Map: Here's where the most shark attacks have happened
At least 1,660 "unprovoked" shark attacks have been reported in the U.S. since the 1800s.
Florida leads the nation in the number of attacks, with far more than any other state.
The International Shark Attack File has tracked shark attacks in the U.S. as far back as the early 1800s – long before the 1916 shark attacks along the New Jersey coast inspired the "Jaws" novel and movie.
As cinephiles mark the 50th anniversary of "Jaws," a popular beach in Florida has been deemed the "shark bite capital of the world."
In 2024, there were 47 "unprovoked" shark bites around the globe, and 28 of those happened in the U.S., according to the Florida Museum of Natural History's International Shark Attack File (ISAF). There were also 24 "provoked bites," which happen when humans try to interact with sharks.
The ISAF has tracked shark attacks in the U.S. as far back as the early 1800s – long before the 1916 shark attacks along the New Jersey coast inspired the "Jaws" novel and movie.
Shark expert George Burgess, former director of the Florida Program for Shark Research, described the 1916 Jersey Shore attacks as "the most unique set of shark attacks that ever have occurred" in a 2012 interview with Smithsonian Magazine. Spielberg's 1975 film, based on Peter Benchley's novel, captured that same sense of mystery and fear—and turned it into box office history.
RELATED: 'Jaws' was fiction; this was the terrifying true story
You can read more about the "Jaws" anniversary and the 1916 shark attacks here.
By the numbers
Florida has reported 942 shark attacks since 1882, far more than any other state.
Julie Andersen, founder of the New York-based Shark Angels, told Fox News Digital that shark sightings and encounters have increased from coast-to-coast, but it doesn't mean there are more sharks in the ocean. The 47 unprovoked bites recorded in 2024 were far below the 10-year average of 70 shark bites a year.
What they're saying
"The rise in sightings is due to a mix of factors: more people in the water, better technology, shifting ocean conditions, and in some cases, successful conservation," she said.
Local perspective
New Smyrna Beach, located in Volusia County, Florida, "consistently tops global charts for shark encounters," Andersen said.
Dig deeper
Andersen said most unprovoked shark bites are considered minor injuries.
"Most of these bites are minor, often from migrating small blacktip sharks mistaking toes and fingers for small bait fish. Many don't even require stitches," she explained.
There was only one unprovoked shark attack death in the U.S. in 2024. It happened off the northwest coast of Oahu, Hawaii, and claimed the life of well-known surfer and lifeguard Tamayo Perry, according to USA Today.
Here's a breakdown of shark attacks in the U.S. by state:
Florida: 942
Hawaii: 199
California: 141
South Carolina: 120
North Carolina : 81
Texas: 49
Oregon: 29
New Jersey: 16
Georgia: 17
New York: 24
Alabama: 10
Massachusetts: 6
Virginia: 5
Louisiana: 5
Delaware: 5
Mississippi: 2
Washington: 2
Rhode Island: 2
Maine: 2
Connecticut: 1
Maryland: 2
The Source
This report includes information from the International Shark Attack File, Fox News Digital, USA Today and previous LiveNow from FOX reporting. FOX's Austin Williams contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
The Heather and David Turkey Fund Cheesecake Showdown on Pittsburgh Today Live
Is there a better day of the year to kick off Team PTL's next cheesecake showdown than on National Cheesecake Day?! The best part - this competition is for a great cause. The New York Cheesecake Company has drawn inspiration from our hosts, Heather Abraham and David Highfield, to create two new delectable cheesecake flavors. Heather's Kookie-Cookies is up against David's Savory French Toast Crunch. By ordering these desserts you can help fill the Thanksgiving tables of our neighbors in need. The Heather and David Turkey Fund cheesecakes are available for pre-order now at The New York Cheesecake Company bakery in Robinson Township. Visit their website here to order! They are sold in four, eight or 12 packs through the end of October. A total of $5 per pack will go straight to the KDKA-TV Turkey Fund. Thank you for supporting our neighbors in need! You can order Heather's cheesecake here and order David's cheesecake here.
Vox
7 hours ago
- Vox
Most couples used to meet this way. What happened?
Like many women these days, 30-year-old Jude Cohen is over dating apps. So she's decided to relinquish some of the responsibility in finding a partner: 'I'm asking my friends to set me up,' the New York City-based communications consultant says. Late last year, a family friend heeded the call and, without warning, introduced Cohen to a potential date via text. The man lived in her hometown, hundreds of miles away, but she wasn't opposed to long distance. Prior to their date a few weeks later — Cohen was back in town for a wedding — she knew scant about him. She made an attempt to find her date's Instagram but was unsuccessful. The date was fine, she says, and the conversation was 'lovely.' But Cohen just wasn't attracted to her date. Ironically, if he lived in New York, she'd have plenty of friends to set him up with. Still, Cohen is holding out hope for a successful setup. 'I continue to ask my friends to set me up,' Cohen says. 'It was not a deterrent that the first time didn't work out. All in all, it wasn't a bad experience. It's just a part of the numbers game that you have to play to find your person.' Vox Culture Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The setup can feel like a relic of a bygone era of dating. Introducing two friends who might be romantically compatible seems quaint in a time when people can filter through singles based on the most granular qualities on apps. But for most of modern dating, heterosexual couples were most likely to meet their spouse through friends. That is, until the 2010s, when meeting online overtook friend-facilitated introductions, a trend that has only accelerated since then. According to one study, only 20 percent of straight couples met through friends in 2017, compared to 39 percent who met online. Compare that to 1995, when a third of couples met through friends and only 2 percent met online. It's safe to say that the setup is, if not dead, on life support. But as more singles grow frustrated with dating apps and yearn for more organic connection, could a return to the setup be in order? Are singles willing to surrender control in pursuit of a partner? Related Delete your dating apps and find romance offline 'Of all the things I've heard people say they're doing to try to meet people more organically,' says Liesel Sharabi, an associate professor in human communication at Arizona State University, 'getting set up isn't one that I've had people tell me that they're really longing to go back to. For some of them, they probably never experienced it.' From introductions to algorithms Coupling up only became an individual pursuit recently. Historically, choosing a partner was a group affair. Outsiders have had influence on romantic relationships in myriad ways: For centuries, parents the world over have had some degree of control over who their children married (and in some cultures, they still do); a long line of matchmakers worked to connect families in their communities; and friends, extended family, neighbors, coworkers, and other group members all had a stake in who their friends paired off with. A study from 1991 found that when a couple felt their family and friends approved of their relationship, they were more likely to stay together. (It should be noted that study participants were primarily middle-class college students.) The setup comes with clear upsides. If a mutual friend thinks there might be something between two people in their orbit and goes out of their way to make an introduction, that speaks volumes. Knowing this person has been vetted and vouched for in some way is appealing. A setup has built-in accountability, too. Your date may be less likely to be a jerk if they know their behavior might get back to their friends. But being this intertwined can also get awkward in the event of a fight or breakup, when personal moments are suddenly fodder for group gossip. Over the last few decades, choosing a partner became a more private pursuit. The facilitating friends also have a lot at stake. Research shows that playing matchmaker for friends is associated with higher wellbeing, happiness, and, overall, is a rewarding experience. The matchmaker might feel a sense of ownership over the fledgling couple, the reason for their love. A successful setup has implications beyond the couple themselves, too — the friend group deepens with new connections and can fracture if the relationship dissolves, with mutual friends choosing sides or dividing time between exes. But over the last few decades, choosing a partner became a more private pursuit, says Reuben J. Thomas, an associate professor of sociology at the University of New Mexico. Instead of leaning on social networks to facilitate a match, dating is now 'a very personal quest to find a relationship that helps you become the person you want to be, the best you, to 'self-actualize' through your relationship/marriage (and to leave the relationship if it hampers that),' Thomas says in an email. Instead of relying on the extended network of your community, you can sort through profiles of hundreds of strangers from the privacy and comfort of your bedroom. One of dating apps' greatest strengths is their ability to connect users to people outside of their social network. Most Americans marry people of similar racial, educational, and socioeconomic backgrounds, and dating apps have the power to at least diversify the dating pool, if not totally buck the trend. Your friends and family are limited in their social reach; they only interact with a finite number of people at work, at school, at clubs. There's an even greater cap on how many of those people are single. 'People's friendship circles tend to have fewer single people in them as they age beyond early adulthood, as more and more of their friends enter marriages and long-term relationships,' Thomas says. With increased exposure to a diverse array of strangers, singles on apps have more control over their love lives. In a period of history when Americans are spending less time with friends — and more time alone — you might not want to wait around for a pal to set you up with their coworker, nor should you have to. 'That's quite a bit different than how we've always met our partners,' Sharabi says. 'Usually, we run in the same network, we have the same habits, routines. When you talk about introducing somebody who's entirely independent from that, it does change the dynamic a little bit.' Removing friends and family from the romantic equation has some downsides, Sharabi says. In a study, Sharabi found that couples who met online reported slightly less satisfying and stable marriages than those who met offline. This can be attributed to lingering stigma around app-faciliated connections and family members who may judge a partner from outside their circles more harshly. 'Now you've got friends and family that are really disconnected from the process as well. They're not always supportive of the relationship,' Sharabi says. 'You're out there meeting strangers who they may or may not approve of because they just don't know them.' The new dating experience The setup may also not mesh with modern dating's array of expectations. The amount of information app users have access to prior to a date — an assortment of photos, interests, career, even weeks' worth of conversation — far exceeds the brief bit of background a friend may offer before setting you up. Another expectation of digital courtship — that the 'perfect' person is just a swipe away — can further dilute the allure of a setup. If the date you met online fails to meet your standards, hope springs eternal that the next profile will check all your boxes. With seemingly endless options, singles might discount someone simply because they don't have the right look or the right job. The nature of the setup is virtually the opposite: Here's one person you might jive with. If you aren't satisfied, it might be awkward with your mutual friend — and you'll be sent straight back to the dating apps. 'I feel like my friends have been single for so long,' says Maxine Simone Williams, the founder of the speed dating event series We Met IRL, 'they have a laundry list of what they want, which makes it even harder to set them up, because it's like, well, you don't want this.' On rare occasions, Williams has seen some event attendees walk in, survey the room, and leave. 'They're like, nobody here was my type,' she says. As much as modern daters lament the constant rejection and expendability of modern dating culture, it's also possible that they enjoy being in the driver's seat and having control. 'You do often hear people yearning for a simpler time of romance, but I think in reality they would hate it if society went back to the old ways,' of family-controlled marriages and having fewer options, Thomas says. 'Losing the ability to just shop for potential partners oneself, to have choice and agency, to be able to take the initiative and fairly quickly find a date in a big online space full of options, losing that would greatly frustrate most people today.' When it comes to dating in college, Chicago-based marketing intern Aliza Akhter has relied on apps to meet other singles. The last time the 20-year-old met a significant other through friends was in high school. To Akhter, setups are something her parents' generation did. Her friends don't ask each other if they have other single friends. She'd be open to meeting someone at a friend's party or even a setup date, but she's in the minority, she says. 'If you're single, it's pretty much a given that you either have a dating app or you have at some point,' Akhter says. 'So maybe it's just the fact that people know that there's another easier option than the introduction.' Algorithms have replaced the role of family and friends in facilitating relationships. Still, the fate of the setup isn't all grim. In recent research, Arielle Kuperberg, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, has found among thousands of college students nationwide, more are now meeting romantic partners through friends and family than they were in 2019. Fewer are meeting partners online compared to 2020, when nearly a quarter of respondents met their significant other online. 'We have a five-year period we look at in this paper, from 2019 through 2024,' Kuperberg says, 'and the last year was the highest rate at which people were met through friends and family. So I think there could be a comeback.' Sharabi, however, is not as optimistic. 'I think it's dead,' she says, 'and I think that dating apps killed it.' In her view, algorithms have replaced the role of family and friends in facilitating relationships and despite apps' negative publicity as of late, she doesn't see them disappearing altogether. But if Jude Cohen, the freelance communications consultant in New York, has anything to say about it, the setup will live on. Cohen and her friends have sought to make the experience more joyful by organizing what they call the 'Blind Date Club' where each friend is tasked with bringing a date to dinner for another person in the group. Some brought friends of friends, others made dating app profiles on behalf of their pal. ('It was very clear on the profile I'm swiping for my friend Amy,' Cohen says.) Cohen found a date for her friend John by posting a video on TikTok. Five out of the six couples extended their date beyond the initial dinner. Cohen was one of them — she had a few more dates with her setup, too. Although none of the matches grew into anything more serious, Blind Date Club was a whimsical way of bringing community back into dating.
Associated Press
7 hours ago
- Associated Press
IAS Services Helps Family Overcome UK Visa Rejection with Successful Appeal
Obtaining Further Leave to Remain (FLR) in the UK can be complex, especially when it involves families. When the Home Office rejects an application, affected individuals who have lived in the UK for some time will face an emotionally challenging journey of having to leave the country. But with the proper immigration support, families can find hope and success, even after a disappointing start. This article discusses how a UK-based family, after being rejected for an FLR application by the Home Office, received a second chance through the assistance of immigration lawyers. Their experience highlights the importance of seeking professional support in improving the outcome when applying for Further Leave to Remain. The Background: A Family's Struggle After Rejection The story begins with a young family who had built a life together in the UK. The primary resident, a settled person, was supporting their spouse, who had been residing in the country under the UK Spouse visa for the past 33 months. During the spouse's time in the UK, they welcomed a child, who automatically acquired British citizenship. As their current visas neared expiration, the non-British spouse applied for leave to remain, hoping to maintain their lawful immigration status and continue building a family life in the UK. Unfortunately, their hopes were shaken when the Home Office refused their application. This rejection risked separating the family, as the non-British spouse was no longer legally allowed to remain in the UK. Instead of giving up, the family sought help from experienced UK immigration advisors. What Went Wrong With Their Application The application for further leave to remain under the family route was rejected because the family failed to provide sufficient evidence of their income. The British partner's employment situation had changed since the initial Spouse visa application was submitted. With the FLR application, they were combining their savings with their salaried income. However, some of the key gaps in their documentation included: Though they met the income threshold in practice, the lack of complete supporting documents led to a refusal. These are common mistakes in visa applications, particularly when applicants handle the process independently. The Role of Immigration Advisors After reviewing the rejection letter, the immigration lawyers advised the couple to submit a fresh application with stronger supporting documents. They immediately began working on a new application for FLR under the family route. The immigration advisors thoroughly assessed the family's situation, collected and reviewed all supporting documents, and helped them clearly demonstrate their right to remain in the UK with their new application. A crucial element of the new application was demonstrating the best interests of their UK-born child, a factor that UK immigration law gives significant weight to in family-based cases. Thanks to the expert guidance, the family's new application was approved. This meant the non-British spouse could continue living, working, and raising their child in the UK legally. The applicant also has a clear pathway to settlement in the future, as long as they meet the conditions. Understanding Further Leave to Remain Further Leave to Remain (FLR) allows individuals already in the UK to extend their stay. It's essential for spouses, partners, children, or parents living with family in the UK. Depending on your circumstances, you may apply under different FLR categories, including: In this case, the family applied under the FLR(M) category because the non-British spouse was in the UK under the Family visa route. The advisors carefully matched their application to this route, ensuring compliance with all requirements. Tips to Strengthen Your FLR Application If you are applying for leave to remain, here are some tips to increase your chances of success: Why Professional Help Matters Many visa refusals stem from misunderstandings of the legal process or the absence of key evidence. The UK immigration system is complex, and even minor mistakes can lead to major delays or denials. In this family's case, working with experienced immigration advisers made all the difference. They understood how to interpret and apply the immigration rules, handle the application process, and communicate with the Home Office. Their guidance strengthened the family's application and gave them peace of mind during a stressful time. If your visa has been refused and you're unsure how to proceed, seeking professional help can save you time, reduce stress, and increase your chances of success. Qualified immigration lawyers and advisers can: For families building a life in the UK and wanting to avoid disruptions in their stay, this support can be a valuable investment in long-term stability and peace of mind. Conclusion Immigration is often about building a family life and a future in a new country. This case study shows that rejection doesn't have to be the end of a hopeful family future. With the proper support, families can handle the UK immigration system successfully. If you're facing a challenge with your visa application, consider working with an immigration lawyer. Their help can make all the difference between rejection and approval. Media Contact Company Name: IAS Services Contact Person: John Davis Email: Send Email City: London Country: United Kingdom Website: Press Release Distributed by To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: IAS Services Helps Family Overcome UK Visa Rejection with Successful Appeal
