Nato leaders agree to 5 per cent defence spending goal in annual summit
Donald Trump's pressure on Washington's European allies.
The North Atlantic Council (NAC), which convened on Wednesday during the two-day Nato Summit in The Hague, the member states' leaders agreed to spend the higher percentage annually on core defence requirements and 'defence-and-security-related' expenditures by 2035, in the face of 'profound security threats and challenges', including 'long-term threats posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security'.
Nato heads of state said in The Hague Summit Declaration issued after the NAC that their investments will ensure that they have the 'forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, war fighting readiness, and resilience' required for 'deterrence and defence, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security'.
It said the allies agreed that the five per cent commitment will be comprised of at least 3.5 per cent of GDP annually on 'core' defence expenditure and requirements within the next decade for meeting 'Nato capability targets', and up to 1.5 per cent to 'protect critical infrastructure, defend our networks, ensure our civil preparedness and resilience, unleash innovation, and strengthen our defence industrial base'.
02:42
Ukraine leader Zelensky ready to step down for peace under Nato security
Ukraine leader Zelensky ready to step down for peace under Nato security
'We reaffirm our shared commitment to rapidly expand transatlantic defence industrial cooperation and to harness emerging technology and the spirit of innovation to advance our collective security,' the declaration said. 'We will work to eliminate defence trade barriers among allies and will leverage our partnerships to promote defence industrial cooperation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
41 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's Putin, Zelensky talks chiefly served Russian aims
The current phase of the war in Ukraine continues unabated into its fourth year, with grinding offences and strikes against civilian infrastructure increasingly the norm. It is, for Ukraine, arguably the most vulnerable that it has been since 2022. These developments have prompted calls among world leaders to end the conflict. On the surface, United States President Donald Trump's meetings with both the Ukrainian and Russian leaders suggest a balanced approach. In reality, however, Trump's actions primarily benefit Russia. After the recent meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, Trump declared that their summit had been 'very useful.' When asked how he would rate the meeting on a scale of one to 10, the president declared the meeting 'was a 10 in the sense we got along great.' While Trump and Putin may have hit it off, the issue with such an assessment is that it failed to address the underlying reason for the meeting: Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In this regard, the meeting was far more useful for Putin and Russia than Ukraine and its allies. Putin managed to stoke tensions, and potentially divisions, among Ukraine's principal supporters by not including Ukraine in the summit. No other countries participated in the summit. This format caused considerable consternation in Ukraine, where it was feared that Trump would make an agreement without Ukrainian consent, as well as in Europe, where Russian aggression and revisionism is a more direct threat. Prior to Trump assuming power for a second time in 2025, Ukraine benefited from a largely united front among NATO and the European Union. This unity has declined over the last several months, and the Alaska summit reinforced this decline to Russia's benefit. Putin and his negotiators managed to obtain a major concession from Trump at the summit as Trump renounced his own recent calls for a ceasefire. For Ukraine and its allies, achieving a ceasefire was a fundamental requirement for any peace negotiations in 2025. This precondition has become more significant as Russia ramps up its attacks on Ukrainian cities and civilians. Lastly, the very nature of the Alaska meeting itself helped legitimize Russia in international opinion. Since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has courted international opinion. It's been more successful than most people in Europe and North America realize, as significant portions of Asia, Africa and Latin America remain ambivalent or even support Russia in its war against Ukraine. Nonetheless, Russia was always restrained by the condemnation it received from multiple international organizations, most notably the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Trump welcoming Putin on American soil, when the Russian leader is under what amounts to a de facto travel ban by the International Criminal Court, undermines these institutions' condemnations. The benefits that Putin obtained from Trump in Alaska demanded an immediate response by Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelensky promptly arranged a White House meeting with Trump in the aftermath of the Alaskan summit. And he didn't arrive alone: European leaders accompanied him to show solidarity with Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted the European leaders weren't on hand to prevent Trump from bullying Zelensky, as occurred during their last Oval Office meeting. That's probably only partly true. Several European leaders — ranging from the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to French President Emmanuel Macron — almost assuredly accompanied Zelensky to prevent Trump from forcing the Ukrainian leader into concessions that are detrimental to their interests as well. Trump's pre-meeting social media post undoubtedly heightened their concerns. In the post, he placed the burden of peace on Zelensky and argued that Ukraine must accept the loss of Crimea and never accede to NATO. Ukrainian officials sought to carefully orchestrate Zelensky's one-on-one Oval Office meeting with Trump. Zelensky wore a suit and delivered a letter from the Ukrainian first lady to Melania Trump. These and other efforts aimed to stroke Trump's ego, and the president's response — in particular, agreeing with a reporter that Zelensky 'look(ed) fabulous' in a suit — suggests it was a success. The same American reporter criticized Zelensky for failing to don a suit during his ill-fated February White House visit. Notably, Trump did not rule out a role for American soldiers in helping to maintain peace in Ukraine during the meeting. Outside observers believe an American presence in Ukraine to maintain any eventual peace is a fundamental requirement for its success. Unfortunately, while Trump did not immediately oppose the idea, he did not make any firm commitment either. Trump's propensity to reverse course on statements that he makes at the moment, furthermore, undermines any firm takeaways from the meeting. Any direct American involvement in Ukraine would also undermine his support among his political base. One of Trump's key campaign promises was not to involve the US in 'endless foreign wars.' A move by Trump to deploy American soldiers to Ukraine would be politically tenuous, as fractures are already emerging among his political base over his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Trump's cordial meetings with Zelensky and European leaders may fuel hope among Ukraine's supporters in the coming days. But any optimism should be tempered by the damage done by Trump's meeting with Putin. Trump reportedly interrupted the meetings in Washington to call Putin. Trump's unwillingness to make firm commitments at the meetings with Zelensky and European leaders means that Russia, on balance, has succeeded in advancing its interests to the detriment of Ukraine and the prospects for a long-term, sustainable peace. James Horncastle is assistant professor and Edward and Emily McWhinney professor in international relations, Simon Fraser University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
AllAfrica
2 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Shanghai rally shows China markets don't need the West
The Shanghai Composite Index (SCI) closed at its highest level in a decade on Monday, finishing at 3,728. This is not just a local story but a global signal. Markets are often shaped by perception, and the perception now is that Asia is showing leadership at a time when many expected only caution. The SCI's 20% rebound since April is remarkable by any measure. It tells us that confidence can return quickly when conditions change. Chinese households, sitting on near-record levels of savings, have been ploughing cash into equities. The immediate trigger was President Donald Trump's decision to pause his tariff escalation with Beijing, removing a looming risk that had weighed heavily on sentiment. For months, global investors had been braced for confrontation, and the absence of fresh tariffs under a new 90-day truce released pent-up demand. What is striking is the speed of this turnaround. In April, Chinese equities were being sold off heavily and international investors were trimming exposure. But by August, the market had swung to a decade high. This kind of shift demonstrates the power of liquidity when coupled with even a modest easing of political risk. This rally is not occurring in isolation. Across Asia, momentum is building. Indian equities surged the most in more than three months on the back of tax-cut pledges. The MSCI Asia Pacific index has recently gained 0.4%, adding to signs that investors in the region are prepared to take on more risk. The synchronization is important: Asia is leaning into growth while European and US markets remain tentative as Trump makes a renewed try to end the Ukraine war. The Shanghai milestone carries global importance because of who is driving it. Local retail investors are taking the lead. Flush with liquidity, they are providing the fuel for the rally at a moment when international institutional investors remain largely cautious. This divergence matters. It shows that regional pools of capital are increasingly able to move markets on their own terms. The world can no longer assume that Wall Street sets the tone everywhere. For investors outside China, two lessons stand out. First, capital is no longer tied to a single center of gravity. The US still exerts enormous influence, but regional markets are proving capable of writing their own narrative. Second, politics has an immediate and powerful effect. Trump's tariff truce with Beijing is one of the clearest demonstrations this year that optimism returns almost instantly when barriers and uncertainty are lifted. The ripple effects are already visible. Cyclical stocks across Asia are attracting stronger bids. Oil prices are steadying, with Brent crude trading near US$81 a barrel as supply disruption concerns ease. Gold rose 0.4% as Treasuries inched higher, but safe-haven flows look vulnerable if investors continue to rotate toward equities. This is why Shanghai's rally should be seen as a leading indicator rather than a domestic quirk. Local investors are showing what happens when liquidity meets confidence: markets respond rapidly and decisively. If sentiment in Europe and the US follows the same path, we could see a broad-based re-rating of global equities into the final quarter of the year. Timing is critical. If Trump's mediated Ukraine war talks produce even a modest gesture toward progress, it would reinforce the optimism already visible in Asia. Combined with the pause in tariff escalation with China, that could provide precisely the environment in which sidelined global capital begins to move back into equities. Later this week, the US Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole retreat will give investors another focus point. Jerome Powell is widely expected to set the stage for a September rate cut after recent softer data. This tilts policy in favor of risk, but liquidity support matters little if investors are paralyzed by geopolitical concerns. The evidence from Shanghai is that once those concerns ease, capital moves swiftly. From my perspective, there are two broader conclusions. Asia has been underestimated. The assumption that it is merely a follower of Western sentiment has been challenged by a SCI rally of this scale, powered largely from within. The feedback loop between politics and markets is more immediate than ever. Every summit, truce and concession is repriced almost instantly. This volatility carries risk, but it is also where the greatest opportunities emerge. The decade-high close in Shanghai is not simply a domestic event. It's a global signal that liquidity, confidence and geopolitics are combining to reshape capital flows. International investors are paying close attention, and many will be forced to reconsider their positioning. Asia is no longer reflecting the mood of global markets. It's increasingly setting the pace.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Zelensky says Ukraine security guarantees to be ‘unpacked' in 10 days
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday after his meeting with US President Donald Trump and European leaders that security guarantees for Kyiv is likely to be worked out within 10 days. Advertisement 'Security guarantees will probably be 'unpacked' by our partners, and more and more details will emerge. All of this will somehow be formalised on paper within the next week to 10 days,' Zelensky said at a broadcast press briefing after his meetings. Trump told Zelensky on Monday that the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there, though the extent of any help was not immediately clear. 'It is important that the United States is sending a clear signal that it will be among the countries helping to coordinate and will also be a participant in the security guarantees for Ukraine,' Zelensky said. 'I believe this is a major step forward.' Although a peace deal appeared far from imminent after the meetings in Washington, Zelensky said his Monday meeting with Trump was his 'best' so far. Advertisement He also said Ukraine was ready to meet Russia in 'any format' and that territorial issues would be discussed on a bilateral level with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but no dates for a possible meeting with Moscow have been scheduled yet.
