uMkhonto weSizwe party's politics of convenience
When the Western Cape High Court in Cape Town ruled that it makes no sense for an impeached judge to sit on a body that selects judges, it struck a blow for the good guy in South Africa.
For far too long a situation has been allowed to develop where the three arms of state, the judiciary, the executive and the legislature, are constantly being put at odds with each other, not for the positive development of the country, but for selfish short-term interests of corrupt individuals and their political parties.
But this time, the judiciary said no, common sense must prevail. John Hlophe, who was impeached as a judge, cannot take part in the process of selecting judges.
Former president Jacob Zuma's party uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has vowed to appeal the judgment on principle and not simply to have Hlophe reinstated to the Judicial Service Commission.
It is not because it benefits the country that they want this to happen, but simply that it benefits the MK to have a decision of the legislature overturned by the courts.
This way, the MK, although just the thirdbiggest party in parliament, can get to 'govern through the courts', something parties of the left have always accused opposition parties to the right of the political divide, like the DA, of doing.
It is ironic that the MK has put itself forward as a party that fights for issues on principle when its own internal operations are nowhere close to being based on a set of established principles that can be identified by all and sundry, especially its own members.
Its recently fired secretary-general (SG), Floyd Shivambu, found out in the most painful way that where there are no defined principles, anybody can be a victim.
He was fired as SG for what he thought was acceptable within the party: identifying with a disgraced fugitive. He saw nothing wrong with that but was fired for it.
ALSO READ: Court finds impeached judge John Hlophe unfit to serve on JSC
Truth be told though it was not for meeting pastor Shepherd Bushiri that he was fired. The MK has shown a lot of brazenness when it comes to dealing with corruption-tainted prominent individuals that it has become their political home.
In the bigger scheme of things, by their own standards, a meeting with Bushiri wouldn't move their moral needle. It was simply that Shivambu had served his purpose in the party.
He was parachuted in to demonstrate that the party was not a Zuma one-man-show, an ethnically defined entity based in one province, but that it had appeal to all South Africans.
Sadly, the learned Shivambu fell for the ruse and centred himself in a party where he was always an unwanted outsider from day one.
Shivambu probably believed that he could mould the MK into the revolutionary force that he always publicly pronounced it to be but, from the beginning, he had to contend with defending unprincipled decisions, such as wanting parliament to accept that an impeached judge was a fit and proper person.
In other words, honesty and good moral judgment could be sacrificed at the convenience of the party.
That judgment by the court goes to the heart of what is wrong with this country and its politics: an organisation that does not embrace democracy in its own internal operations wants to control the outcomes of a democratically elected legislature and have them overturned.
The lesson for Shivambu and the MK is that good, morally-based judgments might appear expendable in achieving short-term goals, but history leans towards what is right for society.
NOW READ: MK party removes Floyd Shivambu as SG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Police fire rubber bullets at Germiston residents in housing stand-off
EKURHULENI - Police fired rubber bullets at residents who tried to block the eviction of scores of houses in Germiston on Tuesday by throwing stones and torching a municipal building, officials said. After police gained access to the housing complex in Ekurhuleni, a squad of men moved in and hauled furniture and personal belongings out of the homes. Shocked residents accused the government of failing them amid South Africa's housing crisis, saying they believed the homes were part of a scheme to provide houses for black South Africans disadvantaged by the previous racist apartheid system. Two people were arrested for setting alight the nearby offices of the municipal home affairs department, police said, adding they were acting on a June court order to evict people from the complex, which was reportedly home to 450 families. "Unfortunately, the people got wind of the eviction and closed the road. Innocent people and the police were thrown with stones and we had to retaliate to ensure that we dispersed them," Major General Fred Kekana, the deputy provincial police commissioner, told AFP. "Somebody allegedly threw a petrol bomb at the Department of Home Affairs. Two arrests have been made so far," he said. Some residents insisted they had not been issued an eviction order and had been paying rent for years. "Our government is failing us. They are chasing us yet we have titles for these houses," 37-year-old resident Akhona Mbadi, a mother of four children, told AFP. After taking power following the end of white minority rule in 1994, the African National Congress-led government adopted a Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) to provide subsidised housing and other services to black South Africans disadvantaged by apartheid. By 2017 nearly 14 percent of South African households lived in RDP or government-subsidised homes, according to government figures. However, homelessness has risen dramatically from 13,000 in 1996 to more than 55,700 in 2022, according to government statistics.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Old Mutual takes B20 to the people
At a time when the voices of ordinary citizens matter the most, Old Mutual is championing inclusive dialogue through its Add Your Voice campaign, an initiative designed to bridge the gap between global policy discussions and everyday South Africans. Central to this effort is the People's Podium, a platform that invites citizens from diverse backgrounds to share their perspectives on critical economic and social issues, ensuring their voices are heard in shaping a more equitable future. Borne out of a desire to encourage active citizenship during South Africa's G20 Presidency, the Add Your Voice campaign endeavours to promote inclusive dialogue, leading to inclusive growth. 'Guided by B20 South Africa's theme of inclusive growth and prosperity through global cooperation, we want to host and participate in discussions that address some of the world's leading economic challenges. The result is policy recommendations that are not only actionable but reflect the values of collaboration and inclusivity,' said Celiwe Ross, Director for Group Strategy, Sustainability, People and Public Affairs at Old Mutual Limited. The multi-channel, digitally led campaign coincides with and builds on Old Mutual's partnership with the B20 Summit. As part of the partnership, several members of the Old Mutual team will help guide discussions across four of the eight B20 task forces, ensuring that the talks feature localised input and perspectives. Envisioned as an open space that invites and champions the input of every South African, Add Your Voice gives people the chance to engage with B20 via popular social media platforms, supported by other channels to amplify as many voices as possible. People can share their experiences, both social and economic, their views on national policy and objectives, and their overall thoughts on how the country and leaders can best achieve them. At the heart of Old Mutual's Add Your Voice campaign is The People's Podium, which South Africans can engage with through relevant channels. The podium enables citizens to share their personal aspirations and definitions of progress, thoughts on how to combat the nation's systemic challenges, and visualise their economic future. 'The People's Podium is an explicit response to the need to bridge the gap between people and policy, eliminating the disconnect that many South Africans feel towards policy decision-making. Big, meaningful conversations are never and should never be limited to boardrooms or the corridors of power. We have an opportunity to hear directly from South Africans on what matters most to them,' Ross explained. The campaign will also feature a wide range of content that aims to amplify voices, educate audiences, simplify complex information, offer expert insights and position Old Mutual as an information bridge between ordinary South Africans and the B20 proceedings. 'Policy is not always discussed and shared in an accessible way, using terms and overarching ideas that do not connect or even resonate with people's lived realities. By demystifying economic policy and gathering citizen input, we're not just facilitating public engagement, but empowering people to have a say in how we put South Africa on the right path to transformation,' Ross explained. Add Your Voice is a rallying call for South Africans to rise up and be heard. Old Mutual encourages everyone to be on the lookout for campaign material and activations and get ready to share their ideas, thoughts and aspirations as we forge our future together.
