Alphabet Traders Look to Developer Event to Shift AI Narrative
(Bloomberg) -- Alphabet Inc.'s investors are looking to this week's developer conference to see if the company can reset the narrative amid fears that its long-standing market dominance is on shaky ground.
America, 'Nation of Porches'
NJ Transit Train Engineers Strike, Disrupting Travel to NYC
NJ Transit Makes Deal With Engineers, Ending Three-Day Strike
NYC Commuters Brace for Chaos as NJ Transit Strike Looms
The Google I/O event, which begins Tuesday, is expected to showcase the company's latest advancements in artificial intelligence. Positive updates could help ease concerns about the rivals nipping at its heels and eating away at its dominant position in web search, even as the company spends heavily on AI.
'The hope is that it will provide a roadmap for a strong future, because right now everyone is waiting for a shoe to drop and has their finger on the trigger for any negative headline,' said David Katz, chief investment officer at Matrix Asset Advisors. 'I think it is far stronger than the stock is currently discounting, so view the negativity as a buying opportunity, but it definitely faces more headwinds with AI than it ever did with legacy search.'
The stock is down 12% this year, compared with a gain of 2.1% for the Nasdaq 100 Index. Meta Platforms Inc., the other significant player in online advertising, is up almost 10%.
Recent weakness in Alphabet came after an Apple Inc. executive said during court testimony that searches on its Safari web browser fell for the first time in April. Alphabet disputed this, and pointed to I/O as a place where it can address concerns by sharing its latest innovations. Last week, The Information reported that Alphabet will unveil an AI agent for software development at the event, along with a Pinterest-like feature, among other updates to its Gemini AI chatbot. However, an underwhelming presentation may be a cause for further weakness.
'A good story may not be enough at I/O this time around to sway investors given we're now armed with recent data points around slower paid click growth, Safari search volume declining for the first time in 22 years, and ChatGPT and Meta AI's march to a billion users,' Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik wrote.
Since ChatGPT emerged in late 2022, Alphabet has seen repeated selloffs on concerns it is falling behind in AI. The issue, along with heightened antitrust uncertainty, has weighed on Alphabet's multiple, making it the cheapest big-tech stock by far.
Alphabet is still viewed as a central player in AI in terms of both talent and intellectual property, and the stock has repeatedly bounced back from slumps. The company's most recent results beat expectations and showed AI-related demand, while an April event focused on the company's cloud business was viewed positively as a sign that the company could capitalize on AI.
However, new entrants in AI have made Alphabet look as though it is playing defense, especially when it comes to search, which accounts for more than half of the parent company's revenue and the vast majority of profits. According to the latest Statista data, which is from March, Alphabet has about 89.7% of worldwide market share for search engines, compared with 92.9% in January 2023, around the time ChatGPT took the tech world by storm.
Ben Reitzes, Melius Research's head of technology research, writes that Alphabet 'is sure to come out swinging' at the event, but that 'in order to get more positive, we need to see evidence that Gemini can be monetized to replace search as we know it.' He has warned that the company is at risk of losing younger users to companies like OpenAI.
A key question for investors is how much the stock already reflects these concerns and what a fair value would look like as its market share settles over the longer term. Currently, shares trade at 16.4 times estimated earnings, under its 10-year average of 20.5. The stock sits at a notable discount to other megacaps and the Nasdaq 100 Index, where the multiple is 26. Meta, its closest peer in both business model and multiple, trades at 23 times future profits.
This valuation comes even as analysts continue to anticipate strong long-term growth potential. Revenue is seen rising at a double-digit clip every year through 2028. Net earnings are expected to grow almost 20% this year, even as Alphabet spends heavily on AI. Analysts expect $74.9 billion in capex this year, growing to $77.1 billion in 2026.
'If Alphabet can pull its great tech, talent, data, and user base into one compelling offering at I/O, there's definite upside,' said Michael Brenner, senior research analyst and asset allocation strategist at FBB Capital Partners. 'The stock certainly looks cheap, but it isn't one of our biggest overweights because you have these question marks surrounding its biggest business. There's nothing to stop the multiple from falling further if the threat doesn't dissipate.'
Tech Chart of the Day
Chinese shipments of Apple's iPhone and other mobile devices to the US dived to their lowest levels since 2011 in April, underscoring how the threat of tariffs choked off the flow of big-ticket goods between the world's two largest economies.
Top Tech Stories
The Chinese government accused the Trump administration of undermining recent trade talks in Geneva after it warned that using Huawei Technologies Co.'s artificial-intelligence chips 'anywhere in the world' would violate US export controls.
Nintendo Co. has turned to Samsung Electronics Co. to help make the main chips for the Switch 2, a move that may help the Japanese company ramp up production of the gaming console enough to sell a higher-than-projected 20 million units by March 2026.
Grab Holdings Ltd. and GoTo Group were among ride-hailing and delivery services targeted by driver protests on Tuesday in Indonesia, with thousands gathering to demand better compensation and other terms.
While using web site data to build a Google Search topped with artificial intelligence-generated answers, an Alphabet executive acknowledged in an internal document that there was an alternative way to do things: They could ask web publishers for permission, or let them directly opt out of being included.
Earnings Due Tuesday
Earnings Postmarket:
Palo Alto Networks Inc. (PANW US)
Viasat Inc. (VSAT US)
--With assistance from Subrat Patnaik, Andy Lin and Vlad Savov.
Why Apple Still Hasn't Cracked AI
Anthropic Is Trying to Win the AI Race Without Losing Its Soul
Microsoft's CEO on How AI Will Remake Every Company, Including His
Cartoon Network's Last Gasp
DeepSeek's 'Tech Madman' Founder Is Threatening US Dominance in AI Race
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Saudi Arabia's IPO Boom Faces Multiple Challenges
June 9th, 2025, 6:42 AM GMT+0000 Saudi Arabian firms have raised about $3 billion from new share sales this year, making it one of the world's hottest IPO markets. But a series of recent setbacks is threatening to take the sheen off that boom, Bloomberg's Laura Gardner Cuesta reports on Horizons Middle East & Africa. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg: The China Show 06/09/2025
'Bloomberg: The China Show' is your definitive source for news and analysis on the world's second-biggest economy. From politics and policy to tech and trends, Yvonne Man and Stephen Engle give global investors unique insight, delivering in-depth discussions with the newsmakers who matter. (Source: Bloomberg)


Tom's Guide
42 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I challenged Gemini Live vs ChatGPT in 5 voice challenges — there was one clear winner
AI assistants are constantly becoming smarter, faster and gaining new abilities. Now, they can see, speak, listen and even crack a few jokes with you when you need a favorite chatbots offering hands-free assistance are ChatGPT with Voice and Vision and Google's Gemini Live. I use them both regularly and interchangeably, but one thing I haven't done is test them against each other. So, I just had to know, which assistant is better to the point it actually feels the most human? To find out, I put both tools through five unique voice-based tests designed to push their limits. These were not your average 'What's the weather?' prompts. I challenged them to recall context, analyze images, collaborate creatively and even roleplay with personality. One emerged as the clear winner, and in this article I'll show you why. Prompt: 'My name is Amanda and I'm planning a trip to Boston with my family of five. What should we do first?" Later: "Remind me what I said my name was earlier?'Gemini Live quickly asked for more information to ensure it gave me the best information. It asked the ages of my kids and what types of activities we prefer as a family. It made some very general recommendations that I could have gotten anywhere, but still information. The chatbot remembered my name when I asked it to recall immediately made some general family-friendly recommendations (similar to what Gemini gave after asking me more about myself) and then asked me about my family's preferences. From there, it offered more unique and engaging activities that were both on and off the typical tourist path. The chatbot remembered my name when asked to recall ChatGPT wins for out-of-the-box recommendations that I hadn't thought of (and I'm from Boston). It was very helpful with both unique and interesting ideas for my active family of five. Prompt: 'Explain the potential societal impacts of widespread AI companions.'Gemini Live acknowledged positive aspects but remained very general and lacked specific societal consequences. Although the chatbot did mention both sides, without elaborating, the response was somewhat empty and less went beyond vague statements and provided concrete examples of both positive and negative impacts. The chatbot's conclusion emphasized the need for balance. Although ChatGPT responded clearly and thoroughly, the chatbot is very sensitive. At one point during the conversation I put the phone down and it stumbled, asking, 'What else can I help with?' When I asked the bot to keep going, it was confused so I had to re-ask the question, which felt less ChatGPT wins for a more thorough and balanced response to the question. While it stumbled with some technicalities, the answer to the prompt was superior. Gemini ended the conversation with "worth thinking about," which seemed less insightful. Prompt: "Sell me a maple pecan latte like a Gen Z barista, adding in humor naturally."Gemini Live leaned into the Gen Z character with fun lines that felt both natural and effortless. It wasn't as verbose as ChatGPT, which made it feel more human and delivered a lengthy sales speech that made me cringe. It didn't get the Gen Z tone as well as Gemini and the whole response felt a little too polished and buttoned Gemini Live wins this one. This was where Gemini shined. Its energetic voice delivery and personality were spot-on as it leaned into the character with ease. Prompt: 'Take a look at these old bananas and give me suggestions for what to do with them.'Gemini Live took one look at the bananas and immediately suggested banana bread. A good option, but an obvious one. When pressed for something different, it suggested smoothies. I told it I didn't have a lot of extra ingredients and it hallucinated saying, 'that's okay, how about a smoothie?' Once again, I told it I didn't have any other ingredients. Finally it suggested making banana ice also suggested banana bread but in the form of 'banking' with other ideas mixed in. It went further to suggest smoothies. When I mentioned I didn't have any other ingredients, it suggested blending with ice and water for a 'refreshing drink.' Additionally, it suggested more pantry-friendly ingredients like honey, cinnamon and vanilla that I was more likely to have on hand (as apposed to Gemini suggesting various fruits, seaweed or kale).Winner: ChatGPT wins this round with a clear edge for true multimodal communication with creativity and visual intelligence. Prompt: "Help me brainstorm a bedtime jingle for my kids and sing it if you can." Gemini Live went line by line of the song for a more collaborative experience. It was asking me about instruments and themes as well as styles. While it was nice to be included, any parent trying to get their kid to sleep at bedtime just wants something fast. I would appreciate this collaborative effort if I needed the song in a different created a sweet lullaby in minutes – and even sang it! The song was creative and well written even though the bot's voice was a little too robotic. I then asked it for different lyrics and for it to sing it in other styles and it got straight to work even rapping it like Kendrick Lamar (that is, if Lamar were a bot).Winner: tie. Both tools came up with catchy rhymes and fun ideas. ChatGPT took the lead in structure while Gemini felt a little looser, more like spit balling with a friend — which was charming, but less directed. After putting both AI assistants through their paces, it's clear that ChatGPT currently offers the more advanced and well-rounded experience. From deeper reasoning and sharper memory to stronger visual analysis and quicker creative execution, ChatGPT consistently delivered results that felt more helpful and said, Gemini had standout moments, especially in personality-driven prompts where it came across as more spontaneous and fun. If you're looking for an assistant to make you smile and keep the vibe light, Gemini shines. But if you want the most capable hands-free AI companion that can think deeply, see clearly and even sing (or rap!) on command — ChatGPT is still the one to beat.