logo
Renewable subsidies are poisoning the nation's electricity grid

Renewable subsidies are poisoning the nation's electricity grid

The Hill06-04-2025

The Inflation Reduction Act is deeply unpopular among conservative Republicans. Yet a solid bloc of 21 GOP members of Congress recently called for keeping the its lavish tax credits for renewable energy. In a letter to the House Ways and Means Committee, they warned that disrupting the tax credits would 'risk sparking an energy crisis in our country, resulting in drastically higher power bills for American families.'
There is just one problem with that claim. Our country is already facing an energy crisis and steadily rising power bills, precisely because of the Inflation Reduction Act's renewable subsidies. Those subsidies, and the renewable tax credits in particular, are poisoning the economics of the reliable power sources we actually need, namely coal, natural gas and nuclear.
In its latest reliability assessment, the North American Electrical Reliability Corporation warns that America is facing a widening gap between electrical generation capacity and soaring demand.
Coal-fired plants, which provide reliable baseload power, are rapidly retiring. Approximately 15 percent of current U.S. coal-fired generation capacity is expected to retire by 2030. Meanwhile, electricity demand is expected to rise at least that much by then due to the revolution in AI and the push to electrify everything. This equates to a shortfall of about 400 gigawatts — about 30 percent of projected demand.
In a properly functioning electricity market, investment in new baseload plants like natural gas and nuclear would be booming. Instead, investment in such plants has virtually disappeared. In 2024, new natural gas capacity barely offset nuclear retirements, while nearly 9 GW of coal plants retired.
Worse, reliable capacity is being replaced by renewable power that is mostly a dangerous mirage. The grid saw 13 GW of new solar additions, but solar plants are usually rated at around 24 percent of their nominal capacity and can't be counted on to produce even that when needed. In terms of what the North American Electrical Reliability Corporation calls 'projected available power,' the electricity grid is actually shrinking.
Why the paradox? By flooding the market with heavily subsidized renewable energy, the Inflation Reduction Act depresses prices during periods of peak renewable production, forcing baseload generators offline for several hours every day. As a result, they are unable to fully recoup their operating and capital costs, which drives up the prices they have to charge when their power is needed, or drives them out of business altogether.
Naturally, investors prefer the guaranteed profits of the Inflation Reduction Act. They are flooding the grid with far more renewable energy projects than grid operators can handle.
The consequences are apparent. The Midcontinent Independent System Operator, responsible for power across the Midwest, faces 'high risk of electricity shortfalls beginning in Summer 2025.' In terms of projected available power, resource additions are not keeping pace with retirements and rising demand, leaving those states vulnerable to severe blackouts and price spikes.
In Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and nearby states, winter has become the highest-risk period for blackouts — an unprecedented shift caused by excessive reliance on intermittent renewable power. Electricity rates in the area have already risen between 30 percent and 50 percent since 2021 and will likely rise another 30 percent or more in the next year, if last August's capacity auction is any guide.
Indeed, some Republicans seem to be falling for a new mirage — that heavily subsidized construction of new transmission lines will solve the problem. To be sure, the problem of intermittency is somewhat mitigated by aggregating the pool of available renewables across regions. But as Texas discovered in the deadly Winter Storm Uri, no matter how large the pool, intermittent renewables simply cannot be counted on when they are most needed. And they're no substitute for traditional power plants in providing reliable electricity.
Congressional subsidies create powerful special interests armed with all sorts of reasons why the country urgently needs Congress to keep giving them free money. Those arguments are almost always wrong, but in this case they are dangerously so.
The Inflation Reduction Act is paralyzing the nation's electricity grid at the worst possible time. Those 21 members of Congress should understand why before they take a vote they will live to regret. The Inflation Reduction Act needs to be repealed as soon as possible — starting with the renewable energy tax credits.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention
Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention

Judge sides with Trump DOJ to keep Mahmoud Khalil in detention Show Caption Hide Caption Supporters protest for Mahmoud Khalil's release from ICE detention Supporters demanded the release of Mahmoud Khalil while he attended a hearing at the LaSalle Immigration Court in Jena, Louisiana. A federal judge ruled the Trump administration could keep Mahmoud Khalil in custody under a secondary legal argument. On June 13, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz, of New Jersey, rejected the 30-year-old Palestinian Columbia University graduate's request to be released after three months in immigration detention. On June 11, Farbiarz initially ruled Khalil couldn't be detained by Secretary of State Marco Rubio's determination that he threatened American foreign policy interests. But Farbiarz left open other options for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hold Khalil. Ahead of a court-ordered deadline to respond on June 13, Justice Department lawyers argued Khalil could be held for misrepresenting information on his permanent residency application, under a federal immigration statute lawyers have presented to the court. "Khalil is now detained based on that other charge of removability," Justice Department lawyers wrote in a June 13 letter submitted to court. "Detaining Khalil based on that other ground of removal is lawful." They said Khalil now has options to seek his release with the charge pending. Farbiarz sided with that assessment and said the secondary charge hasn't been blocked by the court. He said, "a number of avenues are now available to" Khalil, "including a bail application to the immigration judge presiding over the immigration case." Khalil's lawyer, Amy Greer, said that the government was using 'cruel, transparent delay tactics' to keep him away from his wife and newborn son on their first Father's Day, on June 15. 'Instead of celebrating together, he is languishing in ICE detention as punishment for his advocacy on behalf of his fellow Palestinians,' Greer said in a statement. The Justice Department had no comment beyond the filings, an agency spokesperson said in an email. The government had until June 13 to appeal the judge's initial ruling. Justice Department lawyers pushed Khalil to follow the administrative actions instead of filing in federal court. "These administrative processes are the proper avenues for Khalil to seek release, not having a federal district court hold that the government cannot detain Khalil on a charge that the Court never found to be unlawful," the government lawyers said in the letter. In his original June 11 ruling, Farbiarz Khalil's request to temporarily block federal officials from deporting him under Rubio's determination. On June 13, he extended the government's time to respond to appeal his decision. Justice Department lawyers instead brought up the second argument. Khalil's legal team sent a letter to Farbiarz the morning of June 13, requesting that the client be freed since the appeal from the government did not meet the morning deadline. Khalil has been held in an immigration detention center in Louisiana since March. His lawyers have fought for his release to be with his wife and newborn son, Deen. However, a June 12 email sent to Khalil's lawyers by Brian Acuna, director of the New Orleans ICE Field Office, stated that he had "no information [that] your client will be released or a time for that," court records showed. His lawyers instead needed to contact ICE's Office of Chief Counsel on that matter, the email said. Immigration agents arrested Khalil, a green card holder married to an American citizen, on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment building in Manhattan. A Palestinian born in Syria, Khalil was a spokesman and negotiator for pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia. Khalil was not accused of any crime. Noncitizens can be deported if the Secretary of State finds that their presence threatens U.S. foreign policy interests, even if their beliefs, statements or associations are "otherwise lawful," the Trump administration argued. They cited a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 as the basis. Farbiarz ruled against the Secretary of State's determination and said the secondary argument — that he omitted information on his application to enter the country — "almost surely flows" from Rubio's determination. On June 13, Farbiarz said Khalil hadn't given factual evidence as to why it could be unlawful to detain him on the secondary charge.

Cassidy's Kennedy quagmire
Cassidy's Kennedy quagmire

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Cassidy's Kennedy quagmire

The Big Story The Trump administration assured Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) his support of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation would mean no attacks on vaccine confidence, yet recent actions suggest those promises meant more to one side than the other. © AP Cassidy, the chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, publicly wavered over Kennedy's confirmation, with the then-nominee's refusal to acknowledge the safety and efficacy of vaccines being a particular sticking point. By the end of Kennedy's second confirmation hearing, Cassidy acknowledged he was still 'struggling' with the nomination. He was won over by Trump administration officials, who promised the senator would have input on hiring decisions; that federal advisory boards would remain unscathed; existing vaccine safety systems would continue; and Kennedy would testify before the HELP panel quarterly. But Kennedy's tenure as Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary has already seen massive layoffs, controversial changes to the vaccine approval process and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices being cleared out and replaced with Kennedy's allies. Louisiana State University department chair and political science professor Robert Hogan suggested Kennedy's moves won't necessarily hurt Cassidy in a GOP primary. Cassidy is up for reelection next year. 'You would think that that would hurt him electorally, but … I think ultimately, what could have hurt him is if he had stuck with his professional standards and the standards of the medical community' and spoken out against Kennedy, Hogan said. The Louisiana senator hasn't spoken on Kennedy's actions that seemingly fly in the face of their agreement, only saying that he is continuing to talk with the Trump Cabinet secretary. Cassidy faces a tough road to reelection. He was among the GOP senators who voted to convict Trump of an impeachment article accusing him of inciting the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Former House member John Fleming (R) has launched a primary campaign against him. Hogan said Fleming is a formidable opponent. 'If it comes down to, they're equal on every other dimension except [Fleming] did not vote to impeach Trump? That's the message, I think that will come through very clear to Republican voters,' he said. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Joseph Choi and Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: CDC: Average age of US moms giving birth rises to nearly 30 The average age of first-time mothers in the U.S. has risen to almost 30, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). New data published in a National Vitals and Statistics Report on Friday shows the mean age of mothers at first birth increased by 0.9 years between 2016 and 2023, rising from 26.6 years to 27.5. Asian women reported the largest increase in mean age at first birth … Axelrod on RFK Jr.'s vaccine moves: 'Genuine catastrophe in the making' Democratic political strategist David Axelrod on Friday condemned changes Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made to a key vaccine advisory committee. Kennedy earlier this week fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with eight of his own picks, a significant downsizing for the independent, expert … FDA approves expanded use of Moderna's RSV shot, but uncertainty remains The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the approval of Moderna's RSV vaccine late Thursday to include people 18 to 59 years old who are at increased risk for severe illness from respiratory syncytial virus, the company said. The vaccine was previously only licensed for adults 60 years and older. 'RSV poses a serious health risk to adults with certain chronic conditions, and today's approval marks an important … In Other News Branch out with a different read: Prediabetes interventions at forefront of treatment: What to know The conversation around prediabetes has entered a new day for Americans. Earlier this week, the American College of Lifestyle Medicine published the first clinical practice guideline to prioritize lifestyle interventions in treating Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. The guideline offers a comprehensive roadmap for clinicians to effectively incorporate therapeutic lifestyle behavior interventions as a mainstay of treatment, while … Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care: What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Most read stories on The Hill right now: Republicans lay groundwork for 'total tax cliff' at end of Trump's term Congressional Republicans are laying the groundwork for a tax cliff at the end of President Trump's term in office. While the conference is pushing … Read more Newsom becomes a fighter, and Democrats beyond California are cheering California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is meeting the moment, Democrats say. Amid the growing storm over the Trump administration's response to protests … Read more What People Think Opinions related to health submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

Trump embraces Israeli strike after arguing against it
Trump embraces Israeli strike after arguing against it

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump embraces Israeli strike after arguing against it

President Donald Trump spent the bulk of this week saying he hoped Israel wouldn't strike Iran. But by Friday, he was all in. The president had hoped for more time to negotiate with Tehran over its nuclear program, but once Israel launched the massive attack, Trump embraced the new dynamic, using it as leverage to try to seal the deal he wanted all along. 'He didn't want them to go now,' a senior administration official said about Israel. 'He understands they're a sovereign nation, and he will support them because they're our ally,' added the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive situation, 'but he wanted more time.' The administration's shift in tone in the first 24 hours after the attack underscores the balancing act the president is engaged in as he tries to assuage various factions in the administration while still maintaining pressure on Iran. The messaging served to assure Israel that the United States had its back, nod to the hawkish faction of the Trump coalition and try to calm the jittery MAGA isolationists who have long been wary of Middle East entanglements. The constant, however, was Trump's desire to bring Iran back to the table even as the Islamic Republic vowed retribution. 'There is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump posted on Truth Social, his first public remarks after the Israeli attack. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left.' Trump's offer to Iran doubled as a 'direct push to Israel' to tap the brakes, the senior administration official said. But by Friday afternoon, with Iran firing dozens/hundreds of rockets toward Israel, the administration left little doubt that it was ready to support Israel's defense, a marked shift from the relatively neutral statement Secretary of State Marco Rubio released immediately after Israel's attack. 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' Rubio said Thursday night in a statement. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense.' But by Friday morning, Trump was calling reporters and making it clear that he knew about Israel's plans in advance, describing it as a 'very successful attack' in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. The initial administration messaging was, 'we yellow-lighted it,' said Curt Mills, executive director of The American Conservative magazine. 'Today they said we greenlit it. Or they moved toward a light green.' The senior Trump administration official insisted that while Washington had been informed of Israel's plans ahead of time, the United States had no role in helping plan the attack. 'We did not help plan and they didn't give us every detail,' said the person, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive conversations within the administration. 'We purposely did not want to know the details,' they said, adding that the United States had the chance to participate in the action against Iran, but opted not to join. Though Trump might have preferred more time to negotiate, he appeared frustrated that talks had stalled, signaling early this week that time for Iran was running out. 'They are good negotiators, but they're tough,' he said Monday at the White House. 'Sometimes they can be too tough, that's the problem. So we're trying to make a deal so that there's no destruction and death. We told them that. I have told them that. I hope that is the way it works out. It might not work out.' The 'too tough' negotiations came as an influential group of hawkish conservatives lobbied Trump furiously to bless the Israeli government's efforts to destroy Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's attack further exposed a rift inside Trumpworld between those hawks, who see Iran as an existential threat to Israel, and the isolationists wary of Middle East entanglements informed by the long and costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "A lot of people in the MAGA movement, and ones that have really invested a lot in electing Trump and [Vice President JD] Vance will be incredibly disappointed if this turns into a larger war and it will lead to some fractures," said a former Pentagon official granted anonymity to speak about the internal dynamics of the president's foreign policy team.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store