Our land should serve as a shared inheritance, fostering opportunity
For too long, Scotland's land has been concentrated in the hands of a few, a legacy of feudal structures that have denied communities their rightful stake in the resources that sustain them. The bill's aim to diversify ownership and empower local people is a step toward justice, but it must go further to dismantle the entrenched inequalities that persist.
READ MORE: Call for public input on Scotland's land reform launches
Land is not merely a commodity; it is the foundation of our collective existence, entrusted to us to steward for the benefit of all, not to be hoarded for private gain.
I advocate for measures that prioritise community-led ownership models, ensuring that the fruits of the land – whether agricultural, environmental, or cultural – are shared equitably among those who live and work upon it.
The bill must also strengthen accountability. Large estates, often held by absentee landlords, have too often neglected the needs of local people, prioritising profit over prosperity. Robust mechanisms are needed to ensure landowners act as responsible custodians, investing in the social and ecological health of their communities. This includes supporting sustainable practices that preserve the land for future generations, reflecting a moral duty to care for what we have been given.
READ MORE: Michael Russell: What should Scotland's land reform actually deliver?
In the Outer Hebrides, we see the transformative potential of community ownership, where land is managed collectively to support housing, enterprise, and cultural heritage. The bill should expand such models nationwide, empowering communities to shape their own futures. This requires not only legislative support but also adequate funding and resources to level the playing field, particularly for rural and island communities facing unique challenges.
I urge the parliament to view this bill as a chance to build a Scotland where land serves as a shared inheritance, fostering unity and opportunity for all its people. Let us commit to a vision where every community has a voice in the land that defines it, and where the wealth of our natural heritage is harnessed for the collective good.
Councillor Gordon Murray
Comhairle nan Eilean Siar
I WELCOME The National's coverage of the international research team's peer-reviewed critique of the Cass Review, recently published in BMC Medical Research Methodology (International study tears into Cass Review on trans healthcare in UK, May 14). This critique is far more than a difference of opinion, it is a meticulous dissection of the Cass Review's methodological flaws, with serious implications for healthcare policy across the UK.
A standout strength of the critique lies in its discussion of the Cass Review's call for randomised controlled trials on puberty blockers. The authors explain, with clarity and rigour, why such trials are not just ethically fraught but likely to be confounded by unmanageable variables. The kind of young person able or willing to remain in a control group without access to treatment may differ significantly from one who would seek care through other routes. The result is a study that measures not the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, but the effects of poor access and frustrated need. That is not good science, it's bad ethics – and worse policy.
READ MORE: Trans women protest topless outside Scottish Parliament
The wider methodological flaws identified in the critique, from misuse of appraisal tools to the unexplained exclusion of relevant studies, further undermine the authority with which the Cass Review has been used to justify sweeping policy decisions, including the withdrawal of puberty blockers from NHS care.
The UK and devolved governments now face a clear choice: double down on a politically expedient report riddled with scientific inconsistencies, or recommit to evidence-based policy grounded in methodological integrity and ethical responsibility. Scotland, in particular, has the opportunity to lead by example, rejecting the instrumentalisation of flawed reviews in favour of care informed by robust, inclusive research.
The time for scrutiny is now. This peer-reviewed critique demands it.
Ron Lumiere
via email
A DISTURBINGLY interesting few days. Donald Trump gets a 'gift' of a $400 million jet from an oil-rich country. Also at this time, oil-rich country Scotland has its last oil refinery shut down and is informed that the number of its homeless people is increasing. Meanwhile, although there is no Russian participation in the Eurovision Song Contest due to its invasion of Ukraine, Israel is allowed to take part while it is destroying Gaza.
So, so sad a world to live in.
Douglas Stanley
Ayr
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
12 hours ago
- The National
It's not enough for SNP to occasionally say ‘independence'
Moving from local to national, there was a call for a constitutional convention from Councillor Murray in The National on Saturday. On the same day in the same paper, Gordon Macintyre-Kemp (Believe in Scotland) called for a new national conversation through a citizens convention. Independence Forum Scotland's Summer Convention on Scotland's Future will take place in Perth this Saturday. It will be their second this year. The grassroots took root, sheltered immediately after 2014, and the movement well continued. And thank (supply your own deity or whatever) for that. It's still the same message from across that movement: independence. It's sad, then, that political parties such as the SNP haven't moved on in tandem with us. The independence message has been diluted, and looking at the most recent rejection last week, it's more a case that the message was missing, again. John Swinney is quoted after the latest failure as saying: 'I thought the SNP was best placed to see off Reform because of the scale of collapse in the Labour vote.' Is it too much to believe (as I have done til now) that the SNP would see off Reform and the other pro-Unionist parties not by asking for a vote just to keep someone else out, but with their laid-out vision for independence? It is their raison d'etre after all. Not heart before head, but by taking the abstract notion of independence and translating that into the positive. It's not enough for the SNP to occasionally say 'independence' like some now tired mantra. Or expect me to click my heels and wish, Dorothy-like. Where is the plan, the strategy, the tactics? Where, when are we reminded of the changes to date that have had a positive impact? The likes of additional child payments, free bus passes, achieved through our government, our parliament, albeit hamstrung via the clever trap that is devolution. Where, when is the current highway robbery situation explained, as energy flows out of Scotland only to be returned at an increased cost to households? Westminster seems to have imposed a tariff on Scotland, having robbed us first! I think even Trump would be impressed with that one! There's no room to say that as this was a local election, indy shouldn't feature. These are all 'local' issues across the 'nation'; indy should always feature. Then to all politicians who say they believe in independence: you need to be connected with the grassroots movement, you have to heed what we say, see what we're doing, realise the strength, the numbers. You need to be prepared to tell folks if it's change you want, then change you'll get with independence, and here's how, here's the plan. The clock is ticking down to 2026. Selma Rahman Edinburgh WHY oh why can't we have simple literature telling the general public that with INDEPENDENCE we will be THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS better off and rid of THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS from Westminster that is making us worse off? Ken McCartney Hawick
The National
a day ago
- The National
Scotland's future is something that is worth talking about
It's our second such gathering, following our Spring Convention in Edinburgh in March, and we're making good on our promise to move around the country. This time, we're visiting the fair city of Perth, and we look forward to welcoming 90 or so participants to the Salutation Hotel for a day of fascinating presentations and discussions. The main purpose of the convention is to address issues affecting Scotland's future. We're not directly discussing independence and how we get there, but as we deal with questions about various key subjects, we tend to find that in every case at least part of the answer is independence. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action', says Swinney The opening session of Saturday's event will be about identity and cultural issues: 'Wha's like us? A look at Scottishness, Scotland and independence.' Why? Well, culture, language and history are pivotal facets of nationhood. When a nation is absorbed into another, or into an empire, there is a very real danger that these crucial facets are diluted or lost. Thus a vital part of regaining independent nationhood is a rediscovery of our culture, language and history – yet, at least until recently, this has not figured greatly in Scotland's campaign for independence. The session will be led by Stuart McHardy – the writer and historian who has demonstrated how our history has been distorted and suppressed over the years – and Roger Emmerson, a distinguished architect whose latest book, Scotland In 100 Buildings, was published last month. Stuart and Roger will outline how culture leads politics, not the other way round, and lead participants in an examination of Scottish distinctiveness and why it matters. With Stuart's penchant for storytelling, we expect a lively conversation which will inform and, we expect, inspire everyone in the room. Our discussions from the Spring Convention are still ongoing, of course, so the remainder of the morning will be devoted to catching up on the topics we covered in Edinburgh. It's been great to witness the progress our colleagues at Energy Scotland have been making since their splendid contribution to the Spring Convention. They've featured in the pages of The National several times; developed a strong website, published papers on various key energy topics; made a splash at last month's Scottish Sovereignty Research Group conference, and featured on a special Lesley Riddoch podcast. John Proctor, the chair, will update us further on their activities and put a number of policy propositions to the convention. The need for land reform, as a means of unlocking the potential of our nation and its population, continues to be a major issue in Scottish politics. It's been frustrating to see all manner of good intentions over the past 18 years failing to shift the dial. At present, our hopes are vested in the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill, which is at stage two of its consideration by the Scottish Parliament. John Hutchison will report on its progress and the work of Community Land Scotland, which held its annual conference at the end of last month. The third strand of the Spring Convention we'll revisit is democracy and governance. Here, while our aspirations are for the restoration of Scotland's independence, we don't want that to result in a replica of the limited democracy that the UK provides. Geoff Bush will review the multitude of views expressed by participants in Edinburgh, and the discussion will continue from there. READ MORE: SNP candidate calls out Tory rival for being in 'lockstep with failed ideology' At lunchtime, we're delighted to be able to present a feature common to many gatherings – a fringe event! For those who are interested (quite a few, we suspect) David Younger of Scotland Decides will give a presentation about his organisation's independent blockchain voting platform, technology-enabled Direct Democracy which offers a way forward backed by international law and free of UK interference. He'll also outline how this fits with this own vision of how a National Convention might be organised – and what it could achieve. In the afternoon we'll be concentrating exclusively on the massive issue of poverty and the wellbeing economy. We've got a host of speakers and panellists lined up, including William Thomson of Scotonomics; Craig Dalzell of Common Weal; lawyer and activist Eva Comrie; Jim Osborne of the Scottish Currency Group, and Annie Miller of Basic Income Network Scotland. Not yet signed up for the Summer Convention? There are still one or two places available, and we'd be delighted if you could join us. It's free to attend, but booking is essential, and you can do so via We'll also be happy to answer any questions you may have – just email us at convention@ Looking forward to seeing you in Perth!
The National
5 days ago
- The National
John Swinney responds to 'controversial' ScotRail AI voiceover
The Government-owned train operator recently rolled out 'Iona', an AI voice on some routes, which replaced older messages recorded by Mathers since 2005. While established Scottish voiceover artist and actress Gayanne Potter is seeking 'an apology from ScotRail and an acknowledgement they have made a mistake' when basing "Iona" on recordings she made in 2021 without her consent, Mathers revealed to The National she also had no knowledge of the AI rollout. ScotRail later told Mathers's agent which trains the AI has now been rolled out on and contracted the actress for another six months of usage. READ MORE: I've voiced ScotRail trains for 20 years. No one told me AI was replacing me During FMQs on Thursday, Tory MSP Sandesh Gulhane asked the First Minister about the issue, to which John Swinney said Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop had told him ScotRail were "fixing it", referring to the voiceover. Gulhane said: "ScotRail is owned by the Scottish Government, yet it has chosen to use an AI voice, instead of employing a Scottish voice actor. "Is this how the Scottish Government supports actors?" Responding to Gulhane, Swinney said: "ScotRail have taken forward a development and I understand it has caused some controversy. "I'm sure ScotRail is engaging constructively with all concerned. "I think sometimes, these things just need careful handling, and I'm sure ScotRail will be doing exactly that. "The Transport Secretary tells me they're fixing it, so they'll be fixing it." ScotRail has been contacted for comment. READ MORE: Union slams Scottish companies using voice data without consent for new AI announcers SNP MSP Ben Macpherson has earlier highlighted Netflix's experience of filming Department Q — a drama currently ranked number one in the UK — in Edinburgh, asking the First Minister what was being done to encourage the growth of Scotland's film industry. Swinney said: "I welcome very much the investments that were made surrounding Department Q. I think it's been a tremendous success, and will be a great advert and showcase for our country. He added: "We have increased the budget for Screen Scotland and of course, the screen strategy that was published last year outlines an ambitious plan to grow the sector further and to combine international investment with increased support for emerging Scottish producers and local creative originations."
