logo
Frustration mounts as Ohio statehouse tackles property tax relief

Frustration mounts as Ohio statehouse tackles property tax relief

Yahoo07-02-2025

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The start of another year means lawmakers lay out their priorities and like the last two years, which yielded little relief, leaders said property tax relief is at the top of their lists, but some Ohioans are growing frustrated and worried.
'I just wanted to stay in my house in a quiet way,' central Ohio homeowner Janice Beaty said.
Beaty, 86, has owned her home for 45 years. Her husband died 10 years ago, so now she is living on a single fixed income of about $3,700 a month.
Columbus schools, state clash on Ohio 'bathroom ban'
'I am on Social Security,' she said. 'And they gave me an increase this year; $50 didn't go very far.'
With a fixed income, a combination of her pension and social security, her rising property taxes are a point of stress.
'I think it has gone up two or three times in the past few years,' she said. 'I managed to pay the taxes, the last taxes it got. But it's going to come up again.'
And that's not all she has to pay: she said things like car payments, new glasses, utilities, and everyday necessities stack up.
'I'm over 80 and not in a good position to go out and work anymore,' she said.
Ohio lawmakers not likely to consider gun reform after New Albany shooting
Beaty said that like many of her friends, she gets offers to sell her home; sometimes, she even gets badgered.
'I'd get some money out of it, but I'd lose my house,' she said. 'Pictures on the wall of my kids, my grandkids, and other things that are family possessions.'
Even if Beaty sold, she said renting a place in a retirement community is out of her budget, so she is looking to state leaders, like Ohio House Finance Committee Chair Brian Stewart (R-Ashville) for help.
'We've got kind of a big a la carte menu on property taxes,' Stewart said.
People protest President Donald Trump, Project 2025 at Ohio Statehouse
Right now, the Ohio House Finance Committee is hearing testimony on the state's two-year, multi-billion-dollar budget, but the version they are looking at as introduced by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, which is subject to change, does not have any property tax relief.
'I think the governor's budget probably assumes that we're going to take the lead in doing that,' Stewart said. 'Part of that for this process will be determining what can we what can we afford in the financial situation that we have, a lot of these proposals cost quite a bit of money, but I think there is an appetite to look at property taxes.'
Stewart said he 'expect(s) multiple members will prepare and offer amendments relating to property taxes, and if they do, we will give them a lot of consideration.'
Meanwhile, Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) has a different idea. When Huffman was asked if he wanted to include relief in the budget, he said, 'I hope not.'
'Because often when everything gets shoved into a budget, we figure out later how it's interacting with each other,' Huffman said.
What taxes are increased in proposed Ohio budget?
Huffman also does not want one big bill. Lawmakers plan to introduce a series of bills, each one targeting a specific area that needs to be addressed.
'A giant bill has so many complex problems in it, there will be something in it that everybody dislikes,' he said. 'So, let's look at this problem and have people understand why it is a difficult question.'
Huffman said it is a 'preferred method' to keep property taxes both separate from the budget, which has a July 1 deadline to pass, and tackle each issue one by one.
'This problem with property taxes has been created over decades,' Huffman said. 'The concept is we are going to peel the onion a little bit at a time is single issue single bill.'
The series of property tax bills that Huffman is talking about will be introduced within the next several weeks.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC News Suspends Journalist for Calling Stephen Miller and Trump ‘World-Class Haters'
ABC News Suspends Journalist for Calling Stephen Miller and Trump ‘World-Class Haters'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ABC News Suspends Journalist for Calling Stephen Miller and Trump ‘World-Class Haters'

ABC News suspended senior national correspondent Terry Moran after he wrote a social media post criticizing Donald Trump and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, describing each man as a 'world-class hater.' 'Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater,' Moran wrote late Saturday night on X, formerly Twitter, adding, 'You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.' Moran called the president 'a world-class hater' whose 'hatred [is] only a means to an end, and that end [is] his own glorification.' Moran later deleted the post. ABC announced Sunday that it suspended Moran. 'ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others,' an ABC spokesperson said in a statement. 'The post does not reflect the views of others at ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to Moran's post by calling it 'unhinged and unacceptable.' 'We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable,' she posted on X. Miller himself weighed in. 'For decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose,' he said. Moran wrote that Miller 'is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy.' Miller, a key contributor to Project 2025, is the mind behind many of the administration's cruelest immigration policies, including deportations of undocumented immigrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador and the new travel ban on nationals entering the U.S. from twelve countries. He has reportedly set a goal that Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrest no fewer than 3,000 immigrants per day and has threatened to oust officials who get in the way of reaching that goal. Miller also talked to Fox News in November 2024 about a plan to use executive orders from 'the moment President Trump puts his hands on that Bible.' Since taking office, Trump has signed executive orders to empower law enforcement while protecting them from accountability, advance his anti-transgender agenda, end birthright citizenship, revoke abortion rights, and strip federal funding from NPR and PBS, among others. This incident is just the latest in the Trump administration's battle with ABC News. The network agreed in December to pay $15 million to settle a defamation suit Trump brought against them after host George Stephanopoulos inaccurately said Trump had been found civilly liable for the sexual abuse and defamation of E. Jean Carroll. Stephanopoulos wrongly said on air that Trump was 'found liable for rape' and 'defaming the victim of that rape.' Staffers reacted to the news by telling Rolling Stone in December that it was 'frightening' to see the outlet's 'capitulation' to Trump. 'My fear is this sets a tone for the next four years, and that the tone is: Do not upset the president,' one staffer said. More from Rolling Stone The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Trump Moves to Deploy National Guard to L.A. Over ICE Protests Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Should you claim Social Security at 62 or 70? The answer may surprise you
Should you claim Social Security at 62 or 70? The answer may surprise you

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Should you claim Social Security at 62 or 70? The answer may surprise you

Should you claim Social Security at 62 or 70? The answer may surprise you The decision on when to claim Social Security is complex and personal. What's the ideal age for claiming Social Security retirement benefits? It depends on who you ask. The earlier you start, the smaller your checks. But, you'll collect these payments for more time. That's the trade-off. But what exactly are your options, and how much of a difference can claiming later rather than earlier make? The answer might surprise you. Claiming Social Security early vs. waiting Social Security offers taxpayers a respectably wide range of payment options. Eligible individuals can claim as early as the age of 62, but can also wait until they turn 70. Or, they can file at any point in time in between. Each of these choices, however, results in a different monthly payment. And the disparity between these payments can be stark. The table below puts things in perspective, comparing the difference in payment size for each age of this nine-year range relative to this year's average Social Security retirement benefit of $1,976 per month. Notice that while there's a progressive reduction in benefits the earlier you claim, there's also an ever-growing benefit for delaying the initiation of benefits beyond your full retirement age (or FRA). This additional benefit, however, stops growing once you turn 70. You're reading that right. For the average beneficiary right now, the difference between claiming when you're 62 versus claiming at the age of 70 is over $1,000 per month. That's no small amount for most households. And the bigger your payment, the bigger the potential difference. Things to consider about taking Social Security The comparisons are clear -- there's an obvious and meaningful mathematical upside in waiting as long as possible to file for Social Security's retirement benefits. Except these numbers alone don't necessarily tell the entire story for every individual and their unique situation. It's possible there's a very good reason to claim Social Security benefits as early as you possibly can, like health-related matters. You may also have enough money saved up to tap later in your life (like an IRA) to allow you to begin collecting some income before you otherwise might. More: 3 ways to increase your Social Security benefit today There's another often overlooked upside to claiming at 62 years of age, however, even if you don't need this money yet because you're still gainfully employed. That is, you might be able to do something more financially productive with these cash payments than the Social Security Administration is doing for you on your behalf. Although the figure's not etched in stone, the average internal rate of return on money withdrawn from your paycheck and forked over to Social Security has been in the ballpark of 4%, after inflation. Sometimes it's more. Other times it's less. Any given year's effective return on this "investment," however, mirrors the average yields on longer-term U.S. Treasury Bonds at the time. Right now that's between 4% and 5%. If you can take these payments and do something more constructive with the money, it makes sense to do so. But won't collecting Social Security while you're also working possibly reduce your Social Security payment? If you're below your full retirement age, yes, it can. Specifically, any work-based wages beyond $23,500 you earn this year will start to shrink any Social Security payments you're already collecting. If you're going to earn enough at your job in 2025, in fact, it's possible you could erase all of your current Social Security benefits payments. You're not actually losing money if this ends up being the case, however. These reductions are ultimately credited toward future Social Security payments, which are no longer reduced by work-based income once you're past your full retirement age. (There's also a very specific income threshold that applies only in the year in which you reach your full retirement age, although that's best left to another discussion.) In many regards this option allows you to have your cake and eat it, too. For most people though, just know that plans to invest their early Social Security payments rarely pan out as initially intended. Successfully implementing such a plan requires a great deal of discipline. Just think about it very carefully Bottom line? There's no one-size-fits-all answer as to when you should claim your Social Security retirement benefits. You'll want to think carefully about your particular situation, including making some predictions as to what it will look like in the future. Broadly speaking though, it rarely hurts to wait just a little while longer to claim, if only to make sure that plan is going to work for you, or to beef up your numbers just a little bit more. And you will most definitely want to make sure it works for you before making the decision. The Social Security Administration will allow people who have claimed at or after reaching full retirement age to suspend these payments if they've only been collecting for 12 or fewer months. Anyone initiating these benefits before reaching their full retirement age, however, is permanently locked into their reduced payments. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale
AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale

After Hackread reported that the previous leaked data of 88M AT& T customers now includes both date of birth and Social Security numbers, an AT&T spokesperson said in a statement: 'It is not uncommon for cybercriminals to re-package previously disclosed data for financial gain. We just learned about claims that AT&T data is being made available for sale on dark web forums, and we are conducting a full investigation.' Confident Investing Starts Here:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store