logo
Sometimes even 'bad press' is bad and these 10 tech rebrands prove it

Sometimes even 'bad press' is bad and these 10 tech rebrands prove it

Yahoo10-02-2025

We love to hear about innovations in consumer technology that will "change the world." Often, the word "disruptive" is used to describe such innovations. But what happens when the disruption isn't to the world's status quo but to those attempting to disrupt it? You get gaffs like Airbnb's logo rebranding in 2014. Its Bélo symbol was involved in multiple controversies. Sometimes, a rebrand isn't as apparent as a new logo. Instead, it's a change in direction, like when Apple launched FCPX and alienated much of its professional audience.
Recently, Microsoft rebranded Bing Chat, making it Microsoft Copilot, and experienced a failure. That got us thinking about other hilarious historical fails. Let's take a trip down nightmare memory lane to revisit the ten worst tech rebrands of all time.
Netflix started an online DVD rental service. When streaming was introduced in 2007, it was part of the fee you paid for DVD rentals. However, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings saw the future of online video consumption and had a plan. Hastings announced in July 2011 that Netflix would separate the two services. What was once $10 for DVD rentals and unlimited streaming would now be $7.99 for DVD rentals or streaming and $15.98 if you wanted both.
Two months after the announcement, Netflix stock lost half its value. Hastings announced a new DVD rental service in September 2011 called Qwikster. Users needed to sign up for a new, separate account, but consumers weren't having it. So, Hastings and company shuttered that service one month later. "Fail fast," indeed.
A new kid on the block tried to corner the mobile payment market in 2013. AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile backed the mobile wallet app, Isis. The app was intended to be its own payment vendor instead of a place to hold your credit and debit cards. But the timing for that name was horrible. The terrorist organization, Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, aka ISIS, made global headlines, making it challenging for those searching the internet for information about the mobile wallet Isis.
Isis was rebranded to Softcard to make it search-friendly and to distance the brand from the terrorist organization. Isis Mobile Wallet/Softcard never took off. Still, you may be using remnants of its IP today because Google bought portions of Softcard and relaunched Google Wallet as Android Pay.
An enterprising tech journalist, TechCrunch's Michael Arrington, regaled the world in 2008 with his vision of the casual computing future: the CrunchPad. Originally slated to retail for $200, the Singapore development studio Fusion Garage brought the tablet to market without Michael Arrington at the helm as the JooJoo.
The JooJoo launched for $500 days before the iPad. "JooJoo" is the phonetic pronunciation of "juju," derived from the West African word for "luck." Launching before the iPad was bad luck because the iPad was a better device in terms of hardware and its app store ecosystem, which ensured the name rebrand wasn't the only reason the JooJoo would fail.
Oxford University Press began printing in 1669 and is one of the most lauded producers of dictionaries. It published its first dictionary in 1884. But what happens when a brand with a centuries-long pedigree wants to bring its look into the 21st century?
Like "The Shack," Oxford's modernizing wasn't for the better. Oxford University Press replaced its classic blue logo in 2014 with a modernized logo that it hoped would help it stand out and beat the competition. It did when it introduced its new Beats Words By Dre logo for Oxford Dictionaries. It looks familiar, right? When it brainstormed this, it didn't forget about Dre.
I'm a fan of the artist enclave, DeviantArt. It's easy to get lost in the rabbit hole of genres of fan art, photography, literature, and more, but the logo you see today wasn't around before 2014.
That year, it hired global independent design studio Moving Brands to help it move into the future as DeviantArt, presenting a new site layout to its users, called "deviants," and introduced a mobile app. With all of that came a logo redesign. It changed from its "DA" initials logo (top) to one with slices (bottom), and it was definitely "artistic." I'm still trying to determine if the green element is a step stool or a martial arts weapon called a "Tonfa."
Microsoft 365 Office is the most widely used productivity suite in the corporate world. Its user base grew by 200 million in 2019, so there are many eyes on the company's brand. That means small things can become a big deal. Such is the case with the now viral name change and logo redesign for Microsoft 365 Office, now Microsoft 365 Copilot.
Copilot is Microsoft's foray into artificial intelligence, and since AI is the future, I'm not mad about the name change. The hot takes came fast and furious when everyone saw the new logo, which had the M365 tag strewn across it so small it was almost illegible.
Microsoft is all-in on its AI initiative, raising the subscription price for the first time in 13 years and integrating Copilot into the base plan instead of charging extra for a Copilot Pro subscription. Maybe it should've paid a bit extra to have that logo redesigned.
Tech and science fiction go hand-in-hand. Star Trek communicators are now smartphones. "The Demolition Man" featured driverless cars, and now Waymo's on the road. Some movies seem to have a prescience about what's to come, and the folks in marketing at what was once known as the Sci-Fi channel wish they could've tapped into that quality before rebranding to SyFy.
In Poland and other countries around the world, "Syfy" is synonymous with the STI syphilis. That's probably not what you want consumers to associate with your brand, but it wasn't enough to make SyFy rethink its redesign. The name remains today, and it is still ridiculed. I guess there's truly no such thing as "bad press."
Radio Shack's move in 2008 to rebrand to "The Shack" to survive the recession in the United States didn't work out well. It tried to remain relevant and appeal to younger consumers but alienated its long-time DIY customers. The odd thing was that it never fully committed to the rebrand. The marketing referred to the company as "The Shack," while the logo had both names, "RadioShack The Shack," making it confusing.
When a stoic Morpheus speaks those words to Neo, it references another virtual world, the fictional "Matrix." The issue in is the same: How do you communicate the virtual world's value without showing someone what it is? Even then, how easy is it for the average user to conceptualize what exactly Mark and the Facebook fam are trying to do as they drive folks to the Metaverse?
The most concerning issue with the rebrand is that while the age demographic with the most users in the US is between 25 and 34, users who spend the most time on Facebook are between 55 and 64. How well are they receiving the new branding and the aspirational ideals put forth by Mark Zuckerberg? Is "Meta" too meta for Meemaw and PawPaw?
Picture this: Twitter was so widely used that it became the "go-to" platform for those fighting oppression internationally during social upheaval and protest. Traditional media organizations quote its content multiple times daily in broadcast news reports and more.
Now picture this: Elon Musk buys the platform and runs into trust issues with that audience, so much so that many advertisers drop Twitter. Some major brands with an active presence also shut down their Twitter accounts. According to analysts, 32 million users left after Musk's $44 billion purchase.
Amidst all that, and despite Twitter's powerful name recognition, Musk changed the branding. Elon Musk's rebranding of the Twitter platform to "X" is the worst tech rebrand in modern times. Almost 18 months after the announcement, nearly everyone still refers to his platform as "X (formerly Twitter)." Not to mention, sending someone an "x" sounds weird: "Hey! I'll X you that info in a bit."
Writing an article like this is tough because many involved in these decisions take huge risks, and I applaud that. It's easy to get stuck in the paralysis of analysis, and it's also challenging to catch lightning in a bottle and come up with a rebrand that resonates with consumers and makes tech cool again. Let these ten examples be cautionary and educational, showing you what not to do the next time you're thinking of changing things up.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Airbnb Partners With Club World Cup 2025 on Experiences and 'Alternative Accommodations'
Airbnb Partners With Club World Cup 2025 on Experiences and 'Alternative Accommodations'

Skift

time36 minutes ago

  • Skift

Airbnb Partners With Club World Cup 2025 on Experiences and 'Alternative Accommodations'

Airbnb is trying to use any excitement surrounding the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 to give a higher profile to its experiences business. As with the Olympics last year in France, Airbnb is using sports celebrities to carry the torch. Airbnb just became the Official Alternative Accommodations and Experiences Booking Platform partner for the FIFA Club World Cup 2025, which begins Saturday in Miami. It also announced it is a "supporter" of the FIFA World Cup 26, to be held in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, and FIFA Women's World Cup 2027, hosted by Brazil. FIFA has several levels of marketing arrangements. For the FIFA World Cup 26, tournament partners such as Aramco, Adidas and Coca-Cola, have top-tier rights and have branding throughout the matches. Supporters like Airbnb don't h

Netflix Eyes EMEA Expansion With Euro 1B Investment Plan in Spain
Netflix Eyes EMEA Expansion With Euro 1B Investment Plan in Spain

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Netflix Eyes EMEA Expansion With Euro 1B Investment Plan in Spain

Netflix NFLX relies heavily on its international business as a key growth driver. In the first quarter of 2025, revenues rose 12.5% year over year, largely driven by strong international regional performance. Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) revenues grew 15% year over year to $3.4 billion and the Asia-Pacific (APAC) jumped 23% to $1.26 billion. Collectively, international markets contributed nearly 44% to total revenues, highlighting the company's growing dependence on non-U.S.-based now plans to invest €1 billion (approximately $1.14 billion) in Spain between 2025 and 2028, as it doubles down on Spanish shows. This long-term commitment will support the production of original content, local job creation and infrastructure development, including the expansion of studio operations in Madrid. The goal is to deepen its creative and operational footprint across the EMEA has evolved from a regional production site into a global content powerhouse for Netflix. With more than 1,000 Spanish titles released and billions of viewing hours generated, Spain has proven its value as a high-performing content market for the company. This new investment firmly establishes Spain as a cornerstone of Netflix's broader EMEA expansion Netflix's focus on streaming regional content has been leading to international growth. The company is expanding its content pipeline across key markets, including India, Mexico, Spain, Italy, Germany, Brazil, France, Turkey and the Middle East, supporting both market-specific relevance and global viewership scale. The streaming landscape is growing more competitive, with Netflix facing rising pressure from Amazon Prime Video, a streaming television service owned by Amazon AMZN. By integrating its vast e-commerce ecosystem with streaming, Amazon offers a unique value proposition that challenges Netflix's dominance in the streaming Disney+, the streaming arm of Disney Entertainment, a major segment of Disney DIS, is accelerating its global growth by significantly increasing the production of international original content, directly challenging Netflix's dominance in key overseas markets. Backed by an expanding international footprint and a powerful franchise-driven content lineup, Disney+ continues to post strong user growth, positioning itself as a formidable rival in the global streaming race. Shares of Netflix have gained 36.6% year to date compared with the Zacks Broadcast Radio and Television industry's return of 24.7%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Netflix trades at a premium with a forward 12-month P/S ratio of 10.95 compared with the broader Zacks Broadcast Radio and Television industry's forward earnings multiple of 4.12. NFLX has a Value Score of D Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NFLX's 2025 revenues is pegged at $44.47 billion, indicating 14.01% year-over-year growth. The consensus mark for earnings is pegged at $25.32 per share, down by a penny over the past 30 days. This indicates a 27.69% increase from the previous year. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research NFLX currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) : Free Stock Analysis Report The Walt Disney Company (DIS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Top Founder-Run Company Stocks That Are Safe Long-Term Plays
Top Founder-Run Company Stocks That Are Safe Long-Term Plays

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Top Founder-Run Company Stocks That Are Safe Long-Term Plays

An updated edition of the April 30, 2025, cultivate and make a company from scratch. They have profound passion, a steadfast vision, and tireless dedication for their ventures. Their willingness to take risks often surpasses that of traditional managers, as they embrace unconventional ideas, champion innovation, and make bold decisions to drive success. As a result, these businesses often become true reflections of their founders' core values, ideals and long-term companies represent less than 5% of the S&P 500 index. But that does not make their contribution any less. Everyone is aware of the success stories of visionary founder-owners like Elon Musk, Warren Buffett, Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, who have redefined industries, creating trillion-dollar companies that continue to thrive. Some of today's prominent founder-run companies are NVIDIA Corporation NVDA, Amazon AMZN, Meta META, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A), (BRK.B) and Netflix NFLX. Founder-led companies represent nearly 15% of the total index's market capitalization, with technology companies taking the these companies are born out of a unique idea, they often involve technological innovation. These companies are built from scratch in a way that they can navigate challenges to stay sustainable over the long term. Initially, others may not relate to a founder's belief, making it difficult to source funds for the project. The founder often ends up putting personal wealth and savings into such bootstrap companies. If successful, they attract angel investors or raise funds. But it's always the founder-owner whose stake and risk are the highest. Moreover, founder-owners often struggle to delegate responsibilities, driven by skepticism about whether others can truly match their level of commitment or understanding. Thus, they tend to assume multiple senior roles and frequently struggle to identify a capable successor. However, excelling across all areas is rarely feasible. This hesitation to delegate can restrict the infusion of professional expertise, potentially impeding the company's ability to scale effectively or respond swiftly to changing market there is strong evidence that founder-led companies tend to perform better over time. Per Harvard Business Review Study, founder-led companies had a market-adjusted return of 12% over three years against a return of negative 26% for companies that hired a professional CEO. Our Founder-Run Companies Screen further makes it easy to identify high-potential stocks. Currently, stocks like Netflix, AppLovin Corporation APP and Dell Technologies Inc. DELL look appealing. Ready to uncover more transformative thematic investment ideas? Explore 30 cutting-edge investment themes with Zacks Thematic Screens and discover your next big opportunity. Netflix, with a market capitalization of $387.7 billion, is considered a pioneer in the streaming space. The company evolved from a small DVD rental provider to a dominant streaming service provider, courtesy of its wide-ranging content portfolio and strong international footprint. Wilmot Reed Hastings Jr. co-founded Netflix with Marc Randolph in 1997 and is the executive chairman of the has been spending aggressively on building its portfolio of original shows. This is helping the company sustain its leading position despite the launch of services like Disney+ and Apple TV+, as well as existing services like Amazon Prime Video. NFLX carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks company's focus on streaming regional content has been leading to international growth. Netflix is diversifying its content portfolio and working on projects across India, Mexico, Spain, Italy, Germany, Brazil, France, Turkey and the entire Middle East. The company has launched low-priced mobile plans in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand. Moreover, the upcoming lower-priced ad tier is expected to further drive growth in these price-sensitive regions. Netflix's 2025 priorities include improving its core business with more series and films to offer an enhanced product experience, growth of its ads business, and newer initiatives such as live programming and games. It believes these initiatives should help it sustain healthy growth and thus projects 2025 revenues between $43.5 billion and $44.5 billion and an operating margin of 29%.AppLovin, with a market capitalization of $129.7 billion, has solidified its leadership in mobile advertising, powered by its next-gen AI engine, Axon 2. Adam Foroughi co-founded AppLovin with John Krystynak and Andrew Karamin in 2012 and is the executive chairman of the AXON machine learning engine has played a pivotal role in driving the growth of its software platform, enabling developers to optimize both user acquisition and monetization efforts. As the mobile advertising landscape shifts toward data-driven, performance-oriented solutions, AppLovin is strategically positioned to capture greater market share, particularly through its increasing emphasis on scalable, AI-enabled technologies. Its vertically integrated model, which combines cutting-edge ad tech with owned content, provides a competitive advantage in data utilization and user engagement transition to a software-centric model has led to improved margins and strengthened its financial performance, backed by solid free cash flow and effective capital management. The company's decision to divest lower-performing gaming assets and focus on its high-growth ad tech platform positions it to further enhance profitability and deliver stronger returns on invested is capitalizing on AI to drive direct, scalable monetization in mobile advertising, a strategy that is paying off. It sports a Zacks Rank # Technologies, with a market capitalization of $75.5 billion, is a leading provider of servers, storage and PCs. Boasting one of the world's largest technology infrastructure companies, Dell was founded by Michael Saul Dell and is expected to benefit from recovering demand driven by the PC-refresh cycle. Dell addresses the evolving needs of on-premises, cloud, and edge environments by enabling organizations to manage and secure workloads effectively through advanced storage solutions such as PowerProtect Data Domain and PowerScale. These systems are further strengthened by AI-powered ransomware detection, enhancing data protection and operational Zacks Rank #2 company is also benefiting from strong demand for AI servers, driven by ongoing digital transformation and heightened interest in generative AI applications. AI-focused server launches and collaboration with key players like NVIDIA and AMD further enhance its competitiveness in the AI infrastructure space. Dell's strong cash flow, as well as disciplined capital allocation, reflects its solid Technologies' innovative portfolio, expanding partner base and growing AI footprint are major growth drivers. Thus, for the first quarter of fiscal 2026, revenues are expected to be between $22.5 billion and $23.5 billion, with the mid-point of $23 billion suggesting 3% year-over-year growth. Non-GAAP earnings are expected to be $1.65 per share (+/- 10 cents), indicating 25% growth at the midpoint. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B) : Free Stock Analysis Report AppLovin Corporation (APP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store