logo
Democrats race toward 2028 while Republicans take a wait-and-see approach

Democrats race toward 2028 while Republicans take a wait-and-see approach

CNN13-05-2025

The 2028 presidential primary contests are still nearly three years away, but the early jockeying to replace President Donald Trump has already started in earnest — at least among Democrats.
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who narrowly won the 2020 Iowa caucuses, is back in Cedar Rapids on Tuesday for a veterans-focused town hall. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democrats' 2024 vice presidential nominee, and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore are attending events in South Carolina, a longtime early primary state, at the end of the month. Other would-be leaders of the party have started floating their names as possible contenders, beefing up their fundraising apparatuses, launching podcasts and visiting key states.
While Republicans appear wary of stepping on Trump's toes during the early days of his second term, Democrats are rushing to fill a leadership vacuum caused by their 2024 losses and uneven response to the current administration.
'I think [voters] are hungry and thirsty for what comes next, and these people see a political opportunity to fill that void and to make a name for themselves,' said one former 2020 Democratic presidential campaign staffer. 'Talk about their records, do more interviews, do more alternative media, start PACs, raise money, hire a small team, travel around the country — I think everybody sees an opening.'
The rush signals the potential for a wide-open Democratic field, even as former Vice President Kamala Harris weighs whether to run for governor of California in 2026 or launch a third bid for the White House.
The next election cycle could rival 2020, when more than two dozen people sought the party's nomination. Candidates began launching their campaigns as early as summer 2017, while more than a dozen people started running in the winter and spring following the 2018 midterms.
While the contours of a 2028 race are still difficult to divine at this stage, Democratic voters will likely look to candidates to articulate why they lost the last election and how best to defeat Trump's Make America Great Again movement, whose followers will be searching for an heir to the president. Already, those who have floated their names or said they're fielding calls about running have laid out their approach to taking on Trump's GOP successor.
Asked by veteran Democratic strategist (and CNN political analyst) David Axelrod last month whether she is considering a run, former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said 'yes,' before saying Democrats need to engage in deep introspection.
'Where did we go wrong?' she said. 'What are our policies going to be? What is our platform going to be? What will our tactics be? How will we overcome this impression that we're elitist?'
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has distinguished himself from other Democratic governors by aggressively taking on Trump and criticizing his own party's 'simpering timidity,' including during a fiery speech in New Hampshire last month. Kentucky's Andy Beshear — the two-term red-state governor who recently said he would 'consider' running for president — has started a podcast and is elevating his national profile. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has also jumped into the podcast game, angering members of his party along the way by breaking with many Democrats leaders on issues such as transgender athletes' participation in sports.
Others have participated in the growing trend of Democratic lawmakers holding town halls in districts held by Republicans. Walz, who has not ruled out a 2028 presidential run, held several events this spring. Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, who outperformed Harris to earn a battleground state Trump won last year and who has become a leading voice on how to win back moderates, held his own event in Pennsylvania over the weekend.
A few elected officials have been more coy. Governors such as Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Moore of Maryland have stressed their commitment to their work at home and have brushed off the 'resistance' label.
'I am not running,' Moore said when asked whether he would run for president in 2028 during an appearance on the 'The View' this month.
'I'm really excited about the work that's happening right now in the state of Maryland,' he said.
Of course, today's answer is not always tomorrow's: Then-Sen. Barack Obama said in January 2006 that he would not run for president and would serve his full six-year term only to launch a campaign in February 2007.
A Democratic strategist advising a possible 2028 candidate said they thought the future primary would be a 'healthy' size, which they said was a positive. Some of the policy ideas in major Biden administration laws such as the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act originated during the 2020 presidential primary. The next primary could offer a range of theories on how Democrats can defeat Trump's successor.
'The more people who step forward and say, 'This is why I think we lost, and this is how I will be able to win people over and this is the long term vision I have for our country,' the better,' the strategist said.
Harris has also started to reemerge since last year's election loss and leaving Washington four months ago. The former vice president recently spoke at a gala hosted by Emerge, which works with women interested in running for politics, and appeared at a fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee. She also made a surprise appearance at the Met Gala in New York, though she skipped the red carpet.
Looming over every appearance is the question of what Harris will do next: Either run for California governor, where her entrance into the race could clear the field, or wade into a crowded Democratic primary in 2028, where her opponents might attempt to magnify her failed 2020 and 2024 runs.
The 2020 Democratic campaign staffer pointed to Harris' poor showing in 2019 — when she dropped out before the Iowa caucuses — and her losses to Trump last November in every swing state.
'If the battleground states would have been more muddled, [or if] she would have won the popular vote, I think that there'd be a bigger push for her to stay involved at the presidential level,' they said.
Prospective Republican candidates, meanwhile, seem to be giving the president breathing room to enact his agenda and waiting to see what sort of influence he'll have in 2028, particularly when it comes to Vice President JD Vance. After weeks of flirting with the idea of a constitutionally prohibited third term in office — including selling 'Trump 2028' hats — Trump told NBC News in an interview last week he's 'not looking at' another campaign.
In the same interview, Trump pointed to two potential successors: Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Most of the 2028 GOP field is taking a 'wait-and-see approach' to the presidential contest and whether Trump lets the race play out or throws his weight behind Vance or another candidate, said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist who worked on Rubio's 2016 presidential campaign.
'The leadership vacuum [on the left] is going to draw people into the presidential race sooner. There's no leadership vacuum' among Republicans, Conant said. 'If anything, it's a crowded room filled by one man.'
Unlike Democrats, Republicans traveling to early primary states do so at their own peril, said Bill Stepien, a GOP strategist who managed Trump's 2020 campaign.
'Everyone knows why you're in Manchester, New Hampshire, or Ames, Iowa. You're not fooling anybody,' he said. 'The advice is to do the job you have and do it really, really well.'
Some prospective candidates have received the message. The New Hampshire Republican Party was in discussion late last year with two prospective GOP presidential contenders about headlining events in 2025, one person with knowledge of the planning told CNN. But after Trump's inauguration, the conversations abruptly ended.
'Since then, there's been crickets,' the person said. 'It's almost as if the word has gotten out not to rain on Trump's parade.' The New Hampshire Republican Party did not respond to requests for comment.
The dark period is a stark change from the summer of 2024, when many of the GOP's ascending stars appeared eager to court Granite State Republicans at the party's July convention. Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Sen. Tom Cotton, both of Arkansas, addressed the New Hampshire delegation while several others had a more intimate and private audience, the source said.
Convention organizers assigned New Hampshire attendees to a hotel in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin — an hour away from the convention in downtown Milwaukee, fueling speculation that Trump's advisers didn't want ambitious Republicans hobnobbing too much with the delegates from the first-in-the-nation primary.
Now, the expectation is that activity will remain limited through 2025.
'No one is informally laying the groundwork, no one is organizing to a 'Draft X Candidate' committee,' said the person familiar with the New Hampshire GOP's discussions. 'I don't see anything happening this year.'
Another GOP strategist said prospective candidates who would normally use this time to start super PACs and deliver set-piece speeches need to instead take a more subtle approach oriented around supporting the administration.
'You're going to get yourself on Fox [News] as much as possible. You're going to try to do something high profile to support the president, but then you're quietly thinking, 'All right, what am I going to need? How can I raise a whole bunch of money?'' the strategist said. 'I wouldn't be going to Iowa and New Hampshire yet.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cuomo attacked during debate by fellow Dems for allegedly lying to Congress about COVID nursing home scandal
Cuomo attacked during debate by fellow Dems for allegedly lying to Congress about COVID nursing home scandal

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Cuomo attacked during debate by fellow Dems for allegedly lying to Congress about COVID nursing home scandal

Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was blasted by fellow Democrats running against him to be the next mayor of New York City for lying to Congress, an allegation pushed by Republicans that the Trump administration is currently investigating. Cuomo repeatedly dismissed questions throughout Wednesday night's debate on whether he lied to Congress about his role in drafting a New York State Department of Health report that officials determined had undercounted the number of nursing home deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, Cuomo blasted the current investigation as a symptom of partisan politics and insisted the report in question "did not undercount the deaths." "The people died and he still won't answer your questions," Cuomo's opponent, Michael Blake, a former state assemblyman from the Bronx, said after Cuomo failed to provide a straight answer. Blake's retort resulted in one of the debate moderators asking Cuomo once again to respond to the allegations that he lied to Congress about his role in drafting the report that undercounted the number of COVID-19 nursing home deaths. This time, he engaged. "No, I told Congress the truth," Cuomo relented. "No, we did not undercount any deaths," he added. "When they are all counted, we're number 38 out of 50, which I think, shows that compared to what other states went through, we had it first and worst, and that only 12 states had a lower rate of death – we should really be thanking the women and men who worked on those things." "It's just a yes or no question," the moderator shot back at Cuomo. "Were you involved in the producing of that report?" However, Cuomo still did not address the question directly, leading to laughter from his opponents. "It's not only that Andrew Cuomo lied to Congress – which is perjury – he also lied to the grieving families whose loved ones he sent in to those nursing homes to protect his $5 million book deal," said Brad Lander, New York City's comptroller. "That's corruption." Last month, the Trump administration's Department of Justice opened a criminal investigation to get to the bottom of whether Cuomo lied to Congress about the decisions he made during the COVID-19 pandemic while serving as governor. In March 2020, Cuomo issued a directive that initially barred nursing homes from refusing to accept patients who had tested positive for COVID-19. The directive was meant to free up beds for overwhelmed hospitals, but more than 9,000 recovering coronavirus patients were ultimately released from hospitals into nursing homes under the directive, which was later rescinded amid speculation that it had accelerated outbreaks. Subsequently, a report released in March 2022 by the New York state comptroller found Cuomo's Health Department "was not transparent in its reporting of COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes" and it "understated the number of deaths at nursing homes by as much as 50%" during some points of the pandemic. New York Attorney General Letitia James similarly released a report amid the pandemic showing New York state nursing home deaths had been undercounted.

Trump's Travel Ban Could Shake Up International Sporting Events
Trump's Travel Ban Could Shake Up International Sporting Events

New York Times

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump's Travel Ban Could Shake Up International Sporting Events

The proclamation President Trump's signed this week banning travel to the United States by people from a dozen countries makes an exception for athletes, coaches and support staff for 'major sporting events,' including the World Cup and the Olympics. What qualifies as a major sporting event remains to be seen. Mr. Trump's proclamation declaring the ban, issued on Wednesday, says that the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, will determine which events can receive an exemption. A host of international sporting events are planned in the United States over the next months and years. While some of the countries on the ban list, like Chad and Yemen, are not traditional sporting powers, others, like Iran and Haiti, could well expect to send athletes to the United States for a range of competitions. Mr. Trump also imposed a lower level of restrictions on seven other countries, including Cuba, a strong player on the international sporting stage, and Venezuela. Decisions will have to be made quickly. The CONCACAF Gold Cup, the men's soccer championship for North American, Central American and Caribbean nations, begins June 14 and will be played at sites across the United States (and one in Canada). Haiti has qualified for the competition and is scheduled to play games in San Diego, Houston and Arlington, Texas. The Club World Cup, the world championship for men's club soccer teams, also begins June 14 in several U.S. cities. No team based in a country on the banned list has qualified, but the teams involved include players and staff members from all over the world. CONCACAF, which runs the Gold Cup, and FIFA, which runs the Club World Cup, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Other events coming to the United States this year — including the under-19 softball World Cup and the world skateboarding championships — are less likely to be considered 'major' events. There are also big races, like the Chicago and New York marathons in the fall. Mr. Rubio may find himself facing a lot of judgment calls. The implications for college athletics, where rosters in many sports are dotted with international students, are also unclear. Both events that are explicitly exempted from the ban — the men's soccer World Cup and the Summer Olympics — are coming to the United States after this year. The World Cup is scheduled for 2026, and Iran has already qualified. (Hosting duties will be shared with Canada and Mexico.) Los Angeles will host the Summer Olympics in 2028.

Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag
Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 16: Samuel Altman, CEO of OpenAI, testifies before the Senate Judiciary ... More Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law May 16, 2023 in Washington, DC. The committee held an oversight hearing to examine A.I., focusing on rules for artificial intelligence. (Photo by) Steve Jobs often downplayed his accomplishments by saying that 'creativity is just connecting things.' Regardless of whether this affects the way you understand his legacy, it is beyond the range of doubt that most innovation comes from interdisciplinary efforts. Everyone agrees that if AI is to exponentially increase collaboration across disciplines, the laws must not lag too far behind technology. The following explores how a less obvious interpretation of this phrase will help us do what Jobs explained was the logic behind his genius The Regulatory Lag What most people mean when they say that legislation and regulation have difficulty keeping pace with the rate of innovation because the innovation and its consequences are not well known until well after the product hits the market. While that is true, it only tells half of the story. Technological innovations also put more attenuated branches of the law under pressure to adjust. These are second-order, more indirect legal effects, where whole sets of laws—originally unrelated to the new technology—have to adapt to enable society to maximize the full potential of the innovation. One classic example comes from the time right after the Internet became mainstream. After digital communication and connectivity became widespread and expedited international communication and commercial relations, nations discovered that barriers to cross-border trade and investment were getting in the way. Barriers such as tariffs and outdated investment FDI partnership requirements—had to be lowered or eliminated if the Internet was to be an effective catalyst to global economic growth. Neoliberal Reforms When the internet emerged in the 1990s, much attention went to laws that directly regulated it—such as data privacy, digital speech, and cybersecurity. But some of the most important legal changes were not about the internet itself. They were about removing indirect legal barriers that stood in the way of its broader economic and social potential. Cross-border trade and investment rules, for instance, had to evolve. Tariffs on goods, restrictions on foreign ownership, and outdated service regulations had little to do with the internet as a technology, but everything to do with whether global e-commerce, remote work, and digital entrepreneurship could flourish. These indirect legal constraints were largely overlooked in early internet governance debates, yet their reform was essential to unleashing the internet's full power. Artificial Intelligence and Indirect Barriers A comparable story is starting to unfold with artificial intelligence. While much of the focus when talking about law and AI has been given to algorithmic accountability and data privacy, there is also an opportunity for a larger societal return from AI in its ability to reduce barriers between disciplines. AI is increasing the viability of interdisciplinary work because it can synthesize, translate, and apply knowledge across domains in ways that make cross-field collaboration more essential. Already we are seeing marriages of law and computer science, medicine and machine learning, environmental modeling, and language processing. AI is a general-purpose technology that rewards those who are capable of marrying insights across disciplines. In that sense, the AI era is also the era of interdisciplinary boundary-blurring opportunities triggered by AI are up against legal barriers to entry across disciplines and professions. In many professions, it requires learning a patchwork of licensure regimes and intractable definitions of domain knowledge to gain the right to practice or contribute constructively. While some of these regulations are generally intended to protect public interests, they can also hinder innovation and prevent new interdisciplinary practices from gaining traction. To achieve the full potential of AI-enabled collaboration, many of these legal barriers need to be eliminated—or at least reimagined. We are starting to see some positive movements. For example, a few states are starting to grant nurse practitioners and physician assistants greater autonomy in clinical decision-making, and that's a step toward cross-disciplinary collaboration of healthcare and AI diagnostics. For now, this is a move in the right direction. However, In some other fields, the professional rules of engagement support silos. This must change if we're going to be serious about enabling AI to help us crack complex, interdependent problems. Legislators and regulators cannot focus exclusively on the bark that protects the tree of change, they must also focus on the hidden network of roots that that quietly nourish and sustain it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store