Overall tax take up 8.5% as corporation taxes drop
The latest Exchequer Returns figures show the State enjoyed a €4bn surplus to the end of May, an improvement of €3.2bn on 2024. However, when receipts arising from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling for the Apple Tax Case are excluded, the underlying position was a surplus of €0.7bn, a decrease of €0.1bn on the same period last year.
Income tax receipts of €2.8bn were collected in May with income tax receipts so far this year amounting to €14.5bn up 4.5% on last year.
Corporation tax receipts of €2.5bn were collected in May, down by €1.1bn on the same month last year.
The Department of Finance said this reflects once-off factors that boosted May 2024 receipts, distorting the year-on-year comparison.
May is a VAT-due month and receipts of €3.5bn were up on the same month last year by €0.1bn.
On a cumulative basis, receipts of €7.4bn were up by €1.1bn on the same period last year. When once-off CJEU revenues are excluded, cumulative corporation tax receipts to end-May amounted to €5.7bn, down by €0.6bn (9.4%) on the same period last year.
Reacting to the figures, the Minister for Finance, Paschal Donohoe said the most notable feature of the returns was the 'marked' year-on-year drop in corporation taxes. "While this reflects once-off factors last year, it nonetheless highlights the degree of concentration in the corporate tax base, wherein a small number of multinational firms can significantly impact on the overall tax yield," he said.
'In a context of unprecedented uncertainty in the international economic landscape, this serves as a timely reminder of Ireland's exposure to changes in the global trading environment, and of the vital importance of adhering to a sensible and sustainable budgetary strategy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Retirement age remains bone of contention at WRC and Labour Court ahead of legislation
Legislation intended to allow employees work until they qualify for the State pension will not be enough for many of the workers who want, or need, to defer retirement, a Siptu official who fights cases on the issue at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and Labour Court believes. 'This won't be the end of it,' says Rachel Hartery of the Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Bill 2025, a piece of legislation intended to address a situation in which people find themselves caught for a time between having to retire from work and being entitled to their State pension, currently on reaching 66. 'People are definitely going want to work later.' With the legislation still pending, a steady stream of cases involving workers wanting to work beyond their 65th birthday continue to be heard at the WRC and Labour Court. Recent decisions on the issue include one from the WRC in which a warehouse worker, Eugene McEnery, at Partners in Logistics, was found not to have been discriminated against when he was forced to retire five months after his 65th birthday when he declined an extension based on reduced hours. READ MORE The Labour Court, meanwhile, overturned a WRC decision and awarded €18,000 to Liam Murphy, who had worked as a general operative at Deepak Fasteners in Shannon, Co Clare, for 45 years but whose request to stay on beyond his 65th birthday was refused by the company. In another case, the Labour Court reduced an award for discrimination made to Patrick O'Callaghan against his employer, Ferrero Ireland, by €5,000, to €15,000, with aspects of the company's position described as inconsistent to the point of being 'incomprehensible' but the firm is now seeking a judicial review of the decision in the courts. What the various cases highlight is that the outcomes are often dependent on how carefully the company has considered and implemented its own policies and that cases can be won even where there are apparent inconsistencies. As in the instance of Denise Murphy, an administrative worker at the Royal College of Surgeons , who was found not to have been discriminated against when refused a second extension despite being able to point to the fact that the college employed up to 27 people who had been retained beyond 66. The college told the WRC it had done so because those people were in technical or academic roles and were much harder to replace. Whether a role is physically demanding or not is regularly a factor in cases too, with safety issues often cited, as they were in the McEnery case. John Murphy, who took a case against Bausch and Lomb and initially returned to work after mediation while the company changed its policies and allowed other workers to stay on, admits the lack of any physically aspect to his job on production at the firm's Waterford plant was one reason he was so keen to extend his working life. 'I was physically well, I keep myself fit,' says Murphy, who was represented by Hartery in the WRC and the Labour Court, where he was ultimately awarded €2,000 when he sought a further extension at 68. 'I loved my job so I wanted to stay on but there was a financial part to it, too, I went to get a medical card and was told I wasn't entitled to one until I was 70 after more than 40 years working, so there was that. I'd have the odd visit to the doctor or the dentist and they add up if you are paying for them out of your pension.' Murphy's position is fairly typical of the sort of motivations driving people to work longer, says Laura Bambrick, head of social policy and employment affairs at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu). 'If you look at it, there's a lot of people hitting life's milestones a lot later,' she says. 'They're having second families, they're buying homes later, so the mortgage is going later. The children are being born later, so the parents are bankrolling them for longer. 'So there is often a desire to stay on in your job for longer but there is also, for many people, the financial necessity to do it.' The new Bill, currently working its way through the Oireachtas and which is expected, Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has said, to come into effect early next year, will go a long way towards addressing one particular reason many people currently wish to work beyond their scheduled retirement age of 65 – that they cannot get a State pension for another year. It will allow the majority of private-sector workers – most in the public sector can already stay on until 70 – to tell their employers they want to remain in place for that time and employers will have more limited scope to decline the request. 'The onus would be on the employer to defend the right to refuse the employee's request. We are very clear on that,' Mr Burke said last month. 'The threshold is very high in terms of fines and the reasonable justification.' While there are exceptions, the new law should substantially change the landscape, agrees Bambrick. People will not be compelled to work the extra year and it is impossible to know how many will but some 4,500 65-year-olds received the specific Department of Social Protection payment intended to tide them over to State pension age last year and it seems clear many of these lacked an alternative. A number of employers have already revised their retirement policies in anticipation of the legislation, which had originally been expected to be enacted by the last government. 'We have already seen a small bit of an uptick in the number of companies informing employees as a whole that they can retire either at their contractual retirement age or 66. Other companies are managing it on a request-by-request basis,' says Nichola Harkin, head of employment law services at Ibec . 'For traditional reasons the most common contractual retirement age will be 65 but I would say that employers are quite frequently giving employees a post-retirement fixed-term contract to bring them to 66 or maybe even a longer one than just one year.' Even after the new legislation comes in, she says there will continue to be instances in which employers have legitimate reasons for preferring not to extend the terms of some employees. Goals such as intergenerational planning, the creation of a more balanced workforce or health and safety are all provided for in both the Bill and the existing code of practice on longer working. The WRC cases, it seems, will likely continue.
Irish Examiner
3 days ago
- Irish Examiner
'Preferred bidder' found for MV Matthew berthed in Cork Harbour
Drug trafficking cargo ship the MV Matthew has cost the State almost €10m in maintenance, crewing, and berthing fees since it was intercepted in 2023. A buyer has been found for the drug trafficking ship, and the Revenue Commissioners are engaging with Panamanian authorities to ensure legal and regulatory compliance. The MV Matthew, a Panamanian-registered ship, was at the centre of the largest cocaine seizure in the history of the State. Eight men were sentenced to a combined 129 years in prison in July for their role in the drug trafficking operation in which some €157m worth of cocaine was seized. The MV Matthew, owned by a Dubai-based company, was boarded at gunpoint by Ireland's elite army ranger wing in rough seas off the Cork coast in September 2023. Eight men from the 21-person crew were ultimately charged with drug trafficking offences. The ship, which has since been berthed in Cork Harbour, has been costing an average of €120,000 each week to maintain. However, Revenue has confirmed that 'a preferred bidder has been identified' for the MV Matthew. 'Revenue is engaging with the Panamanian authorities to ensure compliance with maritime legislation and regulations that govern the disposal of the MV Matthew, and has received confirmation from them that it is receiving attention,' a statement said. 'Revenue hopes to have these matters finalised shortly. Revenue is required to ensure that all regulations and legal obligations are fully complied with throughout the disposal and removal process.' 'Far too long' Berthing the ship, which includes costs for unberthing and moving the vessel when necessary, has cost €2,187,950. Maintenance of the ship — including fuel costs, waste removal, and repairs — has cost €3,784,050. Crewing has cost 3,762,054. More than €9,734,054 has been spent on the ship in total. These costs were paid by the Revenue Commissioners to maintain and manage the MV Matthew from September 2023 to the end of July 2025. Fianna Fáil TD for Cork South Central Séamus McGrath said that the disposal of the MV Matthew is taking 'far too long'. 'The cost of keeping it on a weekly basis is extremely high,' he said. 'I doubt very much at this stage if the State will actually be any net better off as a result of the sale, given the amount of cost that was incurred in terms of the storage and maintenance of the ship.' The ship had been maintained to allow access for defence legal teams as it was at the centre of a major criminal trial. The Special Criminal Court authorised its release on December 2. It was only possible to dispose of the ship from that date. Mr McGrath said that it should have been ready for sale as soon as it was released by the courts. He said he has raised his concerns both with Revenue and with the Public Accounts Committee, and has requested further information on the sales process.
RTÉ News
4 days ago
- RTÉ News
Presidential hopeful Gareth Sheridan says he has backing of two councils
Presidential hopeful Gareth Sheridan has said he has support in Tipperary and Laois county councils. The businessman, who officially launched his campaign in Dubin this morning, says he is confident he can be proposed and seconded by six local authorities, but would not be drawn on the other four. Anyone hoping to get their name on the ballot requires the support of four councils or 20 members of the Oireachtas. A sitting president can also nominate themselves. Mr Sheridan said his campaign is focused on housing, and that he wants to 'make Ireland home again'. He points to article 45.2.1 of the Constitution which requires the State to direct its policy towards securing that citizens may "through their occupations, find the means of making reasonable provision for their domestic needs". Mr Sheridan said this means working people should be able to afford to buy a home in Ireland. He added that he would hold the Dáil to account over housing failures.
