Bombay HC seeks BMC's reply to plea against ‘unhygienic' Tardeo fish market
The Bombay High Court recently sought an affidavit from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in reply to a PIL by residents of housing societies in south Mumbai's Tardeo area, alleging that a new fish market run within the residential area was affecting their health and religious sentiments.
The court asked the BMC to ensure hygiene conditions are maintained in the fish market.
A bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Makarand S Karnik on May 8 was hearing a PIL by Megha Agarwal, Vikram Jogani, Laxmichand Gala, and Mahendra Jain from Tulsiwadi area in Tardeo.
The petitioners, through advocate Deepa Pohuja, claimed that the fish market, which opened in March this year on the ground floor of the municipal building in the area, did not maintain any hygiene norms and the water with foul odour would come in the basement and compound of the petitioners' housing societies and on the Tulsiwadi Main road.
The petitioners also claimed that the runoff water filled the road with 'maggots', and while there were three to four stalls in the market at present, there would be 50-50 more stalls in the future.
The petitioners argued that the said fish market was in a residential area having over 19 buildings and four temples. The PIL claimed that the market had been 'gravely affecting the lives of those living in the locality' and the residents' religious sentiments.
The petitioners claimed that the same caused health problems to children, senior citizens and other residents. Moreover, the PIL alleged that inconvenience was caused to devotees who visit temples, including a Jain temple in the nearby area.
The residents also claimed that there were no fixed timings for transporting goods from the fish market, and the said vehicles parked in the narrow lane cause traffic congestion in the vicinity.
Advocate Chaitalee Deshpande for the BMC submitted that the civic body would ensure that the fish market was run following the guidelines applicable to BMC-run fish markets.
The high court issued notices to the respondents, the state government and the BMC authorities, including its assistant commissioner, markets, and directed them to file affidavits in reply within four weeks, after which it will hear the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Gurdwara on encroached land razed after HC order
Mumbai: In what is seen as a win for residents, an illegal religious structure (gurdwara) at the Joggers Park on Lokhandwala Back Road, Andheri (West) was demolished in the wee hours of Monday by those who had unauthorisedly built the structure in 2022. The action came following a legal battle waged by residents. The Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Joggers Park is used by residents regularly for jogging and walking. However, according to the BMC, taking undue advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic, some people initially started serving food packets outside the park and subsequently began operating a langar inside the park. Thereafter, they built an unauthorised religious structure within the Joggers Park, it said. According to an affidavit submitted earlier this year by the civic body, it found certain unauthorised constructions, and a show cause notice was issued. Subsequently, a speaking order was passed by BMC on May 29, 2024. Thereafter, the BMC demolished the structures but had left one structure, which was converted into a religious place, untouched. On May 2 this year, the Bombay High Court ordered the respondents to remove the structure. The repondents included Celebrations Sports Club/Samarth Nagar Lokhandwala Complex Co-Operative Housing Societies Association Limited, Punjabi Association of Lokhandwala and Sanjha Chula Guru Ka Langar Trust. Lokhandwala Joggers Park Association secretary, Anuj Mittal, said, "It is a victory not just for legality, but for the citizens' right to reclaim public space. The issue was never religious, but against unauthorised occupation of a public park. The structure was demolished by the encroachers themselves late Sunday night. We residents waged a sustained legal battle right from December 2023, by filing a PIL in the Bombay High Court. " Mittal said , "The Supreme Court too dismissed the appeal of the encroachers'" Filmmaker Ashoke Pandit and activist, said, "The outcome is an untiring effort of citizens of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala. Land grabbing in the name of God should not be allowed, besides gardens are meant for recreation and not for religious purposes. More importantly, this is an open space. "
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
HC lifts ban on PoP idol-making, but no immersion in sea, rivers
Mumbai: Bombay High Court on Monday lifted the ban on the manufacture of Plaster of Paris (PoP) idols and directed the state govt to take a policy decision on their immersion within three weeks. Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne passed the order following the Central Pollution Control Board's expert committee on May 21 clarifying that CPCB's May 2020 revised guidelines banning manufacture and immersion of PoP idols "are always advisory in nature". The committee opined that the making of PoP idols is not prohibited. It recommended that state govts may decide to allow immersion subject to conditions, including ensuring designated temporary artificial tanks/ponds for immersion of PoP idols. However, immersion will not be allowed in natural water bodies such as rivers, lakes, ponds, and the sea. Hence, the judges modified the Jan 30 order that directed strict enforcement of CPCB's ban and asked the state to take a decision on their immersion. The Jan 30 interim order was passed on a PIL by three activists and nine clay-based idol-makers to enforce CPCB's May 2020 ban. Petitions were also filed by associations of PoP idol-makers, saying the ban violates their fundamental rights, including the right to carry on trade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No dark spots, 10 years younger! Just take this from Watsons URUHIME MOMOKO Learn More Undo Advocate Uday Warunjikar and senior advocate S M Gorwadkar, for the petitioners, said the state govt appointed an expert committee whose report was sent to CPCB, which set up its own committee to look into the former's recommendations. With CPCB's clarification, they urged the HC to modify the Jan 30 order that "completely banned the manufacture and sale" of PoP idols and to direct the state to take a decision on their immersion. Advocate general Birendra Saraf urged that at least for huge idols "that are 20 feet," some exemption be granted to immerse in natural water bodies, adding, "Some statues have become so much part of our culture..." "Large size idols, you work out a solution. Because the court may not be an ideal place... One thing we are clear about is that we will not allow immersions in a natural water body,'' the CJ said. The judges said it will be open to members of the petitioner association as well as other artisans to make PoP idols subject to compliance with the Sept 2012 Nagpur bench order, pointed out by senior advocate Mihir Desai for PIL petitioners, to put a red mark to distinguish PoP idols. "However, it is directed that such idols shall not be immersed without leave of this court,'' they added, and posted the hearing on June 30.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Will oppose redevelopment project until everyone gets 500 sq ft houses in Dharavi: Aaditya Thackeray
Days after the state government approved the masterplan of Dharavi Slum Redevelopment Project, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray on Monday said his party would oppose the project until and unless all residents are guaranteed 500sqft homes in Dharavi and all the residents are declared eligible for free rehabilitation. Thackeray also demanded that the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) and Dharavi be granted the same status as Gujarat's GIFT City, claiming that Mumbai was being sidelined in favour of Gujarat and GIFT city was moved to Gujarat from Mumbai's BKC. Addressing a rally in Mulund, Thackeray alleged that the redevelopment plan would lead to large-scale displacement and benefit private players at the expense of long-time Dharavi residents. 'Our party's stand is very clear.. Every resident of Dharavi must get a 500 sqft house. If all residents are not made eligible, we will not allow them to be moved out of Dharavi,' said Thackeray at the 'Ladha Aaplya Mumbaicha' (fight for our Mumbai) campaign organised by the Sena UBT ahead of the BMC elections. Thackeray added that the current plan recognizes only those who settled before 2000 while many with documents dated after 2011 are likely to be excluded from rehabilitation and free houses in Dharavi. According to the eligibility criteria, for people to get homes, ground-floor residents who settled in Dharavi before January 1, 2000, will be eligible for a 350sqft home within Dharavi at no cost. Those who settled between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011, will receive a 300sqft home outside Dharavi at a cost of Rs 2.5 lakh under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY). Residents who live in upper-floor structures built before November 15, 2022, and ground-floor tenements constructed between January 1, 2011, and November 15, 2022, will be offered rented accommodations outside Dharavi. These residents will also have the option of a hire-purchase scheme for 300 sqft homes. At the rally, Thackeray also raised objections to the proposed use of Deonar dumping ground and other land parcels given for the Dharavi redevelopment project. 'The BMC had clearly stated that the land cannot be given unless it is cleaned first. It is not suitable for people to live there,' he said. He also criticised the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project, questioning why the route was designed to benefit Gujarat rather than linking Mumbai to other parts of Maharashtra.
