Meta is turning to AI models from rivals like Anthropic to help its engineers code better
Meta has rolled out a new internal AI assistant for coding that is powered by multiple AI models, including those from rivals like Anthropic's Claude.
The tool, called Devmate, became available to employees in March and is increasingly being used for more complex coding tasks that another internal AI assistant called Metamate often struggles with, two employees, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution from Meta, told Business Insider.
The addition of Claude and other models shows that despite investing tens of billions of dollars into building its own AI models, Meta remains willing to use competitor models when they perform better.
"Like many companies, we're experimenting with various models to help with coding efficiency," a Meta spokesperson told Business Insider. "We'll continue to refine and gather feedback as we go."
Software companies, including giants like Microsoft and Google, increasingly use AI to write code. Demand for coding assistants like Cursor and Replit, many of which rely on Claude for its ability to handle complex, multi-step reasoning better than alternatives, has soared.
Demand is growing not just from companies but from their employees. Amazon, for instance, recently rolled out Cursor internally after several employees inquired about using the coding assistant, BI reported earlier. Thanks to this boom, Anthropic has reportedly crossed $3 billion in annualized revenue.
Anthropic didn't respond to a request for comment from BI.
Employees say Devmate has increased productivity
Devmate doesn't just help write code. It can also analyze failed tests, determine what went wrong, and automatically submit fixes for human review — capabilities that engineers have long viewed as futuristic.
One current Meta employee said Devmate has cut their workload in half.
"Devmate turns a 30-minute task into a 15-minute one," this employee said. "It's better than Metamate because it makes fewer mistakes when you chain multiple steps together, which is crucial for more advanced tasks."
Internally, Devmate is considered an agentic assistant, meaning it can handle multi-step tasks and take actions on its own. This is more akin to tools like the buzzy coding app Cursor or Windsurf, another coding app recently acquired by OpenAI.
"Code Llama sucks," another employee said, referring to Meta's own coding model, which is one of the options available within Metamate. "It's a good coding model by 2024 standards, but it's not good compared to the options we have in 2025."
The employee said that they now use Metamate for simpler tasks like pulling up specific sets of data, while relying on Devmate for bigger, more complex tasks like building entire programs that move and process large amounts of data. Metamate does not support video or images and lacks agentic features.
The Meta spokesperson confirmed that Devmate was used for more complex coding tasks.
Meta rolled out Metamate last year, the Financial Times reported. In addition to coding, employees can use it for conducting research and drafting internal and external communications. At the time, Meta executives said that the company wanted to create "the world's best enterprise assistant."
The Meta spokesperson said that the company wants Metamate to be helpful for all employees, including those who aren't technical.
Meta's AI shortcomings
One former Meta engineer told BI that while Meta's Llama model has made strides in areas like multilingual tasks and reducing hallucinations (AI's tendency to make up things), it is still behind in some capabilities needed for writing the best code.
"When it comes to instruction-following and multi-step reasoning, which you need for any real coding agent, it's not there yet," the former Meta engineer said.
These shortcomings have added urgency to Meta's broader AI strategy. CEO Mark Zuckerberg is meeting with top AI researchers at his homes in Palo Alto and Lake Tahoe to recruit for a new "superintelligence" team, Bloomberg reported.
Meta is also reportedly finalizing a $15 billion deal to acquire nearly half of Scale AI, a data-labeling and annotation startup. As part of that deal, Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang is expected to join Meta and lead the new team.
Zuckerberg has predicted that AI will write half of Meta's code within a year.
"Our bet is that in the next year, probably, maybe half the development is going to be done by AI as opposed to people," he recently said.
For now, though, that AI comes from competitors.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
New York state lawmakers passed a bill on Thursday that aims to prevent frontier AI models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic from contributing to disaster scenarios, including the death or injury of more than 100 people, or more than $1 billion in damages. The passage of the RAISE Act represents a win for the AI safety movement, which has lost ground in recent years as Silicon Valley and the Trump Administration have prioritized speed and innovation. Safety advocates including Nobel prize laureate Geoffrey Hinton and AI research pioneer Yoshua Bengio have championed the RAISE Act. Should it become law, the bill would establish America's first set of legally mandated transparency standards for frontier AI labs. The RAISE Act has some of the same provisions and goals as California's controversial AI safety bill, SB 1047, which was ultimately vetoed. However, the co-sponsor of the bill, New York state Senator Andrew Gounardes told TechCrunch in an interview that he deliberately designed the RAISE Act such that it doesn't chill innovation among startups or academic researchers — a common criticism of SB 1047. 'The window to put in place guardrails is rapidly shrinking given how fast this technology is evolving,' said Senator Gounardes. 'The people that know [AI] the best say that these risks are incredibly likely […] That's alarming.' The RAISE Act is now headed for New York Governor Kathy Hochul's desk, where could either sign the bill into law, send it back for amendments, or veto it altogether. If signed into law, New York's AI safety bill would require the world's largest AI labs to publish thorough safety and security reports on their frontier AI models. The bill also requires AI labs to report safety incidents, such as concerning AI model behavior or bad actors stealing an AI model, should they happen. If tech companies fail to live up to these standards, the RAISE Act empowers New York's Attorney General to bring civil penalties of up to $30 million. The RAISE Act aims to narrowly regulate the world's largest companies — whether they're based in California (like OpenAI and Google) or China (like DeepSeek and Alibaba). The bill's transparency requirements apply to companies whose AI models were trained using more than $100 million in computing resources (seemingly, more than any AI model available today), and are being made available to New York residents. While similar to SB 1047 in some ways, the RAISE Act was designed to address criticisms of previous AI safety bills, according to Nathan Calvin, the Vice President of State Affairs and General Counsel at Encode, who worked on this bill and SB 1047. Notably, the RAISE Act does not require AI model developers to include a 'kill switch' on their models, nor does it hold companies that post-train frontier AI models accountable for critical harms. Nevertheless, Silicon Valley has pushed back significantly on New York's AI safety bill, New York state Assemblymember and co-sponsor of the RAISE Act Alex Bores told TechCrunch. Bores called the industry resistance unsurprising, but claimed that the RAISE Act would not limit innovation of tech companies in any way. 'The NY RAISE Act is yet another stupid, stupid state level AI bill that will only hurt the US at a time when our adversaries are racing ahead,' said Andreessen Horowitz general partner Anjney Midha in a Friday post on X. Andreessen Horowitz, alongside the startup incubator Y Combinator, were some of the fiercest opponents to SB 1047. Anthropic, the safety-focused AI lab that called for federal transparency standards for AI companies earlier this month, has not reached an official stance on the bill, co-founder Jack Clark said in a Friday post on X. However, Clark expressed some grievances over how broad the RAISE Act is, noting that it could present a risk to 'smaller companies.' When asked about Anthropic's criticism, state Senator Gounardes told TechCrunch he thought it 'misses the mark,' noting that he designed the bill not to apply to small companies. OpenAI, Google, and Meta did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Another common criticism of the RAISE Act is that AI model developers simply wouldn't offer their most advanced AI models in the state of New York. That was a similar criticism brought against SB 1047, and it's largely what's played out in Europe thanks to the continent's tough regulations on technology. Assemblymember Bores told TechCrunch that the regulatory burden of the RAISE Act is relatively light, and therefore, shouldn't require tech companies to stop operating their products in New York. Given the fact that New York has the third largest GDP in the U.S., pulling out of the state is not something most companies would take lightly. 'I don't want to underestimate the political pettiness that might happen, but I am very confident that there is no economic reasons for them to not make their models available in New York,' said Assemblymember Borres. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Meta's $14.8 billion Scale AI deal latest test of AI partnerships
By Jody Godoy (Reuters) -Facebook owner Meta's $14.8 billion investment in Scale AI and hiring of the data-labeling startup's CEO will test how the Trump administration views so-called acquihire deals, which some have criticized as an attempt to evade regulatory scrutiny. The deal, announced on Thursday, was Meta's second-largest investment to date. It gives the owner of Facebook a 49% nonvoting stake in Scale AI, which uses gig workers to manually label data and includes among its customers Meta competitors Microsoft and ChatGPT creator OpenAI. Unlike an acquisition or a transaction that would give Meta a controlling stake, the deal does not require a review by U.S. antitrust regulators. However, they could probe the deal if they believe it was structured to avoid those requirements or harm competition. The deal appeared to be structured to avoid potential pitfalls, such as cutting off competitors' access to Scale's services or giving Meta an inside view into rivals' operations - though Reuters exclusively reported on Friday that Alphabet's Google has decided to sever ties with Scale in light of Meta's stake, and other customers are looking at taking a step back. In a statement, a Scale AI spokesperson said its business, which spans work with major companies and governments, remains strong, as it is committed to protecting customer data. The company declined to comment on specifics with Google. Alexandr Wang, Scale's 28-year-old CEO who is coming to Meta as part of the deal, will remain on Scale's board but will have appropriate restrictions placed around his access to information, two sources familiar with the move confirmed. Large tech companies likely perceive the regulatory environment for AI partnerships as easier to navigate under President Donald Trump than under former President Joe Biden, said William Kovacic, director of the competition law center at George Washington University. Trump's antitrust enforcers have said they do not want to regulate how AI develops, but have also displayed a suspicion of large tech platforms, he added. "That would lead me to think they will keep looking carefully at what the firms do. It does not necessarily dictate that they will intervene in a way that would discourage the relationships," Kovacic said. Federal Trade Commission probes into past "aquihire" deals appear to be at a standstill. Under the Biden administration, the FTC opened inquiries into Amazon's deal to hire top executives and researchers from AI startup Adept, and Microsoft's $650 million deal with Inflection AI. The latter allowed Microsoft to use Inflection's models and hire most of the startup's staff, including its co-founders. Amazon's deal closed without further action from the regulator, a source familiar with the matter confirmed. And, more than a year after its initial inquiry, the FTC has so far taken no enforcement action against Microsoft over Inflection, though a larger probe over practices at the software giant is ongoing. A spokesperson for the FTC declined to comment on Friday. David Olson, a professor who teaches antitrust law at Boston College Law School, said it was smart of Meta to take a minority nonvoting stake. "I think that does give them a lot of protection if someone comes after them," he said, adding that it was still possible that the FTC would want to review the agreement. The Meta deal has its skeptics. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts who is probing AI partnerships involving Microsoft and Google, said Meta's investment should be scrutinized. 'Meta can call this deal whatever it wants - but if it violates federal law because it unlawfully squashes competition or makes it easier for Meta to illegally dominate, antitrust enforcers should investigate and block it," she said in a statement on Friday. While Meta faces its own monopoly lawsuit by the FTC, it remains to be seen whether the agency will have any questions about its Scale investment. The U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust division, led by former JD Vance adviser Gail Slater, recently started looking into whether Google's partnership with chatbot creator was designed to evade antitrust review, Bloomberg News reported. The DOJ is separately seeking to make Google give it advance notice of new AI investments as part of a proposal to curb the company's dominance in online search. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New details emerge on Meta's $14.3B deal for Scale
Meta's deal to partially acquire the AI startup Scale, giving it 49% ownership, is certainly unusual. What Scale officially announced is that the deal values the company at over $29 billion and that it will 'distribute' proceeds to shareholders and vested equity holders (aka employees) granting them with 'substantial liquidity' while allowing them to continue as shareholders. Meta is also hiring Scale's famed founder CEO Alexandr Wang, who famously dropped out of MIT at age 19 to build the company, which offers AI training data verified by humans. This might have sounded like Meta could buy shares from existing shareholders, but that's not the case, sources told Bloomberg. Investors are getting dividends. For instance Accel, which backed the company early, should get a payout of $2.5 billion, Bloomberg reports. (We've asked Accel for comment.) Scale has dozens of backers, including Amazon and Meta, and was last valued at $14 billion after raising a $1 billion Series F a year ago. So a payout of this magnitude is almost like buying the company. We'll have to wait and see if regulators agree. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data