logo
‘The tide is shifting': Massive Australian protest over Gaza crisis seen as a sign of growing global alarm

‘The tide is shifting': Massive Australian protest over Gaza crisis seen as a sign of growing global alarm

CNN3 days ago
When Australia wants to put on a show, it turns to the sweeping expanse of Sydney Harbour, home to the Opera House and the iconic bridge that connects the city with its northern suburbs.
So, when organizers of usually small pro-Palestinian protests held every two weeks since Israel's 2023 invasion of Gaza detected a shift in community attitudes towards the grinding conflict – at home and abroad – they chose the bridge to make a global statement.
'We thought that the kind of bold and somewhat audacious idea that we were going to march over Sydney Harbour Bridge would capture the imaginations of everyone out there who was horrified by what we were seeing,' said protest organizer Josh Lees, from the Palestinian Action Group.
The group had been emboldened by artists making pro-Palestinian statements at Glastonbury and the victory of Democratic New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who received backing from some of the city's Jewish population despite his criticism of Israel.
'We felt it here in Australia, too,' said Lee, adding that the 'real uptick in horror and anger' had translated into pledges of support from church groups, unions and members of parliament representing 'a much broader section of society' than had previously engaged in the group's protests.
Last Sunday, at least 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge clutching umbrellas, signs and flags, lashed by cold winds and heavy rain, according to police estimates. Organizers put the figure at closer to 300,000. That so many people braved the elements for the hastily organized event – conceived just seven days before – suggests that Australians want their government to act, Lees said.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Tuesday she wasn't surprised about the scale of the turnout.
'I think the distress of Australians on what we are seeing unfolding in Gaza, the catastrophic humanitarian situation, the deaths of women and children, the withholding of aid, I anticipated that we would see marches of this scale,' she told ABC Radio National.
'They do reflect the broad Australian community's horror at what is going on in the Middle East, and the desire for peace and a ceasefire, which is what the government is seeking.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Labor government is under increasing pressure to join other US allies, the United Kingdom, France and Canada, in pledging formal recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September.
Albanese and senior ministers have in recent weeks laid the groundwork for a public announcement saying it's a matter of 'when, not if.'
Wong said Tuesday talks are being held with the international community ahead of the UNGA, as she underscored the urgency of the situation.
'There is a risk there will be no Palestine left to recognize if the international community don't move to create that pathway to a two-state solution,' she said.
The US now stands increasingly alone from many of its closest Western allies on the issue of recognizing a Palestinian state and has condemned the moves by the UK, France and Canada. Recognition by Australia would add to that isolation.
Calling for recognition of Palestinian statehood wasn't on the list of four demands submitted by the Palestinian Action Group before Sunday's march.
'What we marched for on Sunday, and what we've been protesting for two years, is not recognition of a non-existent Palestinian state that Israel is in the process of wiping out,' said Lees. 'What we are demanding is that the Australian government sanction Israel and stop the two-way arms trade with Israel.' The group also called for aid to be allowed into Gaza, an immediate ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal.
The Australian government says it hasn't supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel during the latest Gaza war or for at least the past five years. However, Australian businesses are part of a supply chain that provides parts for F-35s, the type of fighter jet that Israel uses to bomb Gaza.
'Australian industry contributes components and parts, but the Australian Government does not have a direct bilateral arrangement with the Government of Israel in relation to the F-35 program,' a defense ministry spokesperson said. The F-35 supply chain is centrally coordinated by Lockheed Martin and the US government, the spokesperson added.
'Once they go to the United States, Australia has no control over them,' said Ian Parmeter, Research Scholar and Middle East Expert at the ANU Centre of Arab and Islamic Studies in Canberra. 'The Australian government could refuse export permits for these components, but the contribution we make to the manufacture of F-35s would almost certainly be picked up elsewhere without any trouble.'
To date, Australia has sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, in a joint move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom in June. It previously sanctioned individuals over their involvement in settler violence in the West Bank.
But whatever Australia does in response is likely nowhere near enough to pressure Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu to end the conflict, which his security cabinet agreed to extend Thursday with the occupation of Gaza City.
'Frankly, the one person who has leverage over Netanyahu is (US President Donald) Trump,' said Kenneth Roth, former Human Rights Watch executive director and visiting professor at Princeton University's School of Public and International Affairs. 'He alone could condition the arms sales and military aid on an end to the mass atrocity being committed in Gaza,' Roth told public broadcaster ABC Tuesday.
Parmeter said Trump is prepared to disagree with Netanyahu, but 'whether he's prepared to rein in Netanyahu and make him stop the war in Gaza, to go to a ceasefire, and to essentially allow as much aid to flow as is needed, is very hard to say.'
They may be thousands of miles away but the conflict in Gaza has been deeply felt by members of Australia's Muslim and Jewish communities.
Reports of both antisemitism and Islamophobia have surged in Australia since October 2023, according to the offices of two separate envoys appointed to address the issue.
Last month, antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal presented a sweeping plan to combat what she said was a 'wave of hate.' It included education campaigns, police and immigration reforms, and penalties for public institutions, particularly universities, who fail to act
At the time, the government said it would consider the recommendations, as critics pointed to their potential threat to free speech in a country that values freedom of expression.
The size of Sunday's march was considered by some a victory over attempts to silence criticism of Israel. Days before the event, New South Wales Police tried to block the march in the Supreme Court on the grounds of public safety, after similar objections from state authorities.
The bid failed when a judge ruled that, on balance, the prosocial nature of the event and experience of the organizers meant that banning it would not make it any safer, as thousands would still likely turn up.
Police warnings of a crowd crush didn't eventuate, though there were so many people on the bridge that at one stage officers issued text messages and orders from loudspeakers on helicopters telling protestors to stop and walk back towards the city.
Perceptions of the event ranged from a soul-restoring display of public compassion to a misguided attempt to wade into a complex debate with a cast of Hamas sympathizers.
'Obviously, we don't politically support Hamas,' said Lees, of the Palestinian Action Group.
Australian media reflected the opposing views in vastly different front-page treatments. Alongside an image of a woman in a headscarf, The West Australian's headline read: 'Bloody chaos: Baby dolls smeared in fake blood and Aussie flag burned as wild protests become our norm.'
The same day, the Sydney Morning Herald, owned by a rival media group, ran an image of crowds on the bridge with the headline, 'Sydney says 'enough'.''
The march was noticed from Israel where Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar urged Australians to 'wake up!'
'The distorted alliance between the radical Left and fundamentalist Islam is sadly dragging the West toward the sidelines of history,' he wrote on X with an image of a protester holding a photo of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In a statement, the Australian Iranian Community Alliance also pointed to the photo and other imagery at the march and asked whether participants were 'truly part of a movement seeking peace, or inadvertently amplifying forces opposed to it?'
Co-CEO of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim noted in a letter to The Australian newspaper that none of the protesters called for the release of Israeli hostages.
The day before the march, images of two emaciated Israeli hostages were released by the group, including video of one who said he was digging his own grave.
'If people want to see Israeli hostages return, then they should also be fighting to end this genocide and for Israel to get out of Gaza,' said Lees.
After the march, the Australian government committed an extra 20 million Australian dollars ($13 million) in aid to Gaza, taking the total to 130 million Australian dollars ($84 million) since October 2023, but it stopped short of granting any of the other demands.
Hoping to build on the momentum, Lees says the group's planning a nationwide event on August 24.
'I think we have, by holding this like immense demonstration on Sunday, helped to inspire people around the world to see that the tide is shifting, that masses of people now have seen through all of the kind of pro-Israel lies and propaganda that we've been bombarded with for so long, and are prepared and willing to stand up in bigger numbers than ever before to try to stop this genocide.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Billionaire Democratic Gov. Pritzker defends his wealth as party rails against the rich
Billionaire Democratic Gov. Pritzker defends his wealth as party rails against the rich

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Billionaire Democratic Gov. Pritzker defends his wealth as party rails against the rich

Gov. JB Pritzker, D-Ill., was pressed by NBC's Kristen Welker on his billionaire status as other members of the Democratic Party, including New York City mayor candidate Zohran Mamdani, continue to rail against billionaires. "Some in your party are openly questioning whether billionaires such as yourself should exist at all, governor," Welker said before she played a clip of Mamdani saying the United States shouldn't have billionaires. Welker asked the Democratic governor if the party should be embracing an anti-billionaire message. "Look, how much money you have doesn't determine what your values are, and I'm a Democrat because I believe that everyone deserves health care. I'm a Democrat because I believe we've got to fund education and have a free public education available to every kid in this country. I'm a Democrat because I believe that we've got to stand up for our democracy and against the MAGA Republicans who are literally trying to take away people's rights around this country. It does not matter what your income level is, what matters is what your values are and that's what makes me a Democrat," Pritzker responded. Other liberals, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., have also been vocal in criticizing billionaires. Sanders has been touring the country on a "Fighting Oligarchy" tour since President Donald Trump took office. Sanders started the tour to "take on the Oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country." Other Democrats, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., have spoken out in favor of increasing taxes on billionaires. Warren fiercely defended Mamdani's plan to increase taxes on billionaires should he be elected mayor during an interview on CNBC earlier this week. Welker also pressed Pritzker on the Republican redistricting efforts in Texas and whether Democrats were being hypocritical. "I do want to look at the map of Illinois. Let's take a look at this. Despite President Trump winning 44% of the statewide vote in 2024, Republicans hold only three of Illinois's 17 districts. These districts seem to be to maximize Democratic advantage. What do you say to those who argue it's hypocritical for you to criticize Texas for partisanship when your state also drew maps to boost your party's standing?" Welker asked. "Well, remember that what Texas is trying to do is, again, violate the Voting Rights Act. We didn't. We held public hearings, legislative hearings. People attended them. They spoke out. There was a map that was put out. There were actually changes made to the map and a map was passed, and it was done at the end of the census, the decennial census, so that's how it's done in this country," Pritzker responded. Welker said that groups who grade the fairness of congressional maps have given Illinois an F. She pointed to one government watchdog who said Illinois' map "represents a nearly perfect model for everything that can go wrong with redistricting." "You talk about preserving democracy, how do you preserve democracy, if you're using the same tactics that you've criticized Texas Republicans for?" Welker asked. Pritzker said again that the Texas Republicans were attempting to violate the Voting Rights Act. "Democracy is at stake and these Texas Democrats are standing up to what the GOP is attempting to do which is to, to steal seats because they know what they've done is wrong. They know that they've made an enormous mistake," he said.

Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'
Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'

Trump says he plans to make an announcement Aug. 11 about a D.C. crime initiative, even as violent crime is down significantly in the nation's capital. Last year marked the lowest level of violent crime in Washington, D.C., in more than 30 years, but President Donald Trump has raised concerns about public safety in the city, teasing a plan that would also target its homeless population. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social on Aug. 10. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." In a series of social media posts, Trump said he would unveil his initiative on Aug. 11, adding it would address the city's crime and the "Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well maintained Capital." The president threatened to "take Federal control" of Washington, D.C., in an Aug. 5 post complaining about crime. The post came after Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency nicknamed "BigBalls," was assaulted in an attempted carjacking. "Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control," Trump said on Aug. 5, adding: "If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City." Days later, Trump ordered an increased federal law enforcement presence on D.C. streets, led by officers from U.S. Park Police and including officers from about a dozen other agencies. Cruel and unusual punishment?: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps Violent crime declined by 35% in D.C. in 2024, according to data compiled by the D.C. Metropolitan Police. The 2024 numbers marked the lowest level of violent crime in "over 30 years," the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said in a news release. Homicides dropped by 32%, robberies were down 39% and armed carjackings were down 53%. Violent crime has declined so far in 2025, according to police data. Homicides and robberies are down 12% and 28%, respectively, while total violent crime is down 26% through Aug. 8 when compared with the same period in 2024. Homicides spiked in D.C. in 2023 to 274, up from 203 the year before, before dropping down to 187 in 2024, according to police data. That is the lowest level since the city had 166 homicides in 2019. There have been 99 homicides in 2025, compared to 112 during the same period last year. Trump has long denigrated Washington, D.C, which leans heavily Democratic. He also floated taking over governance of the district in February in comments to reporters, complaining about crime and homelessness. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY

NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'

Gov. Kathy Hochul slighted mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani in a live TV interview Sunday — signaling she may not endorse him in the election even after he praised her 'courage.' 'We still have many differences,' Hochul said, keeping her distance from her fellow Democrat during a Fox News Sunday interview. 'I don't know how you whitewash that away.' Fox host Shannon Bream had read a statement from Mamdani effusively praising Hochul for sparring with President Trump and Republicans over redistricting fights that could dictate who controls Congress. Advertisement 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul hinted that she may not make an endorsement at all in the New York City mayoral election during an interview Sunday. Tomas E. Gaston Mamdani said Hochul showed 'courage' and was 'meeting the moment.' 'Is the feeling mutual? Is Mamdani a good choice' [for New York City mayor], Bream asked, sparking Hochul to bring up their 'many differences.' Advertisement 'He can agree with me and many people agree with me and I think it's not just Democrats who say, 'New Yorkers stand up for our rights.' We do that,' Hochul said. 'We're fighters. I'm a mom from Buffalo. I guess they're not used to taking on a mom from Buffalo.' Hochul, who is seeking re-election next year, has come out against Mamdani's proposals to hike taxes by $9 billion on millionaires and corporations in the city to fund his affordability agenda of subsidized child care, fare-free bus services, housing expansion and government-run grocery stores. 4 Hochul with Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Mayor Eric Adams at the Dominican Day Parade on Aug. 10, 2025. LP Media Advertisement Those taxes need sign off from the governor and state lawmakers, who also are up for re-election in 2026. Despite the apparent snub, Hochul did say she agrees with Mamdani's focus on tackling New York's high cost of living and making both the city and state more affordable for residents. 'There's many areas of disagreement,' she noted. 'But also there's areas of alignment including affordability. His election touched a nerve. And people said, 'you know what, we're just not getting ahead.'' 4 Mamdani praised Hochul for having 'courage' and 'meeting the moment' in her battle with Republicans over redistricting. LP Media She claimed that President Trump's policies, including imposing tariffs, have not helped. 'There's a sense that we need some change now,' Hochul said. Hochul then hinted she may sit out the race and not endorse Mamdani, who is running against two other Democrats running on independent party lines — Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom she served with as lieutenant governor. She took over as governor when Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations that he denies. Advertisement 4 Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are running against Mamdani as independent candidates. LP Media 'I already worked with two different mayors. I'll continue to work with whomever the voters want me to and I'll make it work out. I'm not going to go to war with the 8 million residents of New York I also represent,' the governor said. 'My job is to calm things down,' Hochul said. 'Let's see what the election results are. But people have to recognize that the candidate for mayor [Mamdani] has also touched a nerve and we need to respond to that. I'm aligned with him that we need to find ways to make life more affordable for New Yorkers.' It wouldn't be the first time Hochul stayed on the sidelines during a high-profile mayoral showdown. In her native Buffalo in 2021, democratic socialist India Walton defeated then-sitting Mayor Byron Brown in the Democratic Party primary but Brown, a moderate, continued as a write-in candidate. Hochul stayed out of the race, and Brown won re-election in a landslide in November as the write-in candidate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store