Community rallies behind local man seeking kidney donor at ‘Adam's March for a Match'
NORTHAMPTON, Mass. (WWLP) – People from all over western Massachusetts came together to support a local man in his battle with kidney failure.
Friends, family, and the community gathered at Look Park on Sunday for Adam's March for a Match, walking to support Adam Gagne as he battles Stage 5 kidney failure.
'Groovin' with Garrett' fundraiser for local man who was paralyzed in skiing accident
'I created a video telling his story and what we needed, and then I worked with two of his really good friends, longtime friends, Sue and Eric Dibrinkisi,' said David Jeffway, Adam's March for a Match organizer. 'We decided we needed to rally the community behind him because he has been such a big part of this community.'
Adam was unable to be in attendance, as he has been in the hospital due to complications, but he was present on a video call. People were able to speak with Adam, sharing how he impacted their lives and adding written messages to his support board.
Adam Gagne made a huge impact on his community, as he served as Scout Master for over 30 years. Now his scouts throughout the years are giving back to him.
'Scouting and obtaining that rank of Eagle is all about giving back and helping other people at all times, which is part of the Scout oath,' said Jeffway, who served as an Eagle Scout under Gagne. 'This is all of that on display. It is not just through the words, it's exactly what we learned in scouting.'
The event was also catered by Jake's in Northampton. The restaurant's owners, Christopher Ware and Alexander Washut, were also Eagle Scouts under Gagne.
'He was like an older brother, more so than a Scout Master, if you will,' Ware said. 'It was really a great time in our lives, so when we heard he needs this kidney, we thought we want to help him any way we could.'
Jeffway said the goals of the event are to find a living donor, raise money for Gagne and his family, and show him just how many people care about him. For more information on how you can become a living donor and test to see if you are a match for Adam, visit baystatehealth.org/living-donor.
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
DaVita HealthCare (DVA) Down 3.4% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?
It has been about a month since the last earnings report for DaVita HealthCare (DVA). Shares have lost about 3.4% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is DaVita HealthCare due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. It turns out, fresh estimates have trended downward during the past month. The consensus estimate has shifted -6.57% due to these changes. At this time, DaVita HealthCare has an average Growth Score of C, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with an F. However, the stock was allocated a grade of A on the value side, putting it in the top quintile for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of this revision indicates a downward shift. Notably, DaVita HealthCare has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report DaVita Inc. (DVA) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Entitled mom expected play center to staff to clean up her child's vomit: Is this a normal experience?
No one warns you that stepping foot into a play center during winter is like entering the Hunger Games… but with a lot more snot (we're talking code green). When Melbourne mom, Emily, took her 18-month-old daughter for a play date at her local play center she got much more than she bargained for. 'My friend's daughter vomited in the soft play area over foam mats. She immediately cleaned up the vomit with baby wipes,' Emily shared with Kidspot. However, baby wipes can only fight so many battles. Which is why Emily's friend decided to notify staff. 'They were unable to clean it themselves due to OH&S' 3 TikTok User LifeOfEmily94 took to TikTok to share her fellow mother's experience. 'We expected that staff would have gone to put some signage up to avoid the area, and disinfect the area. Instead, the staff tried to give her (Emily's friend) water, paper towel and an unknown spray and told her she had to clean it up herself,' the mother recounted. Emily said her friend told staff that she would clean it after changing her daughter out of the soiled clothing. 'They insisted that it needed to be cleaned then and there and that they were unable to clean it themselves due to OHS,' Emily explained. 'Due to their persistence, I volunteered to clean it while my friend was cleaning up her daughter in the change room.' The mother cleaned up the mess and let the workers know when she was done. 'I told the staff that I had wiped it, but that it needed further cleaning. It was reiterated to me that staff could not clean it up,' Emily shared. 'The staff were notified that the child had peanut butter for breakfast as we exited. I am unsure if this prompted them to do a thorough clean.' Taking to TikTok the mum retold the story to determine if the process was normal for play centre businesses. 'Is this a normal play center experience?' she wrote on the video. Commenters were quick to chime in with their opinions. 'Honestly play centers just harbor bacteria. I avoid them. We end up sick every time we go to one. It's all young people working,' one parent wrote. 'That is disgusting and a hazard! I would not be going back there,' a second criticized. A third added: 'If you want your kids dosed up on hand, foot and mouth, take them to a play centre.' 'My intention is not to shame the play centre' The incident has left Emily questioning if she'll return to a play center in the future. 3 The staff told the mom multiple times that they could not clean the vomit themselves due to OH&S. retbool – 'It's made me concerned about the spread of germs, especially as we are now in winter. I definitely won't be attending any play centre that does not have an appropriate response to cleaning up bodily fluids,' Emily said. The mother wanted to ensure her video educated parents, without causing damage to the business' image. 'My intention is not to shame the play centre, but to bring awareness to other parents that play centres may not be as sanitary as we thought,' Emily explained. The owner provided a statement after Kidspot reached out for comment: 'I was actually here that day. I have instructed my staff not to clean vomit as I will not allow them to get sick should it be a virus. My staff come first. The mum did clean and her girlfriend came to the counter. She was given gloves, sanitiser spray and paper towel. The mum left straight after. My staff went and sprayed Glen 20 on the affected area (which wasn't left wet) and we sanitised the whole centre when we closed. We do have in our rules that we request sick children not to attend our centre. We are the cleanest centre around and take sanitising very seriously. Not sure how they could say we didn't do anything re signage etc when they left straight away. I also will not leave a sign in the middle of the play area for a child to hurt themselves on or throw around. No other parent has ever complained about cleaning up 'their' child's vomit and have never expected us to clean up for them.' While the mother didn't name the business, Bumblebeez Indoor Playcentre & Café at Werribee came forward to clarify their policy in a post on their Facebook page: 'Our policy is that we do not clean your child's vomit. I will not allow my staff to clean it incase your child is unwell, I do not want my staff members or their families to get sick… especially whilst we are short staffed atm (at the moment). Parents are given a cloth, disinfectant, paper towel, gloves and a bag. We will then spray the area with Glen 20 and do a deep sanitisation that night. Please note all floors and equipment is wiped down nightly for hygiene purposes. What are your thoughts???' 3 The mother claims that her intention is not to 'shame the play center.' Better Health Victoria advises that when handling spills of body fluids it's crucial to adhere to infection control procedures. Isolation of the area, wearing protective gear, using disposable paper towels or a chlorine-releasing agent to absorb the fluid, cleaning with a bleach solution followed by hot water and detergent are all advised. It's also recommended that the area is thoroughly dried, waster is disposed of correctly and hand hygiene is maintained. Contaminated clothing should be rinsed in cold water, soaked in bleach, and washed separately in hot water.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
America might finally make childbirth free—and moms could be the biggest winners
'This is how much it costs to give birth in America: $44,318.41.' That was the now-viral TikTok from a mom just days postpartum, scrolling through the itemized bill at home. Her insurance only covered $20,353.62—despite paying $2,500 a month for coverage for her family of five. This mom's story isn't an outlier. According to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, privately insured families in the U.S. pay an average of $3,000 out-of-pocket for childbirth on average—just for having a baby. By 'choosing' to have a baby with a midwife in a birth center, I personally had to pay a $10k fee upfront. (Wanting midwifery care in a calm setting for my super fast labors didn't feel like a choice, but in America, it is.) Moms bear so many burdens for having babies. And one devastating cost that sets so many families back financially when they're just beginning life together is the price of childbirth, even with insurance. We're talking million-dollar NICU bills. $50k c-section charges. A financial punishment for doing the most critical work in a country: bringing the next generation of citizens into the world. But that may soon change. A bipartisan group of senators has introduced a bill that could be a game-changer for millions of American families. The Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act (S.1834) was announced on May 21, 2025, and aims to eliminate all out-of-pocket costs related to prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum services for those with private health insurance. The bill's sponsors—Sens. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)—say the legislation is about protecting families from being buried in medical debt at one of the most vulnerable times in life. 'Bringing a child into the world is costly enough without piling on cost-share fees that saddle many mothers and families with debt,' Sen. Hyde-Smith said in a statement announcing the legislation. 'By relieving financial stresses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, hopefully more families will be encouraged to embrace the beautiful gift and responsibility of parenthood.' A companion bill is expected in the House, led by Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), who told Vox, 'This idea is simple and powerful: Pregnancy and childbirth are normal parts of family life. So, insurance companies should treat it like the routine care it is and cover the cost—not stick people with huge medical bills.' While the average out-of-pocket cost is around $3,000, the financial burden can be far worse for many: 17% of privately insured moms face bills over $5,000 1% are hit with bills exceeding $10,000 17.5% of women with private insurance report problems paying medical bills Nearly 9% say they couldn't pay them at all These numbers are not just statistics—they represent real parents delaying care, going into debt, or struggling to recover financially in the fragile weeks after childbirth. If passed, the bill would expand the list of 'essential health benefits' under the Affordable Care Act to include full-spectrum maternity care. Medicaid already covers these services in full, and that's how 41% of births in the U.S. are paid for. But for the 178 million people on private insurance plans? Birth is still a budget-buster. The new legislation would require private insurers to pick up the tab. That means: Prenatal care (including appointments and ultrasounds) Labor and delivery Hospital stays Postpartum recovery and mental health care Neonatal and perinatal services Lactation support The estimated premium hike to cover it all? About $30 per year, according to Lawson Mansell, policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, who conducted the cost modeling for the bill. Mansell told Vox this proposal is the simplest way, on an administrative level, to make birth free. Related: Too many U.S. moms are in debt from giving birth. They deserve better. Beyond the financial relief, this bill has the potential to improve health outcomes for moms and babies. Research backs this up: A report by the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner found that eliminating cost-sharing for prenatal services is associated with improved maternal and infant outcomes, including fewer preterm births and higher birth weights. So in addition to relieving the stress families face, covering prenatal care fully makes it more likely that moms actually get it. Another study published in BMC Public Health linked removing financial barriers under the Affordable Care Act to increased use of preventive care, such as mammography and Pap tests. While the study focused on these services, the findings suggest that eliminating financial barriers can encourage timely and consistent healthcare utilization. The bill's sponsors come from across the political spectrum—and so do its supporters. Everyone from the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to anti-abortion groups like Americans United for Life and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America have voiced support. Even Planned Parenthood Action Fund commented they 'generally supports legislation to make the cost of maternal health care and parenting more affordable.' Related: The cost of giving birth is getting more expensive—and some families are getting hit with childbirth debt If the bill becomes law, the financial landscape of pregnancy would change dramatically—especially for those in the 'missing middle': families who earn too much for Medicaid but not enough to easily afford thousands in delivery fees. It would also offer immediate relief for parents managing multiple financial burdens at once: high rent, unpaid leave, child care costs, student loans. You know, new motherhood. Call your representatives. Especially if you have private insurance and have ever been slammed with a delivery bill. You can find contact info at and Share your story. Lawmakers have said constituent birth bill stories played a big role in shaping this legislation. Talk about it on social. If your childbirth costs shocked you, say so. Use hashtags like #MakeBirthFree and tag your reps. This moment is historic not just because it's bipartisan, but because it signals a new kind of family policy thinking: one where moms aren't expected to 'figure it out' in isolation, one giant bill at a time. As Yuval Levin of the American Enterprise Institute put it in a policy brief, 'Substantively and symbolically, bringing the out-of-pocket health care costs of childbirth to zero is an ambitious but achievable starting point for the next generation of pro-family policies.' Whether you're pregnant now or years past it, you probably remember your hospital bill—and you definitely remember how it made you feel. Exhausted. Angry. Maybe even ashamed. This new bill says: No more. And moms deserve that. Sources: Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress. February 2025. AEI. Family-Friendly Policies for the 119th Congress. America might finally make childbirth free. May 2025. Vox. America might finally make childbirth free. Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal. May 2025. America United for Life. Americans United for Life Applauds Bipartisan Innovative Policy Proposal to Make Maternal Healthcare More Affordable. AMA advocacy to improve maternal health. May 2025. AMA. AMA advocacy to improve maternal health. Impact of removing cost sharing. 2019. BMC Public Health. Impact of removing cost sharing under the affordable care act (ACA) on mammography and pap test use. New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs. May 2025. Niskanen Center. New bipartisan proposal would remove childbirth costs and confusion for parents. Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery. May 2023. CDC. Characteristics of Mothers by Source of Payment for the Delivery: United States, 2021. About the Affordable Care Act. Us Department of Health an Human Services. About the Affordable Care Act. Out-of-pocket medical bills childbirth. National Library of Medicine. Out-of-pocket medical bills from first childbirth and subsequent childbearing. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt. National Library of Medicine. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt in the USA, 2019–2020. Sentators introduce bill to ease financial burden of pregnancy. Cindy Hyde-Smith. SENATORS INTRODUCE BIPARTISAN BILL TO EASE THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF PREGNANCY, CHILDBIRTH. Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs. KFF. Women who Give Birth Incur Nearly $19,000 in Additional Health Costs, Including $2,854 More that They Pay Out of Pocket.
