Get superior tracking for only $30 with this smart alternative to the AirTag
TL;DR: The KeySmart SmartCard slips right into your wallet or passport holder, helping you keep tabs on your valuables without the bulk. Right now, you can grab a three-pack for just $89.99 (reg. $119).
The KeySmart SmartCard offers a minimalist solution for keeping tabs on your belongings. Its ultra-slim design fits anywhere, and with Find My app compatibility, you can locate your items in seconds, all from your Apple device. Right now, you can score a three-pack for $89.99, making them just $30 each.
Let's face it — in today's busy world, none of us have twenty minutes to hunt for our wallet every time we misplace it. And we really don't have time to lose the items we use the most. That's where the KeySmart® SmartCard comes in, offering a sleek, ultra-thin tracker that keeps you organized.
Imagine what you can do with the half-hour you spend weekly searching for random belongings. The KeySmart® SmartCard features a compact design that fits into tiny spaces, unlike the AirTag. And thanks to the Apple Find My app integration, finding items is as easy as opening your phone.
Aside from besting the AirTag with subtle and convenient placement thanks to its sleek size, the KeySmart® SmartCard also improves on the AirTag's waterproof status. It offers an IPX8 rating compared to the AirTag's IP67 rating, so it can withstand being submerged in water for longer.
While the AirTag needs new batteries every time it dies, the KeySmart® SmartCard operates on a rechargeable battery that easily powers up with a Qi-enabled wireless charger.
Stay organized and worry-free with this three-pack of KeySmart SmartCards, now available for just $89.99 (reg. $119.97), only $30 each.
StackSocial prices subject to change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett outlines plan to save Intel and America's advanced chip manufacturing
1. Yes, the USA NEEDS INTEL, as Intel is the only U.S. company capable of providing state of the art logic manufacturing. 2. Neither Samsung or TSMC plan to bring their state of the art manufacturing to the U.S. in the near term. 3. U.S. customers like Nvidia, Apple, Google, etc needs and should understand they NEED a second source for their lead product manufacturing due to pricing, geographic stability and supply line security reasons. 4. Intel is cash poor and can't afford to invest in the capacity needed in the future to replace TSMC or even a reasonable fraction of TSMC capacity. They probably need a cash infusion of $40B or so to be competitive. Realistically that investment is 100% of the Chip Act Capital grants so unlikely the USG is the savior. 5. The only place the cash can come from is the customers. They are all cash rich and if 8 of them were willing to invest $5B each then Intel would have a chance. 6. The current Intel CEO's comments about not investing in new technology (14A) until customers sign up is a joke. To win in this space you need to be the leader in technology not the follower. It takes multiple years to create one of these technologies and no customer wants to sign up for something that is second best. 7. Fortunately Intel has good technology to work with (high NA EUV, backside power, etc) so they have a realistic shot at leadership IF THEY INVEST NOW. They just need the money. 8. Where does the money come from? The customers invest for a piece of Intel and guaranteed supply. Why should they invest? Domestic supply, second source, national security, leverage in negotiating with TSMC, etc. AND IF THE USG GETS ITS ACT TOGETHER, they catalyze the action with a 50% (or whatever number Trump picks) tariff on state of the art semi imports. If we can support domestic steel and aluminum, surely we can support domestic semiconductors. 9. The FFWBMs (four former wise board members) of Intel continue to claim you have to break Intel into two pieces before any customer will invest in Intel. Be serious. There are many company interactions that involve both supply and competition. It is also extremely hard to imagine Intel really competing with the likes of Nvidia, Apple, Meta, Google, Dell, etc in their well established product lines. By all means, if you want to complicate the problem, then take the time to split up Intel and make the FFWBMs happy but if you're in the business of saving Intel and its core manufacturing strength for the USA then solve the real problem – immediate investment in Intel, committed customers, national security, etc. 10. POTUS and DoC can set the stage, the customers can make the necessary investments, the Intel Board can finally do something positive for the company, and we stop writing opinion pieces on the topic. The opinions expressed in commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of once-iconic Intel fell into a 20-year decline The day after Trump called Intel's chief 'conflicted,' former directors call for a new company, a new board, and a new CEO Trump accuses Intel CEO of being 'highly conflicted,' demands resignation as Tom Cotton highlights reporting into China ties This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here Are My Top "Magnificent Seven" Stocks to Buy Now
Key Points Apple and Tesla are starting to look more intriguing at their latest price points. AI buildout is a massive tailwind for nearly all seven of these companies. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › The "Magnificent Seven" is a term coined by CNBC's Jim Cramer that includes some of the leading tech companies in the market. The cohort consists of: Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) All of these companies (except for Nvidia) have reported results, and investors may be curious as to which ones look like solid buys. I think all of these stocks are growing more interesting each day, but of the seven, I think five are a buy and two are to be watched. I'm keeping an eye on Apple and Tesla Over the past few years, many of these companies have delivered explosive revenue growth, except for Apple. Apple's growth finally returned in Q3 FY 2025, delivering double-digit growth (if you round up) for the first time since early 2022. Still, there are some questions about being behind in the AI arms race and what Apple's next big product is. I'm not ready to declare Apple a buy yet, but it's growing more intriguing with each quarter. Tesla is in the worst shape of any Magnificent Seven company, with revenue falling 16% year over year in Q2. Additionally, with EV and regulatory credits getting eliminated, significant headwinds are popping up. However, Tesla's business has never been solely about EVs; otherwise, its valuation wouldn't make sense. An investment in Tesla is a bet that its humanoid robots, AI, self-driving, and rob-taxis will all be successes eventually. But for right now, I'm comfortable waiting on Tesla's situation to improve. I'm a buyer of the remaining five The other five members of the Magnificent Seven all look promising to me, as they're all experiencing strong growth. Meta Platforms delivered a shocking Q2 report that delivered 22% revenue growth despite only guiding for 13% growth. That strength is expected to continue through Q3, with 20% revenue growth expected. Meta's advertising business is second to none, and the improvements it's making with AI to aid in ad creation and engagement are starting to pay off. Alphabet similarly had a strong advertising quarter, despite many investors being worried about Google Search potentially being left behind by generative AI. Google Search's revenue rose 12% year over year, showcasing its strength and silencing doubters about its longevity. Companywide, Alphabet's revenue rose 14% year over year, with diluted earnings per share rising 22%. That's an impressive result from a company that is supposed to be struggling. Additionally, Alphabet is the cheapest stock on this list, trading for 20 times forward earnings. All of this combines to make Alphabet one of the best stocks to buy right now. Despite Microsoft being the second-largest company in the world, it delivered monster growth in Q4 FY 2025 (ended June 30). Revenue was up 18% year over year, but the biggest shock in its report was Azure. Azure is Microsoft's cloud computing product and is a leading platform for building AI models. Azure's revenue was up a jaw-dropping 39% this quarter, showcasing strong demand for computing power. This tailwind will persist for some time, making Microsoft an excellent stock to scoop up now. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) investors had a negative reaction to its report, which caused shares to sink following earnings. However, I don't think they were as bad as the market thought, and the long-term outlook is still positive for the company. Amazon's profit growth continues to outpace revenue growth thanks to the strength of high-margin businesses like advertising and Amazon Web Services (AWS). As long as this trend continues, Amazon will be a strong long-term pick. With both advertising and AWS being Amazon's fastest-growing segments by far, this trend looks primed to continue for the foreseeable future. Last is Nvidia, which hasn't reported earnings yet. However, all of the companies involved in building out AI infrastructure on this list stated that their capital expenditures will be rising next year due to increased data center spend. This bodes well for Nvidia, as it receives a huge chunk of this spend. Additionally, Nvidia has reapplied for its export license to begin shipping H20 chips to China again, which will provide another growth tailwind for its business. I expect Nvidia to report blowout earnings on Aug. 27, making the stock a smart stock to scoop up before then. Nvidia may be the world's largest company, but I expect it to get even bigger with increased AI buildout. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here Are My Top "Magnificent Seven" Stocks to Buy Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Shark Tank' star Kevin O'Leary says being liked has nothing to do with success—Steve Jobs taught him: ‘You can't worry about whose feelings you bruise'
Multimillionaire investor Kevin O'Leary goes by the nickname 'Mr. Wonderful,' but he doesn't feel the need to play nice—he says being liked has nothing to do with success. In actuality, being a respected and effective business partner is most important, in order to tap into 'signal' mode and drive the best results. It's a leadership style he picked up from working with the late Apple cofounder Steve Jobs in the 1990s, who may not have been the most enjoyable to work with, but whose infectious success drew people into his orbit. CEOs take on all sorts of personas, from the benevolent leader to the cutthroat business executive. Millionaire entrepreneur Kevin O'Leary is famous for his brutally honest, intimidating aura on-screen as a Shark Tank investor—and some of that leadership style rubbed off on him from working with the late Apple cofounder Steve Jobs. 'I don't think people you work with need to be your friends,' O'Leary tells Fortune. 'They have to respect you, and you have to lead them forward on their careers, make the money, and help them achieve their goals.' O'Leary, the so-called 'Mr. Wonderful,' doesn't feel the need to play nice or sugarcoat his opinions, and it may be part of the reason why he's amassed a $400 million fortune through his business success. The serial investor made a big splash in 1999 when he sold his business SoftKey Software Products to Mattel for $4.2 billion, just after working with Jobs on developing Apple's educational software. O'Leary Ventures, his venture capital firm, has also backed more than 80 startups including sustainable company Blueland—which has raked in over $100 million in lifetime sales—and $14.5 million photo printing app Groovebook. Scoring a deal with 'Mr. Wonderful' on Shark Tank and beyond is no easy venture—he's known as a quick-witted, bold, and demanding business investor. And he isn't afraid to ruffle some feathers, as he's embodied a 'founder's mindset' that prioritizes signal over noise. That means being able to get three to five of the most important things done quickly, while drowning out outside chaos and distractions. It's a leadership strategy he observed from Jobs in the 1990s, who often disregarded feelings in order to ensure his business partnerships thrived. O'Leary knows he needs to crack a few eggs to make an omlete—even if it means not being popular. 'I don't spend a lot of time on likability, I don't care about that. It seems so irrelevant. If you spend your time worrying about that, you're going to fail for sure, because you're going to miss the signal,' O'Leary continues. 'The signal is not having everybody like you—that has nothing to do with success…You can't worry about whose feelings you bruise. You've got to get it done.' Working with Jobs and leading with tough love: 'You're gonna deal with it anyways' Silicon Valley CEOs aren't known to be the most friendly or personable—and the late tech mogul Jobs was no exception to that rule. While SoftKey was working with Apple in creating new educational software, O'Leary had suggested that Jobs hear why teachers and students want from the games. But the Apple cofounder was having none of it, stating their opinions didn't matter, and that the programs would work best under Jobs' direction. 'Over time, you want to be part of that momentum, because you're on the winning team. We made a lot of money with Steve Jobs, he was right. 'You make the software, I'll deliver the market. Just go do it right.' I listened to him, and he was right.' O'Leary notes that it's more important to be respected than well-liked. His leadership strategy revolves around leading his business partners forward in their careers, making them lots of money, and helping them achieve their goals. It might require some tough love, but the most successful people he's worked with, including Jobs, aren't hung up on being enjoyable. 'I don't think that's certainly how Jobs operated, and so I don't spend a lot of time worrying about that stuff,' O'Leary says. 'I know a lot of people don't like me because I'm blunt and I tell the truth—I don't really care. It's the truth today, it's the truth next week, it's the truth in six months. You're gonna deal with it anyways.' Moments Jobs proved his success required ruling with an iron fist Jobs was well known for creating tense work environments, but after all, diamonds are made under pressure. As a perfectionist who loved to micromanage his employees, even the smallest perceived error could have resulted in a tirade. For instance, staffers on his Macintosh team were once berated for having improper spacing in the system's interface. The devil is in the details—and now there are more than 100 million Macs in use. 'It created a high-pressure environment,' Chris Neck, professor of management at Arizona State University, wrote about Jobs' intense leadership style. 'He pushed the original Mac team with impossible deadlines, often clashing with engineers but producing a revolutionary product.' Neck noted that this abrasive approach lost Apple some key talents, such as Macintosh computer designer Jef Raskin, who decided to leave the company in 1982. Even when Jobs was pursuing other projects outside of Apple, he had that same trademark intensity. Jobs was one of the three founding fathers of Pixar Animation Studios, after having purchased the group from LucasFilm in 1986. But to get iconic films like Finding Nemo and Toy Story off the page and onto movie screens worldwide, he put staffers under an intense work schedule. No one wants to be woken up to their boss calling them at 3 a.m.—but picking up the phone wasn't optional with Jobs on the other end of the line. 'He would call—especially the producers—at any time, day or night, three in the morning, you're on vacation, doesn't matter,' Pete Docter, chief creative officer at Pixar who formerly worked under Jobs, said at Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Gala this year. 'He wants to talk to you about it, you're on.' O'Leary told Fortune that he thought Jobs' leadership style was 'something else'—but he admired how he was able to command teams, keep his eye on the prize, and stay in that 'signal' mode. It's a mindset and strategy that's infectious to work with, he says. 'I'm not saying I liked him that much, but damn, I respected him. Because he had incredible execution skills—he could say, 'I'm going to get from here to there, and get it done.' He didn't give a damn who got in his way,' O'Leary reminisces. This story was originally featured on Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
