venomous snake. Its venom is not the most potent among venomous snakes, but the amount it releases in a single bite is powerful enough to kill 20 people or an elephant.
Here's why their presence near Mount Everest is concerning
King cobras and Monocled cobras, both snakes, are mostly found in the Tarai regions in parts of southern Nepal and northern India. As the temperature continues to rise, they are now found nesting in hilly and mountainous areas as well.
"Those snakes were rescued from houses and compounds with the help of a snake rescuer and were released in the nearby forest. Locals have also found King Cobra eggs and nests in nearby jungles," Jaya Thapa Magar, chair of the municipality's ward 1, told The Kathmandu Post.
The experts are worried as the presence of these snakes in colder regions could be because of climate change, with experts suggesting that rising temperatures might be driving these tropical snakes to higher altitudes. If this change continues, it will impact the region's ecosystem.
Subodh Acharya, a snake rescue trainer from Mithila Wildlife Trust, Janakpur, told the outlet, "These snakes might have come to the Valley with logs and hay in trucks, but have already made habitats here."
The rescued venomous snakes have been released there, with Mr Acharya urging people to be vigilant while they are in the forests.
Climate change in Nepal
In the past few years, Nepal has witnessed extreme weather events linked to climate change. The maximum temperature in Nepal is rising at a rate of 0.05 degrees Celsius per year.
King cobras are listed as vulnerable in the National Red Data Book of Nepal and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.
Habitat destruction, human conflict and snakebites are significant threats to king cobra populations. A report published in March 2022 in The Lancet, which is a leading international medical journal, highlighted that incidents of snakebite and resulting deaths are common in the Tarai districts during the summer. Each year, approximately 2,700 people, mostly children and women from Nepal's Tarai region, lose their lives because of snakebites.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
World's longest and most poisonous snake, video of 18-feet long King Cobra leaves everyone in shock, watch here
Viral video: Currently, a video is going viral on social media, which can make anyone's heart tremble. The video shows a young man holding a huge snake. The snake is not an ordinary one, but the longest and most venomous snake in the world, the Malaysian King Cobra. It is a sight to behold. Watch the video here This is a Malaysian King Cobra. The longest venomous snake on the planet. It is the longest of the different subspecies of King Cobra, as well. Adult males can possibly reach up to 17ft to 18ft (5m). — Nature is Amazing ☘️ (@AMAZlNGNATURE) August 15, 2025 The video is shared by Nature is Amazing ☘️ @AMAZlNGNATURE on X, with the caption: 'This is a Malaysian King Cobra. The longest venomous snake on the planet. It is the longest of the different subspecies of King Cobra, as well. Adult males can possibly reach up to 17ft to 18ft (5m).' King Cobra is famous not only for its length, but also for its intelligence, deadly poison and unique hunting technique. The special thing is that this snake also eats other snakes. This is the reason why it is called the 'King of Snakes'. This snake is so poisonous that it can kill an elephant. According to experts, the venom of the Malaysian King Cobra is so powerful that it can kill even an adult elephant in a few hours. However, this snake does not attack humans easily. It attacks only when it feels threatened. The female king cobra also makes a nest to protect its eggs and becomes very aggressive during this time. This feature makes only the king cobra different among snakes. The Malaysian King Cobra is found in Peninsular and East Malaysia. It's the world's longest venomous snake, capable of growing to impressive lengths of 5-6 meters. King cobras are generally shy and try to avoid humans. When threatened, they can rear up, spread a hood (similar to true cobras), and emit a hissing sound that can resemble a dog's growl.
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Climate havoc: Jellyfish are getting in the way of electricity supply
Next Story David Fickling Heat has begun to impact power infrastructure in unforeseen ways. In France, two nuclear plants had to be shut down as jellyfish clogged parts of their cooling systems. Other plants face other problems. Can solar panels and lithium batteries ride to the rescue? A swarm of jellyfish caused two nuclear plants in France to shut down. Gift this article It's not just people who struggle to perform effectively when temperatures soar. The electricity system we depend on to keep us cool has the same problem. A swarm of jellyfish linked to unusually warm waters in northern Europe caused French utility Electricite de France to shut two nuclear power stations this week after these invertebrates clogged up parts of their cooling systems. It's not just people who struggle to perform effectively when temperatures soar. The electricity system we depend on to keep us cool has the same problem. A swarm of jellyfish linked to unusually warm waters in northern Europe caused French utility Electricite de France to shut two nuclear power stations this week after these invertebrates clogged up parts of their cooling systems. Other reactors in the country may have to cut output because temperatures in the Rhône and Garonne rivers are too high. In Iraq, supply to most of the country went down last week as millions of pilgrims descended on the city of Karbala for the Arba'in festival, spiking grid demand for fans and air-conditioners as the mercury rose above 40° Celsius. Even back-up equipment struggles in such conditions: electricity went out and play was suspended at the Cincinnati Open tennis tournament last week after an on-site generator apparently overheated. Power that goes out when we most need it should infuriate but not surprise us. Most of our infrastructure is designed to perform within specific temperature ranges that the global climate is leaving behind. More and more of it is likely to start breaking as heatwaves become more intense and widespread. That's particularly the case with thermal generators, which use the heat of burning fuels or atomic decay to spin turbines and create electricity. Such plants need to dump excess heat, but this gets harder as the air and water outside warm up. The result is decreasing efficiency and overheating, forcing plants to burn more fuel for the same output or halt operations. The probability that a coal generator will have a forced outage goes up by 3.2 percentage points during heatwaves, while gas and nuclear are respectively 1.3 and 1 percentage points more likely to suffer an unplanned failure, according to a recent study by researchers in Sweden and Italy. Separately, Iraqi researchers found that a gas plant lost about 21% of its generation potential as the temperature rose from 25° to 50° Celsius. Drought, which commonly occurs alongside heatwaves, makes the problem worse. Most thermal generators cool themselves by heating up water, whether it's in the sea, rivers or cooling towers. Cool water, like cool air, gets less abundant as the temperature rises. India has lost 19 days' worth of coal electricity since 2014 because water shortages have forced shutdowns, Reuters reported recently. In many areas, residents depend on tanker trucks and ever-deeper boreholes because generators are using up all of the surface water. Power stations may put more pressure on supplies of water between now and 2050 than the drinking water needs of its population, according to government forecasts. Conventional generators aren't the only ones to suffer. As anyone who's sat through a still and humid summer day would recognize, wind speeds often plummet in hot weather. Since the early 1980s, the area of the globe affected by such conditions has increased by 6.3% every decade—to the point that about 60% of the planet is now at risk. In Australia, Siberia and Europe, the availability of wind can now decline by 30% to 50% during heatwaves relative to what it would be in normal years—though a few areas, such as the northern US, east Africa, the Amazon and western China experience the opposite effect. Even if we can solve the problem of generating energy, getting it to consumers presents challenges. Transmission cables and transformers heat up as electrons travel through their wires and rising air temperatures make such components more susceptible to failure—especially as they're typically working harder on such days due to all the air-conditioners and fans running. It's not just people who need relief from the heat. About a third of electricity consumption from data centres comes from heating and cooling to maintain stable temperatures on-site. That demand rises along with the mercury and is becoming more pressing with the spread of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies. A heatwave in 2022 caused chaos at two London hospitals when their server racks shut down, scrambling the IT systems they depend on to process medical data. The rising dominance of solar panels and lithium-ion batteries, which tend to be more resilient than thermal generators and wind during heatwaves, will offer some respite. It still may not be enough. Most of our industrial civilization, built from the energy riches unleashed by coal, oil and gas, depends on a moderate climate that their carbon emissions are throwing into disorder. The damage caused by fossil technology is going to be with us long after we have switched to cleaner ways of generating power. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Is CO2 truly a pollutant? We break down the debate
Is carbon dioxide a pollutant? A small but vocal group of researchers, authors and US government officials say it is time to change the definition. Greenhouse gases including CO2 are considered air pollutants under the Clean Air Act, according to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said federal regulators must determine whether these pollutants endanger public health. Most climate and atmospheric scientists say rising levels of CO2 are raising the planet's temperature, which in turn is leading to more intense storms, rising sea levels and the risk of more intense drought and wildfires that endanger human health and welfare. The Trump administration is asserting that CO2 isn't a threat to public health, as part of a new effort to undo some of the Environmental Protection Agency's responsibilities for regulating emissions. CO2 'is a greenhouse gas. It absorbs infrared radiation, but it's not a pollutant," said Energy Secretary Chris Wright in an interview with the Journal. 'It does not cause acute harm to humans." The definition of CO2's role is central to the EPA plan, which would eliminate the so-called endangerment finding that followed from the 2007 court ruling. Public hearings start this week, kicking off what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle over whether the government will continue to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from vehicles, power plants and other industries. There are both certainties and uncertainties about CO2 and its effects on the planet. Carbon dioxide is an odorless gas that plants absorb and, together with sunlight, use to produce food and oxygen during photosynthesis. Humans exhale CO2 as a waste product of cellular activity. It isn't toxic to people at current levels in the atmosphere. It is also produced by the burning of fossil fuels in vehicles, power plants and other industrial activities. In a world without human activity, natural sources of CO2 such as volcanoes, decomposing plant material and wildfires, would be balanced by natural 'sinks" that absorb it, such as the ocean and plants that take in CO2 during photosynthesis, according to Daniele Visioni, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Cornell University. While natural emissions are about 10 times greater than human-caused emissions annually, human activities are the primary cause of the current rise in atmospheric CO2, say climate scientists. 'These human emissions come on top of this perfect balance," Visioni said. More than two decades of research from climate scientists and federal agencies have linked rising atmospheric temperatures to rising CO2. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere—the ratio of CO2 to air molecules—has jumped by more than 50% since preindustrial times, from approximately 280 parts per million to 425 ppm today, according to the EPA. Meanwhile, the average global atmospheric temperature has risen 1.27 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit) since the mid-19th century, and the past 10 years have been the warmest since record-keeping began in the 1850s, according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Members of emergency services and locals work to contain a wildfire near Tepelena, Albania. As the scientific consensus on CO2's role in climate change has solidified, so too has the alternative view that more CO2 is good for the planet, and that it was a mistake to classify it a pollutant. This view has been promoted for the past two decades by authors, bloggers and researchers who don't accept the established scientific findings. They say that CO2 isn't directly harmful to humans and has many natural sources, and that since Congress didn't label CO2 a pollutant when it passed the original 1970 Clean Air Act or its amendments in 1990, changing the gas's legal definition will require new legislation rather than EPA regulations. The Energy Department completed a 141-page review of the science of climate change last month that is the scientific foundation of the EPA's effort to roll back existing emissions rules. It is written by five authors who acknowledge that the atmosphere is warming but cast doubt on the severity of the effects of a changing climate and question the accuracy of climate models that predict future warming. The report argues that increasing CO2 levels will boost agricultural production, like a massive jolt of plant food. Some experimental studies have found that increasing CO2 boosts plant growth, but other studies have also found that many food crops lose vitamins, minerals and proteins under high CO2 conditions. The DOE report notes that this loss of nutrients will have to be compensated by using more fertilizers or breeding new strains of food crops to handle the extra growth. Critics say the DOE report is inaccurate. A lawsuit filed last week by the Environmental Defense Fund and the Union of Concerned Scientists in a federal-district court in Massachusetts contends that agency officials violated federal rules that require them to hold open meetings and disclose the report's authors beforehand. A DOE spokeswoman had no immediate comment on the lawsuit. Determining how much and how fast CO2 emissions will warm the planet in the future is still uncertain. That is because large-scale changes in the Earth's ecosystem that are occurring as the atmosphere warms are still being studied, according to Michael Diamond, professor of atmospheric sciences at Florida State University. The warming atmosphere is changing cloud patterns in some parts of the globe, but it isn't clear whether the changes will warm or cool the planet. Much depends on their altitude and density. The warming atmosphere is also pulling more moisture from plants, he said, offsetting the beneficial growth effects of CO2 and melting permafrost in the Arctic, releasing methane, another greenhouse gas. Another big question is whether the oceans might be reaching their limit on absorbing excess heat and CO2. 'There's a lot of things that we still need to understand better about climate change, but we know more than enough to know that it is a threat to human health and wellness and ecosystems," Diamond said.
