UK travellers heading to US could be hit with new £185 visa fee under new rules
UK travellers heading to the United States could soon face an additional charge under new rules being proposed by the US government. The so-called 'Visa Integrity Fee' is part of President Donald Trump's proposed immigration policy, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and could see Brits paying a substantial fee to visit the states.
The new fee is expected to take effect before the end of 2025 and will apply to individuals applying for a 'non-immigrant visa', which includes those travelling to the US for business, study or temporary work lasting longer than three months.
The Visa Integrity Fee is set at around $250 (£185.80) and will be charged in addition to all existing visa application fees.
It is important to note that the fee is only charged once the visa is approved. If an application is denied no fee will be collected. Additionally, the fee will also be reimbursed if travellers stick to their visa conditions such as not working illegally and not overstaying for more than five days.
The reimbursement will be given after your visa expires, however, the exact process for reimbursement remains unclear.
Once implemented, the revenue generated from the fee will be directed to the US Treasury Department's general fund. The US government estimates that this could bring in $28.9 billion (£21.3 billion) over the next ten years.
In addition to the new visa fee, there will also be an increase in the cost of the I-94 form, which tracks arrival and departure dates for non-citizens. The fee for this form will rise from $6 (£4.46) to $24 (£17.84).
According to CNBC, a spokesperson from the Department of Homeland Security said: "President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill provides the necessary policies and resources to restore integrity in our nation's immigration system."
Despite the changes, most UK travellers are unlikely to be affected, thanks to the Visa Waiver Programme (VWP). Under VWP, UK citizens visiting the US for tourism or short business trips typically do not require a visa.
Instead, they must apply for an Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA), meaning they will not need to pay the new Visa Integrity Fee.
An ESTA costs $21 (£15.60) and can take up to 72 hours to be approved. However, not all Brits are eligible for an ESTA.
Those who have a criminal record, have previously been refused entry, deported or overstayed a prior ESTA. may need to apply for a visa and could therefore be charged the new Visa Integrity Fee.
Eligible travellers can apply for an ESTA through the official US government website or the ESTA mobile app, as stated by the GOV.UK website.
With the introduction of the Visa Integrity Fee, UK travellers planning extended stays in the US are advised to check their visa requirements and stay up to date with the latest immigration policies before travelling to America.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump rages over newly surfaced Epstein wedding photos and Victoria's Secret fashion show footage: Live
Newly uncovered photos and footage cast fresh light on Donald Trump 's past ties with Jeffrey Epstein. At least two black and White photos unearthed by CNN confirm for the first time that Epstein attended the president's December 1993 wedding to Marla Maples at the Plaza Hotel in New York. A third photograph taken two months earlier shows the pair together during the opening of the Harley-Davidson Cafe in New York. The outlet also broadcast footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret runway event in New York, showing Trump, accompanied by Melania Trump, 'laughing and chatting' to Epstein. Both the photos and video predate any of Epstein's known legal issues. Asked about the photos in a call with CNN Tuesday, Trump said, 'You've got to be kidding me' before lashing out at the 'fake news' organization and hanging up. The report comes as the president attempted to brush off 'nonsense' claims surrounding the convicted sex offender's case and peddled a conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama manufactured the Russia investigation into Trump's 2016 campaign. Trump rages over newly surfaced Epstein wedding photos Donald Trump has lashed out at CNN after they unearthed photos and footage of the president with Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s. 'You've got to be kidding me,' Trump said in a phone call with the outlet, before branding it a 'fake news' organization and hanging up. At least two black and White photos confirm, for the first time, that Epstein attended the president's December 1993 wedding to Marla Maples at the Plaza Hotel in New York. A third photograph taken two months earlier shows the pair together during the opening of the Harley-Davidson Cafe in New York. The outlet also broadcast footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret runway event in New York, showing Trump, accompanied by Melania Trump, 'laughing and chatting' to Epstein. Both the photos and video predate any of Epstein's known legal issues. James Liddell23 July 2025 10:04 Obama's office issues rare response to 'bizarre allegations' from Trump After President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of treason, branding him the 'ringleader' of the Russia investigation, Obama's office issued a rare response, calling the 'bizarre allegations' both 'ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said: 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.' Rodenbush noted that multiple investigations, including a bipartisan examination by the Senate Intelligence Committee, confirmed Russia had meddled in the 2016 election. That committee was led by then Senator Marco Rubio, now Trump's Secretary of State. Here's the statement in full: Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio. Oliver O'Connell23 July 2025 01:30 Trump labels Epstein files probe 'witch hunt' as he spirals over 'Barack Hussein Obama' in Oval Office rant John Bowden reports from Washington, D.C.: Donald Trump hastily changed the subject to his years-long bid to seek revenge against Barack Obama as he was questioned about the Jeffrey Epstein files during a meeting Monday with the president of the Philippines at the White House. The U.S. president accused his predecessor of 'sedacious [sic]' behavior and ranted about an imaginary 'coup' after Ed O'Keefe of CBS News asked him about the Justice Department reaching out to attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell to request a new interview about Epstein and the sex trafficking ring for which her involvement earned the socialite a 20-year prison sentence in 2022. Continue reading... 'Witch Hunt': Trump's label for Epstein files probe as he spirals in Oval Office rant President turns to DNI Tulsi Gabbard's 'Russiagate' distraction in lengthy screed when asked by reporter about stonewalling over full release of files tied to sex-trafficker financier Oliver O'Connell23 July 2025 01:00 In depth: Trump law to COST millions their healthcare and add $3T in debt while rich see tax CUTS President Donald Trump's signature law will simultaneously cause 10 million people to lose their healthcare while at the same time causing the nation's deficit to skyrocket, due to the fact it also includes massive tax cuts for the wealthy, a new analysis has found. Eric Garcia takes a close look at what is to come... Trump's signature bill adds $3.4 trillion to deficit, leaves 10M without healthcare 'It's actually almost unheard of ... that juxtaposition of taking from the poor while giving to the rich,' one analyst said Oliver O'Connell23 July 2025 00:30 ICYMI: Trump claims he never 'wrote a picture'... turns out that's not true When Donald Trump pushed back against a report alleging he drew a 'bawdy' sketch to celebrate convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 's 50th birthday, the president insisted he doesn't draw pictures. 'I never wrote a picture in my life,' he said in an awkwardly phrased rebuttal to the Wall Street Journal last week, vehemently denying having anything to do with the birthday card. In a later Truth Social tirade he doubled down on the statement and bluntly declared: 'I don't draw pictures.' Despite the president's claims, multiple sketches by Trump have been made public over the years. James Liddell reports. Trump claims he never 'wrote a picture.' His claim has now been exposed At least five sketches attributed to Trump have sold at auction over the past decade, undermining his claim, 'I don't draw pictures' Oliver O'Connell23 July 2025 00:00 Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary insists 'nobody gives a poop' about Epstein Seemingly running cover for the Trump administration, which continues to face demands from MAGA supporters to release the Jeffrey Epstein files, Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary declared on Monday night that 'nobody gives a poop' about the deceased sex offender. When confronted with poll numbers that found a vast majority of Republicans want all the documents related to the Epstein case to be published, the pro-Trump businessman and self-described 'Mr. Wonderful' doubled down while continuing to shrug off the controversy. Justin Baragona has the story. Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary insists 'nobody gives a poop' about Epstein 'Maybe they were raped, maybe they weren't. This is not what American families give a d*mn about,' Kevin O'Leary exclaimed on Monday night. Oliver O'Connell22 July 2025 23:30 Jeff Daniels has pointed message to Trump voters Actor Jeff Daniels has again lashed out at President Donald Trump's supporters, this time with a seven-word message. The 70-year-old Emmy-winning actor, who on numerous occasions has criticized Trump and the GOP, spoke to MSNBC 's Nicolle Wallace on the latest episode of her The Best People podcast about the current political climate under the Trump administration, including tariffs and the state of the Republican party. Inga Parkel has the story. Jeff Daniels issues pointed seven-word message for Trump voters 'Dumb and Dumber' star additionally lamented Kamala Harris's loss, saying he thinks she would have led like Abraham Lincoln Oliver O'Connell22 July 2025 23:00 GOP mocked for posting about Trump's paper straw policies amid Epstein fallout Social media users are mocking the GOP after a tweet from its official X account, stating President Donald Trump is " Making Straws Great Again" as the White House continues to deal with fallout over the Epstein files investigation. Posted Tuesday morning, the tweet includes a photo of Trump looking celebratory with his fist in the air and an inset of paper straws, celebrating the current president's cancellation of paper straw mandates under the Biden administration. Erin Keller reports. People on social media are mocking the GOP's 'Making Straws Great Again' tweet amid Jeffrey Epstein file demands. Oliver O'Connell22 July 2025 22:45 MAGA distractions help Trump deviate from so-called Epstein files President Donald Trump and his administration have been delving into distractions for their Make America Great Again base in deviation from its handling of documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein died in his jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal charges related to the trafficking and sexual abuse of dozens of minor girls. His life and death have been the center of conspiracy theories, notably among Trump's base, as the feds have been tight-lipped about the evidence collected. Rachel Dobkin reports. The Trump administration has recently focused on a slew of issues not related to Epstein, from civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, to the names of sports teams in Washington and Cleveland Oliver O'Connell22 July 2025 22:30
Daily Record
6 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Living near this Scottish landmark can add thousands to your house value
But staying within a mile of another iconic spot could send your home's value plummeting. New research has revealed that living close to some of the UK's most iconic landmarks can significantly impact the value of your property, for better or worse. And one of Scotland's most famous attractions has made it into the top ten. The study, carried out by buy to let insurance experts at the Alan Boswell Group, analysed house prices within a one-mile radius of 30 of Britain's top landmarks. These prices were then compared to average values in the surrounding areas to determine how much of an effect each landmark has on local property prices. Edinburgh Castle was ranked ninth in the study, with homes located within one mile of the historic capital fortress selling for an average of £427,250. That figure is £89,328 higher than the wider area average of £337,922, a rise of 26.4 per cent. The results suggest that having such a renowned attraction on your doorstep could add a sizeable premium to your home's value. However, not all Scottish landmarks offer the same benefit. In fact, some can have the opposite effect. Balmoral Castle in Aberdeenshire was among the worst performing in the study, with a sharp 41 per cent drop in property value for homes located within a one-mile radius. Average house prices near Balmoral are significantly lower than in the nearby town of Ballater, suggesting the Royal connection doesn't always translate to financial gain. Stirling Castle also featured on the list with a smaller but still negative impact on local house prices. The average price in the wider Stirling area is £244,398, but within a mile of the castle, it drops to £223,280, an 8.6 percent decline. Elsewhere in the UK, London landmarks dominated the top of the table. Buckingham Palace claimed the number one spot, with properties located within one mile seeing a staggering 92 per cent increase in value. The average house price in the surrounding City of Westminster stands at £941,900, but this jumps to £1,807,145 near the royal residence. A spokesperson from the Alan Boswell Group explained: 'The buy to let insurance experts at Alan Boswell Group can reveal that being neighbours with the royals can pay off majorly, with Buckingham Palace claiming first place. "The tourist hotspot, with 30 per cent of Brits considering it the best UK landmark, can increase your house value by a whopping 92 per cent if you live within one mile of the attraction.' Royal Albert Hall came second on the list with a 76 per cent increase in nearby house prices. The average property in London's most expensive borough, Kensington, costs £1,130,400, but this figure rises to £1,990,172 for homes located within one mile of the iconic concert venue. Despite the potential for noise from major events, Royal Albert Hall's past issues with complaints - including the loss of its licence to host boxing and wrestling events for 13 years starting in 1999 - appear to have had no impact on local property values. Third place went to the British Museum, where living within a one-mile radius can boost your home's value by 59 per cent. The average house price in Camden stands at £766,100, but climbs to £1,218,395 for those nearer the museum. Not all landmarks bring financial benefits, though. Other UK locations that saw negative effects on house prices include Blackpool Tower (down 28%), Old Trafford in Manchester (down 27%), and Coventry Cathedral (down 21%). Rank Landmark Location Average price in the wider area Average house price within 1 mile of the landmark Price increase % increase 1 Buckingham Palace London £941,900 £1,807,145 £865,245 91.9% 2 Royal Albert Hall London £1,130,400 £1,990,172 £859,772 76.1% 3 The British Museum London £766,100 £1,218,395 £452,295 59.0% 4 Durham Cathedral Durham £215,883 £338,434 £122,551 56.8% 5 Hampton Court Palace Molesey £654,889 £912,002 £257,113 39.3% 6 Tower of London London £479,500 £667,157 £187,657 39.1% 7 Tate Modern London £515,500 £710,532 £195,032 37.8% 8 The Shard London £515,500 £665,806 £150,306 29.2% 9 Edinburgh Castle Edinburgh £337,922 £427,250 £89,328 26.4% 10 Westminster Abbey London £941,900 £1,121,895 £179,995 19.1%
NBC News
6 minutes ago
- NBC News
How Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is shaping this year's biggest elections
President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending law known as the 'big beautiful bill' is expected to be a major issue in the 2026 midterm elections. But first, candidates for governor this year in Virginia and New Jersey are already testing how the measure plays on the campaign trail. Rep. Mikie Sherrill and former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominees in New Jersey and Virginia, respectively, have warned about devastating impacts from looming cuts to social safety net programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Republicans are taking mixed approaches. In New Jersey, a high-tax state where affordability is a top issue, former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli and his allies are planning to go on offense, arguing that Sherrill voted to block critical tax cuts. And in Virginia, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, the GOP nominee, has dismissed concerns about program cuts, arguing that the state's Republican governor has put the state in a strong position to respond. Those lines of attack could determine who holds the governorships of two key states by the beginning of next year, as well as set the tone for how candidates battling for control of Congress approach the issue in 2026. Democrats focus on budget cuts, Republicans focus on tax cuts Democrats have already signaled that they plan to go all in on the measure's changes to SNAP, the program once known as food stamps, and Medicaid. The Democratic Governors Association released a memo Monday detailing its polling of Virginia and New Jersey, which showed majorities of voters in both states have 'serious concerns' and slim majorities saying they would prefer governors who oppose the measure. 'The races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey in November will be voters' first opportunity to reject Trump's harmful budget bill — and the GOP nominees will not be able to run from their record of supporting these deeply unpopular Medicaid cuts,' DGA Executive Director Meghan Meehan-Draper wrote in the memo. A congressional analysis published by Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee estimates that in Virginia, more than 300,000 residents could lose their health care by 2034. The number is a combination of people who could lose their Medicaid under changes to the program and people who would no longer be eligible for the state's expansion of that program under the Affordable Care Act. The New Jersey Department of Human Services estimated that around 350,000 residents who are eligible for Medicaid would lose health care coverage 'because of bureaucratic barriers,' and warned that the state's food assistance program, which affects 800,000 residents, is at risk unless the state can raise between $100 million and $300 million. In New Jersey, Ciattarelli has confronted concerns about Medicaid cuts by echoing Republicans in Washington who say those who need the program's crucial health coverage will still receive it. 'The best way to protect Medicaid is to make sure that those who receive it are truly in need of it most,' Ciattarelli said in a video posted on X after the measure passed the Senate. 'As I go around the state each and every day, I find an overwhelming number of New Jerseyans agree that able-bodied adults without young children should have to work or go to school at least 20 hours a week to remain eligible for their Medicaid benefits.' Ciattarelli and his GOP allies are planning to go on offense on the measure with a focus on taxes, lauding provisions codifying the 2017 tax cuts and temporarily raising the federal deduction for state and local taxes from $10,000 to $40,000, a top issue in the high-tax state. Ciattarelli knocked Sherrill for opposing the measure after pledging to work to eliminate the SALT cap, saying in his video statement that Sherrill 'voted to raise your taxes.' (Democrats note that a SALT cap is still in place under the new law and argue the law's tax cuts will benefit the wealthy overall.) Chris Russell, a Ciattarelli campaign consultant, told NBC News that the campaign plans to emphasize Sherrill's vote against the tax provisions in this measure, which also boosted the child tax credit, and made tips and overtime pay exempt from federal taxes. 'That is going to directly impact people in New Jersey and their pocketbooks,' Russell said, later adding, 'We intend to make her defend that vote.' Change NJ, a pro-Ciattarelli super PAC, has already launched digital ads knocking Sherrill for opposing the measure, focusing on the tax provisions. The group also released a memo last week with a poll from its senior adviser and pollster Kellyanne Conway, Trump's former campaign manager. The survey, which tested a range of attacks against Sherrill, found that the best-performing attack highlighted 'her vote to not extend Trump tax cuts, leading to a potential $1,700 tax hike for families, tax hike on small businesses and a cut to the child tax credit,' although critics of the poll note it modeled an electorate more favorable to Republicans. 'This is the most recent, most vivid example of Mikie doing the things in Washington that people are tired of Trenton Democrats doing,' Change NJ spokesman Carlos Cruz said. 'To that end, you should expect to see us talking a lot about it.' Democrats highlight downstream effects of Medicaid spending cuts Hospital associations have also warned that rural hospitals in Virginia will take a major financial hit under the law, because they rely so heavily on Medicaid dollars: People living in rural areas are far more likely to receive their health insurance through Medicaid. Both Spanberger and Sherrill have emphasized those cuts on the campaign trail. Sherrill held events earlier this month at a health care center in Camden, a solar energy business in Southampton Township, and Kean University in Union to highlight the effects of the 'one big beautiful bill,' which Sherrill has called the "Republican Price Hike Bill.' 'This cruel piece of legislation will kick hundreds of thousands of New Jerseyans off their healthcare and raise costs for even more, cut food assistance for working families, and increase the cost of utilities and mortgages,' Sherrill said in her statement explaining her vote against the measure. 'At the same time, they are funneling New Jersey's hard-earned tax dollars to Trump's billionaire friends and donors.' Spanberger, for her part, made criticism of Trump's bill a central tenet of a campaign bus tour through Virginia in late June, telling voters during a stop in Fredericksburg before the measure was enacted that she'd already begun 'looking at how we can make sure that, come January, as few people as possible get pushed off of Medicaid.' In video released by her campaign after the House passed its iteration of the bill, she warned that it would constitute a 'massive attack on health care as we know it' and create 'a reality where Virginians cannot afford the care they need,' warning that it would boot people off Medicaid, cause rural hospital closures, increase prescription drug costs and overrun emergency rooms. In both states, Democrats also plan to use the Republicans' support for the bill to make the broader case that they won't stand up to Trump, who lost both states by nearly 6 percentage points. Earle-Sears says 'don't panic' In Virginia, Earle-Sears has both praised Trump's tax-and-spend law and brushed off concerns about the measure. At a press conference one week after the law was enacted, Earle-Sears responded to questions about its impact on rural hospitals and voters' concerns about the law more broadly. 'I would say to Virginia, don't panic,' she said, before adding that 'things are being worked out' and saying that federal and state lawmakers had begun taking actions to counter hits to health care coverage. A week earlier — but still after the bill was enacted — Earle-Sears said during an interview on Newsmax, a conservative television network, that the bill 'does so many great things' amid a broader discussion about her policy plans to create jobs in Virginia. And in June, prior to Trump's bill becoming law, Earle-Sears told a crowd at an event in the rural town of Marion that the state would be able to fill in financial gaps created by cuts to Medicaid with 'rainy day' state budgetary funds. Virginia Democrats have pushed as loudly on instances of Earle-Sears defending the law as they have on Spanberger's criticism of it. 'After supporting and praising these cuts, all Winsome Earle-Sears has to say is 'don't panic,'' Democratic Party of Virginia spokesperson Maggie Amjad said in response to questions about how the party was positioning itself to message on Trump's law in the governor's race. Amjad called the GOP nominee's comments 'dismissive and empty advice.' Responding to questions about Earle-Sears' views on Trump's law — and about Democratic attacks on that response — campaign spokesperson Peyton Vogel wrote in an email that 'Abigail Spanberger may not be aware of this, but we're running for Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia.' 'When she and Joe Biden were sending bills that directly impacted the future of our Commonwealth, Governor Youngkin and Lt. Governor Winsome Earle-Sears fought for all Virginians,' Vogel added. 'That's where all of our priorities should be focused, on the people of Virginia. Fear mongering over President Trump's tax cuts is a losing strategy, but we aren't going to get in Abigail's way.' Republicans working for some outside groups wouldn't rule out the idea of ads promoting aspects of Trump's law in the state, as seems to be on the menu in New Jersey, where the pro-Ciattarelli super PAC noted the political value of the tax cut provisions. But Vogel said the Earle-Sears campaign was not planning to feature in any ads, or as part of any paid media, any messaging that defended or touted the "big beautiful bill." 'We are focused on Virginia and Winsome's story,' she said.
