Aussie consumers warned over ‘dangerous' wage advancing pay trend
Don't miss out on the headlines from Business Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Australian consumers have been warned about a 'dangerous' new financial product sending struggling people into debt spirals, and consumer advocates say urgent regulation is needed.
Wage advance services are advertised as offering a quick and easy way to borrow money before your payday, some offering the advances within a minute.
The products are under no obligation to assess a person's ability to service the debt or to give financial hardship assistance.
This has led to a chorus of consumer advocacy groups to call on the Albanese government to urgently regulate the services that they say make the cost-of-living crisis worse and are sending thousands into dangerous debt spirals.
Consumer Action Law Centre chief Stephanie Tonkin said she had heard from people who had taken multiple wage advance contracts and had ended up committing their whole income to repaying the loans.
'These products encourage people to borrow against their future income to meet their essential living needs, and this can cause serious harm when there's no extra money in the next pay cycle, only greater debt,' Ms Tonkin said.
'The fees add up very quickly if you're stuck in a cycle of borrowing now to pay more later.'
This fresh warning comes as buy now, pay later (BNPL) products are brought under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act, a long-time campaign goal for consumer advocacy groups.
'We want wage advance brought under the Credit Act as a priority to give people the same consumer protections as BNPL,' Ms Tonkin said.
'It's taken years for BNPL to be regulated – we can't wait that long again.'
Consumer Credit Legal Service principal solicitor Roberta Grealish likened the proliferation of this type of financial product to a game of 'whack a mole'.
'Wage advance products now need to be brought within the Credit Act to prevent the harms that the new BNPL rules hope to address simply shifting into this space,' Ms Grealish said.
Choice campaigns director Rosie Thomas said the work to close 'lending loopholes' was not yet finished.
'Consumers will continue to be harmed until wage advance is also regulated as credit,' she said.
Originally published as Consumer advocates warn Aussies about 'dangerous' wage advancing products and call for further regulation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
33 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Senior federal politicians questions US presence in Australia after Pentagon launches formal review into AUKUS partnership
The Albanese government has been urged to reconsider the joint US secretive military base Pine Gap and the presence of US troops in Australia as the Trump administration questions the AUKUS pact. Greens senator and defence spokesman David Shoebridge has called on the Albanese government to 'put a stop' to de facto US territories in Australia amid the AUKUS review. The US announced a formal review of the $300 billion AUKUS arrangement after the Albanese government resisted demands to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Shoebridge told Sky News that Australia should stop 'bankrolling' US defence facilities in Darwin, and the secretive Pine Gap facility. 'Australia has for too long allowed Pine Gap and Defence facilities in Darwin to operate as de facto US territories, it's time we put a stop to that,' he said. 'Labor and the Coalition say having US troops stationed here makes us safer. The Greens say it is a major national security risk. 'Donald Trump is erratic, reckless and careless of America's allies and alliances but he does have one fairly constant trait, he puts US interests first. 'If only Australian decision makers did the same for us.' Mr Shoebridge said the US decision to review AUKUS should be met with Australia's own review. 'It's time for Parliament to launch a full inquiry into this dud deal, and allow critics of AUKUS a seat at the table, not just a nodding bunch of Labor and Coalition members.' Several other federal politicians outside of the major parties have also called into question whether the AUKUS deal served the national interest. Independent Senator David Pocock told Sky News he did not have full confidence in the US administration in relation to the AUKUS agreement. 'I think we should take this as an opportunity to actually do a review ourselves. It's long overdue,' he said on Thursday. Teal MP Monique Ryan also said it was 'not surprising' the Trump administration was considering an end to AUKUS, and suggested Mr Albanese should 'do the same'. 'Nations act in their own best interests. Spending $400 billion on subs which may never arrive might well not be in our best interest,' she said on X. Tasmanian Senator Jacqui Lambie recently called into question the Pine Gap facility and said it should be closed in response to Trump's controversial tariffs. 'We don't owe the United States anything. It's time these leaders stood up … It's about time you started hitting them back where it hurts,' Ms Lambie told the ABC. 'I can tell you, if they do not have access to Pine Gap and the communications there, then they are not gathering any intelligence over this side of the world. 'Tell them they've got seven days to remove their US Marines off Australian soil. That will really hurt .' Ms Lambie said Australia had shown the US 'loyalty and our mateship' in various wars, and it was time to show them 'we mean business'. 'We can no longer trust our US allies … with everything that we've given to them over the years, the loyalty, the mateship, the sacrifice … we don't owe the United States anything,' she said. Mr Shoebridge echoed Ms Lambie's sentiment, saying that despite 'all the mateship talk', Australia was not an equal partner but a 'useful patsy for US power projection'.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Asleep at the wheel': Ben Fordham unleashes on Anthony Albanese for torching housing targets with excessive immigration intake
Ben Fordham has blasted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in a fiery verbal spray, accusing the government of undermining its own housing targets by allowing in record levels of migrants. Sky News uncovered on Wednesday that the Albanese government would fail to reach it's target of constructing 1.2 million new homes over five years, with forecasts putting Australia 260,000 short by the deadline of June 2029. The State of the Housing System 20205 report forecast the government would only build 938,000 new homes by June 2029, well short of the 1.2 million repeatedly touted by the Prime Minister. Speaking to Sky News, Urban Development Institute of Australia President Col Dutton said that the UDIA National analysis found that Australia 'will actually undershoot the Housing Accord target by up to 400,000 homes', and that the accelerated immigration program had only made matters worse. Fordham said the Albanese government was deceiving the Australian public if it continued to tout its promise of constructing 1.2 million homes over five years, and that the current rates of immigration were untenable. 'The Albanese government promised to build more houses, today they're building less. They promised to lower immigration, today, they're bringing in more,' Fordham said on his 2GB breakfast program. 'The PM will tell us he's bringing down the migration numbers,' referencing the government's move to limit international student arrivals and 'building as many homes as he can, but we're not seeing it'. Fordham said Australia's housing build was "going backwards" due to the immigration surge. He said while Australians were not ant-immigration the "speed and the size" of the government's intake had caused angst in the community. Mr Dutton said factoring in immigration, UDIA data projections showed that the net losses in housing had ballooned to more than 1,500 every week. 'We simply can't build the houses fast enough. What we need is a sharp focus on skilled migration and coordination of housing supply policy with immigration numbers.' He also stated that the construction industry was being strangled by a myriad of challenges including rigid regulations and red tape, approval delays and a lack of coordination between all levels of governments on environmental laws. 'Supply is being choked by development approvals processes through councils and state governments, lack of funding for enabling infrastructure to service development ready land and cumbersome environmental approval processes lacking a coordinated approach between all levels of government," he said. ABS dwelling completion data showed that Australia had built only 166,000 homes in 2024, with 446,000 net overseas migrants entering the country that same year. With an average of 2.5 people per household, this created a housing shortage of roughly 12,400 in 2024 alone, separate from the existing shortfall.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Seven reasons to think twice about private equity
Private markets are eating the world. That's the prevailing major structural theme in global capital markets that investors, regulators and asset managers have decided they need to accept and confront. The Australian regulator has been spooked into action to try to encourage more companies to list and reverse the shrinking sharemarket, while the country's most esteemed stock picker – Perpetual – is cutting deals with private market competitors.
