Kremlin says it is closely monitoring Western weapons supplies to Ukraine
The supplies of weapons to Ukraine is a business and some European countries will pay for the weapons, spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
A new phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump is not planned, but it could be organized quickly, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
30 minutes ago
- Arab News
Will UK-France ‘one in, one out' deal solve migration dilemma?
Forget the rebranding of the UK-France 'entente cordial' as the 'entente amicale,' as expressed by King Charles when he toasted the relations between the old neighbors when he received Emmanuel Macron during last week's first state visit for a French president since 2008. Forget also the joint nuclear deterrent agreement reached between London and Paris. Forget Macron's mantra of standing together to 'save' European democracy. Forget the need to unhook Europe's excessive dependencies 'on both the US and China.' Forget the need to save a democratic model that is under threat from 'foreign interference, information manipulation, domination of minds by negative emotions and addictions to social media,' as Macron told Parliament. Forget the commitment to save and defend Ukraine, used repeatedly by British and French leaders at every official meeting. Lastly, forget the commitment to finding a solution to the Gaza conflict or a means to lessen the humanitarian blockade starving the Palestinians, as well as the threat to unilaterally recognize Palestine. Forget all these important issues that were evoked during Macron's three-day state visit. Instead, most of the attention focused on the vexing issue of cross-Channel migration, which has become a major headache for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's one-year-old Labour government — just like it has been for all prime ministers, without exception, since the mid-1990s. But it is becoming increasingly problematic because the failure to manage UK migration policy has become the ladder climbed by right-wing populist parties like Reform UK. The 'one in, one out' policy that London and Paris last week unveiled as a pilot program — meaning some of the migrants arriving in the UK on small boats will be returned to France — may not be the silver bullet needed to save Starmer's premiership. Though Starmer described the deal as 'groundbreaking' and capable of stemming the record numbers of people who have embarked on the perilous journey so far this year, it will need time to prove its effectiveness. The failure to manage UK migration policy has become the ladder climbed by right-wing populist parties Mohamed Chebaro Starmer hopes that the deportation of those who cross the English Channel from France will break the model that has been used for the past few years. And he hopes that it will signal to migrants that, if they cross in a small boat, they will ultimately end up back where they started. In exchange for every return, a different individual will be allowed to come to the UK in a legal and safe manner, as part of a scheme for reuniting families or for those who already have a link with the country. The pilot program is understood to start with 50 returns a week and is likely to be ready to commence in the coming weeks. More than 21,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in rudimentary vessels so far this year, 55 percent more than in the same period last year. While the new measures are yet to be tested, some other new powers recently demonstrated by French police could yield different results. Police officers were seen slashing the small rubber boats with knives as they tried to pick up migrants in shallow waters. This dangerous new practice is yet to be contested in court by human right defenders, while it might also not be easy to apply along the entire coastline. Data gathered from both the British and French sides is alarming. Just since May 2024, when the Home Office began publishing this data, the French authorities have prevented more than 33,000 migrants from crossing the Channel to the UK. This includes 21,317 individuals who were prevented from crossing in May to December last year and 12,321 so far in 2025. France has also engaged in 1,158 'events' in that same period, referring to small boats not being allowed to leave or the arrest of smugglers. That means only about four out of every 10 migrants are being stopped from crossing — a figure that Starmer will want to see rise, as he is under pressure from those using migration failures to turn public opinion against the government. At the same time, they are sowing discontent in some communities that could lead to violent acts, threatening the peace and civil cohesion. The truth came in a statement made by Macron, as he blamed Brexit for the sharp increase in migrant arrivals Mohamed Chebaro The truth that neither the government nor the people of the UK wanted to hear came in a statement made by Macron during his visit, when he blamed Brexit for the sharp increase in migrant arrivals. He claimed that Britain's 2020 departure from the EU had worsened the situation in the Channel, cutting off legal migration routes and London's access to the bloc's returns agreements. It appears that those who so hastily engineered and enforced Brexit did not consider the legal parameters that needed to be in place to send people back. That void has become the pull factor and, as a result, the bitter truth is that leaving the EU has had the opposite effect on migration to what the Brexiteers promised. However, Brexit may not be solely to blame, as other factors have left the immigration processing system exposed, such as the policy of austerity during the 14 years of Conservative government up to last July and the slow and ineffective visa schemes that brought much-needed workers to the country. Many of those workers ended up playing the system and becoming a burden on the welfare state, which was already suffering after years of underinvestment. Last week's UK-France summit yielded a lot in terms of upgrading the cooperation between these two neighbors and strategic allies. But its success or failure hinges entirely on the ability of both countries to curb cross-Channel migration, the rise of which was a clear result of Brexit. The one in, one out plan looks good on paper, but its implementation relies on many variables that neither Macron nor Starmer control. It is worth mentioning that, when accounting for population, the UK receives fewer asylum applications than France and the EU average. The French Interior Ministry recorded 157,947 asylum applications in 2024, compared to 108,138 applicants in the UK. Across the EU, there were just under a million applications for the same period. The UK will have to prepare to receive some of these if its new deal with France is going to work.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
UK sanctions Russian spies for ‘threats, aggression'
LONDON: Britain on Friday slapped sanctions on the GRU Russian intelligence agency and 18 named agents accused of 'spreading chaos and disorder' on the orders of Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilize Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens,' Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in a statement, adding 'Putin's hybrid threats and aggression will never break our resolve.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Snapback Threat Deepens Iran-West Tensions Amid Warnings and Diplomatic Standoff
Tensions between Iran and Western powers have escalated sharply, as the European trio - Britain, France, and Germany - hinted at reactivating the 'snapback' mechanism that would automatically reimpose United Nations sanctions on Iran. The looming decision has sparked strong reactions from Tehran, with Iranian officials warning of potential retaliatory actions that may come as a surprise to some European nations. According to diplomatic sources cited by the Associated Press, the foreign ministers of the European trio agreed during a phone call with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier this week to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August, should no substantial progress be made on the nuclear deal. The snapback mechanism, part of the 2015 nuclear agreement, allows any signatory to reinstate international sanctions if Iran fails to uphold its commitments. The clause expires on October 18, making this summer a crucial period for decisive action. In Tehran, the response was swift and stern. Iranian MP Ebrahim Azizi, head of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, denounced the European move as 'a hostile political action.' He stressed that Iran has 'multiple options' and would not hesitate to use them if provoked. 'The West must refrain from such a step,' Azizi warned, 'and if they go ahead with it, our countermeasures may be unexpected for some Europeans.' Conservative Iranian newspaper Kayhan went even further, calling for legislation to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), framing it as a necessary deterrent step. Earlier this month, Iran's parliament passed a law to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), requiring all inspection requests to be coordinated with Iran's Supreme National Security Council. This move came in response to US airstrikes on Iran's underground Fordow uranium enrichment site, as well as facilities in Isfahan and Natanz, during a 12-day war initiated by Israel on June 13. Despite the growing tensions, some Iranian figures are urging a return to diplomacy. Mohammad Sadr, a veteran diplomat and member of the Expediency Council, stressed the need for 'serious and urgent' negotiations with the European trio. 'Given the limited time before snapback is activated, Iran must work to create conditions that prevent Europe from taking that route,' Sadr said in a media interview. The UK, France, and Germany are all original signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal, from which US President Donald Trump withdrew in 2018, arguing it was too lenient on Tehran. Under the agreement, sanctions were lifted in exchange for strict limits on Iran's nuclear program. The snapback clause allows for the automatic reimposition of sanctions if Iran is found to be non-compliant. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated on Tuesday that the trio is now in a position to justify triggering the snapback. Meanwhile, the ambassadors of the three nations met at the German UN mission this week to discuss the situation. Though no specific conditions were disclosed, the discussions signaled growing impatience with Tehran. According to Yedioth Ahronoth, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar urged his German and French counterparts to activate the snapback during a meeting on the sidelines of the EU ministerial council in Brussels on Tuesday. The newspaper reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also discussed the issue with multiple world leaders. A senior Israeli official said: 'There are no longer valid excuses to delay reimposing sanctions.' He added that Iran's previous threats to enrich uranium to 90% are now considered irrelevant. 'Even the US now supports the snapback, and the Europeans are inclined to follow suit.'
