New Zealand Reaches Deal With Canada In Long-Running Dairy Trade Dispute
Dairy exporters had been blocked from the Canadian market, despite the move being in breach of the CPTPP trade agreement.
On Friday morning McClay announced an agreement had been reached.
He says Canada has committed to making changes to its dairy quotas which will deliver up to $157 million to New Zealand dairy exporters.
New Zealand initiated formal dispute settlement proceedings over restricted access to the Canadian market for dairy exports under the CPTPP in 2022.
A dispute panel found in New Zealand's favour, however, Canada failed to fully comply with the panel's ruling. New Zealand threatened further action last year including the imposition of retaliatory tariffs against Canadian exporters.
"The government is pleased that this dispute has now been settled, and New Zealand exporters are guaranteed better access to the Canadian market," McClay said.
Canada said the changes have been negotiated with "close consultation" with its dairy sector and the amendments will result in "minor policy changes".
In a statement Canadian Agriculture minister Heath MacDonald said it was a "mutually satisfactory" resolution.
Under the agreement, Canada has committed to changing the way it administers its dairy quotas under CPTPP, including faster and more efficient access to quotas for New Zealand exporters, reallocation of underused quotas, and penalties for importers who misuse quotas.
"The CPTPP is a world leading agreement that unlocks significant opportunities for all parties, but its obligations must be upheld. Today's agreement reinforces support for the rules-based trading system," McClay said.
He added Canada was a long-stranding friend and trading partner of this country and "constructive engagement" had brought about a resolution.
Last year ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar called the dispute a "betrayal of our friendship".
She said if Canada could not comply with the CPTPP, it should be "booted out of the deal".
Deal welcomed
Fonterra is pleased to see the end of a long running trade dispute involving NZ and Canada.
Fonterra global external affairs director Simon Tucker told Midday Report Canada has a very protected dairy market and it has taken what he calls "dogged determination" by governments and officials to force Canada to comply with its obligations.
He said dairy farmers could sell millions of dollars of products into Canada but it is only a small part of the Fonterra sales which has revenues of more than $20 billion a year.
"Canada is one of those high value niches around the world which would be good for Fonterra.
"This was the right to do; to use the disputes settlement over this issue. We won, and then governments and officials have worked hard to force Canada into compliance.
"This is the right outcome."
Tucker said the win opens up opportunities for New Zealand to pursue further moves especially around Canada's protein subsidies which are considered unfair.
ExportNZ has also welcomed the deal, saying it will unlock higher export value for Kiwi business.
Executive director Josh Tan said the outcome was a win for New Zealand dairy exporters, and a win for the rules-based trading system.
"It's essential that our trade agreements function as they were agreed to - particularly in the current global trade context. Likewise, our trade partners should ensure they are playing by the rules."
Canada was a valuable trading partner for New Zealand, Tan said.
The Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand congratulated the Government for settling the dispute, which was first initiated under the previous Government.
Executive director Kimberly Crewther said the outcome proved that dispute mechanisms were still a valid and viable approach to be taken.
She said Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade estimated $157 million of trade revenue was not able to be used, due to breaches of the CPTPP.
"Previously, it was giving the majority of export licences under these quotas to its own processors, many of whom had very little interest in seeing imports occur and they could hold on to those export licences and not use them without any penalty," Crewther said.
"The changes introduce penalties... so that's a good improvement and we hope that it will lift the utilisation rates."
She said Canadian dairy farmers received subsidies, which brought low prices to global dairy trading among nations without farmer subsidies, like New Zealand.
"They're skewing the global dairy trade playing field quite significantly," she said.
"Unfortunately, Canada's not a stranger to having these sizeable impacts on trade opportunities for New Zealand exporters.
"Canada has a reputation for being amongst the most protectionist of dairy countries in the world, and they do that in a way that makes their market very difficult to access even with these CPTPP quotas, it remains 95 percent closed."
Crewther said New Zealand had "virtually no tariff protections" on dairy into the market, and openly imported dairy into the country.
"So we operate on an open basis, our farmers are not receiving direct subsidies and we are we're trading fairly in the world."
She said its first preference is an on-demand licensing system which ensured those applying for the quotas would utilise them appropriately.
"It's really important to hold them to account. This case has shown that dispute settlement can and does work, and it's important that New Zealand continues to move forward and uses these mechanisms where we need to."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZ 'back on course', govt says
By Russell Palmer of RNZ The government has launched a defence of its record on tackling the cost of living. Finance Minister Nicola Willis joined Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at the Beehive Theatrette for the weekly post-Cabinet briefing. She spent much of the previous week facing questions about her meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell. Luxon said this week marked a full year since the tax bracket changes National campaigned on had come into effect. "It's only through a strong economy that wages rise faster than inflation, that Kiwis can get ahead of their daily costs and our businesses can take risks that can mean that they can invest, grow, and create more jobs," he said. He directly targeted National's main rival in opposition. "Other parties in Parliament believe that raising taxes, growing the public sector, and giving more handouts to those who refuse to work is the answer. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more as Labour and others advocate for didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future." The government's decision to increase fees paid to board members on Crown entities - in some cases up to 80 percent - may undercut the messaging that National is prioritising low and middle-income New Zealanders' interests. But Luxon today pointed to the building products changes announced over the weekend, and the proposed ban on payment surcharges as recent examples. He then pointed to other items in the government's agenda, including: the current pipeline of infrastructure projects, Roads of National Significance, completing the City Rail Link, signing trade deals with the United Arab Emirates and Gulf Cooperation Council, starting negotiations with India, the digital nomads visa, and the Investment Boost policy. Willis soon picked up the baton, rattling off her own list of changes the government had made which she said had helped lower costs, including: the Family Boost policy, ending the Reserve Bank's secondary mandate to account for unemployment, curbing government spending, changing residential tenancy laws, tax deductability changes for landlords, delaying the previous government's petrol excise increases, scrapping the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax, increasing rates rebates for seniors, increasing Working for Families support, and extending maximum subscription lengths. She said National had campaigned on tackling the cost of living crisis, and pointed to rising GDP per capita and wages rising faster than inflation as a result of the government's interventions. "Taking the pressure off inflation - that is the general level of price increases across the economy - helps with the cost side of the cost-of-living equation. Lower inflation means less pressure on prices... it's pleasing to say that wages are now growing faster than inflation and forecasts show this trend continuing over the next few years." She said the government's tax changes meant "households have benefited by an average of $60 a fortnight". The change to interest deductibility for landlords had helped to take the heat out of the rental market, she said, noting "the 2.6 increase for the year to June was the lowest since 2011". She said the government was also making big structural changes, saying "the last government conclusively proved that band aids are not enough" and pointing to a series of policies yet to come to fruition: the Going for Housing Growth policy, Fast-tracking renewable energy consenting, work to address supermarket competition, and to curb council rates increases. "Economies are like oil tankers, you can't turn them around on a dime. But New Zealand is back on course," Willis said. The lists of government achievements kept coming, with Willis also pointing to: education reform, the investment boost (again), promoting global trade and investment, changes to the research and development sector, and "delivering infrastructure projects faster and better". Meanwhile, a Cabinet Office Circular reveals the government signed off on increases to fees available to board members of Crown entities. This includes increases of 30 percent for Group 2 and 4 boards and Audit and Risk committees, and an increase of 80 percent for Group 3 bodies. Luxon said the public sector director fees "have got completely out of whack compared to private sector fees". "Obviously we will never pay as much as someone in the private sector but when you are spending $32 billion on healthcare for example, it's important that we are actually able to attract really good governors for the Health NZ board, for example," he said. The changes took effect at the start of July.
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Riders are opposed to a plan to rip out 22.5km of bike lanes, while many motorists blame them for traffic jams
So, Doug Ford, Premier of Toronto's province, Ontario, passed a law to rip out 14 miles (22.5km) of the lanes from three major streets that serve the core of the city. Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow arrived for her first day in office two years ago riding a bike. She was not pleased with the law, arguing that the city had sole discretion to decide street rules. Chow did not respond to a request to comment. But in public remarks, she has since softened her tone, suggesting it was possible to have a 'win-win solution' by relocating some bike lanes or keeping them in place while adding more driving lanes. 'We could design them better,' Chow told reporters in April. Bike lanes are a sore point for many drivers frustrated by the constant traffic jams in the heart of Toronto. 'There's so much traffic because of bike lanes,' said Nasser Moradman, who has driven a taxi in Toronto for 30 years. The lanes aren't even used much during the long winter, he complained, adding: 'It's miserable. It's very tough to drive in the city.' Cycling proponents and others who vehemently oppose Ford's move mounted a legal challenge, and a provincial court has temporarily barred the removal of any bike lanes until a judge decides if the new law is unconstitutional. Cities across the world, including New York and Paris, have added kilometres of bike lanes to make streets safer for cyclists and encourage drivers to abandon their vehicles and opt for more climate-friendly modes of travel, such as cycling and public transportation. In some places, the lanes have also set off criticism from drivers and others who say that they have made life worse for people who have to drive, including delivery workers and taxi drivers. Sharon Danley who opposes Toronto's bike lanes. Photo / Ian Willms, the New York Times United States President Donald Trump called New York's bike lanes dangerous and claimed that cyclists were 'whacking people'. In Canada, government data shows that about an average of two million people commute to Toronto by car on workdays. And those commuters contribute to the city's congestion, which ranks second behind Vancouver among Canadian cities, according to TomTom, a global traffic index. Toronto's chronic traffic snarls can come as an unwelcome surprise to some visitors. In February, the Carolina Hurricanes hockey team had to abandon a ride because of traffic and walk the remaining blocks to a downtown arena — not the first time that professional athletes have had to do that. The problems have cost the Toronto region about CA$45 billion ($54.6b) in lost productivity per year, according to a report by the Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis. 'Congestion has reached crisis levels,' said Giles Gherson, president of the Toronto Board of Trade, which suggested in a report that Toronto 'rebalance' its roads by cutting back street-level parking and moving bike lanes. Many commuters also argue that driving into Toronto from the suburbs is often faster than using public transportation, with experts saying that the city lacks enough rapid transit to meet its needs. The provincial government has been criticised for long delays to transit projects. The province says only 1.2% of workers commute by bike. For comparison, even in New York City, which has a large system of bike lanes, about 1.4% of people commute by bike, according to city figures. The conflict in Toronto has resonated with people such as Sharon Danley, a retiree. She recently joined a citizens group opposing a bike lane on her street, which she said was disruptive and unfair. The lane, she said, slows down a transit bus for people with disabilities. 'Now what we're doing is clogging up lean arteries and causing a lot of harm,' Danley said. In Toronto, where the car has long been king, cyclists have been gaining ground. Toronto added 67 miles (110km) of bike lanes between 2020 and 2024 and now has 207 miles (333km) of them. The city's bike-share service had 6.9 million rides in 2024, up from 2.9 million in 2020. 'Cycling has become more pleasant,' said Chad Mohr, a food-bank volunteer who delivers groceries by bike. 'Now they're talking about ripping tonnes of that infrastructure out, which would be a tragedy and just a giant, ridiculous, expensive step backward.' The city spent about CA$27 million ($32.7m) to install the bike lanes that Ontario now wants to eliminate. In a report, it estimates that removing them would cost CA$48m. A ghost bike memorial to a cyclist killed in a traffic collision in Toronto, Canada. Photo / Ian Willms, the New York Times Last year, Toronto said halfa dozen cyclists were killed in the city, the highest number in two decades. Between 2016 and 2023, 260 cyclists have been seriously injured, with most crashes on streets with no bike lanes. Removing bike lanes would 'cost people their lives', said Geoffrey Bercarich, a bike-repair technician who installs memorials called ghost bikes in places where cyclists have been killed. Ford has made it clear that he is not opposed to cyclists or cycling. 'I'm not against bike lanes,' he told reporters in May. 'Build all the bike lanes you want, just not on main arterial roads.' Cycling proponents argue that the province has not shown any evidence that removing bike lanes will ease traffic. 'This idea that they're somehow the cause of Toronto's traffic woes isn't based on any fact,' said Michael Longfield, executive director of Cycle Toronto, an advocacy group. He was speaking by phone from a hospital, where he was recovering from a fractured leg that he said he sustained while cycling when a driver opened a door into a bike lane. The Ontario Government has passed a measure that would protect it from lawsuits by cyclists injured on roads where the province tears out bike lanes. Cycling supporters say the move amounts to a tacit acknowledgment that riders will be hurt if the province is allowed to eliminate bike lanes, said David Shellnutt, a personal-injury lawyer in Toronto specialising in cycling cases. 'It is an admission that, yes, we know that what we're proposing here will result in injury and death,' Shellnutt said, 'and so we're going to insulate ourselves from accountability.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Vjosa Isai Photographs by: Ian Willms ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: Media milking butter battle
Big money for butter - as seen on TV on 1News on Tuesday, reporting the bitter butter battle turning political. Photo: screenshot / TVNZ 1News "How much is a block of butter?" a reporter from Stuff asked as things wrapped up the prime minister's post-Cabinet media conference on Monday. The tension was palpable. This was a high-stakes moment. "About $8.40 in New Zealand at the moment," Christopher Luxon responded. Close enough, thankfully for Luxon. Woolworths' in-house salted butter is $8.50, and you can get 500g of Rolling Meadow at PaknSave for $8.29. The consequences for getting it wrong would undoubtedly have been dire. In case you've been living under a rock inside a cave on the planet Venus during a solar storm - while wearing a blindfold and noise-cancelling headphones - our entire nation and nearly all of its media organisations have been fixated on the price of 500g of pure concentrated uncut dairy. The price has risen nearly 50 percent in a year and that's caused quite a few conniptions back home on Earth. Stuff actually ran a story on Luxon getting the price of butter right. Meanwhile journalists accosted Fonterra boss Miles Hurrell out in the open with questions about the cost of his company's yellow gold. First he had to fend off TVNZ political editor Maiki Sherman , not once but twice, ahead of a heavily-promoted meeting with finance minister Nicola Willis at Parliament. Hurrell got away, only to encounter RNZ's political reporter Giles Dexter afterwards - and by then he was pretty fed up. "I'll talk to media in the morning," he replied tersely to Dexter's enquiries. (Two more days passed before he actually did). But the media's intense interest in that meeting was understandable. It had been billed as a kind of 'please explain' and the finance minister told RNZ's Checkpoint she would grill Hurrell on the price of butter. "Sometimes we're seeing cheaper prices in British or Australian supermarkets and I'm interested to understand how much of that is about the lack of supermarket competition here - and how much is about the prices that Fonterra is passing through," she said. But that tough talk got the goat of Newstalk ZB morning host Mike Hosking during his weekly interview with the prime minister on Monday. "No she's not," he responded, after Luxon said Willis was doing a good job on food prices. "She's off to Fonterra this week to meet who? Miles. And what's she going to talk to Miles about? She's going to talk about the price of butter. I can tell you why the price of butter is the price of butter, and I don't know why we have a finance minister who doesn't know. We get the international price for butter." "Nicola has this penchant for saying stuff that might lead you to believe she could produce an uzi out of a handbag and blitz the room," he said later in a two-minute-long Mike's Minute . The following morning Willis was keen to tell RNZ's First Up her meeting with Hurrell was just a regularly scheduled catch-up. But the Fonterra boss was pursued around Parliament and the streets of Wellington nevertheless. It didn't deter our media from delivering blanket coverage of the meeting and post-butter discussion analysis - and the price of butter more generally in news bulletins, commentary and explainers . The Herald 's Liam Dann implored the media to have a little bit of perspective in his weekly column in the Herald on Sunday last weekend. He said high butter prices are actually only costing many families about $4 a week and other price rises hit harder. He told Mediawatch we might be overreacting to the incredible cost of a spreadable product. "If you're going to get worked up about a food product in New Zealand, it's going to be dairy. There's a sort of cultural connection to dairy and this feeling that we produce so much of the stuff that it's not fair that it costs so much." Dann said high dairy prices were a net positive for the country's economy, with the current spike expected to bring in an additional $10 billion in export revenue over this year and next. Politicians - including former Fonterra employee Nicola Willis - were well aware of that. But he acknowledged those gains were less tangible and visceral than the sight of a $10 block of butter in the supermarket aisle. The high price of butter was also emblematic of the wider cost of living crisis, he said. "I'm certainly not downplaying the cost of living crisis... but if you actually do the maths and crunch how much discretionary income's coming or going based on your butter consumption, we're talking cents." "Perhaps it is just that we need something to focus on, to channel that anger around what's happening to the overall supermarket sector." Dann has pleaded with politicians to " raise the quality of debate " and focus on structural economic issues rather than the price of butter. But surely that goes for the media as well? Liam Dann didn't want to blame the media, but said the wider issue of New Zealand's low wage and under-productive economy was far more important and worthy of analysis than individual commodity prices. "How do we organise the system so we've actually got a thriving domestic economy, people are paid more and can afford to eat these products that we've grown up culturally seeing as our own?" Good question. For now though, the media is firmly focused on butter. The meeting between Hurrell and Willis, in particular, would have been a friendly one rather than the adversarial encounter some stories suggested. But that reporting was driven by the intoxicating allure of thousands of clicks. "We see that the butter story is what everybody's clicking on... and it becomes a topic that gets momentum. We start asking economists about the butter, and then that gets into people's heads," he said. "We get a sort of a media spiral going where it just becomes a bit of a phenomenon in its own right." That may not be as edifying as a discussion of the economic conditions behind our lagging wages, but it's certainly a lot more clickable. In the end, just like Fonterra, the media is a business too - and it also follows the money. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
