Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks
Minister of Trade and Industry, Parks Tau, provided a brief outline of his team's engagements with officials from the United States.
Tau addressed the media on Wednesday evening as the dust settled on a frenetic meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Cyril Ramaphosa in a packed Oval Office.
Trade relations were identified as a key objective of the trip to the US, with Tau discussing tariffs, minerals, and the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa).
Framework agreement submitted
Tau, along with Agricultural Minister John Steenhuisen, said the two had been in talks with their US counterparts since Monday.
At the first meeting of trade representatives, US officials provided feedback on areas where the nations may not have aligned.
Tau said the SA delegation relayed this feedback back home, resulting in a revised proposal submitted on Wednesday.
'We have submitted a proposal to the United States with regards to a framework agreement, focusing on issues related to trade and investment,' said Tau.
The proposal identified areas for increased trade and access to each party's markets, while illustrating the benefits of keeping channels as open as possible.
Agoa still before Congress
On Agoa, Tau said that South African officials were informed that the agreement was still before Congress and would be settled later.
'Having met with the trade ministers in Africa at the recent African Continental Free Trade Area Council of Ministers, we have agreed to develop a collective approach with regard to Agoa,' said Tau.
He added that a US-Africa trade forum, at which the African leaders would present this collective agreement, was in the pipeline.
'As South Africa, we have it in our document that the reauthorisation of Agoa is important,' Tau said.
The minister highlighted the role of South Africa's neighbours in negotiations through the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu).
'The context of discussing Sacu is because we negotiate tariffs as a customs union, and this is one of the areas that the US required a bit more elaboration.
'We agreed that we would have the issues on tariffs and non-tariff barriers added, which are the issues we added yesterday,' Tau explained.
Tariff implications
Tau insisted that South Africa was a positive contributor to the US's interests.
The minister claimed that 77% of the products that the US accessed in South African markets were done so tariff-free.
'When we talk tariffs, we are only relating to them in relation to the products that are not listed in the 77%.
'We also indicated the reality that with regards to the main products we sell into the US, these would include some of our minerals, minerals even under the reciprocal tariffs have been excluded,' he explained.
Tau said South Africa supplied 12 of the US' priority minerals, and it was the primary supplier of nine of them.
Other trade avenues mentioned were the establishment of digital opportunities and South Africa gaining access to US liquefied natural gas.
Equity equivalent
Concerns about employment equity hampering potential US investment were addressed, with Tau stating that at least 10 US companies were benefiting from an existing accommodation.
Tau explained that South Africa had a programme to help bridge employment equity gaps called the Equity Equivalent Programmes for Multinationals.
These equity equivalent programmes allow foreign companies to offset their black economic empowerment requirements against skills development or socio-economic programmes.
'They are participating in a manner that enables supply and enterprise development. So, they are building the capacity of their own suppliers in our region, which increases their ability to produce in the country,' stated Tau.
This may open the door for any of Elon Musk's enterprises, with the minister saying Ramaphosa had already met with the South African-born businessman last year.
'We are continuing to pursue Tesla with regards to investing in South Africa as part of the original equipment manufacturers, and we intend to pursue that discussion with them,' Tau concluded.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa says Trump meeting a success despite ambush [VIDEO]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
What role, if any, is South Africa playing in Ukraine peace efforts?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been in direct telephonic contact with all the main players, but it is unclear just how significant a role South Africa can, or will play. Before the big Ukraine war peace summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, 15 August 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa had phone calls last week with the three key players, Putin, Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky – who is, inexplicably, not invited to the Alaska meeting. Were Ramaphosa's calls an indication that he and South Africa have a role to play in trying to end Russia's brutal war on Ukraine, now in its 42nd month? Or was this merely some sort of diplomatic name-dropping? It's clear from the statement by his office that Ramaphosa and Trump mainly discussed tariffs and other aspects of the fraught South Africa-US relationship. Whether they also talked about Trump's peace efforts in Ukraine is unclear. But peace was, of course, the main focus of Ramaphosa's calls with Putin on Thursday, 7 August and Zelensky on 8 August. The Kremlin statement said Putin had shared with Ramaphosa the main results of his conversation the day before in Moscow with Trump's special envoy on the peace process, Steven Witkoff. Putin also complimented the African Peace Initiative, the delegation of Africans which Ramaphosa led in June 2023, meeting Zelensky in Kyiv and Putin in St Petersburg. Ramaphosa's office later said Putin had asked to brief the President on the peace process and had 'expressed his recognition and appreciation for South Africa's involvement in advancing a peace process between Russia and Ukraine'. Call with Zelensky, cryptic statements A day later, Zelensky posted on X that his call with Ramaphosa had been 'a friendly and candid conversation about how to achieve real peace and stop the killings'. He said Ramaphosa had shared details of his conversation with 'the Russian side' (Putin) and was adamant that 'the path to peace must begin with a ceasefire'. Ramaphosa's office said Zelensky 'expressed his appreciation for South Africa's continued support in finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. These statements were rather cryptic. Zelensky and Putin are poles apart on how to end this vicious war, yet both expressed appreciation for Ramaphosa's contributions to peace efforts. So what did Ramaphosa say, what advice, if any, did he give? No one who really knows seems to be saying. Jalel Harchaoui, a political scientist at the Royal United Services Institute, said he believed 'Ramaphosa couldn't possibly have said anything of relevance' in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin. And Ramaphosa's conversations with Zelensky and Putin were probably 'just standard fare', underlining his general narrative that he wants a ceasefire. 'And that does not mean over-concern about Ukraine's territorial integrity or the status of the occupied territories,' said Samuel Ramani, lecturer in politics and international relations at Oxford University (and author of the book, Russia in Africa). 'Moreover, South Africa wants to be seen as supportive of a key Trump initiative to help it deal with the US 30% import tariffs. So I think this is largely routine from him. I wouldn't read too much into it,' he said. Peace talks in SA? One source suggested, however, that a future round of the peace talks starting in Alaska could be held in South Africa. Was this discussed in the phone calls? Dzvinka Kachur, co-founder of the Ukrainian Association in South Africa, noted that Ramaphosa had in the past spoken about the importance of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and so she hoped that he underscored this in his call with Putin. It should also be noted that Zelensky made about 30 calls to international leaders last week to underscore his point that no Ukraine peace negotiations were possible without Ukraine in the room, and that a ceasefire should be unconditional, rather than conditioned on territorial concessions, as the US had initially suggested. And it is understood that Putin also initiated the call to Ramaphosa. Nevertheless Ramaphosa's phone conversations – and there have been others, as well as Zelensky's visit to Pretoria in April and Ramaphosa's in-person meeting with Putin at the BRICS+ summit in Kazan in October 2024 – do prompt the wider question of whether Ramaphosa and South Africa are playing any kind of real role in the Ukraine peace process, and if so what is the contribution, and what should it be? Kachur noted that South Africa was playing a concrete role in the attempts to return some of the about 20,000 Ukrainian children abducted by Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and deported to Russia. When Zelensky met Ramaphosa in Pretoria, he gave him a list of 400 abducted children who South Africa promised to try to return – but with no success and no visible progress so far. African Peace Initiative But Kachur believes there is much South Africa and Ramaphosa could still do for Africa and otherwise. The 2023 African Peace Initiative remained important, not only because of those direct impacts which Ramani mentioned – such as African food insecurity caused by Russia's blockade of Ukraine's grain exports. It also remained important because the Ukraine war also had wider, deeper and longer impacts on principles important to Africa, such as restitution for war damages, accountability for aggression, reframing borders, and the future of the UN system. She also noted that Russia's questionable presence in the Central African Republic, Mali and Niger through the Wagner private security company and its successor, the Africa Corps, had direct negative outcomes for the human rights, safety and security of the continent. 'The illegal, undocumented export of raw materials from these countries also provides Russia with the funding to continue the aggression. This is not bringing any benefits to the continent, but creates more trauma, undocumented weapons and suffering.' And she believes that given its history and role as a champion of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, South Africa could and should be doing more to ensure nuclear safety – which has been jeopardised by Russia's military capture of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Perhaps Ramaphosa was conveying messages in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin, said Steven Gruzd, head of the Africa-Russia project at the South African Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg. 'But I don't think South Africa is playing any major role in peacemaking between Ukraine and Russia. 'I don't see much room and evidence of us being a major peacemaker. 'The African Peace Initiative didn't really go very far. And there was not much follow-up. I don't think the money or the infrastructure has been put behind it to really make it a serious effort.' Gruzd added though that South Africa had also 'taken measures to appear less one-sided (i.e. pro-Russian) in this conflict, the biggest being Zelensky's visit to SA in April'. He thought that South Africa could play a bigger role in the Ukraine peace effort but that would require US support, which could in turn improve its poor relations with Washington. And he noted that South Africa has attended most of Zelensky's international peace formula meetings (which began in 2023) and is working on two points of the formula – returning kidnapped Ukrainian children and exchanging prisoners of war. Denys Reva, researcher at the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, said those meetings still continued at a lower level (mainly, it seems, on the return of the abducted children). And although the African Peace Initiative did not seem to still exist as a formal grouping, South Africa had been engaging in different peace processes, promoting the values of the African peace plan, including advancing African interests and values. For example, at the UN in New York in September 2024, South Africa joined the 'Friends for Peace' group backing the China-Brazil peace plan (which Zelensky strongly opposes because he believes it serves Moscow's interests mainly because it does not demand the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine, as his plan does). Read more: War in Ukraine 'Realistically, no single initiative has yet succeeded in bringing peace,' Reva says. 'Pretoria seems to have shifted its emphasis towards humanitarian concerns, rather than positioning itself as a primary broker of a peace settlement.' He added that 'SA's readiness to mediate the return of the children is an important humanitarian contribution amid stalled negotiations elsewhere. I think Pretoria has been fairly consistent in this regard, and I think that both Kyiv and Moscow probably welcome South African efforts.' And he said both Kyiv and Moscow also see South Africa as crucial in improving their relations with Africa. Ramani said: 'I'm not hearing too much about South Africa being an influential interlocutor.' He added that other countries of the Global South were playing a greater peace role, citing the United Arab Emirates, which he said had hoped to host Friday's summit between Trump and Putin. However, he also added that South Africa was probably doing its best to ensure that the voice of Africa was heard in the Ukraine peace process, and that this was important because the war had significant implications for food security, supply chains and many other things that impacted Africa's socioeconomic development so profoundly. DM
The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
I want a three-way with Putin and Zelensky, says Trump on pending meeting
US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was planning a second meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin soon after Friday's Alaska summit – this time with Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky included. Trump is due to sit down with Putin in Anchorage on Friday, the first meeting between the Russian leader and a sitting US president since 2021. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' he told reporters. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between president Putin and president Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The high-stakes talks come with Trump seeking to broker an end to Russia's nearly three-and-a-half year war in Ukraine, and Zelensky and his European allies have urged the Republican to push for a ceasefire. A stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelensky has not been invited to the Anchorage meeting Friday, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions on Ukraine. Trump said Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if Putin did not agree to end the war after Friday's meeting, without elaborating. The US leader promised dozens of times during his 2024 election campaign to end the war on his first day in office but has made scant progress towards brokering a peace deal. He threatened 'secondary sanctions' on Russia's trading partners over its invasion of Ukraine but his deadline for action came and went last week with no action announced. Trump told reporters he'd had a 'very good call' with European leaders including Zelensky as he took questions from reporters at an arts event at Washington's Kennedy Center. 'I would rate it at 10. You know – very, very friendly,' he said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. © Agence France-Presse
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Barloworld's future at stake as Competition Tribunal hears acquisition details
Former executives in Barloworld are acquiring Barloworld through Entsha Proprietary Limited while Saudi Zahid Group is the other shareholder in Newco. Image: Supplied The Competition Tribunal hearing concerning the acquisition of the longstanding South African company Barloworld by Newco has ignited discussions around empowerment for historically disadvantaged persons as well as the company's impending delisting from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). As the details unfolded on Wednesday, tensions rose over the implications of this significant transaction. Former executives in Barloworld are acquiring Barloworld through Entsha Proprietary Limited while Saudi Zahid Group is the other shareholder in Newco. With Newco intending to bump up its shareholding in the South African company, Barloworld will ultimately be delisted from the JSE. The merging parties through their legal representative told the Competition Tribunal hearing on Wednesday that the delisting of Barloworld was a major condition for the implementation of an Employee Share-Ownership Program (ESOP). After delisting, a women led consortium will also be empowered into the company. 'The merger parties' position is quite clear that if there is no delisting, they're not in a position to implement an ESOP. That being said, we are confident and the likelihood is that there will be a delisting,' the merging parties told the Competition Tribunal hearing. Newco is offering R123.10 per share for Barloworld. The tribunal also heard on Wednesday that Newco now has assurances of about 58% shareholders to raise its stake in the company and delist it. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Barloworld's financial performance adds context to what is at stake. For the year ended September 2024, revenue declined by 7% to R42 billion, with operating profit from core activities falling 12.6% to R3.8bn and Ebitda declining 7% to R5bn. Gross debt, however, eased 29% to R7.9bn. The delisting of Barloworld is important for Newco as without it, it will be 'practically difficult for it to implement' transactions overpowering historically disadvantaged persons. To attain this, Newco is pursuing to bump up its stake to 90%. 'So that is why the HDP transactions are conditional on Newco effectively acquiring all of the Barloworld shares and Barloworld being delisted,' said the merging parties legal representative at the hearing. Wiri Gumbie, principal analyst for mergers and acquisitions at the Competition Commission, told the hearing that he was 'hopeful' that Newco will attain the 90% threshold to unlock total control of Barloworld and delist it. However, some concerns emerged that the delisting of Barloworld may not be easy to attain given that some minority shareholders could be disinterested in giving up their interests in the company. 'It's sounding more and more that the chances of the delisting may certainly not happen. The chances of workers benefiting and the women led consortium benefiting is certainly hanging in the balance in this regard and unfortunately, it is a concern now regardless,' the Competition Tribunal heard. Gumbi also revealed that the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) had indicated that it required the securing of black economic empowerment shareholder participation for it to support the transaction. The merging parties had addressed and resolved this, and the PIC is now satisfied that this has been settled under the conditions set out. Newco had included the empowerment provisions for historically disadvantaged persons and the ESOP after discussions with the PIC. Remaining shareholders that elect not to sell their shares then the requirement to do an ESOP will risk further dilution of their minority stakes. 'If there are minority shareholders that remain on the list and there needs to be, for example, an issuance of new shares or some other major transaction to implement those, there would presumably be some kind of shareholder approvals and and basically shareholder votes required and on such matters,' said the merging parties legal counsel. 'It may well be that if the transaction is implemented by way of an issuance of new shares, they may be affected because they would be effectively a dilution of their shares.' BUSINESS REPORT
