More than a million Afghans forced back from Iran face poverty and uncertain future
More than 1.8 million Afghans have been forced to return this year.
The majority were hosted in Iran, while about 185,500 were repatriated from Pakistan, and 5,000 from Türkiye.
Many were abruptly deported, stripped of their belongings and rights, and returned to a country in the grip of economic collapse and draconian restrictions, especially for women.
One of them is teacher and publisher Azita Nazhand, who has opened a secret school for girls in Kabul since returning.
"We do not have official permission," she explained.
"When the Taliban's Department of Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice visits the school, we tell them that we are only teaching Islamic subjects and the Quran to the girls."
Azita fled to Iran last year, hoping to study, work, and live freely — hopes her father, also a writer, had instilled in her and her sister.
"The smile of the girls at school was a hope for me," Azita told the ABC, tears welling in her eyes.
"When I left them, it was like leaving my soul and everything behind."
But life in Iran brought its own cruelties.
She says Afghan workers like her were treated as second class.
"When we went somewhere to be employed and handed our CVs, no-one would pay attention to us," she said.
"Better working conditions were specified for Iranians, while worse ones were given to Afghan labourers, which was heartbreaking."
When her visa expired in May, she returned reluctantly to Kabul.
"I am highly disappointed," she said quietly.
According to the UN, Afghanistan has become "the world's most severe women's rights crisis".
Almost 80 per cent of young women are excluded from education, work, or training.
Not a single woman holds office in the Taliban's government.
Over 80 decrees have stripped women of basic rights — banning them from school after grade 6, barring most jobs, and prohibiting entry to parks, gyms, and public spaces.
For men too, returning has meant hardship, humiliation and loss.
Darwesh Parwani sent eight of his 12 family members to Iran and Türkiye to work after he became ill and could no longer support them.
They took a week-long journey on foot, crossing mountains and the desert illegally.
They worked in carpentry, poultry farming and other physical labour, but said they faced severe harassment from Iranians.
"My family was harassed on the way to Iran, at work, and at their home," he said.
Darwesh alleges Iranian authorities would ask for money in exchange for leaving them alone.
But eventually they were deported.
Now that his family are back in Kabul, they're living in poverty, burning plastic and paper for cooking fuel.
"We live near a mountain, with no access to water or electricity. We cannot even afford gas," he says, standing outside his modest home.
"If our dignity is respected here, and if there are job opportunities for the young boys and schools for our children, it is better to stay in our country so that we do not suffer humiliation and abuse in another country."
Aid agencies warn the mass returns are pushing Afghanistan closer to collapse, cutting off vital remittances and deepening poverty.
Over half the population already depends on humanitarian aid, which has been slashed by funding cuts.
In the camps near the border, temperatures soar over 40 degrees Celsius.
Babies are changed on bare blankets, fathers queue for hours for rations, and children sleep under canvas tents or in the open.
The crisis escalated after Iran's short war with Israel in June.
Authorities there accused Afghans of spying for Israel and began a fierce crackdown — rounding up undocumented workers, raiding homes, and deporting thousands each day — many who have lived there for decades.
Mir Mohammad Nazari, who spent 16 years in Iran, said his family was humiliated and cheated as they left.
He worked in construction for years until back pain forced him into lighter work as a caretaker.
When the deportations began, he was ordered to leave by July 7, but his employers withheld his wages and refused to pay what he was owed.
"We were ordered to leave … [but] when we asked for our money, they made excuses in different ways" he said.
Even after paying official fees for an exit permit and transport, he says officials demanded more money at every stage of the journey home.
Without passports, the family had relied on temporary registration cards in Iran, but those were revoked before their expulsion.
"There was no justice," he said.
"They knew once we left, they could keep everything for themselves."
It took them three days to leave Iran, and they have now been waiting at a Kabul camp for a week, unsure of what comes next as they hope to return to their home province of Takhar.
Afghan officials have promised to build housing for returnees, but most remain crowded into camps or dependent on relatives who are struggling themselves.
The UN has urged Iran to show restraint and called on donors to step up aid — warning that Afghanistan cannot absorb such a shock alone.
Families stepping off buses at Islam Qala each day face daunting challenges — from securing documents, housing, healthcare, and education, to rebuilding their lives in a homeland that no longer feels like home.
For Azita, the return to Kabul feels like the end of a dream.
"When we left everything behind in Afghanistan, and went to Iran, we carried with us hopes and ambitions we wanted to achieve abroad," she said.
"[But now], all I have is disappointment."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
21 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Bent on upheaval': Unlikely nations unite
Russia may have choked in Ukraine. China may have overreached with Iran. But a new report warns the axis of authoritarians is only getting stronger, and more determined to topple the world order. 'A new Axis of Upheaval — the increasing alignment among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea — is fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape,' argues the Washington DC-based Centre for a New American Security (CNAS). 'Bound by shared opposition to a US-led global order, the four powers are growing in strength and coordination and bent on upheaval.' Russia and China began a new round of joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan yesterday. It's a move designed to reinforce their 'friends-without-limits' strategic partnership. Notably, this deal was sealed days before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Now, CNAS senior fellow Adrea Kendall-Taylor and researcher Nicholas Lokker argue their collaboration has deepened significantly. And Pyongyang and Tehran are tagging along. 'The axis of upheaval envisions a world ordered far differently from the one in which we live today,' says Richard Fontaine, chief executive officer of CNAS. 'The United States must develop a comprehensive response that will safeguard its interests, values, and international arrangements.' But those same 'interests, values and international arrangements' are under stress from within. US President Donald Trump is taking a blowtorch to international trade agreements, friendly alliances and global institutions established through the United Nations after World War II. At the same time, China is strengthening its own international power bloc. 'The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) has become a prototype for China and Russia to institutionalise their coordination on geopolitical affairs,' Mercator Institute for China Studies analyst Claus Soong said. It was founded in 2001 as a regional security forum, he explains. Now, its purpose is to 'legitimise their influence over social and political norms in parts of the world outside the Western-led rules-based order and to promote an alternative order in which global power is shared by multiple states'. But are the new axis powers truly united? And are their promises of mutual support real? Axis of upheaval It's not an anti-NATO. But it is an expanding network of like-minded dictators. 'Looking forward, the military challenges that the axis of upheaval poses are likely to grow,' the CNAS report states. 'Axis cooperation will also complicate the picture for US and allied defence planners who can no longer assume that any one of these countries would fight alone, either because one or more of these countries provides military aid and weapons or, less likely, fighters.' Chairman Xi Jinping and President Vladimir Putin issued a joint SCO statement in May: 'Both sides, together with other member states, will continue to enhance the international influence of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, promoting its role in building a multipolar world order centred on the United Nations and based on strict adherence to international legal principles.' It's a message designed to appeal to leaders uncomfortable with Western rules and standards, and how these are applied. 'The (SCO) organisation has conveyed a worldview emphasising sovereignty and security, and amplifying Chinese and Russian narratives, such as preventing 'colour revolutions' or stopping a 'new Cold War', as Xi has stated, and 'shaping a fair multipolar world order', as Putin has remarked,' Soong explained. But China clearly has issues with UNCLOS, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, despite signing the territorial treaty. Russia sidestepped the UN Charter with its unilateral military assault on a neighbouring sovereign nation (Ukraine). Iran's support for Middle Eastern terrorist organisations — which it insists are religious freedom fighters — has earned it near global pariah status. And North Korea's repressive Kim regime has clawed its way through decades of international sanctions to secure for itself a significant nuclear ballistic missile force. But the SCO is not an alliance, Soong adds; 'Nor does it have a common basis of geopolitical interest. China and Russia are aligned but not allied, and they have differing interests in treating Central Asia as their sphere of influence.' And that, argues Washington DC geopolitical analysts Craig Singleton and Grant Rumley, is the difference between words and actions. 'Herein, of course, lies the rub with Beijing's much-touted Middle East network and the wider China-Russia-Iran alignment,' they write. 'Both rest on partnerships of convenience united by shared grievance — but all too often divided by capability and caution. Convergence on Ukraine 'Co-operation among the four countries was expanding before 2022, but Russia's invasion of Ukraine accelerated their deepening economic, military, and technological ties,' reads the CNAS report, titled The Axis of Upheaval, Gauging the Growing Military Cooperation Among Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. North Korea has sent thousands of troops and millions of rounds of ammunition to support Russia's efforts to eradicate Ukraine. China has been less blatant. At first, it was deliveries of minor mass-produced components to support Russia's failing war machine. Then, accusations expanded to the delivery of Chinese-made drone engines in shipping containers marked 'industrial refrigeration units'. Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has accused China of directly providing Russia with weapons. 'Military cooperation within the axis is likely to shorten the time it will take Russia to reconstitute its conventional forces, increasing the pressure on Europe to more rapidly ramp up its own capabilities,' the CNAS report warns. And Moscow, despite the failure of its advanced weaponry, has plenty to offer in return. 'Russian advancements on the battlefield in Ukraine and experience in modern warfare, for example, are diffusing to each axis country,' the report explains. But this emerging Axis is offering Moscow more than spare parts. 'As Putin's Russia faces Western sanctions due to its war on Ukraine, the SCO has also provided a diplomatic platform through summits and ministerial meetings that have allowed both Beijing and Moscow to form a front with Global South countries more aligned with their anti-Western narratives and authoritarian view,' Soong explains. It's a trend that's drawn the ire of the US Ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker. He has attacked Beijing for using Moscow to wage a 'proxy war' to distract the West from Taiwan and the South and East China Seas. 'China thinks they're fighting a proxy war through Russia,' he told Fox News last week. 'They want to keep the US and our allies occupied with this war, so that we cannot focus on our other strategic challenges.' Iran, the Axis' weak underbelly 'Importantly, the axis's limp showing during the (Iran) war was far more than a political embarrassment for Beijing,' argue Rumley and Singleton. 'It is a warning that any hostile move against Taiwan — especially with Trump in the Oval Office — could trigger an unpredictable US response.' Israel's virtually unopposed targeted assassination of key Iranian military leaders, scientists and politicians and the US bombing of underground nuclear facilities was a direct confrontation with the new Axis. It met no resistance. 'As Israeli warheads slammed into Iranian sites, Chinese statements scolded Israel and urged Washington to rein in its ally, but Beijing still withheld drones, credit, and replacement missile parts for its 'comprehensive strategic' partner,' they argue. 'The net effect has been to reinforce a perception that China often pontificates more than it meaningfully participates.' Soong says the air strikes on Iran demonstrate the SCO's limitations. 'In addition to lacking common values and coherent geopolitical interests, the SCO also has no concrete leverage to take collective action,' he writes. 'When Iran was targeted, the organisation had little capacity for action beyond issuing calls for de-escalation and condemning both Israel on June 14 and the United States on June 23 for their military strikes.' It also demonstrated the West's capabilities. Again. 'The United States' sudden intervention in the Iran-Israel conflict could complicate China's Taiwan calculus,' Rumley and Singleton argue. 'In a crossâ€'strait crisis, a wild-card US president such as Donald Trump might act sooner and hit harder than Chinese planners previously assumed.' But CNAS argues that Russia's and China's limited support for Iran, this time, does not spell the end of their ties. Instead, that cooperation is likely to persist and expand. 'The incentives fuelling their cooperation have not changed since Israel's actions against Iran,' the report states. 'If anything, Russia, China, and North Korea are likely to see value in helping Tehran reconstitute its capacity to antagonise the United States and create policy dilemmas for Washington.' Axis of spin, or leverage? 'With the dust now settled, the lesson most relevant to Beijing lies far from the Gulf,' argue Rumbley and Singleton. 'The short clash confirmed what Chinese strategists have long preached: In great-power contests, hard power decides outcomes.' The Axis forces of World War II were more about moral support than material. Nazi Germany did offer support to Fascist Italy, mainly in an effort to secure oil supplies. But Imperial Japan was limited to an exchange of critical minerals and technical breakthroughs. What of the new Axis of Upheaval? 'There is more divergence among SCO members than alignment, despite its non-Western appearance,' argues Soong. 'The call for collectively building a multipolar global order does not transcend the individual geopolitical interests of its members.' But the Axis is well-positioned for propaganda, he adds. 'Their messaging is clearly reflected in SCO statements and demonstrates a deepening strategic alignment in rhetoric, positioning themselves on the moral high ground in contrast to perceived Western double standards – that the West labels Russia a destabiliser for invading Ukraine, while remaining silent on, or even encouraging, Israel's attack on Iran. ' But CNAS argues the threat of Axis coordination is real. 'While these countries are reticent to incur unnecessary costs on behalf of their partners, they will seek out opportunities to support one another, especially in ways that help them withstand Western pressure,' the report argues. 'Through their cooperation, these countries are gaining valuable information and learning lessons that may strengthen each country's military, and their collaboration will likely increase the resilience of their regimes. 'There is also a rising risk of simultaneity, or the prospect that these countries could initiate more than one crisis at the same time, in an explicitly coordinated or opportunistic manner.' Iran's cheap, functional drone weapons are now being used by Russia and North Korea. Moscow's defence officials are travelling to Pyongyang, Beijing and Tehran to share their combat experience. 'Their cooperation will not end with Russia's war against Ukraine,' the CNAS report concludes. 'Russia's aims go beyond Ukraine, and Moscow will continue to view cooperation with China, Iran, and North Korea as essential to accomplishing these aims.'

Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge calling for an end to the war in Gaza and as pressure builds within Labor ranks for recognition of Palestinian statehood. Assistant Minister for Immigration Matt Thistlethwaite confirmed on Monday the call was being pursued, as Labor politicians backed the peaceful protest organised by the Palestine Action Group with at least three members of the federal caucus in attendance. Backbenchers Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon marched with protesters on Sunday, putting further pressure on Albanese to recognise Palestine. Thistlethwaite condemned any forms of antisemitism or pro-Iran sentiments at the protest, telling Sky News people holding images of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei was wrong. Loading 'A phone call [with Netanyahu] is being pursued. I don't believe that people should have been displaying photos of the Ayatollah Khamenei. I think that's provocative,' he said. 'Nonetheless, Australians have the right to protest and, as long as you do it peacefully and in accordance with the law, which is what occurred on the weekend, then every Australian has the right to protest.' The government has repeatedly said that recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of timing. Allies in France, Canada and the United Kingdom have all laid the groundwork to recognise the state at the next United Nations General Assembly in September. Husic told ABC Radio National he hoped the government would immediately recognise a Palestinian state, arguing the protest sent a signal to Albanese that people want further action.

The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge calling for an end to the war in Gaza and as pressure builds within Labor ranks for recognition of Palestinian statehood. Assistant Minister for Immigration Matt Thistlethwaite confirmed on Monday the call was being pursued, as Labor politicians backed the peaceful protest organised by the Palestine Action Group with at least three members of the federal caucus in attendance. Backbenchers Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon marched with protesters on Sunday, putting further pressure on Albanese to recognise Palestine. Thistlethwaite condemned any forms of antisemitism or pro-Iran sentiments at the protest, telling Sky News people holding images of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei was wrong. Loading 'A phone call [with Netanyahu] is being pursued. I don't believe that people should have been displaying photos of the Ayatollah Khamenei. I think that's provocative,' he said. 'Nonetheless, Australians have the right to protest and, as long as you do it peacefully and in accordance with the law, which is what occurred on the weekend, then every Australian has the right to protest.' The government has repeatedly said that recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of timing. Allies in France, Canada and the United Kingdom have all laid the groundwork to recognise the state at the next United Nations General Assembly in September. Husic told ABC Radio National he hoped the government would immediately recognise a Palestinian state, arguing the protest sent a signal to Albanese that people want further action.