Trump mocks California congressman with digitally altered photo following ICE raid
The post represents the latest example of fallout over an aggressive Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid of a legal marijuana farm in Camarillo (Ventura County) on Thursday, which provoked a chaotic backlash from community members.
The White House wrote on X that the ICE raid targeted an operation 'filled with illegal aliens' and mocked 'Cryin' Jimmy,' who it said defended the workers with the chaotically capitalized phrase 'JuSt StRaWbErRy PiCkErS.' Then it wrote, 'That ain't produce, homes. THAT'S PRODUCT.'
ICE: Raids marijuana farms filled with illegal aliens
Cryin' Jimmy: 'ThEy'Re JuSt StRaWbErRy PiCkErS :sob:'
That ain't produce, holmes. THAT'S PRODUCT. :herb: https://t.co/D1lr6ij8VB pic.twitter.com/HO2P4XuwKg
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 11, 2025
The post came in response to Gomez's criticism of the raid. Gomez has described Central Valley farmworkers as essential laborers.
'How many MS-13 gang members are waking up at 3 a.m. to pick strawberries? O'yeah, zero!' Gomez wrote. 'Trump said he'd go after 'bad hombres,' but he's targeting the immigrant farm workers who feed America. Either he lied — or he can't tell the difference.'
In a video response posted on his Instagram account, Gomez showed an image of the White House post mocking him in the background, but did not respond directly to the image. He said the Trump administration had claimed the raid came in response to conerns that child laborers were being exploited. 'You know what, I don't believe they care about children, about child exploitation. Because if they did, you know what they have to do,' he said, pointing to text that said 'Release the Epstein List,' referring to the purported list of former clients of Jeffrey Epstein.
The posts followed another angry social media exchange over the Camarillo raid, in which Gov. Gavin Newsom excoriated the Libs of TikTok account as a 's— poster.'
The account had posted a widely circulated video purporting to show a protestor in Camarillo pointing a weapon at ICE officers, and questioned whether Newsom would condemn such an action.
'Of course I condemn any assault on law enforcement, you s— poster,' Newsom responded to the Libs of TikTok account. 'Now do Jan. 6.'
Federal agents descended on Glass House Farms in Camarillo on Thursday in the midmorning, and eventually attracted a large crowd of protesters and onlookers. The operation included members of the National Guard, according to the Los Angeles Times. President Donald Trump mobilized the California National Guard last month in order to quell protests over similar raids in Los Angeles.
The Camarillo raid was just the latest in a series of forceful actions by federal agencies intended to ensnare undocumented residents in Southern California.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Border czar Tom Homan's message to anti-ICE protesters: 'You want some? Come get some'
Trump administration border czar Tom Homan fired up the crowd at Turning Point USA's Student Action Summit Saturday night when a heckler asked Homan, "Are you an MS-13 member?" But the heckler's comments added fuel to Homan's fire as he delivered fiery closing remarks, saying, "Tom Homan is going to run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen. Take it to the bank." "U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A," the crowd chanted as Homan exited the stage. About five minutes into Homan's speech, he was interrupted by a heckler who was escorted out by security, lighting a fire for the rest of the speech. Homan had a message to the anti-ICE protesters across the United States, including to those who gathered outside the summit in Tampa, Florida, Saturday night. "You want some? Come get some," Homan said. "I'm tired of it. For the men and women of ICE, I deserve your respect. They're the finest 1% this country has. And Tom Homan isn't going anywhere. Tom Homan isn't shutting up." When the heckler asked Homan if he was an MS-13 member, referencing the Salvadoran transnational criminal gang that has been targeted through Trump's deportation rollout, Homan said federal immigration officers are dealing with these types of detractors on a daily basis. "This guy wouldn't know what it's like to serve this nation. This guy ain't got the b---- to be an ICE officer. He hasn't got the b---- to be a border patrol agent," Homan continued, as the crowd cheered him on. As the heckler was escorted out, Homan added, "This guy lives in his mother's basement. The only thing that surprised me is [he] doesn't have purple hair and a nose ring. Get out of here, you loser." While the crowd continued cheering Homan's fiery speech, he assured that those protesting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would not intimidate agents because "we're going to do the job that President Trump gave us to do." Homan said he has never seen "such hate against the men and women of ICE and in the Border Patrol," and those protesting don't have the courage to put on a badge and stand in their place. While Homan said he was disappointed he didn't see any protesters when he arrived at the summit, protesters had lined the streets outside Saturday afternoon, rejecting Trump's agenda and his crackdown on illegal immigration. The demonstrations on Saturday followed protests that deteriorated into riots in Los Angeles last month as rhetoric against ICE agents has reached a boiling point. Federal immigration law enforcement officers have been targeted since Trump signed his "big, beautiful bill," which includes legislation for robust immigration reform, into law last Friday. There have been at least two ambushes in Texas, and protesters clashed with federal officers at the Portland, Oregon, ICE center. The brazen border czar had made it clear his speech might contain some profanity Saturday night, telling the crowd at the top of his remarks, "Sometimes, I'm harsh. But if I offend anybody here tonight, I don't give a s---." Homan also applauded Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration, telling the crowd, "Under his leadership, we got the most secure border in the history of nation, and we did that in seven weeks. President Trump did in seven weeks what Joe Biden couldn't or wouldn't do in four years."
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
More On The Tips And Overtime Deductions In One Big Beautiful Bill
Earlier this week I noted a subtle difference in the limitations on the tips and overtime deductions included in the Big Beautiful Bill which can create either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. I was so taken by the apparent anomaly that I devoted a whole post to it. Now I am getting back to a fuller discussion. When President Trump first came out with "no tax on tips", I studied the proposals that were floating in Congress and had some concerns. Most notable was the harmful effect one of the proposals would have on Earned Income Tax Credit recipients. And then there was all sorts of commentary on how the provision might be gamed. What ultimately emerged addressed many of the issues. What we have in the final language about tips and overtime illustrates Reilly's Third Law of Tax Planning - "Any clever idea that pops into your head probably has (or will have) a corresponding rule that makes it not work". If you had an idea about how to game the "No tax on tips" of "No tax on overtime", let's see if Congress has already knocked it out even before any regulations have been issued. Deductions Subject To Limitations And Phase Outs First of all, the benefits are only about income tax, not Social Security and Medicare as the "no tax" monikers might imply. Further, the final bill puts limits and phaseouts in place. And the benefits are structured as deductions. It you want to know more about what that means, read the next paragraph, but feel free to skip it. It is worth looking at Form 1040 to understand where the deduction fits in. If you clicked on the link, you will see that your total income is on Line 9. Then on LIne 10, there are adjustments to income. There are a lot of those so they are totaled up on Part II of Schedule 1. Subtracting Line from Line 11 gives you your adjusted gross income (AGI). This is an important number because many thresholds and limitations are keyed to AGI including those of the tips and overtime deductions. Next on line 12 you get either your standard deduction or the total of certain itemized deductions from Schedule A. The tips and overtime will not be among them, so you don't need to be an itemizer. On Line 13 you will see the qualified business income deduction which will be added to the amount on line 12 to arrive at line 14 which is subtracted from AGI to arrive at taxable income. That's where the tips and overtime deductions will go along with the automobile interest deduction included in the bill. I don't know if they will add more lines to the form or give us another schedule. If it is another schedule I hope that they call it Schedule A PLUS. Do you remember all the talk about a postcard tax return in 2017? Still not happening. UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 14: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., holds up a postcard tax return ... More form during the press conference following the House Republican Conference meeting in the Capitol on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017. Ryan is flanked from left by House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)Both the tip deduction and the overtime deduction require that married taxpayers file joint returns to claim the deduction. There are dollar limitations. The limitation is $25,000 for the tip deduction and $12,500 for the overtime deduction on a single return and $25,000 for the overtime deduction on a joint return. The phaseout is the same - $100 for every $1,000 that modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 on a single return or $300,000 on a joint return. The modification to adjusted gross income is an add back of income excluded because it was earned while living abroad or in Puerto Rico on one of the U.S. possessions. I have to wonder if the $150,000 threshold is an echo of the proposal to totally eliminate income taxes on those earning less than $150,000. Qualified Tips Unlike earlier proposals, "qualified tips" are not just tips received by employees. The deduction also applies to tips received in the course of a trade or business. The thing that comes to mind there is food delivery people or Uber drivers who are considered independent contractors. I also recall that adult entertainers can be independent contractors. The deduction will be allowed only to the extent that the gross income from the business exceeds the allocable deductions. This could present some planning issue for how capital assets might be written off. The tip deduction will reduce the amount of income counted as qualified business income for that deduction. What exactly are the "tips" that are the subject of the deduction? First of all, they have to be received by an individual in an occupation which "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024". There is a call for a list to be created. Next the amount involved has to be paid voluntarily, without consequence in the event of nonpayment, not the subject of negotiation and determined by the payor. So that amount that large parties have to pay in a restaurant seems to not qualify. There are excluded fields of business- health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees. I have to wonder if the "performing arts" exclusion knocks out the adult entertainers. There is some litigation in the sales tax area that might help them. Overtime For the definition of "qualified overtime compensation" you really need to look at the bill's language and meditate for a while. Here it is "... the term 'qualified overtime compensation' means overtime compensation paid to an individual required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is in excess of the regular rate (as used in such section) at which such individual is employed". That language triggered some back and forth in the twitterverse, about whether they mean the total amount paid for overtime or just the premium. If you search for what the median hourly wage for Americans is, there are a variety of answers but they seem to be between $20 and $30 per hour, so let's use $25 for illustrative purposes. With that as the base hourly wage you get $1,000 per week for 40 hours, $52,000 per year. At time and half for overtime the $37.50 premium rate would max out the $12,500 limit at 6.5 hours a week. That is how I think of overtime and how I initially read, probably misread, the statute. The consensus seems to be that the deduction is only for the premium. Tom Gorczynski EA pointed out something from the White House website that supports that interpretation. I found that quite persuasive. Kelly Erb also writes that it is just the premium, which seals the deal for me. It still bugs me though. So if it is just the premium it takes 1,000 hours to max out the benefit if you are single in my example. Call it a 60 hours work week. If you are married and your spouse does not work overtime it would be 2,000 hours. At $50 per hour you will hit the maximum at 500 hours of overtime if you are single or 1,000 hours if you are married with a spouse that does not get overtime. Absent a lot else going on, you won't be having to deal with the phaseout. I won't comment on the equity or sense behind this particular deduction other than to remark that back when I used to work more than forty hours a week mostly without overtime pay, I found it a lot harder when I was doing that by working two jobs rather than longish hours on one job. So I am puzzled as to what makes an overtime premium worthy of special tax treatment. Gaming The Overtime Deduction I don't know much about the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the key to the deduction. It is clear however that whether people are exempt employees not subject to the overtime premium requirement can be debatable. Employers will generally prefer to not have that requirement. I don't think this deduction will change that, but I can't resist coming up with a way to game it. Here is the idea. I have a bunch of salaried employees and I want to help them out. So what I do is cut everybody's pay to below $684 per week so that I have to pay them time and a half over forty hours. Then I guarantee them overtime hours which will include overtime hours when they are "on-call". That will bring them up to whatever their previous salary was. And a third of that amount will be deductible. This is actually a terrible idea when it comes to actually executing it, but I felt I had to come up with something if I could. I haven't thought of a way to game the tips deduction, but I am sure they will be coming.
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies
Chadwick Lane Murray Issues a Scholarly, Soul-Shaking Clarion Call on Injustice-Rooted in History, Reaching Toward the Future With an eye on Orwell and a finger on the pulse of generational upheaval, Chadwick Lane Murray's A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies is not merely a book; it is a reckoning in print. Combining personal discovery with public inquiry, this genre-defiant work dissects war, racism, economic inequality, and planetary decline through the prism of history, sociology, and unapologetic moral urgency. Launched in 2025, A Vision of 1984 arrives at a time when public discourse has never been louder-nor truth more elusive. The echoes of the past are impossible to ignore; from soldiers' personal letters smuggled through trenches in Verdun to the dusty protest pamphlets of 1968's Paris uprisings, Murray excavates the forgotten margins of history to illuminate our present. The narrative threads converge into a singular message: systemic injustice isn't accidental; it's by design. 'The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.' – Steve Jobs A Book Anchored in Humanity-and Armed with Numbers Structured into four critical sections-Arbitrariness, Inequitable Distribution, Defective Correctives, and What Can Be Done-the book provides a rigorous framework for understanding how injustice operates across cultural, institutional, and economic lines. Murray doesn't simply ask what went wrong; he asks who made it so. Arbitrariness explores how imperialism, racism, and military conflict create environments where suffering becomes predictable; the author draws on personal family archives, including letters from the Battle of the Somme and Khe Sanh. Inequitable Distribution traces the legacy of wealth hoarding and monopolistic behavior; referencing post-war boom statistics, Murray cites that by 1982, the top 1% of Americans controlled 33% of national wealth-a number eerily similar to current figures. Defective Correctives critiques modern education, judicial, and political systems. As early as 1980, voter confidence in Congress had dropped below 30%; it has yet to meaningfully recover. What Can Be Done proposes moral advocacy over institutional neutrality; a radical thesis for a radical age. His prose is often poetic; his analysis, razor-sharp. There is a method behind the heartbreak. 'Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.' – Bill Gates The Ghost of Orwell Meets the Algorithm Age By resurrecting Orwell's prophetic spirit in the age of misinformation, A Vision of 1984 speaks not just to policy experts or historians, but to anyone questioning the trajectory of modern civilization. Murray juxtaposes the rigidity of bureaucracy with the chaos of human longing; he paints portraits of those ground down by economic gears too large to see. The book is both a historical synthesis and a sociological sermon. And there's data behind the drama. Murray pulls from the digital archives of post-war Britain; he examines U.S. labor participation trends since 1945; he even references the founding of Silicon Valley itself, noting that by 1984-the year Orwell imagined totalitarian surveillance-the seeds of the tech-industrial complex were already blooming in Palo Alto. In fact, by 1984, over 40% of the world's semiconductors were being produced in Santa Clara County; as Murray notes, 'Surveillance didn't come from the government; it came from an IPO.' It's this interweaving of ideology and infrastructure that makes the book both timeless and timely. The Rise of Humanistic Sociology-And the Moral Reckoning Ahead Inspired by the 'new sociology' and thinkers such as Morris Ginsberg, Murray refuses academic detachment. He considers objectivity overrated when facing systemic violence. Instead, he urges action; he views sociology not as a lens but as a lever. Readers will find themselves challenged-emotionally, intellectually, even ethically. 'This is not a bedtime story; this is a wake-up call,' said Ovais Riaz, who represents Murray. 'It challenges every reader-scholars, students, and citizens-to choose whether they want to be part of the solution or simply spectators to decline.' If Orwell gave us a dystopia to fear, Chadwick Lane Murray gives us one to recognize. Book Details Title A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies Author Chadwick Lane Murray Publication Date 2025 Format Paperback; eBook Genre Nonfiction; Sociology; Political Science; History Availability Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Independent Retailers About the Author Chadwick Lane Murray is an independent scholar, essayist, and human rights advocate. Raised between libraries and living rooms filled with war stories, his worldview was shaped not by ideology, but by testimony. He studied the intersections of history and sociology at the University of [Insert], and later worked in urban planning and policy research before devoting himself fully to writing. His passion for justice is more than theoretical; Murray has conducted oral history interviews with veterans of World War II, organized educational outreach in post-industrial cities, and contributed to policy whitepapers addressing economic inequality. His work is known for fusing raw human emotion with empirical rigor-making him a rare voice in a world of noise. Amazon Author Page Disclaimer This original article was independently researched and published by the author with the editorial team of the Evrima Chicago News Bureau. It has not appeared in any previously published form and is presented as a digital-first feature on the sociopolitical relevance of contemporary literary works. The piece is intended for educational, editorial, and syndication purposes across the World Wide Web, news distribution networks, and academic referencing channels. Endorsed by the Author The perspectives, interpretations, and contextual framing expressed herein are those of the Evrima Chicago editorial team and are officially endorsed by Chadwick Lane Murray, author of A Vision of 1984: Social Injustice and Its Enemies . Publication Standards This piece qualifies as an official web syndication under W3C-recognized digital content frameworks and follows metadata tagging standards for news archives, search engine discoverability, and citation integrity. It is timestamped and licensed for redistribution under academic fair use and professional editorial guidelines. No Liability for Moral Reckonings Evrima Chicago assumes no responsibility for existential crises, civic awakening, or spontaneous acts of justice that may result from reading A Vision of 1984 . Proceed with caution; moral clarity is not always reversible. Publisher Note Evrima Chicago is an independent research and media outlet producing editorial content spanning literature, political thought, accessibility (A11Y), digital futures, and journalistic integrity. We aim to create thought-leading narratives rooted in credibility, depth, and meaningful public discourse. PR & Media Contact General Inquiries / Interview: PR@ PR & Media Contact: waasay@ SOURCE: Visions: Social Injustice & it's Enemies. View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
