logo
Police in Berks warn of checkpoints, DUI patrols through graduation party season

Police in Berks warn of checkpoints, DUI patrols through graduation party season

Yahoo06-06-2025
Checkpoints, roving DUI patrols and undercover details at stores that sell alcoholic beverages are in the works in Berks County for the rest of June, a time when high school graduation parties are typically held, officials announced.
The enhanced enforcement follows a month in which local police took about two dozen impaired drivers off the roads in Berks on a single night in sobriety checkpoints, officials said.
While police congratulate the 2025 graduates and encourage them to celebrate with friends and family, they remind them of the zero-tolerance policy for underage drinkers under Pennsylvania law.
The checkpoints and DUI patrols are being conducted with the North Central Regional DUI Enforcement Program, which equips, funds and coordinates the municipal police DUI enforcement in Berks, Schuylkill and 12 other counties. The program is funded through grants from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Adults also face arrest if they are caught serving alcohol to a person under the age of 21. That's in addition to their liability for hosting a party in which alcohol is available to minors.
Police may also be posing as store employees to catch those buying alcohol for minors, a program known as 'Cops in Shops.'
While the latest waves of enforcement have focused on drinking activities surrounding proms and graduation events, anyone who drives while impaired risks arrest.
Three checkpoints were conducted the same night in mid-May, one in Cumru Township and two others hosted jointly by the Eastern Berks Regional and Exeter Township police departments. Combined, police made 25 DUI arrests.
In just two hours on Route 100 in Colebrookdale Township, officers arrested seven drivers for suspected DUI. Later that night, officers moved the checkpoint to Route 422 in Exeter where they made five more arrests.
'Everyone was surprised by the number of encounters with impaired drivers,' Eastern Berks Police Chief Barry Leatherman said. 'It tells us a lot about the amount of impaired driving out there.'
While catching impaired drivers is the goal of checkpoints, locations of which are determined by data on DUI-related crashes, police would rather make no arrests, which would indicate a scarcity of impaired drivers, Leatherman said.
'The reality is if people are breaking the law by doing this (driving after consuming alcohol or using controlled substances) they need to be caught because they're endangering the lives of everyone on the road,' he said.
Young people need to think about potential deadly consequences of impaired driving, Leatherman said.
'The thought of getting arrested or losing your license really pales in comparison to the human toll,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla verdict is a warning not to trust Autopilot marketing
Tesla verdict is a warning not to trust Autopilot marketing

Miami Herald

time5 days ago

  • Miami Herald

Tesla verdict is a warning not to trust Autopilot marketing

The recent $329 million verdict against Tesla in Miami is a clear warning to anyone captivated by 'Autopilot' marketing. In 2019, when a young woman was killed and her fiancé suffered permanent injuries, data showed Tesla's system detected the stopped vehicle ahead, but didn't apply the brakes. The jury found that Tesla oversold its safety features and that drivers shouldn't have to dig through dense manuals or inspect the code to understand those limits, nor should crash victims have to battle a major corporation in court to get justice. This case isn't just about one company; it sets a precedent for every business pitching 'smart' or 'autonomous' features. Whether it's delivery drones, ride-share apps, or the next slick dashboard update, consumers must demand clear, enforceable definitions of terms like 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving.' Without standardized labels and honest disclosures, we risk turning Florida's highways into unregulated test tracks, where real people bear the cost of corporate hype. If you feel misled by a manufacturer's portrayal of what your car, or any device, can do, file a complaint with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or Florida's Division of Consumer Services. Our legislators must enact laws requiring plain-English, consistent labeling for automated-driving functions so that 'Autopilot' means precisely what it promises. Technology should protect us, not gamble with our lives. Let's insist on products that live up to their marketing, or make those who oversell half-baked features pay the price. Merick Lewin, managing partner, Good Guys Law, Plantation Donald Trump became famous for, among other reasons, saying 'You're fired!' on his reality show, 'The Apprentice.' In the White House, however, that meant dismissing anyone who disagreed with him — FBI directors, scientists, generals and honest election officials. On Aug. 1, he fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer for reporting something he didn't like: that job growth in the U.S. had slowed to a near-halt. For Trump, loyalty to himself matters more than truth and leadership. This behavior is more typical of authoritarians than of true leaders. Delia DeVarona Garcia, Miami I have read all the articles lately about Miami-Dade County's budget issues. These issues have become glowing examples of county leaders' poor planning. Mayor Levine Cava spoke about the three years the county received plenty of extra money. However, it seems these funds were squandered. One example is that the new Sheriff's office has a roughly $3 million shortfall to change uniforms, badges and rebrand police vehicles. This was a voter referendum in 2018. They knew it was coming. Why weren't funds set aside for this during the 'fat' years? The Aug. 8 Miami Herald article discussed county leaders' thoughts on cutting the special needs programs that had been funded in previous years. This is total financial mismanagement. Robert J. Lynch, Davie As the owner and operator of several large businesses, I appreciate the difficulty in working with my team to establish annual budgets that make economic sense for the company, enjoyable work experiences for our employees and top tier products for our customers. That process relies on prudent business practices, transparency, communication and heart. Reading the Aug. 8 Miami Herald article, 'Charities facing cuts ask Miami-Dade mayor: Save the safety net, don't 'unravel' it,' made me appreciate just how lucky we are to have Mayor Daniella Levine Cava at the helm. Balancing prudent business practices and community responsibility is not easy. We voted her into office because we trusted her and we felt that she would always do right for the community while governing county finances with smart financial planning. We also voted for her because she is fair, honest, hardworking and most importantly, she has a high moral character, hence, we must appreciate that every decision she makes is for the right reason. Determining which agencies get cut and by how much is difficult, but that is a reality we all must understand and accept. As my late father Stanley G. Tate always said, 'Keep your nose to the grindstone and push forward.' James D. Tate, North Miami The Trump administration has ordered universities to submit information regarding applicants' race, gender and who knows what else. This appears to be just another invasion of our private lives. Private universities are just that — private. They exist by the product they supply. If that product is insufficient to meet the need for employment or acceptance into society, then they have failed and it is not up to our prevailing government to admonish or punish them. They may fall of their own accord by lack of financial or societal support. Our society has more than enough guardrails to keep our citizens on the right track as to race and gender without our all-knowing government poking into university life. Bill Silver, Coral Gables August 13 is International Left-Handers Day, founded in 1976 to celebrate the uniqueness and challenges of left-handed people worldwide. Studies show that about 10% of people are left-handed. Scientists are unsure why some people have a dominant left hand, though there may be a connection between genetics and environment. Some left-handers are found to have more left-handed relatives than average. Based on brain function, some southpaws proudly declare that 'left-handers are the only ones in their right mind.' Being a lefty, however, comes with some difficulties. Many desks and tools are geared more for right-handers than left-handers. Most handshakes are done with the right hand. Even lefty contestants on the hit game show 'Wheel of Fortune' are at a disadvantage when they spin the wheel. Some, however, believe lefties are more artistic and creative than righties, a claim backed up by recent research in the American Journal of Psychology. That study revealed that lefties are better at divergent thinking than righties. That may explain why Mozart, Michaelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci — all left handers — were so gifted. Lefties are also found across the sports and entertainment world. Tom Emery, Carlinville, IL Millions of dollars cut from cancer research. Millions of dollars cut from vaccine research. Millions of dollars cut from other medical research. Cuts to Medicaid also. All of this is putting older and vulnerable people at risk. The Trump Republican Party is not MAGA; it is MOVAD — Make Older Vulnerable Americans Dead. Leon Botkin, Miami

Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly autopilot crash verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws
Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly autopilot crash verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws

Business Insider

time05-08-2025

  • Business Insider

Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly autopilot crash verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws

A group of Tesla shareholders sued the company and CEO Elon Musk, alleging they weren't forthcoming about problems with its robotaxi. The proposed class action lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court Monday, says Tesla misled investors, failed to disclose problems with its long-in-the-works robotaxi service, and "overstated the effectiveness of its autonomous driving technology." "There was thus a significant risk that the Company's autonomous driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, would operate dangerously and/or in violation of traffic laws," the lawsuit said. Tesla debuted a test of its robotaxis — fully autonomous cars available through a ride-hailing service — on June 22. There were some hiccups. According to videos posted by influencers and Tesla shareholder who participated in the test in Austin, some cars drove in the wrong lane, exceeded the speed limit, braked at inappropriate times, and had trouble parking without intervention. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it was looking into the irregularities depicted in videos. Shareholders appeared unhappy: Tesla's stock price fell by 6.05% over June 24 and June 25, following reports about the videos and the NHTSA announcement, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit also points to the August 1 jury verdict in a Florida federal court over a deadly crash involving a Tesla on "Autopilot" mode. The jury awarded the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, a combined $329 million in total damages. It found Tesla responsible for $242.5 million in combined punitive and compensatory damages in the case. Miguel Custodio, a personal injury attorney at Custodio & Dubey LLP, said that the jury verdict put the automated driving industry "on notice." "If their tech is not 1,000% safe or if the marketing is misleading in any way, there is serious legal and financial exposure," he told Business Insider before news of the shareholder lawsuit. "Everyone welcomes new technology, but not if it is at the cost of human lives." In addition to naming Tesla and Musk as defendants, the Monday shareholder lawsuit was also filed against Zachary Kirkhorn, who served as CFO until 2023, and the current CFO Vaibhav Taneja.

Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly self-driving verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws
Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly self-driving verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws

Business Insider

time05-08-2025

  • Business Insider

Shareholders sue Tesla and Elon Musk on heels of deadly self-driving verdict, alleging its robotaxi violates traffic laws

A group of Tesla shareholders sued the company and CEO Elon Musk, alleging they weren't forthcoming about problems with its robotaxi. The proposed class action lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court Monday, says Tesla misled investors, failed to disclose problems with its long-in-the-works robotaxi service, and "overstated the effectiveness of its autonomous driving technology." "There was thus a significant risk that the Company's autonomous driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, would operate dangerously and/or in violation of traffic laws," the lawsuit said. Tesla debuted a test of its robotaxis — fully autonomous cars available through a ride-hailing service — on June 22. There were some hiccups. According to videos posted by influencers and Tesla shareholder who participated in the test in Austin, some cars drove in the wrong lane, exceeded the speed limit, braked at inappropriate times, and had trouble parking without intervention. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it was looking into the irregularities depicted in videos. Shareholders appeared unhappy: Tesla's stock price fell by 6.05% over June 24 and June 25, following reports about the videos and the NHTSA announcement, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit also points to the August 1 jury verdict in a Florida federal court over a deadly crash involving a Tesla on "Autopilot" mode. The jury awarded the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, a combined $329 million in total damages. It found Tesla responsible for $242.5 million in combined punitive and compensatory damages in the case. Miguel Custodio, a personal injury attorney at Custodio & Dubey LLP, said that the jury verdict put the automated driving industry "on notice." "If their tech is not 1,000% safe or if the marketing is misleading in any way, there is serious legal and financial exposure," he told Business Insider before news of the shareholder lawsuit. "Everyone welcomes new technology, but not if it is at the cost of human lives." In addition to naming Tesla and Musk as defendants, the Monday shareholder lawsuit was also filed against Zachary Kirkhorn, who served as CFO until 2023, and the current CFO Vaibhav Taneja.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store