Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein: Why MAGA loyalists are abandoning the president
Trump's Truth Social posts backing up Pam Bondi's claim that the Epstein files were much ado about nothing showed that same brutal disregard for his devout fans. They had taken him seriously ? What fools!
He tried to subdue his MAGAcolytes – his 'boys' and 'gals' – by ordering them not to 'waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' He said that those who are focused on the 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax' are 'selfish people,' 'PAST supporters' and 'weaklings' who had been 'conned by the Lunatic Left.'
If his fans couldn't focus on how great he was, better than 'perhaps any President in our Country's history,' Trump pouted in a post, 'I don't want their support anymore!'
One 'gal,' a Texan named Rosie, said she was brokenhearted. She replied on Truth Social that she has four daughters and 'can't even begin to comprehend the flipped narrative that 'it was so long ago' 'why are we still talking about this' and 'nobody should care.' These victims were some ones daughters, sisters, nieces, granddaughter. Someone's child. Please reconsider, sir.'
Donald and Melania Trump with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2002. Credit: Getty
He has lost some of his base's trust by refusing to deliver the goods, or to acknowledge that he used people such as Kash Patel and Dan Bongino to whip up the frenzy against the paedophile who gave rides to Trump and Bill Clinton on his plane dubbed by some the Lolita Express.
Trump bonded with Epstein years ago, although it's not clear if Trump knew the extent of Epstein's predations. He told New York Magazine in 2002 that Epstein 'likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.'
This past week was the first time Trump had such a dramatic rift with his supporters, who are often compared to a cult.
Trump, who rose to power with the help of Fox News, threatened Emma Tucker, editor of Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal , trying to stop its story about a bawdy letter and drawing he allegedly contributed to a 50th birthday book that Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for Epstein.
'I'm gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else,' he said in a call Tuesday with the Journal. (He filed the suit on Friday.) He denied that he ever drew an outline of a naked woman with his name scribbled in a salacious spot, along with writing an insinuating wish to Epstein that 'every day be another wonderful secret.' (What had to be kept secret, Donald?)
Loading
'I don't draw pictures,' he wrote on Truth Social, denouncing the 'FAKE letter' in the 'Fake Story.'
But Trump's lies – such as the one about his uncle at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Unabomber – are falling apart almost instantaneously. It immediately came out that he was a 'high-profile doodler,' as Tyler Pager put it in The New York Times , and that he donated drawings to charity in the early 2000s.
On Thursday, Trump posted that he had asked Bondi to produce 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval.' But judges usually keep such testimony secret. It was hilarious to see Trump hiding behind the judiciary he has tried to sideline.
The president, hoping to redirect the ire of the base back to its favourite chew toy, the mainstream media, posted that the Journal is a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag.'
Natalie Winters, a reporter for Steve Bannon's War Room podcast, told Bannon that the Journal story made her feel 'gaslit' by the administration. 'I thought the DOJ had nothing related to Epstein,' she said. 'Well, this story sort of contradicts that. So why don't we release it? It's maddening.'
Twisting conspiracy theories into a Gordian knot of hate, Trump is claiming some Epstein files were 'made up' by Barack Obama, James Comey, 'Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration' and 'Crooked Hillary.'
It's tough to blame the deep state when you are the deep state.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
20 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Columbia University agrees to pay $300m to settle White House fight
Washington | Columbia University has reached a landmark deal with the Trump administration to restore federal funding for research, easing a crisis that has rattled the school's finances and upended its leadership. The Ivy League school will pay a $US200 million ($302.3 million) penalty over three years to resolve multiple civil rights investigations, clearing the way for the reinstatement of the majority of more than $US400 million in cancelled grants and contracts, as well as access to billions of dollars in future grants.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Trump pledges billions for new illegal immigration detention facility
The Trump administration has awarded a massive $US1.26 billion contract for an immigration centre in the US to be built in Texas. The Department of Defence awarded the contract to Acquisition Logistics LLC, a Virginia-based company. The centre is planned to be at Texas Army Base Fort Bliss as a tent city. The move would vastly expand the Trump administration's ability to detain and deport migrants. The 1-million-acre base will have 5,000 beds and an airport, creating a deportation hub. This would make the Texas base the largest immigration detention facility in the country. The contract was awarded following the passage of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which allocated $US45 billion to expand the capacity of detention facilities. The enormous spending increase hopes to double ICE's detention capacity to 100,000 to meet Trump's goal of 1 million deportations per year.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Trump administration contradicts Labor by claiming lifting of beef import restrictions a 'major trade breakthrough'
The Trump administration has claimed victory over the decision to end a de facto ban on US beef imports, contradicting Australian government claims. The Albanese government has claimed its surprise decision to scrap biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports has nothing to do with trade negotiations, with Trade Minister Don Farrell telling Sky News Australia they were 'separate issues". But US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins put out a statement on Thursday describing it as a 'major trade breakthrough'. Headlined 'Make Agriculture Great Again Trade Wins: President Trump Secures Greater Ag Market Access to Australia for American Beef,' Secretary Rollins' statement congratulates the US President for his successful negotiation strategy. 'American farmers and ranchers produce the safest, healthiest beef in the world. It's absurd that non-scientific trade barriers prevented our beef from being sold to consumers in Australia for the last 20 years,' Secretary Rollins said. 'This is yet another example of the kind of market access the President negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way. 'Gone are the days of putting American farmers on the sidelines.' Australia imposed a blanket ban on US beef imports in 2003 following an outbreak of mad cow disease. While this was repealed in 2019, biosecurity rules remained in place to ensure beef from third-party countries was not imported to Australia via the US. But speaking on Thursday morning, Trade Minister Farrell said the government had decided to remove the restrictions on the advice of scientific experts. 'A process that's been going now for about 10 years ... has taken place. It's been a very lengthy review, and the review has found that it is now appropriate for Australia to receive American beef,' Senator Farrell said. 'We apply a very strict test in terms of whether the product is safe to be brought into Australia and that there is no risk to the Australian beef or cattle industry … and all of those tests have now been satisfied by the Department of Agriculture." 'We've got some of the top scientists in the world. We've kept out disease for a very long period of time in Australia. We want to continue keeping it out. But if the Americans are able to satisfy those tests, and that's what they've done, then we're prepared to allow them to import their beef.' Challenged on the timing of the decision, Mr Farrell insisted it had nothing to do with US trade negotiations or the imposition of tariffs by President Trump. 'This is not a process that's started since the election of President Trump. It goes back a very, very long period of time,' he said 'We don't link biosecurity issues with trade issues. They're separate issues.' "There's nothing suspicious about this at all'. National Senate leader Bridget McKenzie expressed scepticism about the timing and called for an independent review of the science. 'The timing is exquisite, that this ongoing process to just arrive with science and a protocol that can lift the ban just in time to meet President Trump's demands,' Senator McKenzie said. 'That's why we want to see an independent review.' 'For us to have peace of mind, we would like an independent review of the science that's being applied with respect to these export protocols that says that beef is safe to come in.
