Suffolk DA blasts judge for dismissing case of man detained by ICE midtrial
Wilson Martell-Lebron was detained by ICE near Boston Municipal Court last month after the first day of his trial for falsifying information to the Registry of Motor Vehicles. Judge Mark Summerville, who was overseeing the trial, dismissed the case against Martell-Lebron with prejudice, finding prosecutors knowingly allowed him to be taken into federal custody.
Summerville also held ICE agent Brian Sullivan in contempt, a finding thrown out in federal court at the request of U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah Foley's office.
But in a letter Thursday, Hayden blasted Summerville for apparently failing to take steps to ensure Martell-Lebron's trial could continue after he was detained by ICE. Prosecutors told the judge ICE would bring Martell-Lebron to court if he ordered them to do so.
Hayden wrote that Summerville's decision to hold Sullivan in contempt of court and refer him for prosecution was 'patently illegal.' The district attorney said his office has no authority to prosecute a federal agent.
It's the latest development in a case that has essentially pitted local prosecutors against the federal government amid the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
Hayden's office said it intends to appeal Summerville's decision to dismiss the case.
Hayden's letter faults Summerville's finding of prosecutorial misconduct, saying Massachusetts law precluded him from lumping two Massachusetts State Police troopers and Sullivan, the ICE agent, in with the prosecution team.
The letter also takes aim at ICE for interfering with the proceeding, with Hayden writing that the agency ignored its own protocols, which would typically prevent the arrest of a person on trial in state court. Hayden notes that his office has no authority to prosecute Sullivan, but writes that 'the interruption of a criminal trial by ICE impedes local law enforcement and is contrary to the interests of justice.'
Still, Hayden says, there was no evidence ICE attempted to prevent Martell-Lebron's trial from continuing.
'The record reflects that ICE would have returned the defendant to court if Judge Summerville had merely issued a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to the directives of the Massachusetts Trial Court,' the letter reads. 'Had Judge Summerville simply followed the law and the procedures of the Chief Justice of the Trial Court, the trial could have continued after only a slight delay.'
When Summerville ruled Sullivan was in contempt, he said he had done everything in his power to ensure Martell-Lebron's trial would continue.
Hayden said that was simply not true, and that the finding of contempt violated 'basic facts' of the Supremacy Clause.
Summerville also found there was an 'ethical obligation' for the prosecution to inform Martell-Lebron's lawyer about the pending ICE action, and faulted the district attorney's office for improperly training its prosecutors. Hayden took issue with that claim, writing that no such obligation existed.
Had prosecutors notified Martell-Lebron's lawyer of the pending federal action, they risked federal prosecution, Hayden said, pointing to the case of Judge Shelley Joseph, who was indicted after prosecutors said she intentionally let a man evade detention by ICE.
To that end, Foley, in an open letter to Hayden, said 'any attempt or threat to interfere with the lawful actions of federal agents will not be tolerated.' (The district attorney's office says it never received the letter).
Hayden's letter notes that Massachusetts law prevents the detention of a person solely on the basis of a federal civil immigration detainer and that hiking a person's bail to ensure they remain in custody is a legal question pending before the Supreme Judicial Court.
Still, Hayden places much of the blame on ICE for arresting Martell-Lebron in the first place.
'We do not know why ICE decided to take the unprecedented step of arresting the defendant midtrial, interfering with a state criminal prosecution and preventing this office from holding the defendant accountable, but it certainly was not to protect the public,' he wrote. 'This interruption of a criminal trial makes the public less safe.'
Government 'obligated' to bring Rümeysa Öztürk to Vermont, judge rules
32-story Boston office building sells for $100M below assessed value
Polls find Americans souring on Trump's handling on major issue
Italian restaurant in Boston hotel quietly closes after 7 years
Famous band's member 'never once received a royalty' for millions of albums
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Kilmar Abrego Garcia could be released from jail Friday. Here's what to know
A U.S. magistrate judge is expected to order the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Tennessee jail Friday while he awaits trial on federal human smuggling charges. The release will provide the closest thing to freedom Abrego Garcia has felt since he was wrongfully deported to a notorious El Salvador prison in March, making him a face — if not the face — of President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies. Abrego Garcia's lawyers stated in a court filings Tuesday that a private security firm will take Abrego Garcia from Tennessee to Maryland when he's freed. But Abrego Garcia's liberty before trial could be short-lived. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement may detain him once he arrives in his adopted state of Maryland and could try to deport him again. Depending on who's telling his story, there are two very different versions of Abrego Garcia. Trump and his administration cast him as an MS-13 gang member and a tireless smuggler of migrants across the country. Abrego Garcia's attorneys portray him as a family man and construction worker who was arbitrarily deported and then vindictively charged to save political face. As Abrego Garcia's story takes yet another turn, here's what to know: 'Well-founded fear' Abrego Garcia, 30, grew up in El Salvador and fled at 16 because a local gang extorted and terrorized his family, court records state. He traveled to Maryland, where his brother lives as a U.S. citizen, but was not authorized to stay. Abrego Garcia found work in construction and met his future wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura. In 2018, he moved in with her and her two children after she became pregnant with his child. They lived in Prince George's County, just outside Washington. In March 2019, Abrego Garcia went to a Home Depot seeking work as a laborer when he and three other men were detained by local police, court records state. They were suspected of being in MS-13 based on tattoos and clothing. A criminal informant told police that Abrego Garcia was in MS-13, court records state, but police did not charge him and turned him over to ICE. A U.S. immigration judge denied Abrego Garcia's subsequent asylum claim because more than a year had passed since his arrival. But the judge granted him protection from being deported back to El Salvador, determining that he had a 'well-founded fear' of gang persecution there, court records state. Abrego Garcia was released and placed under federal supervision. He received a federal work permit and checked in with ICE each year, his lawyers said. He joined a union and was employed full-time as a sheet metal apprentice. 'Audacity to fight back' In February, the Trump administration designated MS-13 as a foreign terrorist organization. In March, it deported Abrego Garcia to the prison in El Salvador, violating the U.S. immigration judge's 2019 order. Abrego Garcia later claimed in court documents that he was beaten and psychologically tortured, while El Salvador President Nayib Bukele denied the allegations. The Trump administration described its violation of the immigration judge's 2019 order as an administrative error. Trump and other officials also doubled down on claims Abrego Garcia was in MS-13. Vasquez Sura filed a lawsuit to bring her husband back. Following mounting political pressure and a Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in early June. But it was to face the human smuggling charges. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on and wasn't charged with anything. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty to the smuggling charges filed in June. The case relies on the testimony of cooperating witnesses, some of whom have requested or received help with immigration and criminal matters, according to pre-trial testimony. Abrego Garcia's lawyers on Tuesday filed a rarely used motion to dismiss the case based on 'vindictive and selective prosecution.' 'This case results from the government's concerted effort to punish him for having the audacity to fight back,' his lawyers wrote. The government's response is due in court by Tuesday. Deportation fears realized U.S. Magistrate Barbara Holmes in Nashville ruled in June that Abrego Garcia has a right to be released from jail while he awaits trial, determining that he's not a flight risk or danger to the community. Holmes discussed at a court hearing conditions of release that would require Abrego Garcia to stay with his brother in Maryland. He would also have electronic monitoring and be placed on home detention. But Abrego Garcia has remained in jail at his attorneys' request for about 11 weeks over fears that ICE would immediately try to deport him. Those fears were confirmed in federal court in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia's wife is suing the Trump administration. Thomas Giles, an assistant director for ICE, testified last month that Abrego Garcia would be detained as soon as he's freed. He added that Mexico or South Sudan may be willing to accept Abrego Garcia, but the Trump administration hadn't decided on anything yet. U.S. officials have argued that Abrego Garcia can be deported because he came to the U.S. illegally and because a U.S. immigration judge deemed him eligible for expulsion in 2019, just not to his native El Salvador. Judge provides some protections Despite the fears of deportation, Abrego Garcia's attorneys have asked Holmes to finally release him from jail in Tennessee. A stay of release that they had requested expires Friday. In a filing Thursday, Holmes wrote that she will enter an order regarding Abrego Garcia's pretrial release on conditions. The order was not published as of Thursday afternoon. Abrego Garcia's expected release comes after a federal judge in Maryland provided some protections for him. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who is overseeing the lawsuit, has prohibited ICE from immediately detaining Abrego Garcia when he's released in Tennessee. In a late July order, Xinis required that any removal proceedings begin in Baltimore. That's where they should have begun when the Trump administration wrongfully deported him to El Salvador, Xinis wrote. Xinis also ordered that ICE provide three business days notice if it intends to initiate removal proceedings. The time will give Abrego Garcia and his attorneys the opportunity to raise any credible fears of persecution or torture in the country to which ICE plans to send him. Xinis wrote that the Trump administration has 'done little to assure the Court that absent intervention, Abrego Garcia's due process rights will be protected.' If ICE wanted to return him to El Salvador, it would have to reopen his 2019 case before an immigration judge, Xinis wrote. And that would require formal notice and 'an opportunity to be heard.' Xinis acknowledged that Abrego Garcia may be ordered to appear in Baltimore for immigration proceedings, which 'may or may not include lawful arrest, detention and eventual removal. 'So long as such actions are taken within the bounds of the Constitution and applicable statutes, this Court will have nothing further to say,' Xinis wrote.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NM Gov declines GOP's invite to visit ICE detention center
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, pictured in June at the Roundhouse, won't take New Mexico Republican lawmakers up on an invite to join a tour of the Otero County Processing Center in Southern New Mexico, where an average of 863 ICE detainees are currently held, according to a spokesperson. (Photo by Danielle Prokop / Source NM) Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's 'busy schedule' Monday means she won't join Republican lawmakers on a tour of New Mexico's biggest immigration detention center, a spokesperson for the governor told Source New Mexico on Thursday. New Mexico Republicans shared a letter on social media Wednesday announcing some members would be touring the Otero County Processing Center on Monday, and they invited the governor to come along. The detention center in Chaparral currently houses most of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainees in the state, and its population has increased since President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown began this year. The governor's chief lawyer told an interim legislative committee in July that the governor was considering adding a measure to the agenda at an upcoming special session that would ban immigration detention facilities in New Mexico. Medicaid, ICE detention on agenda for forthcoming special legislative session 'Before we take any action with such far-reaching implications (for example, putting New Mexicans out of work and risking millions of federal funding), it is essential that we have a clear first-hand understanding of the conditions within these facilities and the operations that take place there,' Republican lawmakers Rep. Andrea Reeb and Sen. Crystal Brantley wrote in the letter. The letter went on to invite the governor to tag along for the visit at 8 a.m. Monday. 'We believe your participation would be instrumental in ensuring that any decisions made are fully informed and in the best interests of the people of New Mexico,' the Republicans wrote. In an email Thursday afternoon, Michael Coleman, the spokesperson for the governor, told Source that the governor won't join the tour and also hasn't decided yet whether she'll add an ICE detention facility agenda to the special session call. 'The governor has a busy schedule on Monday and won't be joining in the tour,' Coleman said. 'We're still working to determine a special session agenda, and no final decision has been made on this particular issue.' He also said the governor hasn't yet decided on a date for the special session, which her lawyer said she anticipated would happen later this month or in September to address federal funding cuts Congress recently enacted in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' act. Other crime-related measures could also be on the governor's call. Senate GOP spokesperson Brandon Harris told Source New Mexico earlier Thursday that delays around background checks likely mean reporters won't be able to join the lawmakers during their tour, but they intend to hold a news conference or otherwise provide an update to the public about the tour. That could be on social media or at a previously scheduled meeting of the interim Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee also occurring Monday in Las Cruces. But the governor, who hadn't responded to the GOP's invite as of 1:30 p.m. Monday, would be able to join if she wanted, he said. 'If anyone could probably get expedited [approval],' it's the governor, Harris said. 'If she wanted to, she probably could.' The GOP's letter said the CCJ committee canceled a long-promised tour of the facility, citing concerns about background checks. As of Aug. 4, the average daily inmate population at Otero County Detention Center is 863, an increase of about 60 inmates, on average, since December last year, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. The other two New Mexico facilities in Torrance and Cibola counties have average daily populations of 444 and 223 ICE detainees, respectively, according to TRAC. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
25 Investigates: Canton mom back home after 10 days in immigration detention; questions remain
A Canton mother is home with her family after spending 10 days in immigration detention — despite being a lawful permanent resident with a recently reissued green card. 25 Investigates has been pressing federal agencies for answers about why Jemmy Jimenez Rosa, 42, was detained, and lawmakers are weighing in at odds, saying her case highlights both the pressure on immigration agents and concerns about individual rights. Her husband, Marcel Rosa, described the moment she was released Wednesday night outside the ICE facility in Burlington as 'kind of like an out-of-body experience.' It was a reunion mixed with joy, relief and sadness. Immigration agents detained Jimenez Rosa at Logan Airport on August 11th as she returned from a family vacation in Mexico. Family members say she legally came to the U.S. from Peru when she was 9 and has held a permanent resident green card since then. The U.S. government just renewed her green card earlier this summer. 'They could have just summoned us to a meeting,' Marcel Rosa told Boston 25's Kerry Kavanaugh. 'They did not have to go down this path. They chose to go down this.' Immigration attorney Todd Pomerleau believes Jimenez Rosa was held because of a 22-year-old marijuana possession conviction. That conviction was vacated this week by Massachusetts courts. Still, Pomerleau argues what happened was a violation of her rights. 'This is just the beginning. We demand justice for Jamie. What the federal government just said to this family is deplorable,' Pomerleau said Wednesday night. As 25 Investigates first reported, Jimenez Rosa spent her first four days detained at Logan Airport before being transferred to an ICE facility in Maine. Pomerleau says while at Logan, she didn't have access to a phone call, her attorneys, her medications, or even a shower. 25 Investigates reached out repeatedly to Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the U.S. Attorney's Office, and ICE. Each agency referred questions to another. Late Wednesday night, CBP provided a statement: 'A green card is a privilege, not a right, and under our nation's laws, our government has the authority to revoke a green card if our laws are broken and abused. Lawful Permanent Residents presenting at a U.S. port of entry with previous criminal convictions may be subject to mandatory detention and/or may be asked to provide additional documentation to be set up for an immigration hearing.' The agency did not respond to allegations regarding Jimenez Rosa's detention conditions at Logan. State lawmakers are now weighing in. 'CBP, ICE, they have to move really fast here in Massachusetts. They got to act decisively because they're met with such resistance here,' said Republican State Senator Peter Durant of Worcester and Hampshire. When asked if whether acting fast risks trampling individual rights, Durant said: 'I think that they have such a difficult job, and it makes it hard for the federal officers to do that job when they're under such pressure here in Massachusetts. I think it just adds to a lot of confusion.' 'The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This should not be happening,' said Democratic State Senator Mike Feeney of Briston and Norfolk. 'This doesn't make us safer. It doesn't make us stronger.' Feeney says he and his colleagues believe there should be some type of unified response from state lawmakers. Family members say they are grateful Jemmy is now home and safe, but they fear what could happen to someone else. 'If anyone is in this situation, you need to move fast. Like time is of the essence. She could have been out this country that same day,' Marcel Rosa said. Democratic Congressman Stephen Lynch told 25 Investigates that after seeing our reporting, he plans to request access to the holding facility at Logan Airport to examine what's happening there. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW Solve the daily Crossword
