Tokenize Xchange to exit Singapore after being denied digital payment token licence
This comes after the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) decided not to grant the company a licence to offer digital payment token services, said the Singapore-based digital exchange platform on Sunday (Jul 20).
All 15 employees of Tokenize Singapore will be laid off by Sep 30. However, some may be offered work in the company's international operations, said Tokenize Xchange in response to queries from The Business Times. It declined to comment on why the company was denied a licence by the MAS.
The exchange is relocating to Labuan, and seeking to obtain a licence from the Labuan Financial Services Authority. It is also currently in the midst of acquiring a company that holds a digital financial services licence issued by the Labuan Financial Services Authority. The deal is expected to close by Sep 30.
It will also seek regulatory approval from Abu Dhabi Global Market, a financial zone located in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates.
Hong Qi Yu, chief executive and founder of Tokenize Xchange, said: 'While we regret this outcome in Singapore, we view this development as an opportunity to fortify our international operations.'
Tokenize Xchange's exit comes just over a year after raising US$11.5 million in funding and announcing plans to expand its Singapore team to 100 staff. The expansion was said to help the company adapt to complex regulatory frameworks across South-east Asia.
It was previously operating under an exemption in Singapore. It was among the first three digital asset exchange operators to receive full approval from the Securities Commission Malaysia in April 2020, and is Malaysia's second-largest digital asset exchange.
Founded in 2017, Tokenize has operations in key Asian markets including Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam, serving both individual and institutional investors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
No clarity yet on baseline or pharmaceutical tariffs with US: DPM Gan
Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. SINGAPORE – The US government did not negotiate its tariffs on Singapore and did not want to commit on whether the 10 per cent baseline tax could rise or fall in the future, said Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong. DPM Gan, who visited the US from July 20 to 26 , added that he did not get to further discussions on pharmaceutical tariffs being contemplated by the Trump administration. He told the SG60 IPS-SBF Conference on July 29 that these talks did not take place as he did not get the chance to meet Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. He did, however, meet other officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. They discussed ways to keep up the long and mutually beneficial bilateral economic relationship, as well as potential collaboration in areas like the digital economy. DPM Gan also met business leaders in New York, and congressional leaders handling trade issues in Washington. He also visited an ST Engineering aerostructures factory in Maryland. The US administration was 'not in the mood to discuss any discount to the baseline tariff', DPM Gan said at a dialogue moderated by Mr David Rennie, The Economist's geopolitics editor. 'We also wanted to know whether the baseline tariff will stay at 10 per cent or will it be higher or lower? The answer was non-committal. They are still reviewing the tariff and, in time to come, they will make the appropriate announcement. So we just have to wait and see.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Grace Fu apologises for Tanjong Katong sinkhole, says road may stay closed for a few more days Singapore Terrorism threat in Singapore remains high, driven by events like Israeli-Palestinian conflict: ISD Singapore Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from alleged scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates Singapore Man on trial for raping woman who hired him to repair lights in her flat Sport IOC president Kirsty Coventry a 'huge supporter' of Singapore Singapore 7, including child and firefighter, taken to hospital after fire breaks out in Toa Payoh flat Singapore S'pore can and must meaningfully apply tech like AI in a way that creates jobs for locals: PM Wong Singapore Doctor who forged certificates for aesthetic procedures gets 4 months' jail DPM Gan, who is also Minister for Trade and Industry, said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are key exports from Singapore to the US, are currently exempt from baseline tariffs. But US President Donald Trump had earlier in 2025 threatened to end an exemption for pharmaceutical imports, saying tariffs would be imposed 'at a level that you haven't really seen before'. The US is a major market for Singapore-based drugmakers including American multinationals like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. DPM Gan said official-level discussions between Singapore and the US Department of Commerce, which commenced before his trip, are still ongoing. 'I can't go into detail because negotiation is ongoing and there's a bit of a confidentiality we need to maintain on both sides,' he said when asked what the US was looking to secure through these talks. He added that the US generally had concerns about what the country experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, when supplies of critical pharmaceuticals were disrupted. 'They want to make sure that they have a secure supply line of pharmaceuticals. They do want to see whether they can onshore this production, so that they can produce (it) themselves. But they also know that it's not possible to onshore everything, because some of the raw materials are actually (from) outside of America,' he said. 'They do need to think about how they can work with partners, trusted partners, to make sure that their supply chain is secure and reliable. So that is what they are looking for in their partners, including Singapore,' he added. 'I think the administration's focus now is to finish the negotiation of reciprocal tariffs. Then it will start to engage countries on specific sectoral tariffs in pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.' DPM Gan said Singapore has yet to engage the US on the prospect of semiconductor tariffs . However, he added that discussions to preserve the country's access to artificial intelligence equipment and semiconductors are under way. Speaking at the same conference earlier in the day, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said Singapore's trade and investment relationship with America, even with the tariffs, remains important. 'We would prefer to have zero tariffs of course, but if it is the baseline rate, then we are at the lowest category. We can live with it, and we can still do business and there will still be many opportunities for trade with the US, because whatever is happening in America now, the economy is still resilient, and there is still tremendous innovation happening in American companies, and so there will still be opportunities there,' he said. DPM Gan in his dialogue said the US economy continues to be relatively resilient. He said that based on the feedback from US businessmen he met on his trip, the outlook for the US economy seems cautiously optimistic, adding that Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill , which includes tax cuts and business support measures, may have contributed to this. He said Singapore continues to have a good working relationship with the US. The US was Singapore's second-largest trading partner in 2024, while Singapore was its 16th-largest trading partner. Singapore was also the third-largest Asian investor in the US. More than 250 Singapore companies operate across 45 states, supporting around 350,000 jobs in the US, according to the Republic's Ministry of Trade and Industry. The US also has a longstanding trade surplus and free trade agreement with Singapore. The recent deals between the US and several countries, as well as the European Union economic bloc, are good news, DPM Gan said. 'This gives us a sense that there's good progress in the tariff negotiation. But I also come back with the sense that there remains significant uncertainty. I'm not sure whether the uncertainty has really been eliminated or even reduced,' he added. He cited the lack of clarity on the rules of origin that will be used to determine where products originate from. He also said it is unclear how reciprocal tariffs will be implemented, and how components from different countries and transshipped goods will be assessed. This comes on top of the uncertainty around sectoral tariffs, which are yet to be determined. There is also uncertainty about whether the investments that countries have pledged to the US under tariff deals are new contributions, or money that is currently invested in another country, DPM Gan said. 'For example, the EU has committed to make an investment... over a period of time. Japan has also committed investments into the US. Japan has been a major investor in Singapore. Whether the Japanese investment in Singapore will be diverted to the US is a question that is yet to be seen,' he said. 'There are (also) uncertainties as to how countries will respond to the outcome of the tariff negotiation. Some countries have also committed to purchase more from the US, and they would have been purchasing these products from other countries. Whether now, instead of purchasing from country A, country B, they will now purchase from the US, and therefore exports from these countries to affected countries will be changed,' he added. 'I think these uncertainties (are) second derivative uncertainties. No one is paying much attention yet, because we need to have a tariff settled, then we work out how the secondary impact would be.' Global supply chains will also be restructured if countries move their investments from destinations facing higher US tariffs to those facing lower tariffs, he added. 'The overall global trading system, what we call the rules-based multilateral trading system, that we depend on rules, respecting trade agreements with one another, and not change at will, is something that has been challenged,' DPM Gan said. 'Today, we can agree with one another on a certain tariff, but tomorrow, something happens. We start to change our tariff rate, and that is something that is very uncertain, and that has been seen over the last few months.'
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds. SINGAPORE - The liquidators for three companies of Ng Yu Zhi, the alleged nickel-trading fraudster at the centre of a $1.5 billion nickel trading scam, scored a legal victory on July 29 to recover more than $900 million from nine former directors and employees for their role in Singapore's biggest Ponzi scheme. In 2021, the liquidators of Envy Asset Management (EAM), Envy Global Trading (EGT) and Envy Management Holdings (EMH) sued Ng, former directors Lee Si Ye and Ju Xiao, and former employee Cheong Ming Feng. Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds, supposedly for nickel trading. Of those sums, $593 million, US$192.2 million and €880,000 remain outstanding to investors. In a 180-page judgment issued July 29, the liquidators, who are represented by lawyers Daryl Fong and Lin Ruizi of Shook Lin & Bok, were awarded damages after Ms Lee, Mr Ju and Mr Cheong were found to have breached their duties as directors. They also received damages for fraudulent trading by Mr Ju. The trio were also ordered to pay back about $27 million in commission payments, profit sharing, bonuses, CPF payments, directors' fees and dividends. The High Court, however, ruled that the July 29 judgment is 'not binding' on Ng, who was made bankrupt in December 2022. Civil proceedings against the former managing director of EGT and EAM stopped as a result. Ng's criminal trial on 42 charges ended on July 7 after he opted not to take the stand. He had faced a total of 108 charges over offences including cheating, forgery, fraudulent trading, money laundering and criminal breach of trust. In awarding damages to the liquidators, High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal found that the nickel trading scheme did not exist and none of the investors' monies were used to buy nickel from Poseidon Nickel. This is the Australian firm that Ng claimed to have bought nickel from. Instead the funds were transferred to Ng through Envy Asset Management Trading (EAMT), paid as directors' fees to Ng and Ms Lee, and as commission payments, profit sharing fees to the defendants and other employees. The funds were also used to pay referral fees or 'profits' in excess of the invested principal to investors; and transferred or paid to other companies owned by Ng or his Envy companies, the judicial commissioner found. The High Court also found that the Envy companies were 'hopelessly insolvent and unable to pay their debts. Neither EGT nor EMH had any legitimate, revenue-generating business and there was no other meaningful business undertaken by the Envy companies.' There was also 'compelling evidence of the shocking level of ineptitude and nonchalance' on the part of Ms Lee, who allegedly helped Ng cover up details of fraudulent transfers of $416.5 million and US$17.7 million to his own bank accounts under false pretences, according to the ruling. She was found to be 'grossly negligent' but 'did not have actual knowledge' of the Ponzi scheme as she herself was being duped by Ng, with her own family members and loved ones also invested in the scheme, the judicial commissioner pointed out. As for Mr Ju, the High Court found that he was in breach of his directors' duties and liable for fraudulent trading, among other things. 'That he was willing to forge documents, fraudulently change the paid-up capital sums for EGT and mislead investors ... spoke to his entire approach to his role as a director and employee of the company. These actions also reflect his willingness to be complicit in whatever he was asked to do. This made a mockery of his duties as a director of EGT,' the judicial commissioner said. Mr Cheong, the ex-employee, knew that he was creating forgeries, and also became aware that these were being circulated to both internal employees and external investors, but the High Court found that he did not know that such actions were being done to prop up a sham scheme. For one thing , Mr Cheong was 'not particularly sophisticated and possessed a rather rudimentary understanding of the business'. His own investments 'started even before he joined the Envy companies and he had assisted some of his friends to do the same, which suggests that he himself bought into the logic of the purported nickel trading,' the judicial commissioner said. Regardless of whether Ms Lee, Mr Ju or Mr Cheong had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme, they were still ordered to return most of the monies they had received from the Envy companies. In a separate 62-page judgment released July 29, the High Court ordered six other former employees of the Envy companies to cough up more than $42 million in fictitious profits, commission payments, profit sharing and referral fees paid to them. This award is subject to a deduction of income tax payments made by these six employees. Former employees Lau Lee Sheng, Benjamin Teo Wei Wen, Ms Shen Xuhuai, Koh Hong Jie (Xu Hongjie), Guo Yujia and Jordan Chua Wei Jian were named defendants in this suit brought by the liquidators. The High Court allowed the liquidators to claw back monies paid to them after finding that the Envy companies 'were never under any obligation to pay the commission payments and profit sharing payments to the defendants because the (companies) never made any actual profit.'
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Hongkong Land back in the black with H1 underlying profit of US$297 million
[SINGAPORE] Hongkong Land posted an underlying profit of US$297 million for the six months ended Jun 30, reversing from a net loss of US$7 million in the corresponding year-ago period. Excluding the impact of non-cash provisions for its build-to-sell segment in China, H1 underlying profit stood at US$320 million, 11 per cent higher than the US$288 million recorded the year before. In an interview with The Business Times on Tuesday (Jul 29), Hongkong Land's chief financial officer Craig Beattie said market sentiment in Hong Kong has improved significantly in the first six months of this year, led by the huge jump in capital markets activity. Rents in Hong Kong have been on the decline for five years, and that is unlikely to continue, he added. 'The uptick in capital markets activity combined with rents being at a level that many occupiers feel this is a good point to really jump (in)... has meant that we've seen an improvement in inquiries. 'When you start to see some very savvy (and) large financial firms securing their presence in Hong Kong for the long term, I think people sit up and start to realise that maybe this could be the bottom of the market.' A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Vacancies on a committed basis for the group's portfolio declined to 6.9 per cent as at end-June, compared to 7.1 per cent at the end of 2024. This was also lower than the 11.8 per cent vacancy in Hong Kong's wider Central Grade A office market. In Singapore, the group's office portfolio 'continued to perform well and was effectively fully let', Hongkong Land said. Rental reversions were positive, with average rents increasing to S$11.40 per square foot (psf), compared to S$11.10 psf for the same period in 2024. The group uses underlying profit in its internal financial reporting to distinguish between ongoing business performance and non-trading items, as its management considers this to be a key measure that provides additional information on the group's underlying business performance. Revenue for the first half of 2025 fell to US$751.2 million, down 23 per cent from US$972.4 million year on year as the group winds down its build-to-sell business . Including net non-cash valuation movements, the group recorded US$221 million in profit attributable to shareholders, compared to a loss of US$833 million in H1 2024. Underlying earnings per share for H1 2025 stood at US$0.1351, from an underlying loss per share of US$0.0031 in H1 2024. The board is proposing an interim dividend of US$0.06 per share, unchanged from a year ago. Giving an update on its capital recycling efforts, Hongkong Land said that, as at Jun 30, it has secured 33 per cent of its US$4 billion target. This includes the sale of office floors and retail space in One Exchange Square to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for US$810 million. 'Capital recycling continues to be prioritised to reduce net debt and increase investment capacity, with a number of significant initiatives currently under way.' On the build-to-sell segment, the group said the outlook is 'expected to remain challenging with weak sales levels across most cities on the Chinese mainland'. 'Stimulus measures have had a limited impact on improving broader market sentiment outside of Tier 1 cities. Profit contribution is likely to be substantially lower in the second half of 2025 due to lower profit margins on completed projects.' The group's Landmark retail space in its Hong Kong Central portfolio will continue to be impacted by renovations in the second half of 2025, although this is expected to be 'partially offset' by scheduled re-openings in the fourth quarter. Asked about the impact of tariff uncertainty on the group, Beattie said that in terms of capital recycling, for strategic transactions where buyers see long-term value, those deals will continue to move forward. 'Given the fact that Hong Kong has been in a difficult place but hopefully (is) now coming out of that… I think a lot of investors are perhaps thinking this could be a time to pivot back into this part of the world.' Speaking on whether Hongkong Land still plans to divest MCL Land, Beattie said the group's Singapore property development arm is 'a very strong business overall'. 'Most of our projects are almost effectively fully sold. Whether there (are) opportunities for a buyer to take over the custodianship of our business... we'll just have to see. There's a number of options that we're looking at (in) the moment.' Shares of Hongkong Land closed 2.1 per cent or US$0.13 higher at US$6.39 on Tuesday, before the H1 results were announced.
