UFC fans push for changes as $7.7b Paramount deal promises end to PPV model
UFC's $7.7 billion Paramount Plus deal will eliminate pay-per-view model and move from ESPN Plus. Combat sports journalist Damon Martin and fans criticize repetitive commercials during UFC 319, requesting Dana White make changes to advertising approach when transition occurs
Getty Images UFC President Dana White at press conference discussing the $7.7 billion Paramount Plus deal that will move UFC events from ESPN Plus and eliminate the pay-per-view model for combat sports fans (Image Source: Getty) UFC fans and media personalities are calling for advertising reforms following the promotion's upcoming move from ESPN Plus to Paramount Plus under a new $7.7 billion deal that will eliminate the pay-per-view model.Combat sports journalist Damon Martin voiced frustrations about repetitive commercials during UFC 319 coverage on ESPN Plus, highlighting viewer dissatisfaction with the current broadcast experience.
Also read: The new distribution math: UFC's shift from PPV culture to Paramount+ bundling"I have one request under this new Paramount+ deal with UFC …. Can you PLEASE play more than 2 commercials during a 5 or 6 hour broadcast? I swear I see the same commercials over and over and over again. It's like Groundhog Day from hell," Martin wrote on X.UFC fans responded to Martin's comments with additional suggestions for improving the viewing experience when the promotion transitions to Paramount Plus. Multiple viewers expressed desire for alternative content during commercial breaks. "Better yet, let us watch all the walkouts like we used to and do away with commercials!" one fan suggested, requesting return of fighter walkout coverage instead of advertisements.
Other fans proposed showing arena atmosphere during breaks rather than commercial content. "Better yet, at the very least play the crowd noise or something not a commercial break screen," another viewer commented.Fans described the current UFC viewing experience on ESPN Plus as problematic, with one stating "It's awful." Several viewers suggested improvements similar to WWE's Netflix presentation approach."Also, play some music on the 'we'll be right back screen' I can't stand the silence," one fan requested, seeking audio improvements during broadcast interruptions.Some viewers proposed compromise solutions regarding advertising. "I'd be good with a banner during the commercials," one fan stated, suggesting alternative advertisement placement methods.
Also read: UFC -Paramount+ $7.7 Billion Deal in U.S.: What's included and will fans face higher costs for live sports
Certain fans defended the UFC organization, explaining that commercial content varies based on geographic targeting systems. "It's not the app my man. It's geo based targeting," one viewer commented, attributing repetitive advertisements to regional broadcasting protocols.Additional requests emerged for commentary options, with one fan stating: "Please also add a no-commentary feed option."The UFC's transition to Paramount Plus represents a significant shift in combat sports broadcasting, with the $7.7 billion deal promising to eliminate the traditional pay-per-view model that has defined UFC event distribution for years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
YouTube Or Netflix Could Be The Next Home For Oscars After ABC Contract Ends: Report
Last Updated: Streaming giants like YouTube and Netflix are in the running to host the Oscars after ABC's 2028 contract ends. Could Hollywood's biggest night go digital? Will the 2029 Academy Awards be streaming on YouTube? With ABC's broadcast contract ending in 2028, major streaming and network companies are eyeing the rights to host Hollywood's biggest night. Bloomberg reports that Google-owned YouTube is emerging as a contender alongside Netflix, NBCUniversal, and other media giants. Like Netflix, YouTube has steadily increased its focus on live events. The platform successfully acquired the NFL Sunday Ticket in 2023 and has bid for other major live broadcasts. Meanwhile, ABC has aired the Oscars since 1976, and Disney could still extend its long-standing contract. However, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has reportedly explored alternative options, both as a negotiation tactic and a potential new home for the awards. YouTube's Big Play for Hollywood's Biggest Night Most potential bidders for the Oscars aren't surprising: Disney's ABC, Comcast's NBCUniversal, Netflix, Amazon, and Paramount's CBS all have stakes in live programming or major studio-backed content. But YouTube is the unexpected contender. Sources indicate the platform has inquired about acquiring the rights, signaling a serious move into live entertainment beyond sports and podcasts. Hosting the Oscars would be a bold statement for YouTube. Known primarily for on-demand videos, YouTube would instantly gain global attention by broadcasting a live event watched by millions. The platform's massive reach could inject new energy into the Oscars, which have faced declining ratings in recent years despite occasional spikes, such as the 2025 ceremony—the highest in five years. Hollywood, Streaming, and the Bottom Line While the idea of a YouTube-hosted Oscars may excite fans, it's far from certain. ABC will continue airing the show through 2028, and the Academy is still negotiating. Many bidders can combine broadcast networks with streaming platforms, while several own major studios that prioritise theatrical releases. For now, the Oscars remain a high-profile, though challenging, live event in a changing entertainment landscape. Whether it stays with ABC, moves to Netflix, or takes a digital leap to YouTube, Hollywood's biggest night will continue to evolve—both on TV and online. view comments First Published: August 19, 2025, 00:20 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
This 2-hour 32-minute psychological thriller film will send chills down your spine, climax will leave you speechless, movie is..., lead actors were...
In a city veiled in darkness, a sinister pattern begins to emerge, gruesome murders marked by eerie smiley faces, each more unsettling than the last. Fear spreads like wildfire as a relentless killer plays mind games with the police. But this isn't just a hunt for a murderer, it's a chilling descent into the disturbed psyche of both predator and pursuer. Which film is this? Here we are talking about Iraivan, a Tamil-language psychological thriller film directed by I. Ahmed, which is one such movie that has stirred conversations among audiences and critics alike. Released on September 28, 2023, the film delves into dark corridors of human psyche, exploring themes of justice, trauma, and the thin line between sanity and madness. What was the storyline of Iraivan? The narrative centers around Assistant Commissioner Arjun, portrayed by Jayam Ravi (now known as Ravi Mohan), a cop known for his unorthodox methods and a penchant for delivering justice through lethal encounters. His world is upended when he confronts a serial killer named Brahma, played by Rahul Bose, who leaves a trail of gruesome murders marked by smiley face notes. The case takes a personal toll when Arjun's close friend and colleague, Andrew, is killed during the investigation, prompting Arjun to resign and seek solace in a quieter life with Priya, Andrew's sister, played by Nayanthara. However, peace remains elusive as Brahma escapes custody, reigniting a terrifying killing spree that forces Arjun back into the fray. How were the performances? The film's strength lies in its atmospheric tension and the performances of its lead actors. Jayam Ravi delivers a compelling portrayal of a man grappling with guilt and a thirst for justice, while Rahul Bose's depiction of Brahma is chillingly effective, capturing the essence of a remorseless killer. Nayanthara, though given limited screen time, brings depth to her role, embodying the emotional anchor in Arjun's tumultuous life. Despite its promising premise, Iraivan received mixed reviews. Critics praised the film's initial setup and the psychological complexity of its antagonist but noted that the narrative loses momentum in the second half. Some reviewers also pointed out that the film's attempt to shock with graphic violence overshadowed its psychological depth. More about Iraivan Box office-wise, Iraivan performed modestly. With a worldwide gross of around Rs 22.5 crore, it didn't break records but found its audience post-theatrical release, which was made under budget of Rs 4 crore, and is currently streaming on Netflix.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Taylor Swift dismisses ‘bear' cameo rumors in 'Happy Gilmore 2': 'This is one of those ones...'
A fan theory that has been going around the internet has finally been disproved by Taylor Swift . There has been a constant rumor among Swifty fans that the pop sensation secretly portrayed a bear in Happy Gilmore 2. During her August 13 appearance on New Heights, the podcast hosted by her boyfriend Travis Kelce and his brother Jason Kelce, the 35-year-old superstar herself discussed and clarified the rumors. The Happy Gilmore 2 rumors were proven false by Taylor Swift Jason Kelce questioned her about the circulating rumor, asking her to "confirm or deny" the rumor. Swift said, "I can deny!" in response to this right away. The theory has now become a running joke between her and Travis, she disclosed. "This is one of those ones where, like, we'll send it to each other and be like, 'Hey, did you hear I was the bear in there?'" Swift said, revealing their private jokes. "Yeah, did you hear we bought a house in Lake Como?" he asks. "At this point, we're just like, of course they think I'm inside of a bear costume." The Daylight hitmaker also agreed that because she loved the Adam Sandler film, she found the rumor flattering even though it was totally false. She mentioned that she had seen the film several times because she loved it so much. She laughed and added that she had thought the bear acting was beautiful. The Famous Bear Scene and Travis Kelce's Cameo Adam Sandler, Julie Bowen, Ben Stiller, and Christopher McDonald returned in the July 25 release of the follow-up to the 1996 cult classic Happy Gilmore. Happy Gilmore 2, which was directed by Kyle Newacheck, features numerous cameos by famous people, such as Travis Kelce, Bad Bunny, and Margaret Qualley. Travis plays a waiter in the movie. Travis's personality is tied to a metal post during a dream sequence, which includes the now-famous bear scene. Happy gets coated in honey by Oscar, his caddy, who is portrayed by Bad Bunny, before a bear is let loose to eat him. Fans started thinking that Taylor Swift might have been the person wearing the bear costume because of this exact scene. Swift's View of the Movie Swift continued to praise the movie even after denying the rumors. Shortly after its release, she shared the official Happy Gilmore 2 poster on Instagram, writing, 'Happy Gilmore 2 had me cackling and cheering the whole movie. An absolute must-watch. 13/10, go watch it on Netflix as soon as humanly possible." Taylor Swift Reveals Her Upcoming Album In addition to clearing up rumors, Swift gave her fans a significant update during her podcast appearance. She revealed The Life of a Showgirl, her twelfth studio album. The album is scheduled for release on October 3 and will include 12 tracks. "Get the latest updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie Coolie and War 2 ."
