Bombay HC seeks BMC's reply to plea against ‘unhygienic' Tardeo fish market
The Bombay High Court recently sought an affidavit from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in reply to a PIL by residents of housing societies in south Mumbai's Tardeo area, alleging that a new fish market run within the residential area was affecting their health and religious sentiments.
The court asked the BMC to ensure hygiene conditions are maintained in the fish market.
A bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Makarand S Karnik on May 8 was hearing a PIL by Megha Agarwal, Vikram Jogani, Laxmichand Gala, and Mahendra Jain from Tulsiwadi area in Tardeo.
The petitioners, through advocate Deepa Pohuja, claimed that the fish market, which opened in March this year on the ground floor of the municipal building in the area, did not maintain any hygiene norms and the water with foul odour would come in the basement and compound of the petitioners' housing societies and on the Tulsiwadi Main road.
The petitioners also claimed that the runoff water filled the road with 'maggots', and while there were three to four stalls in the market at present, there would be 50-50 more stalls in the future.
The petitioners argued that the said fish market was in a residential area having over 19 buildings and four temples. The PIL claimed that the market had been 'gravely affecting the lives of those living in the locality' and the residents' religious sentiments.
The petitioners claimed that the same caused health problems to children, senior citizens and other residents. Moreover, the PIL alleged that inconvenience was caused to devotees who visit temples, including a Jain temple in the nearby area.
The residents also claimed that there were no fixed timings for transporting goods from the fish market, and the said vehicles parked in the narrow lane cause traffic congestion in the vicinity.
Advocate Chaitalee Deshpande for the BMC submitted that the civic body would ensure that the fish market was run following the guidelines applicable to BMC-run fish markets.
The high court issued notices to the respondents, the state government and the BMC authorities, including its assistant commissioner, markets, and directed them to file affidavits in reply within four weeks, after which it will hear the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Parties served notices for violating poll code
As the bypoll campaign for the Ludhiana West constituency intensifies, various political parties have been served notices for alleged violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), highlighting ongoing scrutiny of electoral norms. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has notably received over 20 notices from the district election commission for repeated breaches of the MCC. These notices reportedly pertain to unauthorised hoardings and the organisation of public gatherings without prior permission, among other electoral irregularities. The district election commission has issued over 20 notices to the district president of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for repeated violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) during the ongoing bypoll campaign in Ludhiana West constituency. According to officials, these notices pertain to unauthorised hoardings, holding public gatherings without permission, and other breaches of election norms. In comparison, the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) has been issued four notices, while the Congress party has received two. District commissioner-cum-district election officer Himanshu Jain has affirmed that all actions are taken strictly based on received complaints and verified evidence, such as photographs and field reports. Despite this assurance, political observers and rival parties have voiced concerns about the impartiality of the election machinery, with the stark difference in the number of notices drawing particular attention and prompting allegations of preferential treatment. Meanwhile, Jain has urged citizens to actively report any MCC violations through the cVIGIL mobile application, developed by the Election Commission of India (ECI). He stated that all complaints submitted via the app are addressed within a timeframe of 100 minutes. Since the by-election was announced on May 25, a total of 556 complaints have been received through the cVIGIL app, all of which are reported to have been resolved. The cVIGIL app facilitates public reporting of various violations, including the unauthorised use of loudspeakers, distribution of freebies, or illegal rallies, and is accessible on both Android and iOS platforms. As the election campaign enters its final phase, officials are reinforcing calls for all political parties to strictly adhere to MCC guidelines. However, the apparent discrepancy in the issuance of notices remains a prominent talking point, with the election commission yet to provide an official clarification on the matter.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
RTIs filed over samosas & grooms, Bombay HC irked by misuse
MUMBAI: What's eating the State Information Commission (SIC)? Frivolous RTI pleas over samosas in public offices, it appears. SIC told Bombay high court on Wednesday it had received an RTI application to know how many samosas are served in a day in a govt office. The misuse of RTI Act also drew flak from HC. It said laws are made with a beneficial purpose, but "people use them to look for sons-in-law... to find govt employees". "It's a paradox," said a bench of CJ Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne. It was hearing a PIL by former chief information commissioner (CIC) Shailesh Gandhi and five RTI activists to direct SIC to give a roadmap for disposal of second appeals and complaints within 45 days of filing. SIC said the delays were due to vacancies. State's advocate Jyoti Chavan said there are seven sanctioned posts of state information commissioners and one CIC. Four vacancies, including CIC, were filled in April. The petitioners sought three additional posts of state information commissioners, citing nearly 1 lakh pending second appeals and complaints. Chavan said the state would decide on it. When HC asked petitioners' advocate Sunil Ahya whether "their grievances stand redressed", he said no, adding that the CIC was directed by HC in Dec 2023 to file a report on disposal of second appeals. The CJ generally commented about PIL petitioners "consistently finding fault with action of the govt". "They always come with a negative attitude and are never satisfied," he said. The judges said they cannot expand the PIL's scope and added that RTI was misused. The judges said RTI Act does not contain any time limit for second appeals. They disposed of the PIL saying they "hope and trust" SIC "shall make an endeavour to decide second appeals/complaints as expeditiously as possible".
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
10% Maratha reservation to continue this year, hearing on fresh pleas from July 18
The Maratha reservation issue will once again come under judicial scrutiny, with a newly constituted full bench of the Bombay High Court set to begin hearings on fresh pleas from July 18. However, the 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs given to the Maratha community will continue this bench, comprising Justices Ravindra Ghuge, NJ Jamadar and Sandeep Marne, announced on Wednesday that they would devote half-days, full working days and even some Saturdays - ordinarily court holidays - to complete the hearing hearing pertains to challenges against the Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2024, which grants 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community. Under this order, any admission or job appointment made under the SEBC Act remains subject to final court directions. The matter was previously heard by a bench led by then-Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya. However, proceedings halted after his transfer to the Delhi High Court in January. Following this, some students approached the Supreme Court, citing harm to their admission prospects due to the ongoing legal uncertainty. The top court subsequently directed the Bombay High Court to constitute a new full bench, which has now taken Wednesday's hearing, senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, representing the petitioners, urged the bench to expedite proceedings as the academic admission cycle was underway. He argued that, unlike job appointments, delayed admissions would be harder to rectify, even with the interim order in General Dr Birendra Saraf, appearing for the Maharashtra government, said the state needed more time to respond to the latest petition filed in court. He maintained that the interim order provided adequate safeguards and questioned the urgency shown by the petitioners. He also suggested that the petitioners withdraw the new plea if they were unwilling to allow time for the state to considering the submissions, the bench scheduled the hearing for five weeks SEBC Act, passed on February 20 last year by the Eknath Shinde-led Maharashtra government, followed recommendations by the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) led by retired Justice Sunil Shukre. The commission had concluded that "exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations" warranted reservation for the Maratha community beyond the 50 per cent cap mandated by the Supreme legislation, which came just ahead of the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, sparked a series of public interest litigations and petitions challenging its constitutional validity. Simultaneously, numerous intervention applications have been filed by Maratha organisations defending the reservation and opposing the addition to the reservation issue, petitions have also been filed questioning the legality of Justice Shukre's appointment as chairperson of the Watch
