Clouds gather over rupee on tariff worries, persistent outflows
The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated the rupee will open in the 87.65-87.70 range versus the U.S. dollar, compared with 87.5950 in the previous session.
The rupee declined about 2% in July, with U.S. President Donald Trump's threat of a 25% levy on Indian goods, alongside an unspecified penalty, pushing it closer to its all-time low of 87.95.
Economists estimate that the 25% tariff announced could shave off the South Asian nation's growth in 2025-26 by up to 40 basis points, but analysts and investors also reckon that India may be able to achieve a lower rate via negotiations.
"India remains a strategic partner for the U.S. and stands to benefit from opening up its large market. We, therefore, believe there is a path forward and expect India will eventually secure a relatively favourable deal," analysts at BMI said in a note.
A tariff on pharmaceutical exports from India, if implemented, would have a more serious impact on India's growth, the note added.
Uncertainty on trade is also expected to be a near-term drag on foreign investors' outlook on Indian equities. Overseas investors net pulled out over $600 million from local stocks on Thursday, per provisional exchange data.
The 25% tariff may mark the beginning of protracted negotiation, but "India needs some positive news to grab foreign investors' interest as they have continued to dump Indian equities and North Asia, with its value, income and reform tilt is faring much more strongly," said Sat Dhura, portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors.
"It will take more than a trade announcement to reverse that," Dhura said.
Meanwhile, Asian currencies were down between 0.1% and 0.5% on the day, while slimmed hopes of a rate cut by the U.S. Federal Reserve in September helped the dollar cling to the 100 handle, its highest in about two months.
KEY INDICATORS:
** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 87.77; onshore one-month forward premium at 13 paisa
** Dollar index at 100.09
** Brent crude futures down 0.1% at $71.6 per barrel
** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.38%
** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $18.6mln worth of Indian shares on Jul. 30
** NSDL data shows foreign investors bought a net $6mln worth of Indian bonds on Jul. 30
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump steps up attacks on Fed's independence amid interest rates row
Donald Trump called on top Federal Reserve officials to seize control from its chair, Jerome Powell, if he fails to cut interest rates, stepping up his extraordinary attacks on the central bank's independence. The US president called Powell 'a stubborn MORON' in a series of critical social media posts on Friday, days after the Fed held rates steady for the fifth consecutive time. It comes as Trump faces heightened questions over the impact of his aggressive economic policy, and the White House presses forward with plans for a fresh wave of tariffs next week. Hours before the federal government released data which underlined a significant deterioration in the jobs market, Trump again broke with precedent to pin blame on the Fed – and urge it to change course. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell, a stubborn MORON, must substantially lower interest rates, NOW,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social network. 'IF HE CONTINUES TO REFUSE, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' The Fed chair does not unilaterally set interest rates, which are decided by its rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Presidents typically respect its independence, leaving the central bank to make an objective decision – without political interference – about the best policy on interest rates for the US economy. 'Too Little, Too Late. Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster,' Trump wrote, minutes after Friday's lackluster jobs report. 'DROP THE RATE! The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Powell has repeatedly argued that the best approach for the Fed right now is to wait and see the impact of Trump's aggressive tariff strategy before cutting rates. But Trump has increasingly used the Powell, whom he appointed during his first term, as something of a piñata – repeatedly accusing him of damaging the US economy. Two members of the Fed's rate-setting committee dissented from its other policymakers' call to hold rates steady this week, and – to the president's delight – published their reasons on Friday. 'STRONG DISSENTS ON FED BOARD,' Trump wrote, claiming: 'IT WILL ONLY GET STRONGER!' By Friday evening, however, Trump's tone appeared to have changed as he told Newsmax during an interview that Powell will 'most likely' stay in his position. Trump said he would remove Powell 'in a heartbeat' and said the Fed's interest rate was too high but added that others have said Powell's removal would 'disturb the market'. 'He gets out in seven or eight months and I'll put somebody else in,' Trump said. On Friday afternoon, another member of the committee abruptly resigned. Adriana D Kugler, whose term was set to expire in January, announced she would step down next week. She did not provide a reason for the move, and will return to Georgetown University as a professor in the fall. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market,' Kugler said in a statement. Her resignation creates a vacancy for the White House to fill. Reuters contributed reporting
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as Trump punishes America's biggest carmaker in friendly fire disaster
Ford builds more cars in America than any other automaker — but instead of reaping the rewards, it's being hit hardest by new trade rules. Detroit-based Ford assembles 80 percent of its US-sold vehicles domestically. But it still relies on imported parts and aluminum — which now face punishing duties. Under new trade deals with Japan, the EU, and South Korea, many imported goods are subject to a 15 percent tariff. That includes cars from Ford's big rivals Toyota, VW and Kia. That rate is far below the 25 percent tariff applied to auto parts and the 50 percent tariff on aluminum introduced this spring. The result is that Ford's American-first strategy is becoming uncompetitive. Ford expects to pay $2.5 billion in tariffs over the next year alone. 'Ford has more reason to complain,' said Bernstein analyst Daniel Roeska. 'If you're now lowering tariffs and letting more cars and content flow into the U.S., that relatively disadvantages Ford more than others.' Ford, which assembles 80 percent of its vehicles in the US, could be negatively impacted by the new trade agreement with Japan - the company doesn't produce any products in the Asian country, and still faces 25 percent tariffs on necessary parts 'I admire Ford,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a recent CNBC interview. Bessent said he hopes to iron out the 'idiosyncratic' burdens that current tariffs are placing on the company by cutting a deal with Canada to address the cost of importing aluminum. Nonetheless the situation as it currently stands is a direct contradiction of what Trump has said he aims to achieve with tariffs. The Presidents has repeatedly claimed he wants to bring back a golden era of Made-In-America manufacturing with the car industry as a cornerstone. US carmakers have welcomed the support after years of struggling to compete with foreign rivals who can take advantage of lower labor costs and less strict regulations. 'For decades now, it has not been a level playing field for U.S. automakers globally, with either tariffs or trade barriers,' General Motors chief executive Mary Barra said earlier this year. 'So I think tariffs is one tool that the administration can use to level the playing field.' However, the tariffs have now made things more difficult and more expensive. Ford President and CEO Jim Farley Ford has been hit hard by import duties on steel, aluminum and car parts Japanese carmakers like Toyota will face a lower tariff rate than American firms because of Trump's latest deal Automakers have been hit by the steel and aluminum tariffs as well as direct duties on auto parts. Furthermore in the previous era of the North American Free Trade Agreement businesses such as GM, Ford and Stellantis invested heavily in manufacturing in Mexico and Canada. Both countries have been swept up in Trump's roiling trade war with temporary tariffs, threats and U-turns causing chaos for entire industries. The storm does not appear to have passed either with Trump last night unexpectedly raising Canada's tariff rate to 35 percent. Mexico's rate currently remains at 25 percent for the next 90 days. The knock-on effect for consumers has been an increase in sticker prices from both domestically made and imported cars.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Trump played the EU at its own game... and won
Squaring off across the table from Ursula von der Leyen was Donald Trump, banging his fists and demanding a 30 per cent blanket tariff. The clubhouse of the Trump Turnberry golf course had become the unlikely setting of a face-off between the two global superpowers – and ultimately, the EU's humiliation. The Telegraph has spoken to insiders who were in the room when the negotiations were taking place and has seen diplomatic notes that paint a clear picture. It's one of Mrs von der Leyen, the European Commission president, bowing to pressure from the US and being beaten at the bloc's own game. She had just agreed to the US imposing 15 per cent tariffs on EU goods entering America, while Britain had come away with a rate of 10 per cent. And at the end of it all, she and her team of EU negotiators had to put their thumbs up, their smiles not reaching their eyes, as they stood next to Mr Trump who boasted of the 'biggest deal ever made'. US officials had played hardball for the weeks and months leading up to the high-stakes showdown. Panicked European officials had turned to their Japanese counterparts for advice before flying to Scotland, asking for their advice on how to be successful like them. But ultimately, the EU was beaten by a dealmaker who played the bloc's game better than they could have played it. Over the years, Brussels has used the size of its single market to reinforce the need for trading partners to make concessions, rather than the other way round in talks over deals. And European leaders have voiced their frustration at the move. France's leaders described it as a 'dark day' for Europe and that the bloc hadn't been feared enough going into the talks. Trump plays hardball After a round of golf, the stage was set for the American negotiating team, including Mr Trump. A no-deal deadline was set for Friday, Aug 1. Without a pact Brussels would be subjected to the 30 per cent tariffs set out by the president in a letter to Mrs von der Leyen just two weeks earlier. European firms doing business in America would have become uncompetitive overnight if the EC president didn't shake hands on a pact. To secure this deal, the German eurocrat was told she would have to stomach a number of concessions, signing on the dotted line of an agreement that would be considered one-sided in favour of the Americans. Brussels also knew this agreement was needed to avert a nastier, more chaotic transatlantic trade war that would have left Europe without its most important ally until at least January 2029, when Mr Trump's second term comes to an end. To achieve this, member states agreed that they would have to stomach a blanket tariff because of a belief that the US president wouldn't settle without one, a source familiar with the negotiations told The Telegraph. Maros Sefcovic, the EU's trade commissioner, had briefed capitals that they simply wouldn't be able to do business in the US if that tariff rose to the 30 per cent demanded by Mr Trump. Therefore, they needed to settle on a number that would be an increase on the status quo originally charged on European imports into America – 14.8 per cent, according to one official. Some might argue that this was the EU being made to take a taste of its own medicine, with the bloc usually the first negotiator to reach for hard deadlines and use its size and strength to extract concessions from prospective partners. And it worked, the bloc had blinked. Before Mrs von der Leyen headed to Scotland, European capitals signed off on a mandate, perhaps for the first time, that would use a trade deal to increase tariffs from the current number. Behind the scenes For 24 minutes, the US President and the commission chief held an impromptu press conference under the eight chandeliers in the glamorous ball room at Trump Turnberry. With the Brussels and White House press packs ushered out, the real talks could begin. Mr Trump opened with his gambit of 30 per cent tariffs on all European products imported into America. The commission's first offer was 'high single digits', a source briefed on the wrangling said. The White House delegation stood firm as their European counterparts began slowly ratcheting their number closer to the American's figure. But ultimately, the commission's team kept their cool, at the recommendation of the Japanese, the most recent country to sign an agreement with the US. The Telegraph can reveal that a top aide to Mr Sefcovic had reached out to his Japanese counterpart for help on handling the Americans before the talks. 'They come in shouting the high number, and all you have to do is hold your cool and they diminish as you push back,' a source said, describing the advice. The other tactic deployed by the Europeans was to woo Mr Trump with some large numbers presented to him on a single sheet of A4 paper. Eurocrats had used their build-up to prepare an offer on paper that the US president would see as a major victory. That was an offer to buy billions of dollars worth of American military technology – born out of Nato's recent decision to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. The EU pledged to purchase $750bn (£565bn) worth of energy from the US over the next three years. And then there was a further promise that European companies would invest $600bn (£452bn) by 2028. These, European officials claim, are non-binding, not really worth the paper they were written on. The numbers were calculated using publicly available order information and information from trade associations. But this was enough to convince Mr Trump to settle at a tariff rate of 15 per cent, covering about 70 per cent of EU exports and totalling about €780bn (£588bn) worth of trade. In return, US imports into the EU will not face higher tariffs. 'This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity, trade or beyond trade,' Mr Trump declared. 'It's a giant deal,' he added, referring to the $600bn and $750bn promises. 'That's going to be great.' The US president's claims of victory and the deal were met with derision in Europe. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, said the bloc hadn't been 'feared' enough in the talks, which opened the door to the concessions. François Bayrou, Macron's prime minister, described it as a 'dark day' for Europe and accused the Commission of bowing to American pressure. Michel Barnier, the EU's former Brexit negotiator, said accepting tariffs was an 'admission of weakness'. 'This weakness is not inevitable. It results from poor choices that ensure neither the sovereignty nor the prosperity of the continent and its states,' he wrote on social media. Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, meanwhile said it would cause 'considerable damage' to his country's economy, the largest in the Eurozone. In comparison, Britain had negotiated a tariff rate of 10 per cent, five less than the EU, in its own deal with Washington. This was hailed by Brexiteers as evidence that leaving the bloc was the right thing to do. Paris and Berlin had been the two capitals pushing hardest for the bloc to take a more robust stance in the trade talks. The French had especially pushed for a package of €93bn (£81bn) of retaliatory tariffs to be unleashed to bring Mr Trump and Washington to heel. There were also calls from Paris to clamp down on American tech firms doing business in Europe. 'This was a big red button nobody was willing to push,' an EU diplomat told The Telegraph, spelling out fears that Europe's economy is reliant on American payment services. But Mrs von der Leyen, who was particularly dovish, argued that this would spill over into other sectors and potentially spell an end to what is a crucial alliance for Europe, especially in security. Fears that the White House and Pentagon would withdraw security guarantees for Europe and cut off weapons supplies to Ukraine overshadowed the talks. But the commission president and her top officials also steeled member states for a longer-term game. Devil in the detail Gabrielius Landsbergis, a former Lithuanian foreign minister, said: 'The only way I can explain to myself why the EU commission would choose to humiliate Europe by accepting the 15 per cent tariff is that they hope to appease Trump enough for him to maintain US security commitments in Europe.' Now Mr Trump has his victory, the devil would be in the detail as the terms are finalised, Mrs von der Leyen's team told member states. The commission will be looking to quietly enlarge a list of products that are exempted from tariffs in more technical talks with Washington. Eurocrats are already briefing that Britain's deal, despite having a lower tariff rate, doesn't protect key European industries, such as beef farmers.
