Congratulations to Iran and the occasional flash of Trump genius
I love Mexican food, especially Tacos. So it pains me and spoils my appetite whenever media pundits mention the acronym for 'Trump always chickens out'. It must be admitted that most of the time, the president's erratic pronouncements and obsessive-compulsive tweets, from universal tariffs and China sanctions to military support, or the lack thereof, for Ukraine betray a complete absence of clear thinking and actual policy.
But with his highly controversial strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, you have to wonder whether he had not been thinking or at least hoping a few steps ahead of most others, for once. Maybe Taco this time isn't so bad.
Let me, for argument's sake, just put it on the table. Trump, against most of his advisers – both the supposedly wise as well as foolish ones, whether Maga or neocons – has escalated to de-escalate. And Tehran gets the message and is playing ball, hence its latest missile volley, in a symbolic retaliatory gesture, on an American military base in Qatar in which everyone came out relatively unscathed.
Consider the previous sequence of events. First, Trump forced the Iranians to negotiate. Then, when the Israelis attacked, he tried to use that as leverage and continued negotiations. Then he joined the Israelis with the heavy US strike on nuclear-related targets and threatened to broaden the war to impose regime change in Tehran.
The Iranians talked tough but responded with remarkable restraint, having warned friendly Qatar and therefore the Americans, about its forthcoming attack. Trump immediately reciprocated afterwards, and tweeted for world peace.
He thanked Iran 'for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured'.
'CONGRATULATIONS WORLD,' he wrote in all caps. 'IT'S TIME FOR PEACE!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
42 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump considers more Patriots for Ukraine, says Putin ‘really has to end' the war
US President Donald Trump indicated on Wednesday that he would consider providing more of the Patriot missiles that Ukraine needs to defend against mounting Russian strikes, adding that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'really has to end that war'. Advertisement His remarks came after a 50-minute meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of a Nato summit in The Hague. Both leaders described it as a positive step in a conflict that Trump described as 'more difficult than other wars'. During a press conference in which he celebrated his own diplomatic efforts in the Middle East, Trump said the Patriots were 'very hard to get' but that 'we are going to see if we can make some of them available'. Zelensky mentioned air-defence systems but it was not immediately clear whether Trump was referring to more missiles or complete batteries. Trump also left open the possibility of providing more military aid to Kyiv, which has suffered grinding Russian advances on the battlefield in recent months. Advertisement He had previously shown no sign of resuming the donations of weaponry to Ukraine that his predecessor Joe Biden had instituted after Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Nato leaders agree to 5 per cent defence spending goal in annual summit
Nato member states committed to boost investments on defence to five per cent of their domestic output, largely endorsing US President Donald Trump's pressure on Washington's European allies. The North Atlantic Council (NAC), which convened on Wednesday during the two-day Nato Summit in The Hague, the member states' leaders agreed to spend the higher percentage annually on core defence requirements and 'defence-and-security-related' expenditures by 2035, in the face of 'profound security threats and challenges', including 'long-term threats posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security'. Nato heads of state said in The Hague Summit Declaration issued after the NAC that their investments will ensure that they have the 'forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, war fighting readiness, and resilience' required for 'deterrence and defence, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security'. It said the allies agreed that the five per cent commitment will be comprised of at least 3.5 per cent of GDP annually on 'core' defence expenditure and requirements within the next decade for meeting 'Nato capability targets', and up to 1.5 per cent to 'protect critical infrastructure, defend our networks, ensure our civil preparedness and resilience, unleash innovation, and strengthen our defence industrial base'. 02:42 Ukraine leader Zelensky ready to step down for peace under Nato security Ukraine leader Zelensky ready to step down for peace under Nato security 'We reaffirm our shared commitment to rapidly expand transatlantic defence industrial cooperation and to harness emerging technology and the spirit of innovation to advance our collective security,' the declaration said. 'We will work to eliminate defence trade barriers among allies and will leverage our partnerships to promote defence industrial cooperation.'
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Did US strikes wipe out Iran's nuclear facilities? Chinese military experts sceptical
Chinese defence experts expressed scepticism about US President Donald Trump's claim that air strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's biggest nuclear facilities , following reports that core components of Tehran's nuclear assets remained intact. CNN reported on Tuesday that an assessment by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm, was at odds with Trump's claim that Iran's enrichment sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – were 'completely and totally obliterated'. While the full extent of the damage and its implications for Iran's nuclear ambitions are still unclear, Chinese analysts agreed that the strikes were limited in effectiveness. They cited factors including the gap between the depth of Iran's underground facilities and the penetration capabilities of the bombs used, and reports that Tehran might have removed enriched uranium ahead of the attacks. Chinese military aviation expert Fu Qianshao noted that the US said its 'bunker buster' bomb was capable of penetrating 60 metres (197 feet) underground, but if the Iranian facilities were made of specially reinforced concrete, the effective depth would be far less. 'The Fordow facility is buried about 80 to 90 metres underground, so there was a gap there,' he added. 'In the end, the US likely didn't achieve the intended operational goal.'
