CPC Announces Semaglutide Significantly Improves Walking Distance, Symptoms and Quality of Life for People with PAD and Diabetes
Study underscores the direct vascular effects of this class of drugs, researchers say
AURORA, CO / ACCESS Newswire / March 29, 2025 / A novel study of a semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist used to treat type 2 diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease, semaglutide was found to significantly improve maximal walking distance in people with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) and type 2 diabetes, meeting the study's primary endpoint. The STRIDE Trial, presented at the American College of Cardiology's Annual Scientific Session (ACC.25), is the first to evaluate any GLP-1 agonist in PAD for this outcome. In addition to improvements in walking ability and function, people taking semaglutide also saw significant improvements in both symptoms and quality of life compared with those taking a placebo. People taking semaglutide also saw significant improvements in both symptoms and quality of life compared with those taking a placebo. Dr. Marc Bonaca, Executive Director of CPC presented the results and concluded, 'We have the first new treatment for PAD symptoms in 25 years.'
PAD affects an estimated 12 million U.S. adults and over 200 million people worldwide. PAD happens when there is a build-up of fat and cholesterol, most commonly in the arteries of the legs. It's often associated with difficulty walking and poor circulation that can lead to non-healing wounds and a high rate of limb loss. People with PAD are at very high risk for serious complications, including acute limb ischemia - similar to a heart attack or stroke of the leg - that can lead to limb amputation or death if not treated quickly.
'Even at very early stages of PAD, people can't walk well, but they often don't know it's PAD. They may say, 'I've just slowed down,' 'I'm getting older,' or 'I have arthritis,' but they're actually severely functionally impaired and they often will self-limit what they are doing,' said Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH, professor of medicine and director of vascular research at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, Colorado, and the study's lead author, adding that the last drug approved by the FDA for improving functional outcomes in PAD was cilostazol in 2000, so there is a huge unmet need.
'The only drug we have available is contraindicated in people with heart failure, has no benefits beyond improvement in symptoms, and causes a lot of side effects and, so overall it's used in less than 10% of people and so we really have limited options to improve function in PAD,' he said. 'The [issue] is that as PAD progresses, patients go on to get revascularization procedures to open arteries, and become at high risk for adverse cardiovascular and limb events.'
For this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, called STRIDE, 792 people with type 2 diabetes and early-stage symptomatic PAD were enrolled at 112 medical centers in 20 countries. Patients (67 years old on average, about 25% women, 67% white) were randomized to receive semaglutide (1 mg) or placebo for one year (52 weeks). Researchers assessed maximal walking distance - the maximum distance that patients were able to walk on a treadmill at 2 miles per hour at a 12% grade (similar to walking up a moderate hill). Function was assessed at baseline (median maximal walk distance was 186 meters), week 26, week 52 (primary endpoint), and week 57 (5 weeks after stopping treatment). The Colorado Prevention Center (CPC), affiliated with the University of Colorado School of Medicine, supported the treadmill endpoint through its core lab services.
'Despite the fact that people were recruited on the basis of reporting early-stage PAD observed that they were actually severely impaired and could only walk about one-tenth of a mile with symptom onset significantly earlier,' Bonaca said. 'We saw that the drug clearly worked. There was a clear early benefit at six months that continued to increase at one year.'
Overall, patients in the semaglutide arm had median and mean improvements in walking distance compared to placebo of 26 meters and 39.9 meters respectively, giving a statistically significant improvement in the ratio of change from baseline to week 52 of 1.13 (p=0.0004). 'To put that into context, we usually think an increase in walking distance of 10 to 20 meters is clinically important in PAD, so this exceeded those expectations,' he said.
The results were further supported by confirmatory secondary endpoints showing significant improvements in quality of life (as measured by the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 score), symptoms represented by pain-free walking distance, and sustained improvement in maximal walking distance 5 weeks after stopping therapy. Safety was shown to be similar to what was seen in earlier trials with semaglutide, with non-serious gastrointestinal side effects the most commonly reported side effects.
Patients' ankle brachial index, a measure of blood flow in the legs, was also significantly improved among those taking semaglutide compared with placebo. A post-hoc analysis looking at time to rescue treatment (the need for revascularization due to worsening symptoms) or death was also lower with semaglutide. Within one-year of treatment, patients taking semaglutide had a 54% reduction in their risk of dying or needing a medication or procedure to open blocked arteries in their legs due to worsening symptoms compared with those receiving a placebo (14 vs 30 patients).
'Taken together, the data support semaglutide for people with PAD and type 2 diabetes mellitus as a therapy that has cardiometabolic, cardiovascular and kidney benefits and improves function, symptoms, and quality of life.,' said Bonaca, 'There is more work to be done to understand the mechanism of benefit as the population had a median BMI of 28.6 and the relationship between the outcome and weight loss was very weak. This coupled with the increase in ABI really suggests a direct vascular effect. This also raises the question of whether patients with PAD and without type 2 diabetes mellitus could benefit and that should be investigated in future studies.'
The study was limited in that it was only in patients who also had diabetes. In addition, there were fewer U.S. patients because revascularization is so common and that patients who had these procedures were excluded. As a result, there was also less diversity and very few Black patients.
This study was funded by Novo Nordisk. It was simultaneously published online in The Lancet at the time of presentation.
Dr. Marc P. Bonaca can be reached by media at [email protected] or 303-860-9900.
Dr. Marc Bonaca will present the study, 'The Effect Of Once-weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide On Functional Capacity In People With Type 2 Diabetes And Peripheral Artery Disease: Primary Results From The Phase 3b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double Blind Stride Trial,' on March 29, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. CT in Chicago at the American College of Cardiology Meeting.
CPC Clinical Research, an ARO affiliated with the University of Colorado, is conducting the study in collaboration with Novo Nordisk.
2115 N. Scranton St., Suite 2040
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Same-Day Discharge Criteria Outlined for AF Ablation
SAN DIEGO — Same-day discharge after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an appropriate strategy for saving costs if performed with strict selection criteria and protocols, according to a recently issued joint statement from the American College of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society. Same-day discharge has long been indicated for catheter ablations to abort routine atrial flutter, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and focal atrial tachycardias, according to the authors of the new joint statement. Although they maintained patients selected for elective catheter ablation of AF require heightened scrutiny, they endorsed same-day AF ablation when used selectively. The statement evaluates 'evidence supporting shorter hospitalization stay with same-day discharge for intracardiac ablations agonistic to site of care,' reported Amit J. Shankar, MD , an electrophysiologist with Canton-Potsdam Hospital in Potsdam, New York, who served as a representative for the Heart Rhythm Society in developing the statement. Whether in a hospital setting or an outpatient facility, the statement describes same-day discharge ablation as an opportunity to improve patient access, improve efficiency, and reduce healthcare costs. The adoption of same-day discharge after AF ablation was accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, said Samuel O. Jones, MD, a cardiologist affiliated with The Chattanooga Heart Institute in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and a fellow of the American College of Cardiology. 'Improved workflows, technological innovations, and procedure advancements have also contributed to the high rates at which these are performed,' added Jones, who helped write the statement. The statement was released on April 24 to coincide with the first day of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2025 annual scientific meeting. It was simultaneously published in Heart Rhythm and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology . The scientific statement's recommendation is intended for elective rather than urgent or emergency ablations. Support for the statement was drawn from multiple case-controlled studies, meta-analyses, and outcome databases. In one example, a 12-study meta-analysis with data from more than 18,000 elective ablations showed no significant differences in major complications from the procedure among the 40.5% of patients discharged the same day relative to those who were discharged after at least one night in the hospital. In another study, drawn from a real-world prospective registry, outcomes were compared for potential candidates for same-day ablation on the basis of prespecified criteria and those who were not eligible for the procedure. These criteria included no bleeding history, a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%, no pulmonary disease, and no surgical procedures within the previous 60 days. Of the 2332 patients included in the analysis, 1982 (85%) were deemed candidates for same-day ablation. Although freedom for atrial arrhythmias was comparable ( P = .0212) for the two groups, patients discharged the same day had a lower rate of complications (0.8% vs 2.9%; P < .001). The rate of readmission was similar (0.8% vs 09%; P = .924), according to the researchers. Contraindications for Same-Day Ablation In the document, relative contraindications for same-day ablation include decompensated heart failure, significant pulmonary disease, significant risk of bleeding, and any major unstable comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, or renal disease. The document recommends limiting same-day procedures to patients who can have readily available social support and can return to a hospital quickly in the event of a post-procedural complication. Acknowledging that most large hospitals offering ablation for AF already have formal selection criteria and protocols in place for same-day discharge, the authors called for free-standing sites to establish their own if they have not done so. In these settings, the authors emphasized the need to rigorously follow prespecified and 'ironclad' selection criteria and protocols. From this standpoint, Shankar said same-day procedures should always be performed on the basis of shared decision-making with the patient. While the economic benefits of same-day procedures might be shared by the facility and the patient, the latter should understand the inherent differences in the settings and participate actively in any decision of where the ablation is performed. Jones said while a substantial body of evidence supports same-day AF ablation as a safe and effective procedure that can free up necessary resources in the healthcare facility, the potential advantages are relevant only to appropriately selected patients. The new statement also suggests transfer agreements with inpatient facilities should be arranged in advance and that patients should be informed such a transfer is a possibility outside of a hospital setting. However, the document makes clear same-day ablations in alternative sites of care are reasonable when the precautions are observed. In any setting that AF ablation is performed, the writing committee encouraged tracking outcomes to ensure that high-quality care is achieved and sustained. Shankar and Jones reported no potential conflicts of interest.


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Regeneron price target lowered to $650 from $700 at Citi
Citi analyst Geoff Meacham lowered the firm's price target on Regeneron (REGN) to $650 from $700 and keeps a Buy rating on the shares. The company reported mixed itepekimab Phase 3 COPD results in former smokers, the analyst tells investors in a research note. The firm says that wWhile Aerify-1 met its primary endpoint in both dosing arms, Aerify-2 failed to achieve statistical significance improvement at week 52. While Aerify-1 was positive, the path to approval is unclear, contends Citi. Confident Investing Starts Here:


Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Regeneron announces analyses from Phase 3 C-Post trial
Regeneron (REGN) Pharmaceuticals announced detailed analyses from the Phase 3 C-POST trial, which evaluated PD-1 inhibitor Libtayo in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, CSCC, after surgery. The results, shared during an oral session at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO, Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine, NEJM, include additional data for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival, DFS, and the first presentation of key secondary endpoint outcomes. With a median duration of follow-up of 24 months, efficacy results for Libtayo compared to placebo, were as follows: 68% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death, with median DFS not reached for Libtayo-treated patients; At two years, DFS was 87% with Libtayo versus 64% with placebo; 80% reduction in the risk of locoregional recurrence; 65% reduction in the risk of distant recurrence