5L students among only 57L people living outside state: Minister
Out of them five lakh were students who had gone out for higher education, while the remaining 52 lakh went out of the state in search of employment, he added.
Addressing a press conference on the day, Singh said some people are spreading the lie for electoral gains that three crore people have migrated from Bihar.
The rumours being spread about the number of Bihar residents living outside the state are misleading, he said.
The minister added the govt has always been sensitive towards the people of the state. If a person dies outside Bihar, then assistance is provided to his family by the state govt, he said.
Responding to a question on child labour, the minister said child workers are being constantly rescued and efforts are being made to bring them into the mainstream by linking them with various govt schemes.
Regarding the efforts of skill development in the state, Singh took a dig at Rashtriya Janata Dal chief Lalu Prasad and said, "There was a tradition of shepherd schools (charwaha vidyalaya) in Bihar. But, now a skill university is being established in the state, so that the youth can become technically skilled and do not need to go out for employment."
The minister also made a scathing attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and said nothing can be more disgusting than his Bihar yatra against voter list revision. He said everyone should have faith in the Constitution.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes
,,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘Stealing not considered sin but calling someone a thief is': Opposition slams EC over authentication appeal
Congress-led opposition parties hit back at the Election Commission on Sunday, over its appeal to authenticate their "vote chori" claims by filing a supporting affidavit and also termed its elaborate media address on the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) controversy a mere eyewash. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, flanked by senior EC officials, held a press conference in the capital and claimed that deliberate attempts were being made to fearmonger and misguide the voters of Bihar, apparently by opposition parties. It also stated that such fearmongering won't deter it from pursuing and implementing laid-down protocols. Replying to the CEC's presser, Congress accused it of being partisan towards the ruling party, while the RJD said that its clarification was devoid of any substance. Congress leader Pawan Khera, in a strong rebuttal, said: "Stealing is not considered a sin, but calling someone a thief is? Stop the theft, and we will stop calling you thieves. Why hasn't anyone given an account of one lakh votes from Mahadevapura?" Further accusing it breach of privacy, he said: "(BJP leader) Anurag Thakur is carrying digital voter lists of six constituencies—where did he get them from? Isn't that a breach of privacy? Did the Election Commission issue him a notice? No. But when it comes to CCTV footage, you say it violates privacy..." RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha said: "No answers were given. Not a single question was answered. Maybe someone told them to hold the press conference because it was becoming embarrassing. So, they went ahead, but what was achieved? Which question did they actually answer? Forget the political parties—the voters are not convinced by your behaviour and conduct." "Logic cannot be used to justify opacity. Opacity means lack of transparency. The biggest concern is that the Election Commission appears neither impartial nor neutral. This should be a matter of serious concern for you." Purnia MP Pappu Yadav said, "The EC has no understanding of the Constitution or Babasaheb's (B.R. Ambedkar) ideas. After indulging in theft and robbery, will they speak about the Constitution?"
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Communal forces must be kept at bay: TPCC chief
Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (TPCC) chief B. Mahesh Kumar stressed the need to protect the Constitution and democracy from communal forces. Addressing the national conference of Telangana SC, ST, BC, and Minorities Federation at Ravindra Bharathi here on Sunday, the Congress MLC stated that governments are indeed formed only with the support of SC, ST, BC and minorities. In a veiled attack on the BJP and RSS, he said, 'Those who had no role in the freedom struggle are ruling the nation today and attempting to divide people in the name of religion.' Mr. Mahesh Kumar Goud warned of conspiracies to replace the Constitution with 'Manusmriti' and stressed that all sections must unite to stop such attempts. He showered praise on Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy for his attempts to fulfill Rahul Gandhi's vision and highlighted passing of Bills guaranteeing 42% reservations for BCs in local bodies, education and employment. The TPCC chief asserted that safeguarding the Constitution and resisting communal forces that threaten democracy is the responsibility of all citizens. He emphasized the need for unity to protect the nation's democratic fabric and ensure equal opportunities for all.
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Constitutional validity does not mean desirability, ex-CJI Khanna tells one nation, one election panel
Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna has told a parliamentary committee scrutinising the simultaneous election Bill that the constitutional validity of a proposal in no way amounts to a pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of its provisions. In his written opinion to the committee, Justice Khanna, however, said arguments related to the dilution of the country's federal structure might be raised about the constitutional amendment Bill, as he listed the various claims made supporting and criticising the concept, sources said. Most of the experts, who have shared their views with the committee headed by BJP MP P.P. Chaudhary, have rejected the charge that the proposals are unconstitutional but have flagged some issues with the current provisions of the Bill. Justice Khanna, who is scheduled to interact with the committee on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), has joined a few other former CJIs in raising concerns over the extent of power given to the Election Commission (EC) in the Bill. He said the Bill conferred "unfettered discretion" on the EC in deciding that an Assembly poll could not be conducted along with that of the Lok Sabha, and to make a recommendation to the President on these lines, the sources said. "This clause will be open to question as violating and offending the basic structure of the Constitution on the ground of being arbitrary and offending Article 14 of the Constitution," he is learnt to have said. Article 14 deals with equality before law. Indirect President's rule Justice Khanna added, "Postponement of elections by the EC may result in indirect President's rule, in other words, the Union government taking over the reins of the State government. This will be questionable judicially, as violating the federal structure envisaged by the Constitution." Commenting on various arguments related to the Bill, he said the fact that simultaneous elections were held in 1951-52, 1957, 1962 and 1967, was a "coincidence", certainly not an express or not even an implied constitutional mandate. Justice Khanna said there was a difference between "merit review" and "judicial review". When the Supreme Court or High Courts uphold constitutional validity, it was a mere affirmation of the legislative power and that the amendment or the provision was not violative of the constitutional limitations, he said. "The court decisions in no way amount to pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of such provisions," he added. Before Justice Khanna, former CJIs D.Y. Chandrachud, J.S. Khehar, U.U. Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi have interacted with the committee members on various provisions of what is often referred to as "one nation one election" Bill. The BJP and its allies have supported the Bill, asserting that it will boost growth by cutting down on expenditure caused by the relentless poll cycle, leading to frequent deployment of security and civil officials on poll duty and the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct. The Opposition has argued that it undermines democratic principles and weakens federal structure.
