COAS credits Trump with 'preventing many wars'
Listen to article
Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir praised US President Donald Trump on Sunday for his efforts to stop "many wars", including brokering a ceasefire between Pakistan and India in May.
The army chief, who is on an official visit to the United States, held high-level engagements with senior American political and military leadership as well as the Pakistani diaspora, according to a statement issued here by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).
Speaking to the Pakistani Americans, the army chief said that Pakistan achieved notable successes on the diplomatic front, while praising President Trump's leadership for helping avert wars and creating opportunities for renewed bilateral engagement. The army chief described overseas Pakistanis as the country's strength, calling their role as a "brain gain" rather than a brain drain. He said the new generation's ideas, priorities, and global connections were a valuable national asset, with the potential to accelerate Pakistan's progress.
He stressed that the nation's prosperity was closely tied to its global diaspora. He also said that an anticipated Pakistan-US trade deal would bring foreign investment to the country.
Highlighting Pakistan's demographic advantage, the COAS noted that 64% of its population was under the age of 30. He urged expatriates to use their resources and influence to channel investment into the country, adding that national development was inseparable from global engagement.
On security and regional issues, the army chief reiterated that Pakistan had no sympathy for terrorists and was committed to bringing them to justice.
He expressed concern over India's Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) being involved in acts of terrorism, warning that such activities were a matter of grave concern. He vowed a swift and forceful response to any Indian aggression.
Reaffirming Pakistan's stance on Jammu and Kashmir, the army chief said that it was not an internal matter of India but an internationally recognised dispute, echoing Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah's description of it as Pakistan's "jugular vein".
Earlier, the army chief attended the retirement ceremony of US Central Command (Centcom) chief General Michael E Kurilla in Tampa, and the change of command ceremony for Admiral Brad Cooper, who has taken over the role.
The COAS praised the outgoing commander's role in strengthening bilateral military cooperation and expressed confidence in continued collaboration under the new leadership.
He also met Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, discussing matters of mutual professional interest and inviting him to visit Pakistan. On the sidelines, the army chief interacted with defence chiefs from other friendly countries.
While addressing members of the Pakistani diaspora, the COAS urged them to remain optimistic about Pakistan's future and contribute towards attracting investment to the country. The expatriates, in turn, pledged to support Pakistan's progress.
The visit comes just two months after the army chief's high-profile trip to Washington, where he met US President Donald Trump and senior administration officials. That visit, viewed as a significant step in recalibrating Islamabad-Washington ties, took place against the backdrop of a cooling in US-India relations.
Observers say the renewed military-to-military contacts could pave the way for broader cooperation, particularly in regional security and counterterrorism efforts. According to sources, security cooperation between Pakistan and the US has never been so strong as it is right now.
Unlike the previous Biden administration, the current US dispensation has more open approach towards Pakistan. There has been growing realisation in the Trump Administration that Pakistan, contrary to the perception, has shown great willingness to work with Washington.
On the other hand, the view about India in Washington has changed quite dramatically as many US officials view their Indian counterparts arrogant and less receptive to issues of concerns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
41 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Jailed abroad
At a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Overseas Pakistanis last week, it was revealed that over 17,000 Pakistani nationals are currently imprisoned abroad, with most of them detained in Middle East countries. While this number in itself is enough to raise a few eyebrows — with India having around 10,000 nationals detained abroad and Bangladesh 9,000 — supplementary introspection is necessary yet amiss. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs failed to provide further details about the reasons for arrests, unnecessarily extending the measures for due process, and expedition where possible. According to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, "To enjoy the protection of law and to be treated in accordance with law is the inalienable right of every citizen, wherever he may be ..." But unfortunately, many Pakistani nationals remain stagnating in international prisons regardless of the nature and gravity of their crimes. Many of these victims are often jailed due to petty crimes, while others are victims of unreliable prosecutions and sometimes even bigotry. Regardless of the reasons for imprisonment, the state is duty-bound to provide consular assistance to those imprisoned. But lax implementation of consular protection laws coupled with inadequate data deprives them of their rights. These are people with families waiting back home, sometimes spending years stuck in bureaucratic processes hoping for a resolution. Amongst the large number of prisoners, there are some who are even cleared for repatriation by host governments but incompetence on our end keeps them trapped. It is high time that overseas prisoners were provided access to consular officers. The Senate committee has now directed the Foreign Ministry to produce comprehensive data regarding convicted and under-trial overseas Pakistanis within 15 days, a directive which must be followed through for the sake of providing basic human rights.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan has video evidence of downed six Indian aircraft, says Mohsin Naqvi
Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi on Sunday that Pakistan has video evidence of six Indian aircraft, which were shot down during the recent military conflict between the two neighbouring nuclear states. Speaking at a seminar hosted by the Professor Waris Mir Foundation at Aiwan-e-Iqbal, titled 'Global Impacts of Pakistan's Military and Diplomatic Victories over India', the minister stressed that the country's intelligence and defense preparedness outmatched India at every level. Naqvi said, 'We have videos of six Indian aircraft that were shot down.' He said it was decided that no announcement would be made until field evidence was obtained, 'and believe me, we had it within minutes.' Pak-India conflict: Indian opposition assails Modi for failures Naqvi credited Pakistan's intelligence agencies for providing real-time information during the conflict. 'Every decision made in India, every flight their aircraft took — we knew in advance. This was the extraordinary work of our intelligence agencies, the silent warriors who rarely get the credit they deserve,' he said. He also spoke of divine protection, recounting an incident in which seven Indian missiles targeted a major Pakistani base but failed to hit it. 'Some missiles fell short, some landed to the side, but none hit the base. It was nothing short of a miracle,' he added. In contrast, Naqvi said that Pakistan's retaliatory missile strikes hit India's largest oil storage facility with precision. The interior minister praised Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir's leadership, saying he led with great courage and bravery. 'At that time, a delegation from the Saudi government visited Pakistan. The delegation had come from India to Pakistan, seeking peace. The field marshal told them: 'India is like a shining Mercedes, but we are like a dumper truck loaded with stones. Now imagine what will happen when the two collide.' The members of the delegation remained silent,' he said. The minister also highlighted that for the first time, the army, air force, and navy devised a joint strategy and fought the war under one plan. Whereas, he said India's each service chief reported separately to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. '…their viewpoints were entirely different and split. The result was before the world.' Naqvi said that two key figures behind India's strategy were National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Home Minister Amit Shah, not Modi himself. 'These two will be responsible for Modi's downfall and for the damage they are bringing to India,' he warned. IAF chief must have claimed downing Pakistan's aircraft under pressure: defence analyst He also emphasised political unity within Pakistan during the conflict, stating that all parties stood together. 'The Indian delegation failed to lobby international support, particularly in the U.S., while Pakistan's diplomatic front, led by the PPP chairman, was far more effective,' he said. Naqvi further stated India sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan, and used post-9/11 narratives to delegitimise the Kashmiri freedom movement. The seminar was also addressed by Chairman Senate Syed Yusuf Raza Gillani and Speaker Punjab Assembly Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
A terror tag and a diplomatic turn
Just days before President Donald Trump's inauguration for the second term, a senior Pakistani diplomat briefed a group of people including experts and journalists in Islamabad. His focus was on the Pakistan-US relationship under Trump's administration. The bottom line was: Pakistan should be prepared for a tough challenge. According to the diplomat, Trump's team was surrounded by people who had little sympathy for Pakistan. Experts and those who understand Trump as well as the nature of Pakistan-US ties echoed similar sentiments. There was consensus that despite the unpredictable nature of Trump, there was little or no room for better prospects of Pakistan-US ties. On the contrary, everyone agreed that the relationship between the US and India would only deepen under President Trump's second term. But when President Trump delivered a maiden address to the US Congress, he praised Pakistan. This was some achievement given that until then he spared no one. He launched a diatribe both against friends and foes. Pakistan was the only exception, which Trump mentioned in a positive way. His praise stemmed from Pakistan's assistance in arresting one of the key masterminds of the Abbey Gate bombing in Kabul in August 2021. Muhammad Sharifullah, one of the ISIS-Khorasan operatives and according to the US was one of the facilitators of Kabul Airport attack, was apprehended on the intelligence provided by the CIA and swiftly handed over to the US. That cooperation not only earned Pakistan praise from Trump but also opened a channel of communication that would eventually lead to Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir being invited to launch at the White House in an unprecedented turn of events. When Trump applauded Pakistan at the US Congress, people were still sceptical that this bonhomie would be short-lived as Trump cannot be trusted. Questions were raised about what Pakistan had offered or was going to offer to the US in return for this cozying up approach of the US? Many people also wonder whether Pakistan would get anything in return. But what happened over the past few weeks following high-level exchanges and frequent interactions between the two countries was that Trump's praise was not mere rhetoric but now reflecting a shift in the US policy. The substantive outcome of Pakistan helping Trump to advance his domestic agenda by arresting Abbey Gate bombing facilitator was the US State Department's move to declare Balochistan Liberation Army and its suicide squad Majeed Brigade as terrorist outfit. The designation of BLA and the Majeed Brigade, as Foreign Terrorist Organisations (FTO), was a major victory for Pakistan. Islamabad had long sought its listing but with little success. The US declared Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as a terrorist outfit but successive US administrations refrained from taking a similar stance against groups active in Balochistan. One of the reasons included that such groups including BLA and Majeed Brigade were targeting not just the Pakistani interests but also primarily the Chinese interests in the resource-rich Balochistan province. This in many ways probably served the agendas of those who don't want China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to succeed. That was the reason the US decision was extraordinary. The United States not only listed BLA and Majeed Brigade but also seems to be ready to extend cooperation to Pakistan to fight them. The two countries held counterterrorism dialogue, a regular feature, in Islamabad recently. The noticeable change was that for the first time BLA made it to the joint statement. Both delegations underscored the 'critical importance' of developing effective approaches to terrorist threats, singling out the BLA alongside transnational outfits. Washington lauded Islamabad's 'continued successes' in containing entities that threaten regional and global peace. Therefore, listing of BLA and Majeed Brigade is a development that carries legal, political, diplomatic, and operational implications for Pakistan, the US, and even India. First, any BLA or Majeed Brigade funds or property in the US jurisdiction are now frozen. Members and affiliates are barred from entering the US. Providing material support to the group is now a serious US federal crime, even for individuals outside the US if they have US connections. The designation makes it harder for BLA to raise funds internationally through charities, front companies, or sympathetic diaspora groups. The FTO tag makes it riskier for members to travel abroad or seek asylum in countries aligned with US counterterrorism policies. The US can now more actively share intelligence with Pakistan and allies to track, disrupt, or eliminate the group's cells. Diaspora-based sympathisers in the West could face monitoring and prosecution. If BLA finds safe havens in neighbouring states including Afghanistan, the US listing pressures those governments to take action or face reputational costs. While the designation won't end the insurgency, it can weaken its external support structure, especially for high-profile suicide attacks like those by the Majeed Brigade. Second, Pakistan has long stated that BLA is a foreign-backed terrorist group responsible for attacks in Balochistan. The US designation is an international endorsement of that position. Third, India has openly supported Baloch separatists. The US move signals that Washington is not aligning with New Delhi on this issue. Fourth, this listing highlights a warming security relationship between Pakistan and the US. Fifth, quietly, this could create discomfort in New Delhi if US counterterrorism measures start exposing any Indian contacts with Baloch separatists. It is not said publicly but the US move could also be linked to its keen interest in the untapped mines and minerals resources available in abundance in Balochistan. But security is a major challenge. Some view the US interest in mines and minerals with suspicion. The view, nevertheless, in official Pakistani circles is that the US investment in Balochistan could stabilise the situation and it may lay the bases for long-term cooperation between the two countries. The listing of BLA and Majeed Brigade is being seen in that context.
