logo
JPMorgan confirms plans to launch JPMD ‘stablecoin'

JPMorgan confirms plans to launch JPMD ‘stablecoin'

Coin Geek5 hours ago

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
JPMorgan (NASDAQ: JPM) has confirmed that it plans to launch JPMD, a stablecoin-like' deposit token,' which will function like a digital representation of a commercial bank deposit.
A spokesperson for the bank revealed the plans to CNBC on June 17, hot on the heels of the financial behemoth filing for a new trademark for 'JPMD,' which kicked off a round of speculation that it was expanding its digital asset activities.
According to JPMorgan, JPMD will launch on Coinbase's (NASDAQ: COIN) Ethereum-based Base blockchain. JPMD will supposedly allow for round-the-clock settlement as well as an interest-paying mechanism. However, it will only be available to JPMorgan's institutional clients.
'We see institutions using JPMD for onchain digital asset settlement solutions as well as for making cross-border business-to-business transactions,' global co-head of Kinexys, J.P. Morgan's blockchain unit's Naveen Mallela told CNBC.
Rumors around JPMorgan's blockchain plans began to intensify after the JPMD trademark was filed on June 15. The application stated that the trademark is intended to be used in connection with a host of goods and services, relating to digital asset use cases.
For example, it cites 'providing trading, exchange, transfer and payment services for digital assets, namely, virtual currency, digital tokens, payment tokens, decentralized application tokens and blockchain enabled currency.' Later, it lists 'Financial services, namely, facilitating the deposit, holding and withdrawal of electronic funds' and 'Financial services, namely, a financial futures exchange for trading currency including digital currency.'
Virtually any service you'd feasibly expect JP Morgan to provide in connection with digital assets is covered in the application's description. The acronym JPMD, however, was speculated to refer to a stablecoin offering—JPMorgan Dollar.
The trademark application was made under Sections 1(b) and 44(d) of the United States Trademark Act. Section 1(b) filings are used where the company applying for the trademark has a 'bona fide intention' to use the trademark in connection with goods and/or services in the near future. Section 44(d) is used when a trademark application has previously been filed in another jurisdiction—in this case, JPMorgan filed the same trademark application in Singapore on June 11.
The timing is notable. The stablecoin question in the U.S. has received increased attention from the public and private sectors over the past few months.
The U.S. Senate's Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, which is the country's push to fully regulate stablecoin issuance, passed a vote on the Senate floor last month. It specifies who may issue stablecoins and how they must be backed and, in its current form, would require non-publicly listed entities to seek regulatory approval before issuing stablecoins.
Perhaps detecting a seachange for stablecoins is on the horizon; the Wall Street Journal reported in May that the largest banks in the U.S. are considering teaming up to launch a stablecoin, including Bank of America (NASDAQ: BAC), Citigroup (NASDAQ: C), Wells Fargo (NASDAQ: WFC) and JPMorgan. It also reported that retailers Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Walmart (NASDAQ: WMT) were exploring their own stablecoins to shave off transaction fees currently being charged by legacy payment processors.
All of this is buoying the stablecoin and broader digital asset markets. Circle (NASDAQ: CRCL), the issuer of one of the most prominent stablecoins, soared to all-time highs this week, reaching $151 a share. Virtually all Bitcoin ETFs are up roughly 5% on the month and around 30% in the past three months.
Watch: Blockchain is much more than digital assets
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ford Recalls Its Electric Mustang Because The Doors Don't Do Their One Job
Ford Recalls Its Electric Mustang Because The Doors Don't Do Their One Job

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

Ford Recalls Its Electric Mustang Because The Doors Don't Do Their One Job

Faulty Door Locks Could Lead To Fallout When it comes to recalls of cars sold in America, Ford, Stellantis, and Tesla led the way in 2024 with the most. This year, Ford may retake the title. It recently issued a single recall for almost 1.1 million vehicles, and now there's a new one that affects 197,432 Mustang Mach-E electric crossovers in America and another 120,000-odd from other markets. According to The Detroit News, these EVs may lock themselves with no workaround, which could trap people inside the car or prevent them from entering it. Self-Locking Happens In Certain Scenarios According to the recall documents filed with the NHTSA, the problem occurs when the vehicle has a low 12-volt battery, and then 'the electronic door latches may remain locked once the driver or front passenger exits and shuts the door.' If a child is left in the car when this happens, they may be unable to take advantage of the inner door release handles. Worse still, the car may still not unlock when the 12-V battery is jumped. One Mustang Mach-E Forum user reported that his infant was locked in the car for 40 minutes because of this same sort of problem. While Ford works on a remedy, it has issued a stop-sale recall, so there are likely still affected units at dealers. A Simple Fix, But A Long Wait Thankfully, the fault lies in the vehicle's software, so this won't require a physical fix at the dealer. Ford will update the affected 2021-2025 EVs' powertrain control module and secondary on-board diagnostic control module C software at no cost, and owners should expect notification letters to be mailed on June 23. Once Ford has figured out exactly what to do, it will send a second letter, but unfortunately, the automaker only expects the fix to be ready on September 29. On the surface, software seems like something that shouldn't only go wrong when the car reaches users, but test engineers don't usually test new cars with old or weak 12V batteries. Ford's general quality problems will take years to fix, but the automaker is making efforts, and hopefully, it will fall a little further on the recall leaderboard when 2025 comes to a close. About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile

The Corvette Zora Didn't Happen Because The ZR1X Is An AWD ZR1
The Corvette Zora Didn't Happen Because The ZR1X Is An AWD ZR1

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

The Corvette Zora Didn't Happen Because The ZR1X Is An AWD ZR1

Zora Seemed Like The Perfect Name Zora Arkus-Duntov was no ordinary engineer. He turned the Corvette into a true sports car, and although he was several decades ahead of his time, he even advocated the idea of putting its engine in the middle of the chassis. The man died in 1996, long enough to see the ZR1 badge move from performance package to new model line in the C4, but he didn't see his idea of a mid-engine 'Vette realized, as the car only made that change with the reveal of the C8 in 2019. Before that car arrived, a patent filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2014 gave General Motors the right to use the Zora name on a car. GM reapplied for the trademark in 2019, just as the C8 was preparing to enter the world, so the puzzle pieces were falling into place. The ultimate C8 seemed like a romantic way to immortalize the man. Chevrolet could combine the layout that Zora championed with the most capable version of that car, which would surely be a fitting tribute to the man. But when Road & Track asked why our expectations were not met with the nomenclature and we instead got the alphanumeric ZR1X name, the response from a spokesperson was simply, 'ZR1X is an extension of the ZR1 family, so we believe ZR1X is a fitting name for the new variant.' That Explains ZR1X, But Not Why Zora Was Passed On R&T was not satisfied with that answer either, so the publication asked directly why Zora wasn't used, especially since the trademark was secured. 'I know Zora was broadly speculated by enthusiasts, but since it was future product, it was never something we weighed in on,' said the spokesperson. 'What I can tell you is the team felt this Corvette was deserving of the ZR1 designation, and it was an opportunity to show that even though ZR1 and ZR1X are different cars, they have strong familial resemblance and represent ultimate Corvette performance.' Fair enough – we'll give our thoughts on this explanation momentarily. But what does the 'X' stand for? This might seem like a silly question to ask. Surely it references the fact that this is an AWD take on the ZR1, or perhaps an 'Xtreme' version since it has more power, right? Wrong. There was reportedly 'no grand scheme behind it' – the name 'was about sticking close to ZR1.' This leads us back to the cesspool of speculation. Ford decided to call its first electric crossover Mustang Mach-E because the first part of the name is so familiar and could thus help ease the introduction of a new concept (in this case, an electric crossover), and the sales numbers prove the strategy worked. It seems GM simply added a letter to the ZR1 name for similar reasons – a hybridized AWD Corvette may have been a hard sale with an uncommon new name. Our Take: Chevy Had No Choice But To Expand The ZR1 Family Source: Chevrolet Hardcore enthusiasts are resistant to change and averse to the perceived dilution of a nameplate. Many BMW M3 fans bemoaned the move to a V8 in the E9X generation because, in their minds, the recipe had to include a straight-six engine. Similarly, some have already started to denigrate Shelby American's GT350 because it doesn't have a naturally aspirated flat-plane crank V8 like the S550 version that Ford made, so you can be sure that some ZR1 fans will argue that, to them, the badge has always signified a rear-wheel-drive front-engine sports car, even if the engine under the hood has always changed. Fanatics decide that a car fits in a certain box, and then they get annoyed when that box no longer fits. Simply put, GM had a choice between mildly redefining what the ZR1 badge means by putting it on a car with AWD and a hybrid system, or it could have gone the other way, putting the Zora badge above ZR1. This would have been a slippery (and expensive) slope. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. By placing 1,250-horsepower AWD Zora above 1,064-hp traction-limited ZR1, GM would be conceding that the latter no longer means the cream of the Corvette crop; the existence of the Zora would mean the ZR1 is 'less than.' Changing to a mid-engine layout was controversial but necessary, but changing the name that signifies the pinnacle of Corvette performance? That would be a marketing nightmare, and when you've spent the last 55 years (excluding the C5 generation) ensuring that the ZR1 badge is what comes to mind when thinking of an all-American supercar killer, slapping a new name on essentially the ultimate evolution thereof would be disrespectful to the Corvette brand's heritage, and in this world, selling cars is more important than yet another nod to the man who helped shape it. To be fair, Chevy could well still use the Zora name for some kind of limited-run send-off when the C8 is ready to retire in a few years, or it could be reserved to introduce a whole new take on Corvette performance as an EV… About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile

Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for June
Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for June

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for June

A standout lease in a pricey market Amid a summer full of rising lease prices—Nissan included—one name in the lineup still stands out: the 2025 Sentra SV. While the brand has hiked signing costs on popular models like the Kicks, Rogue, and Altima, and demands over $6,000 up front for the Murano or Pathfinder, the compact Sentra continues to offer one of the most approachable new-car leases available. 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Why the Sentra still makes sense The Sentra has always played the value card well, and in 2025, it doubles down on it. The SV trim, recommended for its added tech and comfort, adds Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, dual-zone climate control, and access to the NissanConnect infotainment system with a Wi-Fi hotspot. 2025 Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan And now, it's more affordable than ever. For $209 per month for 39 months with $3,259 due at signing, the Sentra SV offers one of the lowest monthly payments for any gas-powered car or crossover on the market. With a total lease mileage of 32,500 miles, it's a compelling package for budget-conscious shoppers who need practical, fuel-efficient daily transportation. Want more features? The SR isn't a bad deal either If you want a little more style and luxury, Nissan's got an answer there, too. The Sentra SR, with its sharp-looking two-tone paint, 18-inch wheels, and available quilted leather interior, is available for $319/month. While that is a fairly large jump, it's still notably cheaper than most compact crossovers or hybrid sedans, and the upgrades do bring a touch of premium feel to an otherwise budget-friendly ride. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan The SR trim also adds LED headlights, a sportier exterior design, and access to more tech options, including an 8.0-inch touchscreen and premium Bose audio. These extras don't just look good on paper—they elevate the Sentra from a basic commuter to something that actually feels a little upscale inside. It's still the same practical car underneath, but with a more refined edge that's rare in this price range. Final thoughts The 2025 Sentra may not be the most thrilling car to drive, given that its 149-hp engine and CVT are more focused on economy than excitement, but it's quiet, comfortable, and equipped with class-leading safety tech. With EPA ratings of up to 34 mpg combined, supportive front seats, and a spacious 14-cubic-foot trunk, it covers all the basics and then some. Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan If you're shopping for a new daily driver under $250 a month, this summer lease may be hard to beat. Even in a segment filled with great options, the Sentra SV makes a strong case for best overall value. *Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store